Ocean Dynamics

, Volume 65, Issue 11, pp 1399–1410 | Cite as

Interference of wind-driven and pressure gradient-driven flows in shallow homogeneous water bodies

  • Jochen KämpfEmail author


This study explores the characteristics of wind-driven steady-state flows in water bodies of constant density focusing on situations in which the surface and bottom Ekman layer interfere. Under the assumption of constant eddy viscosity in conjunction with a zero-flow bottom boundary condition, such flows can be linearly decomposed into wind-driven and pressure gradient-driven flow components, each affiliated with a frictional boundary layer. The resultant interference patterns, including the creation of undercurrents, are discussed using a one-dimensional water-column model. The second part of this paper employs a three-dimensional hydrodynamic model to study interferences for an idealized large and shallow oceanic bay at low latitudes under the action of a uniform wind stress. Lee effects trigger a surface pressure field that tends to slope against the wind direction. The associated pressure gradient force creates an undercurrent in deeper portions of the bay, while unidirectional flows prevail in shallower water. It is demonstrated that such undercurrents can operate as an effective upwelling mechanism, moving sub-surface water into a bay over large distances (~100 km). Based on estimates of eddy viscosities, it is also shown that Ekman layer dynamics play a central role in the dynamics of most mid-latitude lakes. On the continental shelf of the modern ocean, inferences between the surface and bottom Ekman layers leading to undercurrents do currently only exist in shallow shelf seas at low latitudes, such as the Arafura Sea.


Ekman layer dynamics Undercurrents Lee effect Upwelling Shallow-water environments 



The research received funding from the Australia & Pacific Science Foundation under project APSF 15-04.


  1. Csanady GT (1982) Circulation in the coastal ocean. D. Reidel Publishing Company, BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cushman-Roisin B (1994) Introduction to geophysical fluid dynamics. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  3. Effler SW (1996) Limnological and engineering analysis of a polluted urban lake: prelude to environmental management of Onondaga Lake. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ekman VW (1905) On the influence of the Earth’s rotation on ocean-currents. Arkiv Matematik Astronomi och Fysik 2(11):1–52Google Scholar
  5. Farrow DE, Stevens CL (2003) Numerical modelling of a surface-stress driven density stratified fluid. J Eng Math 47(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fischer HB, List EJ, Koh RCY, Imberger J, Brooks NH (1979) Mixing in inland and coastal waters. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Hela I (1976) Vertical velocity of the upwelling in the sea. Soc Scient Fennica Commentat Phys-Math 46:9–24Google Scholar
  8. Hutter K, Chubarenko IP, Wang Y (2014) Physics of lakes. Volume 3: methods of understanding lakes as components of the geophysical environment. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kämpf J (2010) Advanced ocean modelling—using open-source software. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Luyten PJ, Jones JE, Proctor R, Tabor A, Tett P, Wild-Allen K (1999) COHERENS—a coupled hydrodynamic-ecological model for regional and shelf seas: user documentation. MUMM Report, Management Unit of the Mathematical Models of the North Sea, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  11. Myrberg K, Andrejev O (2003) Main upwelling regions in the Baltic Sea—a statistical analysis based on three-dimensional modeling. Boreal Environ Res 8:97–112Google Scholar
  12. Monismith SG (1985) Wind-forced motions in stratified lakes and their effect on mixed-layer shear. Limnol Oceanogr 30(4):771–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Monismith SG (1986) An experimental study of the upwelling response of stratified reservoirs to surface shear stress. J Fluid Mech 171:407–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Olbers D, Willebrand J, Eden C (2012) Ocean dynamics. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pacanowski RC, Philander SGH (1981) Parameterization of vertical mixing in numerical models of tropical oceans. J Phys Oceanogr 11:1443–1451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rochford DJ (1966) Some hydrological features of the eastern Arafura Sea and the Gulf of Carpentaria in August 1964. Austr J Mar Freshw Res 17:31–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sadrinasab M, Kämpf J (2004) Three-dimensional flushing times in the Persian Gulf. Geophys Res Letters 31, L24301. doi: 10.1029/2004GL020425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sandery PA, Kämpf J (2007) Transport timescales for identifying seasonal variation in Bass Strait, south-eastern Australia. Estuar Coastal Shelf Sci 74(4):684–696. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2007.05.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stevens C, Imberger J (1996) The initial response of a stratified lake to a surface shear stress. J Fluid Mech 312:39–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Svannsson A (1975) Interaction between the coastal zone and the open sea. Finnish Mar Res 239:11–28Google Scholar
  21. Svensson U (1979) The structure of the turbulent Ekman layer. Tellus 31:340–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tomczak M, Godfrey JS (2003) Regional oceanography: an introduction, 2nd edn. Daya Publishing House, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  23. Wang Y, Hutter K, Bäuerle E (2001) Barotropic response in a lake to wind-forcing. Ann Geophys 19(3):367–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wenegrat JO, McPhaden MJ, Lien R-C (2014) Wind stress and near-surface shear in the equatorial Atlantic Ocean. Geophys Res Lett 41:1226–1231. doi: 10.1002/2013GL059149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of the EnvironmentFlinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations