Biomechanical Characterization of Ascending Aortic Aneurysms
- 568 Downloads
Ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms (ATAAs) are a silent disease, ultimately leading to dissection or rupture of the arterial wall. There is a growing consensus that diameter information is insufficient to assess rupture risk, whereas wall stress and strength provide a more reliable estimate. The latter parameters cannot be measured directly and must be inferred through biomechanical assessment, requiring a thorough knowledge of the mechanical behaviour of the tissue. However, for healthy and aneurysmal ascending aortic tissues, this knowledge remains scarce. This study provides the geometrical and mechanical properties of the ATAA of six patients with unprecedented detail. Prior to their ATAA repair, pressure and diameter were acquired non-invasively, from which the distensibility coefficient, pressure–strain modulus and wall stress were calculated. Uniaxial tensile tests on the resected tissue yielded ultimate stress and stretch values. Parameters for the Holzapfel–Gasser–Ogden material model were estimated based on the pre-operative pressure–diameter data and the post-operative stress–stretch curves from planar biaxial tensile tests. Our results confirmed that mechanical or geometrical information alone cannot provide sufficient rupture risk estimation. The ratio of physiological to ultimate wall stress seems a more promising parameter. However, wall stress estimation suffers from uncertainties in wall thickness measurement, for which our results show large variability, between patients but also between measurement methods. Our results also show a large strength variability, a value which cannot be measured non-invasively. Future work should therefore be directed towards improved accuracy of wall thickness estimation, but also towards the large-scale collection of ATAA wall strength data.
KeywordsAscending aortic aneurysm Material properties Planar biaxial testing In vivo pressure–diameter measurements Rupture risk
The authors would like to thank Liberia Fresiello for generating the aortic pressure waveforms.
Funding This study was funded by a research project (G093211N) of the Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO) and a postdoctoral fellowship of FWO.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Duprey A, Khanafer K, Schlicht M, Avril S, Williams D, Berguer R (2010) In vitro characterisation of physiological and maximum elastic modulus of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms using uniaxial tensile testing. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 39(6):700–707. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.02.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fresiello L, Zieliński K, Jacobs S, Di Molfetta A, Pałko KJ, Bernini F, Martin M, Claus P, Ferrari G, Trivella MG, Górczyńska K, Darowski M, Meyns B, Kozarski M (2014) Reproduction of continuous flow left ventricular assist device experimental data by means of a hybrid cardiovascular model with baroreflex control. Artif Organs 38(6):456–468. doi: 10.1111/aor.12178 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Iliopoulos DC, Kritharis EP, Giagini AT, Papadodima SA, Sokolis DP (2009) Ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms are associated with compositional remodeling and vessel stiffening but not weakening in age-matched subjects. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137(1):101–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.07.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Khanafer K, Duprey A, Zainal M, Schlicht M, Williams D, Berguer R (2011) Determination of the elastic modulus of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm at different ranges of pressure using uniaxial tensile testing. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 142(3):682–686. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.09.068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nichols M, Townsend N, Scarborough P, Rayner M (2012) European cardiovascular disease statistics 2012. September. ISBN:978-2-9537898-1-2Google Scholar
- Niestrawska JA, Cohnert TU, Holzapfel GA (2016) Mechanics and microstructure of healthy human aortas and AAA tissues : experimental analysis and modeling. In: ECCOMAS Congress 2016Google Scholar
- Pape LA, Tsai TT, Isselbacher EM, Oh JK, O’Gara PT, Evangelista A, Fattori R, Meinhardt G, Trimarchi S, Bossone E, Suzuki T, Cooper JV, Froehlich JB, Nienaber CA, Eagle KA (2007) Aortic diameter> = 5.5 cm is not a good predictor of type a aortic dissection: observations from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). Circulation 116(10):1120–1127. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.702720 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pierce DM, Maier F, Weisbecker H, Viertler C, Verbrugghe P, Famaey N, Fourneau I, Herijgers P, Holzapfel GA (2015) Human thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysmal tissues: damage experiments, statistical analysis and constitutive modeling. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 41:92–107. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Venkatasubramaniam AK, Fagan MJ, Mehta T, Mylankal KJ, Ray B, Kuhan G, Chetter IC, McCollum PT (2004) A comparative study of aortic wall stress using finite element analysis for ruptured and non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 28(2):168–176. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.03.029 Google Scholar
- Xiong J, Wang M, Zhou W, Wu JG (2008) Measurement and analysis of ultimate mechanical properties, stress-strain curve fit, and elastic modulus formula of human abdominal aortic aneurysm and nonaneurysmal abdominal aorta. J Vasc Surg 48(1):189–195. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.12.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar