Abstract
Reliable estimation of extreme ocean surface gravity waves is important for many scientific and practical issues. In this study, WAVEWATCHIII is used to simulate wave conditions over the eastern Canadian shelf (ECS) for the 30-year period, 1979–2008. The wave model is forced by the 6-hourly winds and ice cover taken from the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR). A parametric vortex is inserted into the CFSR winds to better represent surface winds associated with tropical storms or hurricanes. The model performance in simulating the bulk significant wave height is assessed by comparing model results with wave observations at 12 buoy stations over the ECS. The peaks-over-threshold method is used to estimate the extreme significant wave heights from 30-year wave simulations. The estimated extreme waves with the 50-year return period over the ECS feature large wave heights of more than 12 m in the offshore deep waters and about 8–12 m over the open shelf waters of the ECS. By comparison, the 50-year extreme waves are moderate and 7 m or less in the Gulf of St. Lawrence and inner Gulf of Maine.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aarnes OJ, Abdalla S, Bidlot JR, Breivik O (2014) Marine wind and wave height trends at different ERA-Interim forecast ranges. J Clim. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00470.1
Anderson CW, Carter DJT, Cotton PD (2001) Wave climate variability and impact on offshore design extremes. Shell International and the Organization of Oil and Gas Producers Rep., 99 pp
Caries S, Sterl A (2005) 100-year return value estimated for ocean wind speed and significant wave height from the era-40 data. J Clim 18:1032–1048
Charles E, Idier D, Delecluse P, Déqué M, Le Cozannet M (2012) Climate change impact on waves in the Bay of Biscay, France. Ocean Dyn 62:831–848
Chawla A, Tolman HL (2007) Automated grid generation for WAVEWATCH III. Technical Note 254, NCEP/NOAA/NWS, National Center for Environmental Prediction, Washington DC
Chawla A, Tolman HL (2008) Obstruction grids for spectral wave models. Ocean Model 22:12–25
Chawla A, Splindler DM, Tolman HL (2013) Validation of a thirty year reanalysis using climate forecast system reanalysis winds. Ocean Model 70:189–206
Coles S (2001) An introduction to statistical modeling of extreme values. Springer, London, 208 pp
Cox AT, Cardone VJ, Swail VR (2011) On the use of the climate forecast system reanalysis wind forcing in ocean response modeling. 12th International Workshop on Wave Hindcasting and Forcasting & 3rd Coastal Hazards Symposium, pp. 20, Paper G3
Fairall CW, Uttal T, Hazen D, Hare J, Cronin MF, Bond N, Veron DE (2008) Observations of cloud, radiation, and surface forcing in the equatorial eastern Pacific. J Clim 21:655–673
Hanley K, Belcher S, Sullivan P (2010) A global climatology of wind-wave interaction. J Phys Oceanogr 40:1263–1282
Holland GJ (1980) An analytic model of the wind and pressure profiles in hurricanes. Mon Weather Rev 108:1212–1218. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108
Hu K, Chen Q, Kimbal S (2012) Consistency in hurricane surface wind forecasting: an improved parametric model. Nat Hazards 61:1029–1050
Janssen PAEM, Hansen B, Bislot JR (1997) Verification of the ECMWF wave forecasting system against buoy and altimeter data. Weather Forecast 12:763–784
Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, CollinsW DD, Gandin L, Iredell M, Saha S, Woollen J, Zhu Y, Leetmaa A, Reynolds R, Chelliah M, Ebisuzaki W, Higgins W, Janowiak J, Mo KC, Ropelewski C, Wang J (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437–470
Lazarus SM, Wilson ST, Splitt ME, Zarillo GA (2013) Evaluation of a wind wave system for ensemble tropical cyclone wave forecasting. Part II: waves. Weather Forecast 28:316–330
Lin N, Emanuel KA, Smith JA, Vanmarcke E (2010) Risk assessment of hurricane storm surge for New York City. J Geophys Res 115, D18121. doi:10.1029/2009JD013630
Liu Q, Marchok T, Pan H, Bender M, Lord S (1999) Improvements in hurricane initialization and forecasting at NCEP with global and regional (GFDL) models. NOAA Tech. Proc. Bull. 472, National Weather Service, Office of Meteorology, Silver Spring, MD, 1–7 [Available online at www.nws.noaa.gov/om/tpb/472.htm.]
Makin VK, Kudryavtsev VN (1999) Coupled sea surface-atmosphere model 1. Wind over waves coupling. J Geophys Res 104:7613–7623
O’Brien L, Dudley JM, Dias F (2013) Extreme wave events in Ireland: 14 680 BP-2012. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:625–648
Powell MD, Houston SH, Reinhold TA (1996) Hurricane Andrew’s landfall in South Florida. Part I: standardizing measurements for documentation of surface wind fields. Weather Forecast 11:304–328
Queffeulou P (2004) Long term validation of wave height measurement from altimeters. Mar Geod 27:495–510
Resio DT, Bratos SM, Tompson EF (2002) Meteorology and wave climate. In: Vincent L and Deirbilek Z (Ed.), Part II, Coastal hydrodynamics, Chapter II-2, Coastal Engineering Manual USACE, 72 pp
Ruest B, Neumeier U, Dumont D, Lambert A (2013) Wave climate evaluation in the gulf of St. Lawrence with a parametric wave model. Coastal Dynamics 1363–1374
Saha S, Moorthi S, Pan HL, Wu X, Wang J, Nadiga S et al (2010) The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 91:1015–1057. doi:10.1175/2010BAMS3001.1
Sheng J, Zhai X, Greatbatch RJ (2006) Numerical study of the storm-induced circulation on the Scotian Shelf during Hurricane Juan using a nested-grid ocean model. Prog Oceanogr 70:233–254. doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2005.07.007
Skamarock, WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Barker DM, Wang W, Powers JG (2005) A description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 2. NCAR Tech. Note 468 STR, 88 pp
Smith SD (1988) Coefficients for sea surface wind stress, heat flux, and wind profiles as a function of wind speed and temperature. J Geophys Res 93:15467–15472
Stopa JE, Cheung KF (2014) Intercomparison of wind and wave data from the ECMWF Reanalysis Interim and the NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis. Ocean Model 75:65–83
Swail VR, Cox AT (2000) On the use of NCEP–NCAR reanalysis surface marine wind fields for a long-term North Atlantic wave hindcast. J Atmos Ocean Technol 17:532–545
Swail VR, Cardone VJ, Ferguson M, Gummer DJ, Harris EL, Orelup EA, Cox AT (2006) The MSC50 wind and wave reanalysis. 9th International Wind and Wave Workshop, September 25–29, 2006, Victoria, B.C
Tolman HL (2008) A mosaic approach to wind wave modeling. Ocean Model 25:35–47
Tolman HL (2009) User manual and system documentation of WAVEWATCH III version 3.14. Tech. Note 276, NOAA/NWS/NCEP/MMAB, 220pp
Uppala SM, Kållberg PW, Simmons AJ, Andrae U, Da Costa BV, Fiorino M et al (2005) The ERA-40 Reanalysis. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 131:2961–3012
Vickery PJ, Wadhera D (2008) Statistical models of Holland pressure profile parameter and radius to maximum winds of hurricanes from flight-level pressure and H* wind data. J Appl Meteorol 47:2497–2517. doi:10.1175/2008JAMC1837.1
Vinoth J, Young IR (2011) Global estimates of extreme wind speed and wave height. J Clim 24:1647–1665. doi:10.1175/2010JCLI3680.1
Wang XL, Swail VR (2006) Climate change signal and uncertainty in projections of ocean wave height. Clim Dyn 26:109–126
Wang XL, Feng Y, Swail VR (2012) North Atlantic wave height trends as reconstructed from the 20th century reanalysis. Geophys Res Lett 39, L18705. doi:10.1029/2012GL053381
Xu F, Perrie W, Toulany B, Smith PC (2007) Wind-generated waves in Hurricane Juan. Ocean Model 16:188–205
Young IR (2003) A review of the sea state generated by hurricanes. Mar Struct 16:210–218
Zhang H, Sheng J (2013) Estimation of extreme sea levels over the Eastern continental shelf of North America. J Geophys Res 118:6253–6273
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Heng Zhang, William Perrie, Bechara Toulany, and Shiliang Shan for their contributions. The research was funded by the Marine Environmental Observation Prediction and Response Network (MEOPAR) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). JS is also supported by the Lloyd’s Register Foundation, which helps to protect life and property by supporting engineering-related education, public engagement, and the application of research. Model simulations were conducted on computers operated by the Atlantic Computational Excellence Network (ACEnet), which is a partner consortium of Compute Canada, the organization responsible for research High Performance Computing in Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Leo Oey
This article is part of the Topical Collection on the 6th International Workshop on Modeling the Ocean (IWMO) in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada 23–27 June 2014
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, L., Sheng, J. Statistical estimation of extreme ocean waves over the eastern Canadian shelf from 30-year numerical wave simulation. Ocean Dynamics 65, 1489–1507 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-015-0878-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-015-0878-y