Advertisement

Ocean Dynamics

, Volume 64, Issue 7, pp 989–998 | Cite as

High-resolution X-Band radar measurements of currents, bathymetry and sea state in highly inhomogeneous coastal areas

  • Katrin Hessner
  • Konstanze Reichert
  • Jose Carlos Nieto Borge
  • Craig L. Stevens
  • Murray J. Smith
Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on the 13th International Workshop on Wave Hindcasting and Forecasting in Banff, Alberta, Canada October 27 - November 1, 2013

Abstract

In this paper, high-resolution wave, current and water depth fields derived by marine X-Band radar are presented for a coastal region of extreme tidal currents in the presence of inhomogeneous bathymetry at the south coast of New Zealand’s North Island. The current and water depth information for the presented location covers an area of approximately 13 km2 with a spatial resolution of 225 m and an update rate of 3 min. The sea state data provides a spatial representation of coastal effects like wave shoaling and refraction forced by bathymetry and current interaction. The near-surface current measurements about 3 km off the coast show expected tidal current pattern with maximum northwest/southeast current of 1.5–2 m/s alongshore. This is in agreement with currents from the RiCOM hydrodynamic model. The spatial resolution of the observed current field exhibits in addition small-scale current features caused by the influence of the local bathymetry. These data demonstrate the insight to be gained in complex, high-energy coastal situations through the use of high-resolution remote sensing techniques.

Keywords

Remote sensing Nautical radar High-resolution waves High-resolution current fields Shallow water bathymetry 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The WaMoS II data were acquired within the ONR funded project Hi-Res (N00101411WX20493) and by NIWA under the Coasts and Ocean Research Program. The authors would like to thank John McGregor and Peter Franz (NIWA) for assistance in setting up the field location. The hindcast model data were provided by Emily Lane and Richard Gorman (NIWA). The work presented here was co-funded in the framework of the EU-Project DOLPHIN SPA.2010.1.1-05

References

  1. Bacon Sir R (1932) The concise story of the dover patrol. LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell, P (2007) Mapping the bathymetry of the Dee estuary using wave inversions of marine radar image sequences. In: Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) Conference. Challenges for monitoring and prediction, Villa Marigola, Lerici, Italy, 25–27 September 2007. ITALY, N.U.R.C. NATO Research Centre, La Spezia, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell PS, Osler JC (2011) Mapping bathymetry using X-band Marine radar data recorded from a moving vessel. Ocean Dyn 2141–2156Google Scholar
  4. Hart CA, Miskin EA (1945) Developments in the method of determination of beach gradients by wave velocity. Air survey research paper No 15:1–54Google Scholar
  5. Hessner KG, Bell PS (2009) High resolution current & bathymetry determined by nautical X-Band radar in shallow waters. Proc of the OCEANS May 11–14:2009Google Scholar
  6. Hessner KG, Reichert K, Rosenthal W (1999) Mapping of sea bottom topography in shallow seas by using a nautical radar. Proceedings: 2nd Symposium on Operationalization of Remote SensingGoogle Scholar
  7. Hessner K, Reichert K, Dittmer J, Nieto Borge J, Günter H (2001) Evaluation of WaMoS II Wave data. WAVES 2001 conference, San Francisco September 1–6Google Scholar
  8. Hessner KG, Nieto-Borge JC, Bell PS (2007) Nautical radar measurements in Europe: applications of WaMoS II as a sensor for sea state, current and bathymetry. In: Barale V, Gade M (eds) Sensing of the European seas. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 435–446Google Scholar
  9. Lane EM, Walters RA, Gillibrand PA, Uddstrom M (2009) Operational forecasting of sea level height using an unstructured grid ocean model. Ocean Model 88–96Google Scholar
  10. Nieto Borge J, Reichert K, Dittmer J, Rosenthal W (1998) WaMoS II: a wave and current monitoring system. Proceed. Of the COST 714 conference on directional wave spectra, ParisGoogle Scholar
  11. Reichert K, Nieto JC, Dittmer J (1998) WaMoS II: an operational Wave Monitoring System. Proc Oceanol Int 3(98):455–462Google Scholar
  12. Senet CM, Seeman J, Ziemer F (2001) The near-surface current velocity determined from images sequences of the sea surface. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 39(3):492–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Stevens CL, Smith MJ, Grant B, Stewart CL, Divett T (2012) Tidal energy resource complexity in a large strait: the Karori Rip, Cook Strait. Cont Shelf Res 33:100–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Young I, Rosenthal W, Ziemer F (1985) A three-dimensional analysis of marine radar images for the determination of ocean wave directionality and surface currents. J Geophys Res 1049–1059Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katrin Hessner
    • 1
  • Konstanze Reichert
    • 2
  • Jose Carlos Nieto Borge
    • 3
  • Craig L. Stevens
    • 4
  • Murray J. Smith
    • 4
  1. 1.OceanWaveS GmbHLueneburgGermany
  2. 2.OceanWaveS PacificLower HuttNew Zealand
  3. 3.University of AlcaláMadridSpain
  4. 4.National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA)WellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations