Advertisement

Ocean Dynamics

, Volume 66, Issue 2, pp 263–283 | Cite as

Effect of model error representation in the Yellow and East China Sea modeling system based on the ensemble Kalman filter

  • Kyung Man Kwon
  • Byoung-Ju ChoiEmail author
  • Sang-Ho Lee
  • Young Ho Kim
  • Gwang-Ho Seo
  • Yang-Ki Cho
Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Coastal Ocean Forecasting Science supported by the GODAE OceanView Coastal Oceans and Shelf Seas Task Team (COSS-TT)

Abstract

To increase the accuracy of ocean predictions in the Yellow and East China Sea (YES), the satellite-borne sea surface temperature (SST) data have been assimilated to an operational ocean modeling system by applying an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF). As the observed SST was assimilated continuously into the model with time, the ensemble spread decreased and the efficiency of data assimilation degenerated. To increase liability of the system and the ensemble spread, model uncertainties were represented stochastically by perturbing the model tendency parameters such as eddy viscosity, bottom drag coefficient, light attenuation depth, as well as atmospheric forcing. Data assimilation experiments were performed with forcing from a regional atmospheric model from September 2011 to February 2012. The assimilation results with and without the stochastically perturbed model parameters and atmospheric forcing were compared. The ensemble with the perturbations has larger spread and smaller root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) in temperature compared with the ensemble without the perturbations. The SST RMSD relative to anther supplementary SST dataset was reduced from 0.91 to 0.81 °C over the YES. The assimilation of the SST data improved the simulated SST compared with the observation at the ocean buoy stations, and also made the subsurface temperature profiles closer to the observed ones. The assimilation experiments showed that a stochastic representation of the model errors by the perturbations of the model parameters and atmospheric forcing increases the spread of the ensemble and improves the structure of background error covariance, which enhances the performance of the ensemble modeling system in the YES.

Keywords

Ensemble Kalman filter Assimilation Model parameter perturbation Yellow Sea SST 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was part of the project titled “Development of Korea Operational Oceanographic System (KOOS), Phase 2” and “Integrated management of marine environment and ecosystems around Saemangeum” funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Korea, and this research was supported by the Supercomputing Center/Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information with supercomputing resources including technical support (KSC-2013-C2-045).

References

  1. Anderson JL (1996) A method for producing and evaluating probabilistic forecasts from ensemble model integrations. J Clim 9:1518–1530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson JL (2001) An ensemble adjustment Kalman filter for data assimilation. Mon Weather Rev 129:2884–2903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson JL, Anderson SL (1999) A Monte Carlo implementation of the nonlinear filtering problem to produce ensemble assimilations and forecasts. Mon Weather Rev 127:2741–2758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bocquet M (2011) Ensemble Kalman filtering without the intrinsic need for inflation. Nonlinear Processes Geophys 18: 735–750Google Scholar
  5. Buizza R, Miller M, Palmer TN (1999) Stochastic representation of model uncertainties in the ECMWF ensemble prediction system. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc 125:2887–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burgers G, van Leeuwen PJ, Evensen G (1998) Analysis scheme in the ensemble Kalman filter. Mon Weather Rev 126:1719–1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chassignet EP, Smith LT, Halliwell GR, Bleck R (2003) North Atlantic simulation with the HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM): impact of the vertical coordinate choice, reference density, and thermobaricity. J Phys Oceanogr 33:2504–2526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dee DP (1995) On-line estimation of error covariance parameters for atmospheric data assimilation. Mon Weather Rev 123:1128–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Egbert GD, Erofeeva SY (2002) Efficient inverse modeling of barotropic ocean tides. J Atmos Ocean Technol 19:183–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Evensen G (1994) Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics. J Geophys Res 99:10143–10162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Evensen G (2003) The ensemble Kalman filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation. Ocean Dyn 53:343–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Evensen G (2004) Sampling strategies and square root analysis schemes for the EnKF. Ocean Dyn 54:539–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fairall CW, Bradley EF, Hare JE, Grachev AA, Edson JB (2003) Bulk parameterization of air-sea fluxes: updates and verification for the COARE algorithm. J Clim 16:571–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fujita T, Stensrud DJ, Dowell DC (2007) Surface data assimilation using an ensemble Kalman filter approach with initial condition and model physics uncertainty. Mon Wea Rev 135:1846–1868Google Scholar
  15. Gaspari G, Cohn SE (1999) Construction of correlation functions in two and three dimensions. Q J R Meteorol Soc 125:723–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ha S-Y, Snyder CM (2014) Influence of surface observations in mesoscale data assimilation using an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon Weather Rev 142:1489–1508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haidvogel DB, Arango HG, Hedstrom K, Beckmann A, Malanotte-Rizzoli P, Shchepetkin AF (2000) Model evaluation experiments in the North Atlantic Basin: simulations in nonlinear terrain-following coordinates. Dyn Atmos Oceans 32:239–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamill TM (2001) Interpretation of rank histograms for verifying ensemble forecasts. Mon Weather Rev 129:550–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamill TM, Whitaker JS (2005) Accounting for the error due to unresolved scales in ensemble data assimilation: a comparison of different approaches. Mon Weather Rev 133:3132–3147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoffman RN, Kalnay E (1983) Lagged average forecasting, an alternative to Monte Carlo forecasting. Tellus 35A:100–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Houtekamer PL, Mitchell HL (1998) Data assimilation using an ensemble Kalman filter technique. Mon Weather Rev 126:796–811Google Scholar
  22. Houtekamer PL, Mitchell HL (2001) A sequential ensemble Kalman filter for atmospheric data assimilation. Mon Weather Rev 129:123–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Houtekamer PL, Lefaivre L, Derome J, Ritchie H, Mitchell H (1996) A system simulation approach to ensemble prediction. Mon Weather Rev 124:1225–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jerlov NG (1968) Marine optics. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Kondo M (1985) Oceanographic investigations of fishing grounds in the East China Sea and the Yellow Sea. I. Characteristics of the mean temperature and salinity distributions measured at 50 m and near the bottom. Bull Seikai Region Fish Res Lab 62:19–55 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  26. Kwon KM, Choi BJ, Lee SH, Cho YK, Jang CJ (2011) Coastal current along the eastern boundary of the Yellow Sea in summer: numerical simulations. The Sea 16:155–168 (in Korean with English abstract)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leeuwenburgh O (2005) Assimilation of along-track altimeter data in the Tropical Pacific region of a global OGCM ensemble. Q J R Meteorol Soc 131:2455–2472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lin X, Yang J, Guo J, Zhang Z, Yin Y, Song X, Zhang X (2011) An asymmetric upwind flow, Yellow Sea Warm Current: 1. New observations in the western Yellow Sea. J Geophys Res 116:C04026. doi: 10.1029/2010JC006513 Google Scholar
  29. Lisæter KA, Rosanova J, Evensen G (2003) Assimilation of ice concentration in a coupled ice–ocean model, using the ensemble Kalman filter. Ocean Dyn 53:368–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mitchell HL, Houtekamer PL (2000) An adaptive ensemble Kalman filter. Mon Weather Rev 128:416–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mitchell HL, Houtekamer PL, Pellerin G (2002) Ensemble size, balance, and model-error representation in an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon Weather Rev 130:2791–2808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oke PR, Schiller A, Griffin DA, Brassington GB (2005) Ensemble data assimilation for an eddy-resolving ocean model of the Australian Region. Q J R Meteorol Soc 131:3301–3311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Palmer TN, Alessandri A, Andersen U et al (2004) Development of a European multimodel ensemble system for seasonal-to-interannual prediction (DEMETER). Amer Meteor Soc 85:853–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Park YH (1986) A simple theoretical model for the upwind flow in the southern Yellow Sea. J Oceanol Soc Korea 21:203–210Google Scholar
  35. Reynolds RW, Smith TM, Liu C, Chelton DB, Casey KS, Schlax MG (2007) Daily high-resolution blended analyses for sea surface temperature. J Clim 20:5473–5496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Riedlinger SK, Jacobs GA (2000) Study of the dynamics of wind-driven transports into the Yellow Sea during winter. J Geophys Res 105:28695–28708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sakov P, Counillon F, Bertino L, Lisæter AK, Oke PR, Korablev A (2012) TOPAZ4: an ocean-sea ice data assimilation system for the North Atlantic and Arctic. Ocean Sci 8:633–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Seo GH, Choi BJ, Cho YK, Kim YH, Kim S (2010) Assimilation of sea surface temperature in the Northwest Pacific Ocean and its marginal seas using the ensemble Kalman filter. Ocean Sci J 45:225–242. doi: 10.1007/s12601-010-0021-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Seo GH, Choi BJ, Cho YK, Kim YH, Kim S (2015) Evaluation of a regional ocean reanalysis system for the east Asian marginal seas based on the ensemble Kalman filter. Ocean Sci J 50:29–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shu Y, Zhu J, Wang D, Xiao X (2011) Assimilating remote sensing and in situ observations into a coastal model of northern South China Sea using ensemble Kalman filter. Cont Shelf Res 31:S24–S36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Toth Z, Kalnay E (1993) Ensemble forecasting at the NMC: the generation of perturbations. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 74:2317–2330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Toth Z, Kalnay E (1997) Ensemble forecasting at NCEP: the breeding method. Mon Weather Rev 125:3297–3318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vandenbulcke L, Barth A (2015) Stochastic operational forecasting system of the Black Sea: technique and validation. Ocean Model 93:7–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wan L, Zhu J, Bertino L, Wang H (2008) Initial ensemble generation and validation for ocean data assimilation using HYCOM in the Pacific. Ocean Dyn 53:368–388Google Scholar
  45. Wan L, Bertino L, Zhu J (2010) Assimilating altimetry data into a HYCOM model of the Pacific ensemble pptimal Interpolation versus ensemble Kalman filter. J Atm Ocean Tech 27:753–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang B, Hirose N, Kang B, Takayama K (2014) Seasonal migration of the Yellow Sea Bottom Cold Water. J Geophys Res Oceans 119:2169–9291Google Scholar
  47. Wei J, Malanotte-Rizzoli P (2010) Validation and application of an ensemble Kalman filter in the Selat Pauh of Singapore. Ocean Dyn 60:395–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yu F, Zhang Z, Diao X, Guo J (2010) Observational evidence of the Yellow Sea warm current. Chin J Oceanol Limnol 28:677–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhang SW, Wang QY, Lu Y, Cui H, Yuan YL (2008) Observationof the seasonalevolution of the Yellow Sea Cold Water Mass in 1996–1998. Cont Shelf Res 28:442–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kyung Man Kwon
    • 1
  • Byoung-Ju Choi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sang-Ho Lee
    • 1
  • Young Ho Kim
    • 2
  • Gwang-Ho Seo
    • 3
  • Yang-Ki Cho
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of OceanographyKunsan National UniversityGunsanRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Korea Institute of Ocean Science and TechnologyAnsanRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Korea Hydrographic and Oceanographic AgencyBusanRepublic of Korea
  4. 4.School of Earth and Environmental SciencesSeoul National UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations