Skip to main content
Log in

Minimising harbour siltation—findings of PIANC Working Group 43

  • Published:
Ocean Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modern trends, increases in ship size, improved cargo handling capability, sea level rise and erosion threats to low-lying land, undesirable attributes of certain traditional mud dredging and disposal practices, coupled with pressure from environmental legislation, are all driving a need to manage coastal waters and fine sediment in a more sophisticated manner. Wide-ranging review of world “best practice” has highlighted five fully evolved northwest European generic sediment management systems (SMS) to address these challenges. These are being applied to universally recurring types of port facilities: impounded docks, lock entrances, semi-enclosed basins, channels and fairways. They are applicable to large and small, existing and new facilities in rivers, estuaries, open sea coasts, even in some cases to lakes. They can be passive or active. The functioning of each of these five is explained with comment on economic benefit. What emerges strongly is that the applied academic disciplines of physical and chemical oceanography, plus marine microbiology, are being drawn together to supplement or replace traditional maritime engineering. Following on from a Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses review, these technologies are spreading beyond the northwest European conception area, as well as beginning to be adopted by international dredging companies. The complexity, scale of potential benefit, numbers of poorly understood issues highlighted and embryonic way these are beginning to spread all suggest that this is potentially an important area for future scientific endeavour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailard JA, Jenkins SA (1985) Evaluation of two concepts for reducing sedimentation at Mayport Naval Station. Technical note no. N-1725. Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory, Port Hueneme, California, USA, p 52

  • Berlamont J, Thienpont M, Verner BO, van Bruwaene A, Neyrick L, Maertens L (1983) Mud capture installation at the sea lock of Zeebrugge. Harbour Conference, Antwerp, Belgium

  • Brinkmann B (1990) A contribution to determine the water exchange between river and harbour in tidal areas (in German). Doctorate thesis, Franzius Institut, Hannover, Heft 70, p 150

  • Christiansen H (1987) New insights on mud formation and sedimentation processes in tidal harbours. International conference on coastal and port engineering in developing countries, Beijing, China 2, pp 1332–1340

  • De Broe E (2003) Controlling sediment accumulation behind the locks at Zandvliet and Berendrecht. PIANC Bulletin No 112:1–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcez A (2010) Fluid mud: legal and technical framework; successful experiences and possibilities within Brazil. Keynote address. Proceedings of 10th international conference on cohesive sediment transport processes “INTERCOH 2009”, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Ocean Dynamics. Springer, New York

  • Greiser N, Gamnitzer R, Rupp J, Wurpts R (2004) Density versus viscosity—a comparative study of the nautical bottom. Proceedings of Wodcon XVII, Hamburg, Germany, pp B5-3–B 5-13. ISBN 90-9018244-6

  • Hofland B, Christiansen H, Crowder RA, Kirby R, van Leeuwen CW, Winterwerp JC (2001) The Current Deflecting Wall in an estuarine harbour. Proceedings of the XXIV IAHR Congress, Beijing, pp 242–250

  • Kirby R, Parker WR (1974) Seabed density measurements related to echo sounder records. Dock Harb Auth LIV 641:423–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby R, Parker WR, van Oostrum WHA (1980) Definition of the seabed in navigation routes through mud areas. Int Hydrogr Rev LVII 1:107–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby R, Wurpts R, Greiser N (2008) Emerging concepts for managing fine cohesive sediment. Sediment and ecohydraulics. Proceedings of 8th international conference on cohesive sediment transport, “INTERCOH 2005”. In: Kusuda T, Yamanishi H, Spearman J, Gailani JZ (eds) Proceedings in Marine Science, 9. Sediment and ecohydraulics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Krone RB (1987) Reducing sedimentation rates in harbor facilities. In: Sedimentation control to reduce maintenance dredging of navigation facilities in estuaries. Report and symposium proceedings, Marine Board, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, National Research Council. National Academy, Washington, DC, pp 128–140

  • Kuijper C, Christiansen H, Cornelisse J, Winterwerp JC (2005) Reducing harbour siltation. Part II: application to Parkhafen, Hamburg. ASCE J Waterways Ports Coastal Ocean Eng 131:267–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Communications (China) (2006) Technical specifications of nautical depth applied to muddy harbours (In Chinese). 3 parts: i. Technical coefficients for nautical depth technology; ii. Nautical depth survey; iii. Nautical depth mapping

  • Murless BJ (1989) Bridgwater docks and the River Parrett. Somerset County Council Library Service, Somerset, p 50

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasner H (1992) Sedimentation in tidal harbours (in German). Die Küste, Heft, p 53

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasner H, Pieper R (1992) Improvement of maintenance work in a tidal harbour. Proceedings 10th international harbour congress, Antwerp

  • Periáñez R, Absi A, Villa M, Moreno HP, Manjón G (2005) Self-cleaning in an estuarine area formerly affected by 226Ra anthropogenic enhancements: numerical simulations. Sci Total Environ 339:207–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PIANC (2008) Minimising harbour siltation. Report no 102, p 75

  • Prexl E (2002) Prolonged experience of natural TBT degradation in harbour sediments in storage fields (in German). Report to Emden Port Authority, p 6

  • Röhr F (1934) Water and sediment movements in river and sea harbours (in German). Flussbaulaboratorium der Technischen Hochschule, Karlsruhe, Publ. 1, Verlag von R Oldenbourg, p 52

  • Smith TJ, Kirby R, Christiansen H (2001) Entrance flow control to reduce siltation in tidal basins. Proceedings of 5th international conference on cohesive sediment transport, “INTERCOH 1998”. In: McAnally WH, Mehta AJ (eds) Proceedings in marine science, 3. Coastal and estuarine fine sediment processes. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 459–489

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Transportation. Maritime Administration (1999) Proceedings of the Marine Transportation System (MTS) research and development coordination conference. National Academy of Science, Washington, DC, p 148

    Google Scholar 

  • US Navy/US Army (1987) Sedimentation control to reduce maintenance dredging of navigation facilities in Estuaries. Report and symposium proceedings, Marine Board, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, National Research Council. National Academy, Washington, DC, p 342

  • Van Maren DS (2006) 3D mud transport model, Zeeschelde, Scenario 4. Effect of CDW on sedimentation. Deurganckdok, WL Delft Hydraulics. Report Z3824

  • Vollmers H-J (1963) Systematics of measures to reduce sedimentation in the mouth of river harbours (in German). Technische Hochschule, Karlsruhe, p 54

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurpts R (2005) Fifteen years experience with fluid mud: definition of the Nautical Bottom with rheological parameters. Terra et Aqua 99:22–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurpts R, Greiser N (2010) Reducing dredging costs in muddy layers. Keynote address. Proceedings of 10th international conference on cohesive sediment transport processes, “INTERCOH 2009”, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Ocean Dynamics. Springer, New York

  • Xu J, Yuan J (2003) Study on the possibility of occurrence of fluid mud in the Yangtze deep waterway. International conference on estuaries and coasts, Hangzhou, China, pp 516–520

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Kirby.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Susana B. Vinzon

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kirby, R. Minimising harbour siltation—findings of PIANC Working Group 43. Ocean Dynamics 61, 233–244 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-010-0336-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-010-0336-9

Keywords

Navigation