Skip to main content
Log in

Horizontal gradient in fish assemblage structures in and around a seagrass habitat: some implications for seagrass habitat conservation

  • Full Paper
  • Published:
Ichthyological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Horizontal gradients in fish assemblage structures in and around a seagrass habitat were evaluated by visual observations. The assemblage structures clearly differed between open microhabitats lacking seagrass, i.e., nearby sand and the area adjoining the outer margin of the seagrass bed (referred to as “outer gap”), and microhabitats with seagrass within the overall seagrass bed, although not differing among the latter microhabitats, including both edge and core portions. Such open microhabitats were found to be not always inferior, but nearly equal to or even sometimes greatly superior in fish species’ diversity and/or abundance to the microhabitats with seagrass. In particular, the outer gap was always ranked first in total species’ number and had outstanding abundance in spring. Similar open microhabitats adjoining seagrass walls facing the sand patch within the seagrass bed (referred to as “inner gap”) in spring were also characterized by higher fish species and individual numbers. The 11 most abundant fishes showed four discrete distribution patterns (three recognized herein and one implied by precedent studies), such contributing to a horizontal gradient in the fish assemblage structure. While no fishes showed a preference for the edge or core of the seagrass bed, group-forming juveniles of several species favored gap microhabitats, suggesting that, in addition to the traditionally recognized edge and core microhabitats, the concept of gap microhabitats should be included in seagrass conservation ecology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson TW (1994) Role of macroalgal structure in the distribution and abundance of a temperate reef fish. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 113:279–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckley LE (1983) The ichthyofauna associated with Zostera capensis Setchell in the Swartkops estuary, South Africa. S Afr J Zool 18:15–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell SS, Brooks RA, Robbins BD, Fonseca MS, Hall MO (2001) Faunal response to fragmentation in seagrass habitats: implications for seagrass conservation. Biol Conserv 100:115–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly RM (1994) A comparison of fish assemblages from seagrass and unvegetated areas of a southern Australian estuary. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 45:1033–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly RM, Hindell JS (2006) Review of nekton patterns and ecological processes in seagrass landscapes. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 68:433–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgar GJ, Shaw C (1995) The production and trophic ecology of shallow-water fish assemblages in southern Australia, I. Species richness, size-structure and production of fishes in Western Port Victoria. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 194:53–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan WE, Cantrell RS, Cosner C (1999) How habitat edges change species interactions. Am Nat 153:165–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godin JGJ, Morgan M (1985) Predator avoidance and school size in a cypinidontid fish (Fundulus diaphanus, Lesueur). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:105–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godin JGJ, Classon LJ, Abrahams MV (1988) Group vigilance and shoal size in a small characin fish. Behaviour 104:29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris LA, Buckley B, Nixon SW, Allen BT (2004) Experimental studies of predation by bluefish Pomatomus saltatrix in varying densities of seagrass and macroalgae. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 281:233–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauxwell J, Cebriàn J, Valiela I (2003) Eelgrass Zostera marina loss in temperate estuaries: relationship to land-derived nitrogen loads and effect of light limitation imposed by algae. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 247:59–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holt SA, Kitting CL, Arnold CR (1983) Distribution of young red drums among different sea-grass meadows. Trans Am Fish Soc 112:267–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horinouchi M (2005) A comparison of fish assemblages from seagrass beds and the adjacent bare substrata in Lake Hamana, central Japan. Laguna 12:69–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Horinouchi M (2007a) Distribution patterns of benthic juvenile gobies in and around seagrass habitats: effectiveness of seagrass shelter against predators. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 72:657–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horinouchi M (2007b) Review of the effects of within-patch scale structural complexity on seagrass fishes. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 350:111–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horinouchi M, Sano M (1999) Effects of changes in seagrass shoot density and leaf height on abundances and distribution patterns of juveniles of three gobiid fishes in a Zostera marina bed. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 183:87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horinouchi M, Sano M (2000) Food habits of fishes in a Zostera marina bed at Aburatsubo, central Japan. Ichthyol Res 47:163–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horinouchi M, Sano M (2001) Effects of changes in seagrass shoot density and leaf height on the abundance of juveniles of Acentrogobius pflaumii in a Zostera marina bed. Ichthyol Res 48:179–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horinouchi M, Nakamura Y, Sano M (2005) Comparative analysis of visual censuses using different width strip-transects for a fish assemblage in a seagrass bed. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 65:53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kikuchi T (1974) Japanese contributions on consumer ecology in eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) bed, with special reference to trophic relationships and resources in fisheries. Aquaculture 4:145–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (1998) Ecological methodology, 2nd edn. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruuk H (1963) Diurnal periodicity in the activity of the common sole, Solea vulgaris. Neth J Sea Res 2:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurel BJ, Gregory RS, Brown JA (2003) Predator distribution and habitat patch area determined predation rates of Age 0 juvenile cod Gadus spp. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 251:245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill SE, Fairweather PG (1993) Single large or several small marine reserves? An experimental approach with seagrass fauna. J Biogeogr 20:429–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakabo T (2002) Fishes of Japan with pictorial keys to the species. English edition. Tokai University Press, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Orth RJ, Carruthers TJB, Dennison WC, Duarte CM, Fourqurean JW, Heck KL Jr, Hughes AR, Kendrick GA, Kenworthy WJ, Olyarnik S, Short FT, Waycott M, Williams SL (2006) A global crisis for seagrass ecosystems. Bioscience 56:987–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paton PWC (1994) The effect of edge on avian nest success: How strong is the evidence? Conserv Biol 8:17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher TJ, Parrish JK (1993) Functions of shoaling behaviour in teleosts. In: Pitcher TJ (ed) Behaviour of teleost fishes, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 363–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard DA (1984) A review of ecological studies on seagrass fish communities, with particular reference to recent studies in Australia. Aquat Bot 18:3–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation. A review. Conserv Biol 5:18–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savino JF, Stein RA (1982) Predator–prey interaction between largemouth bass and bluegills as influenced by simulated, submersed vegetation. Trans Am Fish Soc 111:255–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard SA, McComb AJ, Bulthius DA, Neverauska V, Steffensen DA, West R (1989) Decline of seagrasses. In: Larkum AWD, McComb AJ, Shepard SA (eds) Biology of seagrasses: a treatise on seagrass with special reference to the Australian Region. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 346–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Short F, Wyllie-Echeverria S (1996) Natural and human-induced disturbance of seagrasses. Environ Conserv 23:17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sogard SM (1989) Utilization by fishes of shallow, seagrass-covered banks in Florida Bay: 1 Species composition and spatial heterogeneity. Environ Biol Fish 24:53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhrin AV, Holmquist JG (2003) Effects of propeller scarring on macrofaunal use of the seagrass Thalassia testudinum. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 250:61–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ (1981) Techniques of analysis of variance in experimental marine biology and ecology. Ann Rev Ocean Mar Biol 19:513–605

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Masaaki Morisawa (University of Tokyo), Koji Akasaka (University of Tokyo), Minoru Sekimoto (University of Tokyo), Mamoru Sekifuji (University of Tokyo), Natsuko Sugii (University of Tokyo), and staff of the Misaki Marine Biological Station, University of Tokyo, for their general assistance in field work. I also thank the Moroiso Fishermen’s Union for their kind permission to dive in the study area. Constructive comments on the manuscript from Graham Hardy (Whangarei, New Zealand), Mitsuhiko Sano (University of Tokyo) and anonymous referees were much appreciated. This paper was supported by the Mikimoto Fund for Marine Ecology and Grants-in-aid for Young Scientists (B) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (no. 15780134).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masahiro Horinouchi.

About this article

Cite this article

Horinouchi, M. Horizontal gradient in fish assemblage structures in and around a seagrass habitat: some implications for seagrass habitat conservation. Ichthyol Res 56, 109–125 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-008-0070-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-008-0070-1

Keywords

Navigation