Coastal ocean data assimilation using a multi-scale three-dimensional variational scheme
- 413 Downloads
A multi-scale three-dimensional variational scheme (MS-3DVAR) is implemented to improve the effectiveness of the assimilation of both very sparse and high-resolution observations into models with resolutions down to 1 km. The improvements are realized through the use of background error covariances of multi-decorrelation length scales and by reducing the inherent observational representativeness errors. MS-3DVAR is applied to coastal ocean data assimilation to handle the wide range of spatial scales that exist in both the dynamics and observations. In the implementation presented here, the cost function consists of two components for large and small scales, and MS-3DVAR is implemented sequentially from large to small scales. A set of observing system simulation experiments (OSSEs) are performed to illustrate the advantages of MS-3DVAR over conventional 3DVAR in assimilating two of the most common types of observations—sparse vertical profiles and high-resolution surface measurements—simultaneously. One month of results from an operational implementation show that both the analysis error and bias are reduced more effectively when using MS-3DVAR.
KeywordsMulti-scale data assimilation Variational data assimilation Fine-resolution model Ocean prediction Observing system Coastal ocean
The research described in this publication was carried out, in part, at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). We gratefully acknowledge the multi-year support from Dr. Yi Chao, Remote Sensing Solutions, Inc., to the development of the MS-3DVAR system for the SCB region and also many discussions with him that help improve the system. This research was supported in part by the Office of Naval Research (N00014-12-1-093) and (N00014-10-1-0557). The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for comments that were very helpful in improving the manuscript.
- Cohn S (1996) Estimation theory for data assimilation problems: basic conceptual framework and some open questions. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 75 1B:257–288Google Scholar
- Daley R (1991) Atmospheric Data Assimilations. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- Hickey B (1998) Coastal oceanography of western North America from the tip of Baja California to Vancouver Island. The Sea 11:345–363Google Scholar
- Hurlburt H et al (2009) Eddy-resolving ocean modeling, chap. Eddy-resolving global ocean predictio. No. 17, Geophys. Monograph Ser, American Geophysical UnionGoogle Scholar
- Ide K, Courtier P, Ghil M, Lorenc A (1997) Unified notation for data assimilation: operational sequential and variational. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 75, 1B:71–79Google Scholar
- Li Z, McWilliams J, Ide K, Farara J (2015) A multi-scale variational data assimilation scheme: formulation and illustration. Mon Wea Rev. acceptedGoogle Scholar
- McWilliams J (2009) Eddy-resolving ocean modeling, chap. The nature and consequences of oceanic eddies. No. 17, Geophys. Monogrpah, American Geophysical UnionGoogle Scholar
- Rudnick D, Davis R, Eriksen C, Fratantoni D, MJ MP (2005) Underwater gliders for ocean research. Mar Technol Soc J 38:48–59Google Scholar
- Shchepetkin A, McWilliams J (2006) Handbook of numerical analysis: special volume: computational methods for the atmosphere and the oceans, chap. Computational kernel algorithms for fine-scale, multi-process, long-time oceanic simulations. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
- Skamarock W et al (2008) A description of the advanced research WRF version 3. Tech. rep. NCARGoogle Scholar
- Wang X, Chao Y, Dong C, Farrara J, Li Z, McWilliams J, Paduan J, Rosenfield L (2009) Modeling tides in Monterey Bay, California. Deep Sea Res., II 56Google Scholar