Abstract
By means of a suitable weighted rearrangement, we obtain various apriori bounds for the solutions to a Robin problem. Among other things, we derive a family of Faber-Krahn type inequalities.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The last two decades have seen a growing interest in the study of the Robin-Laplacian (see, e.g., [6, 9,10,11, 15]). Recently, in [5], it has been introduced a method that allows to obtain Talenti-type results for this type of operator. The results in [5] are quite surprising since, as well known, the techniques introduced by Talenti in [23] are tailored for problems whose solutions have level sets that do not intersect the domain where the problem is defined, a phenomenon that typically occurs when Robin boundary conditions are imposed.
Such an analysis is pushed even further in [2], where the Robin parameter is allowed to be a function bounded from above and below by two positive constants. Let us emphasize that the methods used in [5] and [2] are based on the classical Schwarz symmetrization, where, as well known, the standard isoperimetric inequality plays a crucial role. For related results see also [12, 21] and the reference therein.
Here we consider the following problem
where, here and throughout the paper, \(\Omega \) is a bounded Lipschitz domain of \(\mathbb {R}^{2}\) containing the origin, \(\beta >0,\) \(l\in (-2,0],\) \(\nu \) denotes the outer unit normal to \(\partial \Omega \) and f(x) is a non-negative function in \(L^{2}(\Omega ,\left| x\right| ^{l}{{d}}x)\), see Sects. 2 and 4 for definitions and some properties of this weighted space. A weak solution to problem (1.1) is a function \(u\in H^{1}(\Omega )\) such that
Our main results are based on a family of isoperimetric inequalities where two different weights (which are powers of the distance from the origin) appear in the perimeter and in the area element, respectively.
We will denote by \(\Omega ^{\sharp }\) the disk centered at the origin of radius \(r^{\sharp }\), where \(r^{\sharp }\) is uniquely defined by the following identity
Let us introduce the so-called symmetrized problem
where \(f^{\sharp }(x)\) is the unique radial and radially decreasing function such that
Our main results are contained in the following three theorems.
Theorem 1.1
Let u and \(v=v^{\sharp }\) be the solutions to problems (1.1) and (1.3), respectively. If \(f(x) \in L^{2}\left( \Omega ;\left| x\right| ^{l}{d}x\right) \) and \(f(x)\ge 0\) a.e. in \(\Omega \) then
and
Theorem above can be significantly improved when the datum f is constant. More precisely the following holds true
Theorem 1.2
If \(f(x)=1\) a.e. in \(\Omega \) then
Let \(\lambda _{1,l}(\Omega )\) and \(\lambda _{1,l}(\Omega ^{\sharp })\) be the first eigenvalues of the problems
and
respectively. Then the following Faber–Krahn type inequality holds true.
Theorem 1.3
It holds that
The paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2 we give the basic definitions and results about the rearrangement with respect the measure \( \left| x\right| ^{l}{d}x\). We also recall the weighted isoperimetric inequality on which such a rearrangement relies. Sections 3 and 4 contain the proofs of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2, respectively. The last section is devoted to the proof of Theorem 1.3. There we include further comments on the relation between the spaces \(H^{1}(\Omega )\) and \( L^{2}\left( \Omega ;\left| x\right| ^{l}{d}x\right) \).
Remark 1.1
Since \(0 \notin \partial \Omega \), our results still hold true if one assumes that the Robin parameter is a function \( \beta (x) \in L^{\infty }(\partial \Omega )\) such that for some positive constant C it holds
Under this assumption the proofs are conceptually equivalent, they just turn out to be more cumbersome.
Let us now make a few comments on the present note.
To the best of our knowledge, neither Talenti-type comparison results nor the Faber-Krahn-type principle have been discovered yet for problems of the kind (1.1).
The weighted isoperimetric inequality we need requires the assumptions made on l and n (\(l \in (-2,0]\) and \(n=2\)).
Finally, it is a quite delicate issue trying to relax the hypothesis \(\beta >0\). For instance, if \(\beta =0\) the operator becomes the Neumann Laplacian. Therefore, by the compatibility condition, one can no longer assume that the function f is positive. Nevertheless, in this case, only some weaker versions of Talenti’s Theorem have been obtained (see [4, 7, 22] and the references therein).
The case \(\beta <0\) is certainly the more challenging. Even if \(l = 0\), i.e. if the Robin parameter is a constant, the issue about the Faber-Krahn inequality’s validity has not yet been fully clarified (see [8, 17, 18] and the references therein).
2 Preliminary results
Let \(\Omega \) be a Lebesgue measurable subset of \(\mathbb {R}^{2}\) and let \(l\in (-2,0].\) Define
and
In the sequel by \(D_{\rho }\) we will denote the disk centered at the origin of radius \(\rho \).
The following result is a particular case of a two-parameter family of isoperimetric inequalities (see, e.g., [3, 13, 16] and the references therein).
Theorem 2.1
It holds that
where \(\Omega ^{\sharp }=D_{r^{\sharp }}\) with \(r^{\sharp }>0:\)
Remark 2.1
Note that the isoperimetric inequality above can be written equivalently as follows
In fact an elementary computation shows that
and
The previous identities imply
Finally we deduce that
and, hence, the claim.
Starting from this isoperimetric inequality one can consider the corresponding weighted rearrangement of a function. For further reading on this topic the reader can consult, for instance, [19, 20, 24] and the references therein.
Let \(u:\Omega \rightarrow \mathbb {R}\) be a measurable function.
Definition 2.1
The distribution function \(\mu :t\in \left[ 0,\infty \right) \rightarrow \left[ 0,\infty \right) \) of u is defined as
Definition 2.2
The decreasing rearrangement \(u^{*}:s\in \left[ 0,\left| \Omega \right| _{l}\right] \rightarrow \left[ 0,\infty \right] \) of u is defined as
Definition 2.3
The weighted Schwarz symmetrization \(u^{\sharp }(x):x\in \Omega ^{\sharp }\rightarrow \left[ 0,\infty \right] \) of u is defined as
Equivalently one can say that \(u^{\sharp }\) is the unique radial and radially non-increasing function such that
Definition 2.4
If \(p\in \left[ 1,+\infty \right) \), we will denote by \(L^{p}(\Omega ,\left| x\right| ^{l}{d}x)\) the space of all Lebesgue measurable real-valued functions u such that
Note that since, by construction, u, \(u^{*}\) and \(u^{\sharp }\) are equimeasurable we have that
We will need in the sequel the following well-known result (see, e.g., [14, 19, 20]).
Proposition 2.1
Let \(u\in L^{1}(\Omega ,\left| x\right| ^{l}{d}x)\) be a non-negative function and let \(E\subseteq \Omega \) be a measurable set. Then we have
We end this section by recalling the following version of Gronwall’s Lemma
Lemma 2.1
Let \(\xi (\tau )\) be a continuously differentiable function, satisfying, for some constant \(C\ge 0\) the following differential inequality
Then
and
3 The case \(\ f(x)\in L^{2}(\Omega ,\left| x\right| ^{l}\mathrm{{d}}x)\)
Let u and v the solutions to problems (1.1) and (1.3), respectively. In the sequel the following notation will be in force.
For \(t\ge 0\) we denote
and
Analogously if \(t\ge 0\) we denote
The proof of our main theorems requires several auxiliary results, that may have an interest of their own.
Lemma 3.1
The following inequalities hold true
where
Proof
Using \(u^{-}=\max \left\{ 0,-u\right\} \) as test function in (1.2), we obtain
Since \(f(x) \ge 0 \), we deduce that \(u^{-}=0\) a.e. in \(\Omega ,\) and the first inequality in (3.5) is verified. We observe that the function v(x) is radial and, therefore, \(v \equiv v_{m}\) on \(\partial \Omega ^{\#}\). From equations (1.1) and (1.3) we easily deduce that
where in last inequality we have used the weighted isoperimetric inequality. The claim is hence proven. \(\square \)
Lemma 3.2
It holds
Proof
Fubini’s Theorem gives
\(\square \)
Now in order to render the notations less heavy we introduce two constants that will appear often in the following
Lemma 3.3
For almost every \(t>0\) it holds that
and
Proof
Let \(t,h>0.\) Using the following test functions in (1.1)
we obtain
Dividing by h and then letting h go to 0 in the previous equality and, finally, using coarea formula, we obtain
where
On the other hand we have
Using the isoperimetric inequality (2.1) we get the claim (3.7).
Note that the distribution function \(\phi \) of v fulfills equality (3.8), in place of inequality, since, as it is straightforward to check, v is a radial and radially decreasing function. \(\square \)
Now we are in position to prove our first main result.
Proof of Theorem 1.1
Multiplying both sides of (3.7) by t and then integrating over \((0,\tau )\), with \(\tau \ge v_{m}\), we get
Lemma 3.2 yields
or equivalently
where C(l) and \(C(\Omega )\) are the constants defined in (3.6). An integration by parts of the left-hand side of (3.9) gives
Setting
an integration by parts of the right-hand side of (3.9) gives
From (3.10) and (3.11) we deduce that
Defining
we can rewrite inequality (3.12) as follows
Gronwall Lemma (2.5), with \(\tau _{0}=v_{m},\) gives
where
While for \(\phi (t),\) the distribution function of v, we have the equality sign
Inequalities (3.13) and (3.14) clearly imply that
Since
we get
i.e. our first claim, inequality (1.4).
Now we want to establish the same comparison between the weighted \(L^{2}\) -norms of u and v, i.e. (1.5). If \(\tau \) goes to \(+\infty \) in ( 3.9) we obtain
while for \(\phi \) it holds
Therefore we get the claim once we show that
Multiplying both sides of (3.7) by \(\dfrac{tF(\mu (t))}{\mu (t)}\) and then integrating over \((0,\tau )\) we get
Again an integration by parts gives
Now set
and
Furthermore define
and
so that
Integrating by parts in \(B_{1}\) we obtain
Since, as it is easy to verify, \(\dfrac{F(\rho )}{\rho }\) is a nondecreasing function, using Lemma 3.2 we derive
Collecting (3.16), (3.17), (3.18) and (3.19) we infer that
Define
then (3.20) can be rewritten as follows
At this point Gronwall’s Lemma (2.5) ensures that
Therefore
Since F, H are nondecreasing functions and \(\mu (\sigma )\le \left| \Omega \right| _{l}\) we have
The last inequality can be equivalently written as follows
where
It is easy to verify that
Therefore from (3.22) and (3.23) we get
which implies
Since
we conclude that
i.e. our claim (3.15). \(\square \)
4 The case \(f(x)=1\)
As already pointed out when f is constant the previous result can be considerable sharpened. In this short Section we provide the proof of Theorem (1.2). Here we will use the same notation of Sect. 3.
Let u and v the solutions of the problems (1.1) and (1.3) with \(f(x)=1\) a.e. in \(\Omega ,\) that is
and
Proof of Theorem 1.2
Note, firstly, that when \(f=1\) inequality (3.7) and equality (3.8) become
and
respectively. Multiplying (4.3) by t and then integrating over \((0,\tau )\), with \(\tau \ge v_{m}\), we get
The last inequality together with Lemma 3.2 with \(f=1\) yield
Again for the solution v of the symmetrized problem we have the equality sign
From (4.4) and (4.5) we immediately deduce that
An integration by parts ensures that
Our claim holds true, since, clearly, \(\phi (\tau )=\left| \Omega \right| _{l}\ge \mu (\tau )\) for all \(\tau \in \left[ 0,v_{m}\right] \). \(\square \)
5 A Faber-Krahn inequality
Consider the functional
Firstly note that F is well defined on \(H^{1}(\Omega ).\) Indeed, as well-known (see, e.g. [1]) \(L^{q}(\partial \Omega )\) is compactly embedded in \(H^{1}(\Omega )\) for any \(q\ge 1.\) Therefore, since \(0\in \Omega ,\) we have that \(\exists C=C(\Omega ,l):\)
Finally let us show that there exists a constant \(C=C(\Omega ,l)\) such that
Since the embedding of \(H^{1}(\Omega )\) in \(L^{p}(\Omega )\) is compact for any \(p\ge 1\) we have
where \(\dfrac{1}{p}+\dfrac{1}{q}=1\) and \(p,q>1.\) Now choose \(q=\widetilde{q} \in \left( 1,\dfrac{2}{\left| l\right| }\right) ,\) so that \( \left| l\right| q<2,\) and \(p=\widetilde{p}=\dfrac{\widetilde{q}}{ \widetilde{q}-1}\) in (5.2) we obtain
Incidentally note that the arguments above also show that \(H^{1}(\Omega )\) is compactly embedded in \(L^{2}(\Omega ;\left| x\right| ^{l}dx)\).
Now we can consider the problem
We claim that the infimum above is attained. To this aim let \(\left\{ u_{n}\right\} _{n\in \mathbb {N}}\) be a minimizing sequence. Without loss of generality we may assume that
Clearly such a sequence is bounded in \(H^{1}(\Omega ).\) Therefore, up to a subsequence, we have that there exists \(u\in H^{1}(\Omega )\) such that
with
Hence, using (5.3), (5.4) and the weak lower semicontinuity of the \(L^{2}-\)norm of the gradient we obtain our claim
Let \(\lambda _{1,l}(\Omega )\) denote the first eigenvalue of the problem
By the consideration above \(\lambda _{1,l}(\Omega )\) has the following variational characterization
Now we are in position to prove the weighted Faber-Krahn inequality (1.9), see also [20] and [5].
Proof of Theorem 1.3
Let \(u_{1}\) be an eigenfunction corresponding to \(\lambda _{1,l}(\Omega ),\) that is
Denoting by z the solution to
Inequality (1.5) gives
which, together with the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, implies
Multiplying equation (5.7) by z, integrating and taking into account of (5.8) we finally obtain
\(\square \)
References
Adams, R.: Sobolev Spaces. Elsevier, Oxford (2003)
Alvino, A., Chiacchio, F., Nitsch, C., Trombetti, C.: Sharp estimates for solutions to elliptic problems with mixed boundary conditions. J. Math. Pures Appl. 9(152), 251–261 (2021)
Alvino, A., Brock, F., Chiacchio, F., Mercaldo, A., Posteraro, M.R.: Some isoperimetric inequalities on \(\mathbb{R} ^{N}\) with respect to weights \(\left|x\right|^{\alpha }\). J. Math. Anal. Appl. 451(1), 280–318 (2017)
Alvino, A., Trombetti, G., Matarasso, S.: Elliptic boundary value problems: comparison results via symmetrization. Ricerche Mat. 51(2), 341–355 (2003)
Alvino, A., Nitsch, C., Trombetti, C.: A Talenti comparison result for solutions to elliptic problems with Robin boundary conditions, arXiv:1909.11950, to appear on Comm. Pure Applied Math
Bossel, M.H.: Membranes élastiquement liées: inhomogènes ou sur une surface: une nouvelle extension du théorè me isopérimétrique de Rayleigh-Faber-Krahn. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 39(5), 733–742 (1988)
Brandolini, B., Chiacchio, F., Trombetti, C.: Optimal lower bounds for eigenvalues of linear and nonlinear Neumann problems. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 145(1), 31–45 (2015)
Bucur, D., Ferone, V., Nitsch, C., Trombetti, C.: A sharp estimate for the first Robin-Laplacian eigenvalue with negative boundary parameter. Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Rend. Lincei Mat. Appl. 30(4), 665–676 (2019)
Bucur, D., Daners, D.: An alternative approach to the Faber-Krahn inequality for Robin problems. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 37, 75–86 (2010)
Bucur, D., Giacomini, A.: Faber-Krahn inequalities for the Robin-Laplacian: a free discontinuity approach. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 218, 757–824 (2015)
Bucur, D., Giacomini, A.: A variational approach to the isoperimetric inequality for the Robin eigenvalue problem. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 198, 927–961 (2010)
Chiacchio, F., Gavitone, N., Nitsch, C., Trombetti, C.: Sharp estimates for the Gaussian torsional rigidity with Robin boundary conditions. Potential Anal. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11118-022-09995-8
Chiba, N., Horiuchi, T.: On radial symmetry and its breaking in the Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities for \(p=1\). Math. J. Ibaraki Univ. 47, 49–63 (2015)
Chong, K. M., Rice, N. M.: Equimeasurable rearrangements of functions. Queen’s Papers Pure Appl. Math. No. 28. Queen’s University, Kingston, Ont., pp. 1–177, (1971)
Daners, D.: A Faber-Krahn inequality for Robin problems in any space dimension. Math. Ann. 333, 767–785 (2006)
Diaz, A., Harman, N., Howe, S., Thompson, D.: Isoperimetric problems in sectors with density. Adv. Geom. 12, 589–619 (2012)
Ferone, V., Nitsch, C., Trombetti, C.: On a conjectured reverse Faber-Krahn inequality for a Steklov-type Laplacian eigenvalue. Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 14(1), 63–82 (2015)
Freitas, P., Krejčiřík, D.: The first Robin eigenvalue with negative boundary parameter. Adv. Math. 280, 322–339 (2015)
Kawohl, B.: Rearrangements and convexity of level sets in PDE. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1150. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1985)
Kesavan, S.: Symmetrization & Applications. Series in Analysis, 3rd edn. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack (2006)
Kovařík, H.: On the lowest eigenvalue of Laplace operators with mixed boundary conditions. J. Geom. Anal. 24(3), 1509–1525 (2014)
Maderna, C., Salsa, S.: Symmetrization in Neumann problems. Appl. Anal. 9(4), 247–256 (1979)
Talenti, G.: Elliptic equations and rearrangements. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4) 3, 697–718 (1976)
Talenti, G.: The art of rearranging. Milan J. Math. 84(1), 105–157 (2016)
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the referee for carefully reading our manuscript and for providing constructive remarks.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. This work has been partially supported by Italian MIUR, through the research project PRIN 2017JPCAPN ‘Qualitative and quantitative aspects of nonlinear PDEs” and by Gruppo Nazionale per l’Analisi Matematica, la Probabilità e le loro Applicazioni (GNAMPA) of Istituto Nazionale di Alta Matematica (INdAM).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Alvino, A., Chiacchio, F., Nitsch, C. et al. Weighted symmetrization results for a problem with variable Robin parameter. Annali di Matematica 202, 2073–2089 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10231-023-01313-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10231-023-01313-2