Advertisement

Mine Water and the Environment

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 20–30 | Cite as

Biological Source Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage Using Microbial and Substrate Amendments: Microcosm Studies

  • Song Jin
  • Paul H. Fallgren
  • Jeffrey M. Morris
  • Ronald B. Gossard
Technical Article

Abstract

Microcosm studies in the laboratory demonstrate that sufficient dosages of wastewater effluent (microbial inoculum) and returned milk (substrate) can effectively raise the pH of pyrite-amended acid mine drainage water to circumneutral levels under aerobic conditions in as little as 7 days, and the pH remains at these levels for >19 months. Microbial analysis indicates that a complex biofilm (>70 species) forms over the pyrite. The biofilm dominantly consists of facultative anaerobes, which potentially interact with obligate anaerobes, such as sulfate-reducing Desulfosporosinus sp., to maintain an oxygen-free micro-environment surrounding the pyrite, even though the overlying water remains aerobic. The biofilm became established in water samples with an initial pH as low as 2, and subsequently caused the water pH to increase to circumneutral levels. Concurrently, concentrations of Al, As, Cu, Fe, Pb, Ni, and Zn all decreased substantially compared to baseline concentrations in the control microcosms.

Keywords

Pyrite Acid Mine Drainage Sulfate Reduce Bacterium Acidithiobacillus Ferrooxidans Pyrite Surface 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Terry Brown (Western Research Institute) for his technical advice, Dr. Amy Pruden (Colorado State University) for assistance in microbial analysis, and Jeff Cooper, Joel Mason, and Jesse Newcomer (Western Research Institute) for assistance with this project. This research was conducted and supported by Western Research Institute (WRI) and Kennecott Energy. Financial support was provided by the U.S. Dept of Energy (DoE) through Western Research Institute’s Cooperative Agreement DE-FC26-98FT40322 with DoE and Kennecott Energy. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed herein are those of the authors and do not reflect the view of the DoE or Kennecott Energy.

References

  1. Abou-Shanab RA, Delorme TT, Angle SJ, Chaney RL, van Berkum P, Ghozlan HA, Ghanem K, Moawad HA (2003) Molecular characterization and identification of nickel-resistance soil bacteria in the rhizosphere of Alyssum murale. Unpubl GenBank entry AY512827Google Scholar
  2. Adams DJ, Gardner KR, Davidson RA, Esplin DN, Pickett TM, Heyrend TT, Montgomery JR (1995) Biotechnology for pollution prevention in the mining industry. Presented at the North West Mining Association Open Industry Briefing, Spokane, WA, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batten KM, Scow KM (2003) Sediment microbial community composition and methylmercury pollution at four mercury mine-impacted sites. Microb Ecol 46:429–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Canty M (1998) Overview of the sulfate-reducing bacteria demonstration project under the Mine Waste Technology Program. Miner Process Extr Metall Rev 19:61–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlson L, Bigham JM, Schwertmann U, Kyek A, Wagner F (2002) Scavenging of As from acid mine drainage by schwertmannite and ferrihydrite: a comparison with synthetic analogues. Environ Sci Technol 36:1712–1719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang IS, Shin PK, Kim BH (2000) Biological treatment of acid mine drainage under sulphate-reducing conditions with solid waste materials as substrate. Water Res 34:1269–1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Characklis WG (1990) Laboratory biofilm reactors. In: Characklis WG, Marshall KC (eds) Biofilms. Wiley, New York, pp 55–89Google Scholar
  9. Christensen BE, Characklis WG (1990) Physical and chemical properties of biofilms. In: Characklis WG, Marshall KC (eds) Biofilms. Wiley, New York, pp 93–130Google Scholar
  10. Coulton R, Bullen C, Hallet C (2003) The design and optimization of active mine water treatment plants. Land Contam Reclamat 11:273–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doye I, Duchesne J (2005) Column leaching test to evaluate the use of alkaline industrial wastes to neutralize acid mine tailings. J Environ Eng 131:1221–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dvorak DH, Hedin RS, Edenborn HM, McIntire PE (1992) Treatment of metal-contaminated water using bacterial sulfate reduction: results from pilot scale reactors. Biotechnol Bioeng 40:609–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elliot P, Ragusa S, Catcheside D (1998) Growth of sulfate-reducing bacteria under acidic conditions in an anaerobic bioreactor as a treatment system for acid mine drainage. Water Res 32:3724–3730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elsetinow AR, Borda MJ, Schoonen MAA, Strongin DR (2003) Suppression of pyrite oxidation in acidic aqueous environments using lipids having two hydrophobic tails. Adv Environ Res 7:969–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fallgren P, Jin S (2005) Source control treatment of acid mine drainage utilizing sulfate-reducing bacteria. Presented at the Joint International Symp for Subsurface Microbiology (ISSM 2005) and Environmental Biogeochemistry (ISEB XVII), Jackson, WY, USAGoogle Scholar
  16. Gill JJ, Sabour PM, Gong JH, Yu H, Leslie KE, Griffiths MW (2006) Characterization of bacterial populations recovered from the teat canals of lactating dairy and beef cattle by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 56:471–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ingvorsen K, Nielsen MY, Joulian C (2003) Kinetics of bacterial sulfate reduction in an activated sludge plant. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 46:129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson DB, Dziurla M-A, Kolmert A, Hallberg KB (2002) The microbiology of acid mine drainage: genesis and biotreatment. S Afr J Sci 98:249–255Google Scholar
  19. Johnson DB, Hallberg KB (2005) Acid mine drainage remediation options: a review. Sci Total Environ 338:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jong T, Parry DL (2003) Removal of sulfate and heavy metals by sulfate reducing bacteria in short-term bench scale upflow anaerobic packed bed reactor runs. Water Res 37:3379–3389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Keeney DR, Nelson DW (1982) Nitrogen–inorganic forms. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis, part 2, chemical and microbiological properties-agronomy monograph, vol 9, 2nd edn. ASA-SSSA, Madison, pp 643–698Google Scholar
  22. Kim SD, Kilbme JJ, Cha DK (1999) Prevention of acid mine drainage by sulfate reducing bacteria: organic substrate addition to mine waste piles. Environ Eng Sci 16:139–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kjeldsen KU, Joulian C, Ingvorsen K (2004) Oxygen tolerance of sulfate-reducing bacteria in activated sludge. Environ Sci Technol 38:2038–2043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kleinmann RLP, Hedin RS, Nairn RW (1998) Treatment of mine drainage by anoxic limestone drains and constructed wetlands. In: Geller A, Klapper H, Salomons W (eds) Acidic mining lakes: acid mine drainage, limnology and reclamation. Springer, Berlin, pp 303–319Google Scholar
  25. Kusel KA, Roth U, Trinkwalter T, Peiffer S (2001) Effect of pH on the anaerobic microbial cycling on sulfur in mining-impacted freshwater lake sediments. Environ Exp Bot 46:213–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lens PN, de Poorter M-P, Cronenberg CC, Verstraete WH (1995) Sulfate reducing and methane producing bacteria in aerobic wastewater treatment systems. Water Res 29:871–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Levings CD, Barry KL, Grout JA, Piercey GE, Marsden AD, Coombs AP, Mossop B (2004) Effects of acid mine drainage on the estuarine food web, Britannia Beach, Howe Sound, British Columbia, Canada. Hydrobiologia 525:185–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lyew D, Knowles R, Sheppard J (1994) The biological treatment of acid mine drainage under continuous flow conditions in a reactor. Trans I Chem E 72(B):42–47Google Scholar
  29. Machemer SD, Wildeman TR (1992) Adsorption compared with sulfide precipitation as metal removal processes from acid mine drainage in a constructed wetland. J Contam Hydrol 9:115–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Manz W, Eisenbrecher M, Neu TR, Szewzyk U (1998) Abundance and spatial organization of Gram-negative sulfate-reducing bacteria in activated sludge investigated by in situ probing with specific 16S rRNA targeted oligonucleotides. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 25:43–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Muyzer G, Dewaal EC, Uitterlinden AG (1993) Profiling of complex microbial-populations by denaturing gradient gel-electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes-coding for 16s ribosomal-RNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:695–700Google Scholar
  32. Purohit HJ, Kapley A (2005) Microbial diversity in a UASB reactor treating wastewater from a CETP operating in high salinity. Unpubl GenBank entry DQ345944Google Scholar
  33. Schramm A, Santegoeds CM, Nielsen HK, Ploug H, Wagner M, Pribyl M, Wanner J, Amann R, de Beer D (1999) On the occurrence of anoxic microniches, denitrification, and sulfate reduction in aerated activated sludge. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:4189–4196Google Scholar
  34. Skousen J, Rose A, Geidel G, Foreman J, Evans R, Hellier W (1998) Handbook of technologies for avoidance and remediation of acid mine drainage. The National Mine Land Reclamation Center, Morgantown, 131 ppGoogle Scholar
  35. Tabak HH, Scharp R, Burckle J, Kawahara FK, Govind R (2003) Advances in biotreatment of acid mine drainage and biorecovery of metals: 1. Metal precipitation for recovery and recycle. Biodegradation 14:423–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tuttle JH, Dugan PR, Randles CI (1969) Microbial sulfate reduction and its potential as an acid mine water pollution abatement procedure. Appl Environ Microbiol 17:297–302Google Scholar
  37. Van Houten RT, Hulshoff Pol LW, Lettinga G (1994) Biological sulphate reduction using gas lift reactors fed with hydrogen and carbon dioxide as energy and carbon sources. Biotechnol Bioeng 44:586–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Webb JS, McGinness S, Lappin-Scott HM (1998) Metal removal by sulphate-reducing bacteria from natural and constructed wetlands. J Appl Microbiol 84:240–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ (1991) 16S Ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 173:697–703Google Scholar
  40. Zhang X, Borda MJ, Schoonen MAA, Strongin DR (2003a) Pyrite oxidation inhibition by a cross-linked lipid coating. Geochem Trans 4:8–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang X, Borda MJ, Schoonen MAA, Strongin DR (2003b) Adsorption of phospholipids on pyrite and their effect on surface oxidation. Langmuir 19:8787–8792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang X, Kendall TA, Hao J, Strongin DR, Schoonen MAA, Martin ST (2006) Physical structures of lipid layers on pyrite. Environ Sci Technol 40:1511–1515CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Song Jin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Paul H. Fallgren
    • 1
  • Jeffrey M. Morris
    • 1
  • Ronald B. Gossard
    • 3
  1. 1.Western Research InstituteLaramieUSA
  2. 2.Hefei University of TechnologyHefeiPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Rio Tinto Energy AmericaGilletteUSA

Personalised recommendations