Skip to main content
Log in

A dynamical study of the mechanical stimuli and tissue differentiation within a CaP scaffold based on micro-CT finite element models

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The control of the mechanical stimuli transmitted to the cells is critical for the design of functional scaffolds for tissue engineering. The objective of this study was to investigate the dynamics of the mechanical stimuli transmitted to the cells during tissue differentiation in an irregular morphology scaffold under compressive load and perfusion flow. A calcium phosphate-based glass porous scaffold was used. The solid phase and the fluid flow within the pores were modeled as linear elastic solid material and Newtonian fluid, respectively. In the fluid model, different levels of viscosity were used to simulate tissue differentiation. Compressive strain of 0.5% and fluid flow with constant inlet velocity of 10 μm/s or constant inlet pressure of 3 Pa were applied. Octahedral shear strain and fluid shear stress were used as mechano-regulatory stimuli. For constant inlet velocity, stimuli equivalent to bone were predicted in 80% of pore volume for the case of low tissue viscosity. For the cases of high viscosity, fluctuations between stimuli equivalent to tissue formation and cell death were predicted due to the increase in the fluid shear stress when tissue started to fill pores. When constant pressure was applied, stimuli equivalent to bone were predicted in 62% of pore volume when low tissue viscosity was used and 42% when high tissue viscosity was used. This study predicted critical variations of fluid shear stress when cells differentiated. If these variations are not controlled in vitro, they can impede the formation of new matured tissue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Byrne DP, Lacroix D, Planell JA, Kelly DJ, Prendergast PJ (2007) Simulation of tissue differentiation in a scaffold as a function of porosity Young’s modulus and dissolution rate: application of mechanobiological models in tissue engineering. Biomaterials 28: 5544–5554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter DR, Beaupré GS (2001) Skeletal function and form. Cambridge university press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartmell SH, Porter BD, Garcia AJ, Guldberg RE (2003) Effects of medium perfusion rate on cell-seeded three-dimensional bone constructs in vitro. Tissue Eng 9: 1197–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checa S, Prendergast PJ (2010) Effect of cell seeding and mechanical loading on vascularization and tissue formation inside a scaffold: a mechano-biological model using a lattice approach to simulate cell activity. J Biomech 43: 961–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cioffi M, Boschetti F, Raimondi MT, Dubini G (2006) Modeling evaluation of the fluid-dynamic microenvironment in tissue-engineered constructs: a micro-CT based model. Biotechnol Bioeng 93: 500–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glowacki J, Trepman E, Folkman J (1983) Cell shape and phenotypic expression in chondrocytes. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 172: 93–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtorf HL, Sheffield TL, Ambrose CG, Jansen AJ, Mikos AG (2005) Flow perfusion culture of marrow stromal cells seeded on porous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics. Ann Biomed Eng 33: 1238–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaksson H, Wilson W, van Donkelaar CC, Huiskes R, Ito K (2006) Comparison of biophysical stimuli for mechano-regulation of tissue differentiation during fracture healing. J Biomech 39: 1507–1516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly DJ, Prendergast PJ (2006) Prediction of the optimal mechanical properties for a scaffold used in osteochondral defect repair. Tissue Eng 12: 1509–2519

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacroix D, Château A, Ginebra MP, Planell JA (2006) Micro-finite element models of bone tissue-engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials 27: 5326–5334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacroix D, Planell JA, Prendergast PJ (2009) Computer-aided design and finite-element modelling of biomaterial scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Phil Trans R Soc A 367: 1993–2009

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lacroix D, Prendergast PJ, Li G, Marsh D (2002) Biomechanical model to simulate tissue differentiation and bone regeneration: application to fracture healing. Med Biol Eng Comput 40: 14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesman A, Blinder Y, Levenberg S (2010) Modeling of flow-induced shear stress applied on 3D cellular scaffolds: implications for vascular tissue engineering. Biotechnol Bioeng 105: 645–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maes F, Van Ransbeeck P, Van Oosterwyck H, Verdonck P (2009) Modeling fluid flow through irregular scaffolds for perfusion bioreactors. Biotechnol Bioeng 103: 621–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin I, Wendt D, Heberer M (2004) The role of bioreactors in tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol 22: 80–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milan JL, Planell JA, Lacroix D (2009) Computational modelling of the mechanical environment of osteogenesis within a polylactic acid–calcium phosphate glass scaffold. Biomaterials 30: 4219–4226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro M, Michiardi A (2008) The challenge of combining cells, synthetic materials and growth factors to engineer bone tissue. In: Barnes SJ, Harris LP (eds) Tissue engineering: roles, materials and applications. Novapublishers, New York, pp 19–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivares A, Marsal E, Planell JA, Lacroix D (2009) Finite element study of scaffold architecture design and culture conditions for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 30: 6142–6149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter B, Zauel R, Stockman H, Guldberg R, Fyhrie D (2005) 3-D computational modeling of media flow through scaffolds in a perfusion bioreactor. J Biomech 38: 543–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potier E, Noailly J, Ito K (2010) Directing bone marrow-derived stromal cell function with mechanics. J Biomech 43: 807–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast PJ, Huiskes R, Søballe K (1997) Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces. J Biomech 30: 539–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raimondi MT, Moretti M, Cioffi M, Giordano C, Boschetti F, Lagana K, Pietrabissa R (2006) The effect of hydrodynamic shear stress on 3D engineered chondrocyte systems subject to direct perfusion. Biorheol 43: 215–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandino C, Checa S, Prendergast PJ, Lacroix D (2010) Simulation of angiogenesis and cell differentiation in a CaP scaffold subjected to compressive load strains using a lattice modeling approach. Biomaterials 31: 2446–2452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandino C, Planell JA, Lacroix D (2008) A finite element study of mechanical stimuli in scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Biomech 41: 1005–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikavitsas VI, Temenoff JS, Mikos AG (2001) Biomaterials and Bone mechanotransduction. Biomaterials 22: 2581–2593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stops AJF, Heraty KB, Browne M, O’Brien FJ, McHugh PE (2010) A prediction of cell differentiation and proliferation within a collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffold subjected to mechanical strain and perfusive fluid flow. J Biomech 43: 618–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Damien Lacroix.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sandino, C., Lacroix, D. A dynamical study of the mechanical stimuli and tissue differentiation within a CaP scaffold based on micro-CT finite element models. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 10, 565–576 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-010-0256-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-010-0256-0

Keywords

Navigation