Advertisement

Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology

, Volume 8, Issue 6, pp 473–486 | Cite as

Markers of inflammation collocate with increased wall stress in human coronary arterial plaque

  • Karen Melissa Hallow
  • W. Robert Taylor
  • Alexander Rachev
  • Raymond Peter VitoEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

In this study, we hypothesized that spatial relationships exist between the local mechanical environment and inflammatory marker expression in atherosclerotic plaques, and that these relationships are plaque-progression dependent. Histologic cross-sections were collected at regular intervals along the length of diseased human coronary arteries and classified as early, intermediate, advanced, or mature based on their morphological features. For each cross-section, the spatial distribution of stress was determined using a 2D heterogeneous finite element model, and the corresponding distribution of selected inflammatory markers (macrophages, matrix metalloproteinase-1 [MMP-1], and nuclear factor-kappa B [NF-κB]) were determined immunohistochemically. We found a monotonic spatial relationship between mechanical stress and activated NF-κB that was consistent in all stages of plaque progression. We also identified progression-dependent relationships between stress and both macrophage presence and MMP-1 expression. These findings add to our understanding of the role of mechanical stress in stimulating the inflammatory response, and help explain how mechanical factors may regulate complex biological changes in remodeling.

Keywords

Atherosclerosis Plaque progression Plaque rupture Nuclear factor-kappa B Matrix metalloproteinase Macrophages Heterogeneous finite element model Mechanobiology Mechanical stress 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aplin AE, Howe A, Alahari SK et al (1998) Signal transduction and signal modulation by cell adhesion receptors: The role of integrins, cadherins, immunoglobulin-cell adhesion molecules, and selectins. Pharmacol Rev 2(50): 197–261Google Scholar
  2. Arroyo LH, Lee RT (1999) Mechanisms of plaque rupture: mechanical and biologic interactions. Cardiovasc Res 2(41): 369–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Heart Association (2006) Heart disease and stroke statistics—2006 update. Dallas, TexasGoogle Scholar
  4. Beattie D, Xu C, Vito R et al (1998) Mechanical analysis of heterogeneous, atherosclerotic human aorta. J Biomech Eng 5(120): 602–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng GC, Loree HM, Kamm RD et al (1993) Distribution of circumferential stress in ruptured and stable atherosclerotic lesions. A structural analysis with histopathological correlation. Circulation 4(87): 1179–1187Google Scholar
  6. Davies MJ (1998) Reactive oxygen species, metalloproteinases, and plaque stability. Circulation 24(97): 2382–2383Google Scholar
  7. Finet G, Ohayon J, Rioufol G (2004) Biomechanical interaction between cap thickness, lipid core composition and blood pressure in vulnerable coronary plaque: Impact on stability or instability. Coron Artery Dis 1(15): 13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Galis ZS, Sukhova GK, Lark MW et al (1994) Increased expression of matrix metalloproteinases and matrix degrading activity in vulnerable regions of human atherosclerotic plaques. J Clin Invest 6(94): 2493–2503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gao X, Iwai M, Inaba S et al (2007) Attenuation of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 expression via inhibition of nuclear factor-kappab activity in inflammatory vascular injury. Am J Hypertens 11(20): 1170–1175Google Scholar
  10. Grote K, Flach I, Luchtefeld M et al (2003) Mechanical stretch enhances mrna expression and proenzyme release of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (mmp-2) via nad(p)h oxidase-derived reactive oxygen species. Circ Res 11(92): e80–e86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Halloran BG, Grange JJ, So BJ et al (1997) Macrophage products inhibit human aortic smooth muscle cell proliferation and alter 1 alpha (i) procollagen expression. Ann Vasc Surg 1(11): 80–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hallow KM (2007) Relationships between mechanical stress and markers of inflammation in diseased human coronary arteries. School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology. Available via SMARTech. http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/16211
  13. Hanley JA, Negassa A, Edwardes MD et al (2003) Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: An orientation. Am J Epidemiol 4(157): 364–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harrison DG, Widder J, Grumbach I et al (2006) Endothelial mechanotransduction, nitric oxide and vascular inflammation. J Intern Med 4(259): 351–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hishikawa K, Oemar BS, Yang Z et al (1997) Pulsatile stretch stimulates superoxide production and activates nuclear factor-kappa b in human coronary smooth muscle. Circ Res 5(81): 797–803Google Scholar
  16. Humphrey JD (2002) Cardiovascular solid mechanics: cells, tissues, and organs. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Ingber DE (2002) Mechanical signaling and the cellular response to extracellular matrix in angiogenesis and cardiovascular physiology. Circ Res 10(91): 877–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. James TW, Wagner R, White LA et al (1993) Induction of collagenase and stromelysin gene expression by mechanical injury in a vascular smooth muscle-derived cell line. J Cell Physiol 2(157): 426–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jiang MJ, Yu YJ, Chen YL et al (1999) Cyclic strain stimulates monocyte chemotactic protein-1 mrna expression in smooth muscle cells. J Cell Biochem 2(76): 303–310Google Scholar
  20. Keeny S, Richardson PD (1987) Stress analysis of atherosclerotic arteries. IEEE Eng Med Biol 9: 1484–1485Google Scholar
  21. Kumar A, Takada Y, Boriek AM et al (2004) Nuclear factor-kappab: its role in health and disease. J Mol Med 7(82): 434–448Google Scholar
  22. Lee RT, Libby P (1997) The unstable atheroma. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 10(17): 1859–1867Google Scholar
  23. Lee RT, Loree HM, Cheng GC et al (1993) Computational structural analysis based on intravascular ultrasound imaging before in vitro angioplasty: Prediction of plaque fracture locations. J Am Coll Cardiol 3(21): 777–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee RT, Schoen FJ, Loree HM et al (1996) Circumferential stress and matrix metalloproteinase 1 in human coronary atherosclerosis. Implications for plaque rupture. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 8(16): 1070–1073Google Scholar
  25. Lehoux S, Castier Y, Tedgui A (2006) Molecular mechanisms of the vascular responses to haemodynamic forces. J Intern Med 4(259): 381–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lendon CL, Davies MJ, Born GV et al (1991) Atherosclerotic plaque caps are locally weakened when macrophages density is increased. Atherosclerosis 1(87): 87–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu J (1999) Biomechanical basis of vascular tissue engineering. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1-2(27): 75–148Google Scholar
  28. Loree HM, Kamm RD, Stringfellow RG et al (1992) Effects of fibrous cap thickness on peak circumferential stress in model atherosclerotic vessels. Circ Res 4(71): 850–888Google Scholar
  29. Lowder ML, Li S, Carnell PH et al (2007) Correction of distortionof histologic sections of arteries. J Biomech 2(40): 445–450Google Scholar
  30. Moreno PR, Purushothaman KR, Fuster V et al (2004) Plaque neovascularization is increased in ruptured atherosclerotic lesions of human aorta: Implications for plaque vulnerability. Circulation 14(110): 2032–2038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nikkari ST, O’Brien KD, Ferguson M et al (1995) Interstitial collagenase (mmp-1) expression in human carotid atherosclerosis. Circulation 6(92): 1393–1398Google Scholar
  32. Ohayon J, Teppaz P, Finet G et al (2001) In-vivo prediction of human coronary plaque rupture location using intravascular ultrasound and the finite element method. Coron Artery Dis 8(12): 655–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ohki R, Yamamoto K, Mano H et al (2002) Identification of mechanically induced genes in human monocytic cells by DNA microarrays. J Hypertens 4(20): 685–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pasterkamp G, Schoneveld AH, van der Wal AC et al (1999) Inflammation of the atherosclerotic cap and shoulder of the plaque is a common and locally observed feature in unruptured plaques of femoral and coronary arteries. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1(19): 54–58Google Scholar
  35. Rekhter MD (1999) Collagen synthesis in atherosclerosis: Too much and not enough. Cardiovasc Res 2(41): 376–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Robbesyn F, Salvayre R, Negre-Salvayre A (2004) Dual role of oxidized ldl on the NF-κB signaling pathway. Free Radic Res 6(38): 541–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sakamoto H, Aikawa M, Hill CC et al (2001) Biomechanical strain induces class a scavenger receptor expression in human monocyte/macrophages and thp-1 cells: A potential mechanism of increased atherosclerosis in hypertension. Circulation 1(104): 109–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stary HC (2000) Natural history and histological classification of atherosclerotic lesions: An update. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 5(20): 1177–1178Google Scholar
  39. Stary HC, Chandler AB, Dinsmore RE et al (1995) A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis. Circulation 92: 1355–1374Google Scholar
  40. Taber LA, Humphrey JD (2001) Stress-modulated growth, residual stress, and vascular heterogeneity. J Biomech Eng 6(123): 528–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Takahashi K, Takeya M, Sakashita N (2002) Multifunctional roles of macrophages in the development and progression of atherosclerosis in humans and experimental animals. Med Electron Microsc 4(35): 179–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. van der Wal AC, Becker AE, van der Loos CM et al (1994) Site of intimal rupture or erosion of thrombosed coronary atherosclerotic plaques is characterized by an inflammatory process irrespective of the dominant plaque morphology. Circulation 1(89): 36–44Google Scholar
  43. Vito R, Whang MC, Giddens DP et al (1990) Stress analysis of the diseased arterial cross-section. ASME Adv Bioeng Proc 19: 273–276Google Scholar
  44. Yamamoto K, Ikeda U, Shimada K (2003) Role of mechanical stress in monocytes/macrophages: implications for atherosclerosis. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 3(1): 315–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yang JH, Sakamoto H, Xu EC et al (2000) Biomechanical regulation of human monocyte/macrophage molecular function. Am J Pathol 5(156): 1797–1804Google Scholar
  46. Zampetaki A, Zhang Z, Hu Y et al (2005) Biomechanical stress induces il-6 expression in smooth muscle cells via ras/rac1-p38 mapk-NF-κB signaling pathways. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 6(288): H2946–H2954CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen Melissa Hallow
    • 1
  • W. Robert Taylor
    • 2
  • Alexander Rachev
    • 1
  • Raymond Peter Vito
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Division of CardiologyAtlanta VA Medical Center and Emory UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations