A three-dimensional random network model of the cytoskeleton and its role in mechanotransduction and nucleus deformation
- 324 Downloads
We have developed a three-dimensional random network model of the intracellular actin cytoskeleton and have used it to study the role of the cytoskeleton in mechanotransduction and nucleus deformation. We use the model to predict the deformation of the nucleus when mechanical stresses applied on the plasma membrane are propagated through the random cytoskeletal network to the nucleus membrane. We found that our results agree with previous experiments utilizing micropipette pulling. Therefore, we propose that stress propagation through the random cytoskeletal network can be a mechanism to effect nucleus deformation, without invoking any biochemical signaling activity. Using our model, we also predict how nucleus strain and its relative displacement within the cytosol vary with varying concentrations of actin filaments and actin-binding proteins. We find that nucleus strain varies in a sigmoidal manner with actin filament concentration, while there exists an optimal concentration of actin-binding proteins that maximize nucleus displacement. We provide a theoretical analysis for these nonlinearities in terms of the connectivity of the random cytoskeletal network. Finally, we discuss laser ablation experiments that can be performed to validate these results in order to advance our understanding of the role of the cytoskeleton in mechanotransduction.
KeywordsCytoskeleton Random network model Mechanotransduction Nucleus deformation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P (2002) Molecular biology of the cell, 4th edn. Garland Science, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Doddi SK, Bagchi P (2009) Three-dimensional computational modeling of multiple deformable cells flowing in microvessels. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 79(4 Pt 2): 046,318Google Scholar
- Evans EA, Skalak R (1979a) Mechanics and thermodynamics of biomembranes: part 1. CRC Crit Rev Bioeng 3(3): 181–330Google Scholar
- Evans EA, Skalak R (1979b) Mechanics and thermodynamics of biomembranes: part 2. CRC Crit Rev Bioeng 3(4): 331–418Google Scholar
- Forgacs G (1995) On the possible role of cytoskeletal filamentous networks in intracellular signaling: an approach based on percolation. J Cell Sci 108(6): 2131–2144Google Scholar
- Head DA, Levine AJ, MacKintosh FC (2003) Distinct regimes of elastic response and deformation modes of cross-linked cytoskeletal and semiflexible polymer networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Soft Matt Phys 68(6 Pt 1): 061,907Google Scholar
- Shafrir Y, Forgacs G (2002) Mechanotransduction through the cytoskeleton. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 282(3): C479–C486Google Scholar
- Shen N, Datta D, Schaffer CB, LeDuc P, Ingber DE, Mazur E (2005) Ablation of cytoskeletal filaments and mitochondria in live cells using a femtosecond laser nanoscissor. Mech Chem Biosyst 2(1): 17–25Google Scholar