Advertisement

Ichthyological Research

, Volume 54, Issue 2, pp 145–159 | Cite as

Redescriptions of the Indo-Pacific atherinid fishes Atherinomorus forskalii, Atherinomorus lacunosus, and Atherinomorus pinguis

  • Seishi Kimura
  • Daniel Golani
  • Yukio Iwatsuki
  • Motohiko Tabuchi
  • Tetsuo Yoshino
Full paper

Abstract

The Indo-Pacific marine atherinid fishes Atherinomorus forskalii (Rüppell, 1838), Atherinomorus lacunosus (Forster, 1801), and Atherinomorus pinguis (Lacepède, 1803) are redescribed as valid species based on the types and non-type specimens collected throughout the Indo-Pacific. They are similar to each other chiefly in having a wide midlateral band (almost the same or greater than the midlateral scale width), large mouth (posterior tip of upper jaw reaching to or beyond a vertical through anterior margin of pupil), and no distinct tubercle at the posterior end of the dentary. All three species are distinguishable from congeners by those characters. The three species have long been confused with each other or synonymized erroneously as a single species. Atherinomorus forskalii, known from the Red Sea and eastern Mediterranean, differs from Atherinomorus lacunosus and Atherinomorus pinguis in having conspicuous, large endopterygoid teeth, forming obvious tooth ridges. Atherinomorus lacunosus, widely distributed in almost the entire Indo-Pacific, from East Africa to Tonga, north to southern Japan, and south to northern Australia, differs from Atherinomorus pinguis in having a wider midlateral band (the lower margin reaching to almost the center of the fourth scale row at level of the anal fin origin vs. the lower margin reaching to the ventral end of the third scale row in Atherinomorus pinguis) and more numerous midlateral scales (40–44 vs. 38–41 in Atherinomorus pinguis). Atherina morrisi Jordan and Starks, 1906, Hepsetia pinguis mineri Nichols and Roemhild, 1951, Pranesus capricornensis Woodland, 1961, Pranesus maculatus Taylor, 1964, and Pranesus pinguis ruppelli Smith, 1965, are regarded as junior synonyms of Atherinomorus lacunosus. Atherinomorus pinguis is also widely distributed in the Indo-West Pacific, from East Africa to northern Australia and north to southern Japan. Atherina pectoralis Valenciennes, 1835, is considered a junior synonym of Atherinomorus pinguis.

Key words

Atherinidae Indo-Pacific region Atherinomorus forskalii Atherinomorus lacunosus Atherinomorus pinguis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

Open image in new window

Atherinomorus forskalii. A Holotype, SMF 1898, 109 mm SL, from Jiddah, Saudi Arabia (Red Sea). B Non-type material, HUJ 5292, 113 mm SL, from Elat, Israel (Red Sea). (For a color version of this figure, see electronic supplementary material, Fig. S1)

Open image in new window

Atherinomorus lacunosus. A Holotype, MNHN A. 4400, 75 mm SL, from New Caledonia. B Holotype of Atherina morrisi, CAS-SU 9354, 102 mm SL, from Yaku I., Kagoshima, Japan. C Holotype of Hepsetia pinguis mineri, AMNH 19519, 79 mm SL, from Pago Pago, Samoa (photographed by T. Fukuhara). D Holotype of Pranesus capricornensis, QM I. 8201, 93 mm SL, from Heron I., Capricorn Group, Queensland, Australia. E Holotype of Pranesus maculatus, AMS IB.5238, 81 mm SL, from Gulf of Carpentaria, Northern Territory, Australia. F Holotype of Pranesus pinguis ruppelli, SMF 6856, 87 mm SL, from Jidda, Saudi Arabia. G Non-type material, FRLM 26461, 106 mm SL, from Bitung, North Sulawesi, Indonesia (fresh condition). (For a color version of this figure, see electronic supplementary material, Fig. S2)

Open image in new window

Atherinomorus pinguis. A Neotype, SAIAB 5682, 105 mm SL, from Mauritius. B Lectotype of Atherina pectoralis, MNHN A 4305, 103 mm SL, Mauritius. C Non-type material, FRLM 28706, 86 mm SL, from Libong I., Trang, Thailand (fresh condition). (For a color version of this figure, see electronic supplementary material, Fig. S3)

References

  1. Bennett, ET 1832Observations on a collection of fishes from the Mauritius, presented by Mr. Telfair, with characters of new genera and speciesProc Zool Soc Lond1830–1831165169Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, ET 1833Characters of two new species of fishes, from the Mauritius, presented by Mr. TelfairProc Zool Soc Lond1832184Google Scholar
  3. Blanc, M, Hureau, J-C 1971Catalogue critique des types de poissons du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle. (Suite) (Mugiliformes et Polynémiformes)Bull Mus Natl Hist Nat (Sér 3) Zool15673734Google Scholar
  4. Bleeker, P 1853Nieuwe tientallen diagnostische beschrijvingen van nieuwe of weinig bekende vischsoorten van SumatraNatuurkd Tijdschr Neder Indië5495534Google Scholar
  5. Bloch ME, Schneider JO (1801) M. E. Blochii, Systema Ichthyologiae iconibus cx illustratum. Post obitum auctoris opus inchoatum absolvit, correxit, interpolavit Jo. Gottlob Schneider Saxo. Berolini. Sumtibus Austoris Impressum et Bibliopolio Sanderiano Commissum, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  6. Bucciarelli, G, Golani, D, Bernardi, G 2002Genetic cryptic species as biological invaders: the case of a Lessepsian fish migrant, the hardyhead silverside Atherinomorus lacunosus J Exp Mar Biol Ecol273143149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cuvier, GL, Valenciennes, A 1835Histoire Naturelle des Poissons, vol 10Chez F.G. LevraultParisGoogle Scholar
  8. Dor, M 1984CLOFRES. Checklist of the fishes of the Red SeaIsrael Academy of Sciences and HumanitiesJerusalemGoogle Scholar
  9. Fowler, HW 1903Descriptions of new, little known, and typical AtherinidaeProc Acad Nat Sci Phila55727742Google Scholar
  10. Fricke R (1999) Fishes of the Mascarene Islands (Réunion, Mauritius, Rodriguez). An annotated checklist, with descriptions of new species. Koeltz, KönigsteinGoogle Scholar
  11. Golani, D, Orsi-Relini, L, Massuiti, E, Quignard, J-P 2002CIESM atlas of exotic species in the Mediterranean vol. 1. FishesCIESMMonacoGoogle Scholar
  12. Goren, M, Dor, M 1994An updated checklist of the fishes of the Red Sea. CRLOFRES IIIsrael Academy of Sciences and HumanitiesJerusalemGoogle Scholar
  13. Günther, A 1861Catalogue of the fishes in the British Museum, vol 3British MuseumLondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Günther, A 1876Andrew Garrett's Fische der Südsee, vol 2L Friederichsen & CoHamburgGoogle Scholar
  15. ICZN1999International code of zoological nomenclature, 4th ednThe International Trust for Zoological NomenclatureLondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Ivantsoff W (1984) Atherinidae. In: Fischer W, Bianchi G (eds) FAO species identification sheets for fishery purposes. Western Indian Ocean (fishing area 51), vol 2. FAO, Rome, pp “ATHER Ather 1” to “ATHER Ter 1”Google Scholar
  17. Ivantsoff, W 1986Family no. 111: AtherinidaeSmith, MMHeemstra, PC eds. Smiths' sea fishesJLB Smith Institute of IchthyologyGrahamstown381383Google Scholar
  18. Ivantsoff, W, Crowley, LELM 1991Review of the Australian silverside fishes of the genus Atherinomorus (Atherinidae)Aust J Mar Freshw Res42179505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ivantsoff, W, Crowley, LELM 2000Atherinidae. Silversides (or hardyheads)Carpenter, KENiem, VH eds. FAO species identification guide for fishery purposes. The living marine resources of the Western Central Pacific, vol 4FAORome21132139Google Scholar
  20. Jordan, DS, Hubbs, CL 1919A monographic review of the family of Atherinidae or silversides. Leland Stanford Junior University PublicationsUniversity Series. Stanford UniversityCaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  21. Jordan, DS, Starks, EC 1906List of fishes collected on Tanega and Yaku, offshore islands of southern Japan, by Robert Van Vleck Anderson, with descriptions of seven new speciesProc U S Natl Mus30695706Google Scholar
  22. Kimura, S 2005AtherinidaeMatsuura, KKimura, S eds. Fishes of Libong Island, west coast of southern ThailandOcean Research Institute, University of TokyoTokyo14Google Scholar
  23. Kimura, S, Peristiwady, P 2000AtherinidaeMatsuura, KSumadhiharga, OKTsukamoto, K eds. Field guide to Lombok Island: identification guide to marine organisms in seagrass beds of Lombok Island, IndonesiaOcean Research Institute, University of TokyoTokyo155157Google Scholar
  24. Kimura, S, Iwatsuki, Y, Yoshino, T 2001aRedescriptions of the Indo-West Pacific atherinid fishes, Atherinomorus endrachtensis (Quoy and Gaimard, 1825) and A. duodecimalis (Valenciennes in Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1835)Ichthyol Res48167177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kimura, S, Iwatsuki, Y, Yoshino, T 2001bValidity of the atherinid fish, Atherinomorus vaigiensis (Quoy and Gaimard, 1825), with comments on its synonymyIchthyol Res48379384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kimura, S, Iwatsuki, Y, Yoshino, T 2002A new silverside, Atherinomorus aetholepis sp. nov., from the West PacificIchthyol Res49240244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kimura, S, Peristiwady, P, Suharti, SR 2003AtherinidaeKimura, SMatsuura, K eds. Fishes of Bitung, northern tip of Sulawesi, Indonesia. Ocean Research InstituteUniversity of TokyoTokyo2425Google Scholar
  28. Klunzinger, CB 1870Synopsis der Fische des Rothen Meeres. I. Theil. Percoiden—MugiloidenVerh K-K Zool-Bot Ges Wien20669834Google Scholar
  29. Klunzinger, CB 1884Die Fische des Rothen Meeres. Eine kritische Revision mit Bestimmungstabellen. I. TeilAcanthopteri veri OwenE. Schweizerbart'sche VerlagshndlungStuttgartGoogle Scholar
  30. Lacepède, BGE 1803Histoire naturelle des poisons, vol 5PrassonParisGoogle Scholar
  31. Leviton, AE, Gibbs, RH,Jr, Heal, E, Dawson, CE 1985Standards in herpetology and ichthyology. Part 1. Standard symbolic codes for institutional resource collections in herpetology and ichthyologyCopeia1985802832Google Scholar
  32. Nichols, JT, Roemhild, J 1951A form of the silverside, Hepsetia pinguis (Lacepède), from SamoaMar Life Occas Papers15557Google Scholar
  33. Quoy JRC, Gaimard JP (1824–1825) Chapter IX. Description des Poissons. In: de Freycinet L (ed) Voyage autour du Monde … exécuté sur les corvettes de L. M. “L'Uranie” et “La Physicienne,” pendant les années 1817, 1818, 1819 et 1820, vol 3. Pillet Aîné, Paris, pp 192–401, pls 43–65Google Scholar
  34. Rüppell E (1835–1838) Neue Wirbelthiere zu der Fauna von Abyssinien gehörig, entdeckt und beschrieben. Fische des Rothen Meeres. Commission bei Siegmund Schmerber, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  35. Schultz, LP, Herald, ES, Lachner, EA, Welander, AD, Woods, LP 1953Fishes of the Marshall and Marianas islands, vol I. Families from Asymmetrontidae through SiganidaeBull US Natl Mus No. 20211685Google Scholar
  36. Smith, JLB 1965Fishes of the family Atherinidae of the Red Sea and the western Indian Ocean with a new freshwater genus and species from MadagascarIchthyol Bull31601632Google Scholar
  37. Taylor, WR 1964Fishes of Arnhem LandRec American-Australian Sci Exp Arnhem Land445307Google Scholar
  38. Weber, M 1913Die Fische der Siboga-ExpeditionE. J. BrillLeidenGoogle Scholar
  39. Whitehead, PJP, Ivantsoff, W 1983Atherina lacunosa and the fishes described by J. R. ForsterJpn J Ichthyol29355364Google Scholar
  40. Woodland, DJ 1961Description of a new species of Pranesus (Atherinidae: Pisces) from the Capricorn group, Great Barrier ReefPac Sci15540541Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ichthyological Society of Japan 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seishi Kimura
    • 1
  • Daniel Golani
    • 2
  • Yukio Iwatsuki
    • 3
  • Motohiko Tabuchi
    • 4
  • Tetsuo Yoshino
    • 4
  1. 1.Fisheries Research LaboratoryMie UniversityMieJapan
  2. 2.Department of Evolution, Systematics and Ecologythe Hebrew University of JerusalemIsrael
  3. 3.Division of Fisheries Sciences, Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of MiyazakiMiyazakiJapan
  4. 4.Department of Marine Sciences, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of the RyukyusOkinawaJapan

Personalised recommendations