Abstract
In recent years, an increasing number of studies have examined the association between mathematical abilities and executive functions (EFs). However, it remains unknown via which mechanisms’ mathematical performance is associated with EFs. The current study examined the associations of overall task proficiency, strategy selection, and strategy execution when solving multi-step subtraction problems with three EFs (i.e., updating, inhibition, and shifting). With a choice/no-choice design, 150 fifth-graders’ (Mage = 10 years, 11 months) direct subtraction (DS; e.g., 712 − 346 = ?; 712 − 300 = 412, 412 − 40 = 372, and 372 − 6 = 366) and subtraction by addition (SBA; e.g., 712 − 346 = ?; 346 + 54 = 400, 400 + 300 = 700, 700 + 12 = 712, and 54 + 300 + 12 = 366) use to solve multi-step subtractions was examined. Participants were offered ten subtractions in one choice condition (free choice between DS and SBA), based on which we obtained data about task proficiency and strategy selection, and in two no-choice conditions (mandatory use of either DS or SBA), which were used to examine strategy execution. The results showed that task proficiency in the choice condition was associated with updating and inhibition but not with shifting. Furthermore, strategy selection was associated with updating but not with inhibition and shifting. Strategy execution was associated with updating but not with inhibition and shifting. The inclusion of separate strategy selection and execution parameters helped to unravel how arithmetic performance and EFs are associated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ai, J., Yang, J., Zhang, T., Si, J., & Liu, Y. (2017). The effect of central executive load on fourth and sixth graders ’ use of arithmetic strategies. Psychologica Belgica, 57(2), 154–172. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.360
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1994). Developments in the concept of working memory. Neuropsychology, 8(4), 485–493. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.8.4.485
Best, J. R., Miller, P. H., & Jones, L. L. (2009). Executive functions after age 5: Changes and correlates. Developmental Review, 29(3), 180–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.05.002
Blöte, A. W., Klein, A. S., & Beishuizen, M. (2000). Mental computation and conceptual understanding. Learning and Instruction, 10(3), 221–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00028-6
Brown, R. R., & Partington, J. E. (1942). The intelligence of the narcotic drug addict. Journal of General Psychology, 27, 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1942.10544722
Bull, R., & Scerif, G. (2001). Executive functioning as a predictor of children’s mathematics ability. Developmental Neuropsychology, 19(3), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326942DN1903_3
Cockcroft, W. H. (1982). Mathematics counts. HM Stationery Office.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge Academic.
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. https://www.thecorestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/Math_Standards1.pdf
Coolen, I., Merkley, R., Ansari, D., Dove, E., Dowker, A., Mills, A., Murphy, V., von Spreckelsen, M., & Scerif, G. (2021). Domain-general and domain-specific influences on emerging numerical cognition: Contrasting uni-and bidirectional prediction models. Cognition, 215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104816
Cragg, L., & Gilmore, C. (2014). Skills underlying mathematics: The role of executive function in the development of mathematics proficiency. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 3(2), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2013.12.001
Eaves, J., Gilmore, C., & Attridge, N. (2021). Conceptual knowledge of the associativity principle: A review of the literature and an agenda for future research. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 23, 100152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2021.100152
Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203267
Gilmore, C., Keeble, S., Richardson, S., & Cragg, L. (2015). The role of cognitive inhibition in different components of arithmetic. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 47(5), 771–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0659-y
Green, H. J., Lemaire, P., & Dufau, S. (2007). Eye movement correlates of younger and older adults’ strategies for complex addition. Acta Psychologica, 125(3), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.08.001
Imbo, I., & Vandierendonck, A. (2007). The development of strategy use in elementary school children: Working memory and individual differences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96(4), 284–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2006.09.001
JASP Team. (2020). JASP (Version 0.11.1)[Computer software].
Lemaire, P., & Lecacheur, M. (2011). Age-related changes in children’s executive functions and strategy selection: A study in computational estimation. Cognitive Development, 26(3), 282–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2011.01.002
Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
Monsell, S. (1996). Control of mental processes. In V. Bruce (Ed.), Unsolved mysteries of the mind: Tutorial essays in cognition (pp. 93–148). Erlbaum.
Nemeth, L., Werker, K., Arend, J., & Lipowsky, F. (2021). Fostering the acquisition of subtraction strategies with interleaved practice: An intervention study with German third graders. Learning and Instruction, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101354
Nigg, J. T. (2000). On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 220–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.220
Pelegrina, S., Lechuga, M. T., García-Madruga, J. A., Elosúa, M. R., Macizo, P., Carreiras, M., Fuentes, L. J., & Bajo, M. T. (2015). Normative data on the n-back task for children and young adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01544
Raghubar, K. P., Barnes, M. A., & Hecht, S. A. (2010). Working memory and mathematics: A review of developmental, individual difference, and cognitive approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.005
Robinson, K. M. (2001). The validity of verbal reports in children’s subtraction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.211
Rodríguez-Nieto, G., Seer, C., Sidlauskaite, J., Vleugels, L., van Roy, A., Hardwick, R., & Swinnen, S. (2022). Inhibition, shifting and updating: Inter and intra-domain commonalities and differences from an executive functions activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. NeuroImage, 264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119665
Sala, G., & Gobet, F. (2017). Working memory training in typically developing children: A meta-analysis of the available evidence. Developmental Psychology, 53(4), 671–685. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000265
Selter, C. (2001). Addition and subtraction of three-digit numbers: German elementary children’s success, methods and strategies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(2), 145–173. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014521221809
Siegler, R. S., & Lemaire, P. (1997). Older and younger adults’ strategy choices in multiplication: Testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.126.1.71
Spiegel, J. A., Goodrich, J. M., Morris, B. M., Osborne, C. M., & Lonigan, C. J. (2021). Relations between executive functions and academic outcomes in elementary school children: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 147(4), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000322
Torbeyns, J., Ghesquière, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Efficiency and flexibility of indirect addition in the domain of multi-digit subtraction. Learning and Instruction, 19(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.12.002
Torbeyns, J., Peters, G., De Smedt, B., Ghesquière, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2018). Subtraction by addition strategy use in children of varying mathematical achievement level: A choice/no-choice study. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 4(1), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v4i1.77
Torbeyns, J., Verschaffel, L., & Ghesquière, P. (2004). Strategic aspects of simple addition and subtraction: The influence of mathematical ability. Learning and Instruction, 14(2), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.01.003
Van Der Auwera, S., De Smedt, B., Torbeyns, J., Verguts, G., & Verschaffel, L. (2023). Subtraction by addition in young multi-digit subtraction learners: A choice/no-choice study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105544
Van Der Auwera, S., Torbeyns, J., De Smedt, B., Verguts, G., & Verschaffel, L. (2022). The remarkably frequent, efficient, and adaptive use of the subtraction by addition strategy: A choice/no-choice study in fourth- to sixth-graders with varying mathematical achievement levels. Learning and Individual Differences, 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102107
van der Ven, S. H. G. (2011). The structure of executive functions and relations with early math learning [Utrecht University]. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/205822
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Lucas Caers and Cato Vandamme for their assistance in the data collection.
Funding
This research was supported by grant G0C7217N “Subtraction by addition. A most efficient strategy for solving symbolic subtraction problems?” from the Research Foundation – Flanders.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interest statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Stijn Van Der Auwera. KU Leuven, Parenting and Special Education Research Unit, Leopold Vanderkelenstraat 32, Box 3765, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. E-mail: stijn.vanderauwera@kuleuven.be.
Current themes of research:
Children’s arithmetic strategy selection and execution. Executive functions. Mathematical conceptual knowledge.
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Van Der Auwera, S., Torbeyns, J., De Smedt, B., Verguts, G., & Verschaffel, L. (2022). The remarkably frequent, efficient, and adaptive use of the subtraction by addition strategy: A choice/no-choice study in fourth- to sixth-graders with varying mathematical achievement levels. Learning and Individual Differences, 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102107.
Van Der Auwera, S., De Smedt, B., Torbeyns, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2022). Adults’ use of subtraction by addition and its association with executive functions. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 8(3), 351–366.https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.7271.
Van Der Auwera, S., De Smedt, B., Torbeyns, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2023). Children’s subtraction by addition strategy use and their subtraction-related conceptual knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10276-3.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Van Der Auwera, S., De Smedt, B., Torbeyns, J. et al. How are children’s strategy selection and execution related to their executive functions? A choice/no-choice study in multi-step arithmetic. Eur J Psychol Educ 39, 2701–2717 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-024-00889-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-024-00889-4


