Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 1669–1684 | Cite as

Stability analysis of a continuum-based constrained mixture model for vascular growth and remodeling

Original Paper

Abstract

A stabilizing criterion is derived for equations governing vascular growth and remodeling. We start from the integral state equations of the continuum-based constrained mixture theory of vascular growth and remodeling and obtain a system of time-delayed differential equations describing vascular growth. By employing an exponential form of the constituent survival function, the delayed differential equations can be reduced to a nonlinear ODE system. We demonstrate the degeneracy of the linearized system about the homeostatic state, which is a fundamental cause of the neutral stability observations reported in prior studies. Due to this degeneracy, stability conclusions for the original nonlinear system cannot be directly inferred. To resolve this problem, a sub-system is constructed by recognizing a linear relation between two states. Subsequently, Lyapunov’s indirect method is used to connect stability properties between the linearized system and the original nonlinear system, to rigorously establish the neutral stability properties of the original system. In particular, this analysis leads to a stability criterion for vascular expansion in terms of growth and remodeling kinetic parameters, geometric quantities and material properties. Numerical simulations were conducted to evaluate the theoretical stability criterion under broader conditions, as well as study the influence of key parameters and physical factors on growth properties. The theoretical results are also compared with prior numerical and experimental findings in the literature.

Keywords

Constrained mixture theory Growth and remodeling Stability analysis Blood vessel 

References

  1. Abdul-Hussien H, Soekhoe R, Weber E, Jan H, Kleemann R, Mulder A, Van Bockel J, Hanemaaijer R, Lindeman J (2007) Collagen degradation in the abdominal aneurysm: a conspiracy of matrix metalloproteinase and cysteine collagenases. Am J Pathol 170(3):809–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aparício P, Mandaltsi A, Boamah J, Chen H, Selimovic A, Bratby M, Uberoi R, Ventikos Y, Watton P (2014) Modelling the influence of endothelial heterogeneity on the progression of arterial disease: Application to abdominal aortic aneurysm evolution. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 30(5):563–586MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Austin G, Schievink W, Williams R (1989) Controlled pressure–volume factors in the enlargement of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 24(5):722–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baek S, Rajagopal K, Humphrey J (2005) Competition between radial expansion and thickening in the enlargement of an intracranial saccular aneurysm. J Elast 80(1–3):13–31MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Baek S, Rajagopal K, Humphrey J (2006) A theoretical model of enlarging intracranial fusiform aneurysms. J Biomech Eng 128(1):142–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bogen D, McMahon T (1979) Do cardiac aneurysms blow out? Biophys J 27(2):301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bots M, Hofman A, de Bruyn A, De Jong P, Grobbee D (1993) Isolated systolic hypertension and vessel wall thickness of the carotid artery. The Rotterdam Elderly Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 13(1):64–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choke E, Cockerill G, Wilson W, Sayed S, Dawson J, Loftus I, Thompson M (2005) A review of biological factors implicated in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 30(3):227–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cyron C, Humphrey J (2014) Vascular homeostasis and the concept of mechanobiological stability. Int J Eng Sci 85:203–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cyron C, Wilson J, Humphrey J (2014) Mechanobiological stability: a new paradigm to understand the enlargement of aneurysms? J R Soc Interface 11(100):20140680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dijk J, Van Der Graaf Y, Grobbee D, Banga J, Bots M et al (2004) Increased arterial stiffness is independently related to cerebrovascular disease and aneurysms of the abdominal aorta the second manifestations of arterial disease (smart) study. Stroke 35(7):1642–1646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Etminan N, Dreier R, Buchholz B, Beseoglu K, Bruckner P, Matzenauer C, Torner J, Brown R, Steiger H, Hänggi D et al (2014) Age of collagen in intracranial saccular aneurysms. Stroke 45(6):1757–1763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Figueroa A, Baek S, Taylor C, Humphrey J (2009) A computational framework for fluid–solid-growth modeling in cardiovascular simulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(45):3583–3602MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Holzapfel G, Gasser T, Ogden R (2000) A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. J Elast Phys Sci Solids 61(1–3):1–48MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Huang Y, Gloviczki P, Duncan A, Kalra M, Hoskin T, Oderich G, McKusick M, Bower T (2008) Common iliac artery aneurysm: expansion rate and results of open surgical and endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg 47(6):1203–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Humphrey J (2006) Towards a theory of vascular growth and remodeling. In: Holzapfel G, Ogden R (eds) Mechanics of biological tissue. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–15. doi:10.1007/3-540-31184-X_1
  17. Humphrey J (2013) Cardiovascular solid mechanics: cells, tissues, and organs. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Humphrey J, Rajagopal K (2002) A constrained mixture model for growth and remodeling of soft tissues. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences 12(03):407–430MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Nissen R, Cardinale G, Udenfriend S (1978) Increased turnover of arterial collagen in hypertensive rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci 75(1):451–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Safar M, O’Rourke M, Frohlich E (2014) Blood pressure and arterial wall mechanics in cardiovascular diseases. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Satha G, Lindström S, Klarbring A (2014) A goal function approach to remodeling of arteries uncovers mechanisms for growth instability. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 13(6):1243–1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Satta J, Juvonen T, Haukipuro K, Juvonen M, Kairaluoma M (1995) Increased turnover of collagen in abdominal aortic aneurysms, demonstrated by measuring the concentration of the aminoterminal propeptide of type iii procollagen in peripheral and aortal blood samples. J Vasc Surg 22(2):155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sheidaei A, Hunley S, Zeinali-Davarani S, Raguin L, Baek S (2011) Simulation of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth with updating hemodynamic loads using a realistic geometry. Med Eng Phys 33(1):80–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Valentin A, Humphrey J (2009) Evaluation of fundamental hypotheses underlying constrained mixture models of arterial growth and remodelling. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A Math Phys Eng Sci 367(1902):3585–3606MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Verhulst F (1996) Nonlinear differential equations and dynamical systems. Springer, BerlinCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Watton P, Raberger N, Holzapfel G, Ventikos Y (2009) Coupling the hemodynamic environment to the evolution of cerebral aneurysms: computational framework and numerical examples. J Biomech Eng 131(10):101003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wolinsky H (1972) Long-term effects of hypertension on the rat aortic wall and their relation to concurrent aging changes: morphological and chemical studies. Circ Res 30(3):301–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wu J, Shadden S (2015) Coupled simulation of hemodynamics and vascular growth and remodeling in a subject-specific geometry. Ann Biomed Eng 43(7):1543–1554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zeinali-Davarani S, Sheidaei A, Baek S (2011) A finite element model of stress-mediated vascular adaptation: application to abdominal aortic aneurysms. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 14(9):803–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations