Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hindcast of extreme sea states in North Atlantic extratropical storms

  • Published:
Ocean Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the variability of freak wave parameters around the eye of northern hemisphere extratropical cyclones. The data was obtained from a hindcast performed with the WAve Model (WAM) model forced by the wind fields of the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR). The hindcast results were validated against the wave buoys and satellite altimetry data showing a good correlation. The variability of different wave parameters was assessed by applying the empirical orthogonal functions (EOF) technique on the hindcast data. From the EOF analysis, it can be concluded that the first empirical orthogonal function (V1) accounts for greater share of variability of significant wave height (Hs), peak period (Tp), directional spreading (SPR) and Benjamin-Feir index (BFI). The share of variance in V1 varies for cyclone and variable: for the 2nd storm and Hs V1 contains 96 % of variance while for the 3rd storm and BFI V1 accounts only for 26 % of variance. The spatial patterns of V1 show that the variables are distributed around the cyclones centres mainly in a lobular fashion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almeida LP, Ferreira O, Vousdoukas MI, Dodet G (2011) Historical variation and trends in storminess along the Portuguese south coast. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:2407–2417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ash E, Busswell G, Pinnock S (2012) DUE Globwave wave data handbook, Logica, UK Ltd. 74 pp

  • Bacon S, Carter DJT (1991) Wave climate changes in the North Atlantic and North Sea. Int J Climatol 11:545–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bancroft GP (2007) Marine weather review – North Atlantic area January through April 2007. Mariners Weather Log 51, 38–53

  • Bancroft GP (2011) Marine weather review—North Atlantic area January through June 2011. Mariners weather log 55 number 3, 15–21

  • Battjes JA, Janssen JPFM (1979) Energy loss and set-up due to breaking of random waves. In Proc. 16th Int. Conf. Coastal Engineering, 569–587, Hamburg Germany

  • Bengtsson L, Hodges KI (2006) Storm tracks and climate change. J Clim 19:3518–3543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardino M, Boukhanovsky A, Guedes Soares C (2008) Alternative approaches to storm statistics in the ocean. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2008), Estoril, Portugal. New York, USA: ASME paper OMAE2008-58053

  • Bidlot J, Janssen PAEM, Abdalla S (2005) A revised formulation for ocean wave dissipation in CY29R1. Memorandum Research Department, ECMWF, April 7, 2005 File: R60.9/JB/0516

  • Cardone VJ, Cox AT, Morrone MA, Swail VR (2011) Global distribution and associated synoptic climatology of very extreme sea states (VESS). Proceedings 12th International workshop on wave hindcasting and forecasting, Hawaii, October 31-November 4, 2011

  • Cavaleri L, Bertotti L, Torrisi L, Bitner-Gregersen E, Serio M, Onorato M (2012) Rogue waves in crossing seas: the Louis Majesty accident. J Geophys Res 117:C00J10. doi:10.1029/2012JC007923

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang EKM, Fu Y (2002) Interdecadal variations in northern hemisphere winter storm track intensity. J Clim 15:642–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherneva Z, Guedes Soares C, Petrova PG (2011) Distribuition of wave height maxima in storm sea states. J Offshore Mech Arctic Eng 133(4):041601–1–041601–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ECMWF (2012) Wave model. Part VII: IFS documentation – Cy38r1. Operational implementation, part VII: ECMWF wave model, pp. 79

  • Environmental Modeling Center (2003) The GFS atmospheric model. NCEP office note 442, global climate and weather modeling branch, EMC, Camp Springs, Maryland

  • Fukuoka A (1951) A study of 10-day forecast (a synthetic report). Geophys Mag 22:177–218, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Guedes Soares C, Neves S (2006) Modelling tidal current profiles by means of empirical orthogonal functions. J Offshore Mech Arctic Eng 128(3):184–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guedes Soares C, Cherneva Z, Antao E (2003) Characteristics of abnormal waves in North Sea storm sea states. Appl Ocean Res 25(6):337–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guedes Soares C, Cherneva Z, Antao E (2004) Abnormal waves during hurricane Camille. J Geophys Res 109:1–7. doi:10.1029/2003JC002244, ISSN: C08008

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulev SK, Grigorieva V (2004) Last century changes in ocean wind wave height from global visual wave data. Geophys Res Lett 31:L24302. doi:10.1029/ 2004GL021040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanafin JA, Quilfen Y, Ardhuin F, Sienkiewicz J, Queffeulou P, Obrebski M, Chapron B, Reul N, Collard F, Corman D, de Azevedo EB, Vandemark D, Stutzmann E (2011) Phenomenal sea states and swell from a North Atlantic storm in February 2011: a comprehensive analysis. Bull Am Meteorol 93(12):1825–1832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannachi A, Jolliffe IT, Stephenson DB (2007) Empirical ortoghonal functions and related techniques in atmospheric science: a review. Int J Climatol 27:1119–1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart RE (2003) A cyclone phase space derived from thermal wind and thermal asymmetry. Mon Weather Rev 131:585–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasselmann K, Barnett TP, Bouws E, Carlson H, Cartwright DE, Enke K, Ewing JA, Gienapp H, Hasselmann DE, Kruseman P, Meerburg A, Müller P, Olbers DJ, Richter K, Sell W, Walden H (1973) Measurements of wind-wave growth and swell decay during the Joint North Sea Wave Project (JONSWAP), Dtsch. Hydrogr. Z. Suppl. A 8 (12), 95 pp

  • Hogben N (1994) Increases in wave heights over the North Atlantic: a review of the evidence and some implications for the naval architect, Trans. RINA, V Vol.137, Part A, pp. 93–115

  • Janssen PAEM (1991) Quasi-linear theory of wind-wave generation applied to wave forecasting. J Phys Oceanogr 21:1631–1642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen PAEM (2003) Nonlinear four-wave interactions and freak waves. J Phys Oceanogr 33(4):863–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen PAEM, Bidlot JR, (2009) On the extension of the freak wave warning system and its verification. Issue 588 of ECMWF technical memorandum, 42 pages

  • Kharif C, Pelinovsky E (2003) Physical mechanisms of the rogue wave phenomenon. Eur J Mech B Fluids 22:603–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komen GJ, Cavaleri L, Donelan M, Hasselmann K, Hasselmann S, Janssen PAEM (1994) Dynamics and modelling of ocean waves. Cambridge University Press

  • Kushnir Y, Cardone VJ, Greenwood JG, Cane MA (1997) The recent increase in North Atlantic wave heights. J Clim 10:2107–2113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lionello P, Sanna A (2005) Mediterranean wave climate variability and its links with NAO and Indian Monsoon. Clim Dyn 25: 611–623

  • Lorenz EN (1956) Empirical orthogonal functions and statistical weather prediction. Technical report, statistical forecast project report 1, Dep Meteorol, MIT 49

  • Magnusson A, Donelan M (2013) The Andrea wave characteristics of a measured North Sea rogue wave. J Offshore Mech Arctic Eng 135:031108–1

  • McCabe GJ, Clark MP, Serreze MC (2001) Trends in northern hemisphere surface cyclone frequency and intensity. J Clim 14:2763–2768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monahan AH, Fyfe JC, Ambaum MP, Stephenson DB, North GB (2009) Review empirical orthogonal functions: the medium is the message. J Clim 22:6501–6514. doi:10.1175/2009JCLI3062.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mori N (2012) Freak waves under typhoon conditions. J Geophys Res 117:C00J07, 10.1029/2011JC007788

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori N, Janssen PAEM (2006) On kurtosis and occurrence probability of freak waves. J Phys Oceanogr 36(7):1471–1483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nesterov ES, Lukin AA (2012) Extreme waves in the North Atlantic. ISSN 1068–3739, Russina Meteorol Hydrol, 2012, No. 11, pp. 728–734. Allerton Press, Inc., 2012

  • Ponce de León S, Guedes Soares C (2005) On the sheltering effect of islands in ocean wave models. J Geophys Res 110(C09020):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponce de León S, Guedes Soares C (2012) Distribution of winter wave spectral peaks in the seas around Norway. Ocean Eng 50:63–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponce de León S, Guedes Soares C (2014) Extreme wave parameters under North Atlantic extratropical cyclones. Ocean Model 81:78–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queffeulou P, Croize-Fillon D (2012) Global altimeter SWH data set. Version 9, April, Technical report, IFREMER

  • Saha SS, Moorthi Pan HL, Wu X, Wang J, Nadiga S, Tripp P, Kistler R, Wooll J, Behringer D, Liu H, Stokes D, Grumbine R, Gayno G, Wang J, Hou YT, Chuang H, Juang HMH, Sela J, Iredell M, Treadon R, Kleist D, Van Dels P, Keyser D, Derber J, Ek M, Meng J, Wei H, Yang R, Lord S, van den Dool H, Kumar A, Wang W, Long C, Chelliah M, Xue Y, Huang B, Schemm JK, Ebisuzaki W, Lin R, Xie P, Chen M, Zhou S, Higgins W, Zou C, Liu Q, Chen Y, Han Y, Cucurull L, Reynolds RW, Rutledge G, Goldberg M (2010) The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis bull amer. Meteorol Soc 91:1015–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders F, Gyakum JR (1980) Synoptic-dynamic climatology of the “bomb”. Am Meteorol Soc 108:1589–1606

    Google Scholar 

  • Serreze MC (2009) Northern hemisphere cyclone locations and characteristics from NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data. National snow and ice data center. Digital media, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamura H, Waseda T, Miyazawa Y (2009) Freakish sea state and swell-windsea coupling: numerical study of the Suwa-Maru incident. Geophys Res Lett 36:L01607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The earth observation handbook 2012—key tables, ESA (European Space Agency) and CEOS (Committee on Earth Observation Satellites), 41pp

  • Verhoef A, Stoffelen A (2012) ASCAT wind product user manual Version 1.12. EUMETSAT/OSI SAF, 27 pp.

  • Weisse R, von Storch H, Feser F (2005) Northeast Atlantic and North Sea storminess as simulated by a regional climate model during 1958–2001 and comparison with observations. J Clim 18:465–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang HD, Cherneva Z, Guedes Soares C, Onorato M (2014) Modeling Extreme Wave Heights from Laboratory Experiments with the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 14:959–968

Download references

Acknowledgments

Tracks of the 2011 and 2013 storms where kindly made available by Guang Ping of EMC/NCEP. This work has been performed within the project CLIBECO—present and future marine climate in the Iberian coast, funded by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT—Fundação Portuguesa para a Ciência e a Tecnologia) under contract n.°: EXPL/AAG-MAA/1001/2013. The first author has been funded by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology) under postdoctoral grant SFRH/BPD/84358/2012.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Guedes Soares.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Oyvind Breivik

This article is part of the Topical Collection on the 13th International Workshop on Wave Hindcasting and Forecasting in Banff, Alberta, Canada October 27 - November 1, 2013

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ponce de León, S., Guedes Soares, C. Hindcast of extreme sea states in North Atlantic extratropical storms. Ocean Dynamics 65, 241–254 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-014-0794-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-014-0794-6

Keywords

Navigation