Abstract
Trabecular bone is composed of organized mineralized collagen fibrils, which results in heterogeneous and anisotropic mechanical properties at the tissue level. Recently, biomechanical models computing stresses and strains in trabecular bone have indicated a significant effect of tissue heterogeneity on predicted stresses and strains. However, the effect of the tissue-level mechanical anisotropy on the trabecular bone biomechanical response is unknown. Here, a computational method was established to automatically impose physiologically relevant orientation inherent in trabecular bone tissue on a trabecular bone microscale finite element model. Spatially varying tissue-level anisotropic elastic properties were then applied according to the bone mineral density and the local tissue orientation. The model was used to test the hypothesis that anisotropy in both homogeneous and heterogeneous models alters the predicted distribution of stress invariants. Linear elastic finite element computations were performed on a 3 mm cube model isolated from a microcomputed tomography scan of human trabecular bone from the distal femur. Hydrostatic stress and von Mises equivalent stress were recorded at every element, and the distributions of these values were analyzed. Anisotropy reduced the range of hydrostatic stress in both tension and compression more strongly than the associated increase in von Mises equivalent stress. The effect of anisotropy was independent of the spatial redistribution high compressive stresses due to tissue elastic heterogeneity. Tissue anisotropy and heterogeneity are likely important mechanisms to protect bone from failure and should be included for stress analyses in trabecular bone.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashman R, Cowin S, Van Buskirk W, Rice J (1984) A continuous wave technique for the measurement of the elastic properties of cortical bone. J Biomech 17(5):349–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(84)90029-0
Benzley SE, Perry E, Merkley K, Clark B, Sjaardama G (1995) A comparison of all hexagonal and all tetrahedral finite element meshes for elastic and elasto-plastic analysis. In: Proceedings of 4th international meshing roundtable, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, vol 17, pp 179–191
Boivin G, Farlay D, Bala Y, Doublier A, Meunier PJ, Delmas PD (2009) Influence of remodeling on the mineralization of bone tissue. Osteoporos Int 20(6):1023–1026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-0861-x
Burr DB (2016) The use of finite element analysis to estimate the changing strength of bone following treatment for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 27(9):2651–2654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3707-3
Carter DR, Beaupré GS, Giori NJ, Helms JA (1998) Mechanobiology of skeletal regeneration. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355(Suppl):S41–55. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199810001-00006
Deshpande V, Ashby M, Fleck N (2001) Foam topology: bending versus stretching dominated architectures. Acta Mater 49(6):1035–1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00379-7
Engelke K, van Rietbergen B, Zysset P (2016) FEA to measure bone strength: a review. Clin Rev Bone Miner Metab 14(1):26–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12018-015-9201-1
Georgiadis M, Guizar-Sicairos M, Gschwend O, Hangartner P, Bunk O, Müller R, Schneider P (2016) Ultrastructure organization of human trabeculae assessed by 3D sSAXS and relation to bone microarchitecture. PLoS One 11(8):e0159,838. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159838
Gross T, Pahr DH, Fc Peyrin, Zysset PK (2012) Mineral heterogeneity has a minor influence on the apparent elastic properties of human cancellous bone: a \(\text{ SR }\upmu \text{ CT }\)-based finite element study. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 15(11):1137–1144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2011.581236
Hambli R, Frikha S, Toumi H, Tavares JMR (2016) Finite element prediction of fatigue damage growth in cancellous bone. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 19(5):563–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2015.1048687
Jaasma MJ, Bayraktar HH, Niebur GL, Keaveny TM (2002) Biomechanical effects of intraspecimen variations in tissue modulus for trabecular bone. J Biomech 35(2):237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00193-2
Kaynia N, Soohoo E, Keaveny TM, Kazakia GJ (2015) Effect of intraspecimen spatial variation in tissue mineral density on the apparent stiffness of trabecular bone. J Biomech Eng 137(1):0110,101–0110,106. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029178
Kelleher JE, Siegmund T, Du M, Naseri E, Chan RW (2013) Empirical measurements of biomechanical anisotropy of the human vocal fold lamina propria. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 12(3):555–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-012-0425-4
Lemaitre J (2012) A course on damage mechanics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg
Lips P, Courpron P, Meunier P (1978) Mean wall thickness of trabecular bone packets in the human iliac crest: changes with age. Calcif Tissue Res 26(1):13–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02013227
Liu XS, Ardeshirpour L, VanHouten JN, Shane E, Wysolmerski JJ (2012) Site-specific changes in bone microarchitecture, mineralization, and stiffness during lactation and after weaning in mice. J Bone Miner Res 27(4):865–875. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1503
Mengoni M, Ponthot JP (2010) Isotropic continuum damage/repair model for alveolar bone remodeling. J Comput Appl Math 234(7):2036–2045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2009.08.061
Patel V, Issever AS, Burghardt A, Laib A, Ries M, Majumdar S (2003) MicroCT evaluation of normal and osteoarthritic bone structure in human knee specimens. J Orthop Res 21(1):6–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00093-1
Reisinger AG, Pahr DH, Zysset PK (2011) Principal stiffness orientation and degree of anisotropy of human osteons based on nanoindentation in three distinct planes. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 4(8):2113–2127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.07.010
Renders GAP, Mulder L, Langenbach GEJ, van Ruijven LJ, van Eijden TMGJ (2008) Biomechanical effect of mineral heterogeneity in trabecular bone. J Biomech 41(13):2793–2798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.07.009
Reznikov N, Chase H, Brumfeld V, Shahar R, Weiner S (2015) The 3D structure of the collagen fibril network in human trabecular bone: Relation to trabecular organization. Bone 71:189–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2014.10.017
Rho JY, Hobatho MC, Ashman RB (1995) Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone. Med Eng Phys 17(5):347–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/1350-4533(95)97314-F
Rho JY, Kuhn-Spearing L, Zioupos P (1998) Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. Med Eng Phys 20(2):92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4533(98)00007-1
Scheiner S, Pivonka P, Hellmich C (2016) Poromicromechanics reveals that physiological bone strains induce osteocyte-stimulating lacunar pressure. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 15(1):9–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-015-0704-y
Spears I, Noort RV, Crompton R, Cardew G, Howard I (1993) The effects of enamel anisotropy on the distribution of stress in a tooth. J Dent Res 72(11):1526–1531. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345930720111101
Torres AM, Matheny JB, Keaveny TM, Taylor D, Rimnac CM, Hernandez CJ (2016) Material heterogeneity in cancellous bone promotes deformation recovery after mechanical failure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113(11):2892–2897. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1520539113
Turner CH, Pavalko FM (1998) Mechanotransduction and functional response of the skeleton to physical stress: the mechanisms and mechanics of bone adaptation. J Orthop Sci 3(6):346–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007760050064
Van der Linden J, Birkenhäger-Frenkel D, Verhaar J, Weinans H (2001) Trabecular bone’s mechanical properties are affected by its non-uniform mineral distribution. J Biomech 34(12):1573–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00146-4
Vande Geest JP, Schmidt DE, Sacks MS, Vorp DA (2008) The effects of anisotropy on the stress analyses of patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng 36(6):921–932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-008-9490-3
Wang X, Allen MR, Burr DB, Lavernia EJ, Jeremiç B, Fyhrie DP (2008) Identification of material parameters based on Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion for bisphosphonate treated canine vertebral cancellous bone. Bone 43(4):775–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2008.05.023
Yeni YN, Zelman EA, Divine GW, Kim DG, Fyhrie DP (2008) Trabecular shear stress amplification and variability in human vertebral cancellous bone: relationship with age, gender, spine level and trabecular architecture. Bone 42(3):591–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2007.11.011
Zysset PK, Dall’Ara E, Varga P, Pahr DH (2013) Finite element analysis for prediction of bone strength. Bonekey Rep 2:386. https://doi.org/10.1038/bonekey.2013.120
Acknowledgements
This material was based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1643164.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
This material was based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1643164.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hammond, M.A., Wallace, J.M., Allen, M.R. et al. Incorporating tissue anisotropy and heterogeneity in finite element models of trabecular bone altered predicted local stress distributions. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 17, 605–614 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-017-0981-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-017-0981-8