Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing rheological properties of fluid mud samples through tuning fork data

  • Published:
Ocean Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At the nautical bottom approach, part of the fluid mud layers can be included in the available depth if they present favorable rheology. As it is difficult to perform in situ rheological profiles, the most adopted procedure is to correlate these properties with other easier measurable ones, typically density. One technique for assessing in situ density profiles is the use of a tuning fork density probe. Density is calculated through frequency and amplitude signals, based in a specific algorithm from the employed device. This method requires a calibration, using local sediment at several densities, as it is conditioned by the rheology of the mud. In order to link the rheological properties of the fluid mud to the response of the tuning fork, first, an algorithm for density calculation was proposed and compared to the standard equipment software. Then, mud samples from different regions in Brazil were employed and a single curve associating the densitometer amplitude signal and the yield stress of the samples was obtained. The proposed approach enables a quick rheological assessment without laboratory rheological tests. It simplifies the steps of the protocol for establishing the critical limit once applying the nautical bottom concept, and it can be replied to other ports and navigation channels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allwright D (2002) The vibrating tuning fork fluid density tool. Study Group Report, Smith Institute,London.

  • Barnes HA (2000) A handbook of elementary rheology. University of Wales - Institute of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, Aberystwyth

    Google Scholar 

  • Benevides DCA, Dias FJS, Alfredini P, Gomes GH (2011) Mapping and estimative of fluid mud layers thickness at Itajai-Açu river port area , seeking improvements to navigation of deep-drafted vessels. In: 12th international congress of the Brazilian geophysical society. SBGf, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp 1289–1294

  • Bruens AW (2003) Entrainment mud suspensions. Delft Univ. of Technology, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabral AMR, Ramos F d S (2014) Cluster analysis of the competitiveness of container ports in Brazil. Transp Res A Policy Pract 69:423–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro JC, Fonseca DL, Vinzon SB, Gallo MN (2017) Strategies for measuring fluid mud layers and their rheological properties in ports. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 143:04017008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claeys S, Staelens P, Vanlede J et al (2015) A rheological lab measurement protocol for cohesive sediment. In: INTERCOH2015: 13th International Conference on Cohesive Sediment Transport Processes. 7–11 September 2015. Leuven, Belgium

  • Fontein WF, Byrd RW (2007) The nautical depth approach, a review for implementation. In: WODCON XVIII ANNUAL DREDGING SEMINAR. WEDA

  • Granboulan J, Feral A, Villerot M, Jouanneau JM (1989) Study of the sedimentological and rheological properties of fluid mud in the fluvio-estuarine system of the Gironde estuary. Ocean Shorel Manag 12:23–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8312(89)90041-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groposo V, Mosquera RL, Pedocchi F, Vinzón SB, Gallo M (2014) Mud density prospection using a tuning fork. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 141:04014047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kineke GC, Sternberg RW, Trowbridge JH, Geyer WR (1996) Fluid-mud processes on the Amazon continental shelf. Cont Shelf Res 16:667–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4343(95)00050-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAnally WH, Friedrichs C, Hamilton D et al (2007a) Management of Fluid mud in estuaries, bays, and lakes. I: Present State of Understanding on Character and Behavior. J Hydraul Eng 133:9–22. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:1(9)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAnally WH, Teeter A, Schoellhamer D et al (2007b) Management of Fluid mud in estuaries, bays, and lakes. II: measurement, modeling, and management. J Hydraul Eng 133:9–22. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:1(9)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAnally WH, Kirby R, Hodge SH et al (2015) Nautical depth for U.S. navigable waterways: a review. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 142:04015014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride M, Boll M, Briggs M et al (2014) Harbour approach channels - Design guidelines. PIANC Report No. 121. Bruxelles, Belgium

  • Mehta AJ, Samsami F, Khare YP, Sahin C (2014) Fluid mud properties in nautical depth estimation. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 140:210–222. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang Q, Zhang R (2015) Factors affecting the rheological characteristics of mud. In: INTERCOH2015: 13th international conference on cohesive sediment transport processes, 7–11 September. Leuven, Belgium

  • Papenmeier S, Schrottke K, Bartholomae A, Flemming BW (2013) Sedimentological and rheological properties of the water-solid bed Interface in the Weser and ems estuaries, North Sea, Germany: implications for fluid mud classification. J Coast Res 29:797–808. https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-11-00144.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva PD, Lisboa PV, Fernandes EH (2015) Changes on the fine sediment dynamics after the port of Rio Grande expansion. Adv Geosci 39:123–127. https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-39-123-2015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STEMA (2007) DensiTune® User’s Manual - Version 4.2. STEMA Survey Services. The Netherlands.

  • Teeter A (1992) The viscous characteristics of channel-bottom muds. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersWaterways Experiment Station. Dredging Research Program. Technical note DRP-2-04

  • Toorman EA (1994) An analytical solution for the velocity and shear rate distribution of non-ideal Bingham fluids in a concentric cylinder viscometer. Rheol Acta 33:193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Craenenbroeck K, Vantorre M, De Wolf P (1991) Navigation in muddy areas: establishing the navigable depth in the Port of Zeebrugge. In: CEDA-PIANC Conference (incorporating CEDA Dredging Days), 13–14 November: Accessible Harbours. Amsterdam

  • Wurpts RW, Torn P (2005) 15 years experience with fluid mud: definition of the nautical bottom with rheological parameters. Terra Aqua 22–32

Download references

Funding

The study receives financial support from the following Brazilian Research Agencies: CAPES (scholarship of second author, FAPERJ (scholarship of third author) and CNPQ (grant PQ 310297/2015-0 for the last author).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diego Luiz Fonseca.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Francisco Pedocchi

This article is part of the Topical Collection on the 14th International Conference on Cohesive Sediment Transport in Montevideo, Uruguay 13–17 November 2017

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fonseca, D.L., Marroig, P.C., Carneiro, J.C. et al. Assessing rheological properties of fluid mud samples through tuning fork data. Ocean Dynamics 69, 51–57 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-018-1226-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-018-1226-9

Keywords

Navigation