European Journal of Psychology of Education

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 463–481 | Cite as

Children with multiple stays at refuges for abused women and their experiences of teacher recognition

  • Sabreen SelvikEmail author
  • Arild Raaheim
  • Carolina Øverlien


Numerous children around the world are forced to make multiple moves with their mothers in and out of refuges for abused women. Each time, they experience a sudden upheaval of their familiar environment. For these children, domestic violence and flight from violence is not an isolated event but part of their upbringing. Few statistics and little research exist on their living conditions and experiences. This article adopts the children’s perspective, examining the ways their teachers recognize their situation and offer them support. Experiences were collected in qualitative interviews with 20 children of ages 6–16 residing at Norwegian refuges. The choice of “mutual recognition” (Schibbye 2009) as a theoretical framework was inductively generated from the data. The constructivist grounded theory coding system was implemented as a data analysis method (Charmaz 2014). The analysis produced five different forms of teacher recognition—formal, practical, third-party, forced, and coincidental—through which teachers offered children various forms of support.


Recognition Domestic violence School Teacher Children 



Thanks to Erik Skaalvik for guiding comments. Special thanks to Anne Solberg for her great support and constructive comments on different versions of this article. Thanks to Extrastiftelsen for funding this research (Grant number: 2012/2/0246).


  1. Aarhuus, M.F. (2013). Skolerådgiverens Kompetanse i Møte med eElever i Krise [School Counsellor’s Expertise in Meeting with Pupils in Crisis]. Master thesis in Education. Department of Education: University in Bergen.Google Scholar
  2. Alistic, E. (2012). Teachers’ perspectives on providing support to children after trauma: a qualitative study. School Psychology Quarterly, 27(1), 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alisic, E., Bus, M., Dulack, W., Pennings, L., & Splinter, J. (2012). Brief report: teachers’ experiences supporting children after traumatic exposure. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 25, 98–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Almqvist, K., & Broberg, A. (2004). Barn som bevittnat våld mot mamma—En studie om kvinnor og barn som vistas på kvinnojourer i Göteborg [Children who experience violence against their mothers—a study of women and children living at Refuges in Göteborg]. Göteborg: Göteborgs stad, Lundby.Google Scholar
  5. Bae, B. (2012). Children and teachers as partners in communication: focus on spacious and narrow interactional patterns. International Journal of Early Childhood, 44(1), 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bancroft, L., Silverman, J. G., & Ritchie, D. (2011). The batterer as parent: addressing the impact of domestic violence on family dynamics. Los Angeles: Sage publications.Google Scholar
  7. Berg, B. (2013). Når ungdom som bor på krisesenter skal tilbake på skolen: En kvalitativ studie av ungdoms opplevelse av å vende tilbake til skolen etter at de har flyttet til et krisesenter [“When children living at shelters go back to school”: a qualitative study of children’s experiences of returning to school after moving to a shelter]. Master thesis. Faculty of Education: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  8. Buckley, H., Holt, S., & Whelan, S. (2007). Listen to me! Children’s experiences of domestic violence. Child Abuse Review, 16(5), 296–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buland, T., Mathiesen I.H., Aaslid, B.E., Haugsbakken, H., Bungum, B., Mordal, S. (2011). På vei mot framtida—men i ulik fart? En sluttrapport fra evalueringen av skolens rådgivning [Towards the future—but at different speeds? A final report from an evaluation of school counselling]. Trondheim: SINTEF Teknologi og samfunn.Google Scholar
  10. Byrne, D., & Taylor, B. (2007). Children at risk from domestic violence and their educational attainment: perspectives of education welfare officers, social workers and teachers. Child Care in Practice, 13(3), 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cater, Å. K., & Øverlien, C. (2013). Children exposed to domestic violence: a discussion about research ethics and researchers’ responsibilities. Nordic Social Work Research, 4(1), 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chanmugam, A. (2009). Perspectives of young adolescent and mother dyads residing in family violence shelters: a qualitative study using life story methods. Doctoral dissertation. University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
  13. Chanmugam, A., & Teasley, M. L. (2014). What should school social workers know about children exposed to adult intimate partner violence? National Association of Social Workers. doi: 10.1093/cs/cdu023.Google Scholar
  14. Chanmugam, A., Kemter, A. J., & Goodwin, K. H. (2015). Educational services for children in domestic violence shelters: perspectives of shelter personnel. Child Adolescence Social Work Journal. doi: 10.1007/s10560-015-0380-x.Google Scholar
  15. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analyses. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  17. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. USA: Sage publications.Google Scholar
  18. Danielsen, A. G., Samdal, O., Hetland, J., & Wold, B. (2009). School-related social support and students’ perceived life satisfaction. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 303–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Danielsen, A. G., Wiium, N., Wilhelmsen, B. U., & Wold, B. (2010). Perceived support provided by teachers and classmates and students’ self-reported academic initiative. Journal of School Psychology, 48(3), 247–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davis, M. (1996). Empathy: a social psychological approach. Madison: Brown and Benchmark Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Drugli, M. B. (2012). Relasjonen Mellom Lærer og Elev—Avgjørende for Elevens Læring og Trivsel [The relationship between teacher and pupil—crucial for pupils’ learning and well-being]. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.Google Scholar
  22. Dyregrov, K. (2006). Skolens viktige rolle etter selvmord. Ny forskning om unge etterlattes ønsker om hjelp og støtte [The school’s important role after suicide. New research on youth survivors’ wishes about help and support]. Bedre Skole [A Better School], (1), 46–51.Google Scholar
  23. Dyregrov, A. (2008). Beredskapsplan for Skolen [Emergency-plan for the school]. Bergen: Fagbokforlatet.Google Scholar
  24. Dyregrov, A. (2010). Supporting traumatized children and teenagers: a guide to providing understanding and help. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Elevorganisasjon [Pupil organization]. (2012). Guide til elevsamtalen: klient eller kollega? [Guide to student conversation, client or colleague?]. Accessed in 05.06.2015 from:
  26. Federici, R. A. & Skaalvik, E. M. (2013). Lærer-elev-relasjonen—betydning for elevens motivasjon for læring [Teacher-student relationship—the meaning of the pupil’s motivation for learning]. Bedre Skole [A Better School], (1), 58–63.Google Scholar
  27. Finkelhor, D., Turner, H. A., Shattuck, A., & Hamby, S. L. (2015). Prevalence of childhood exposure to violence, crime, and abuse: results from the national survey of children’s expousre to violence. JAMA Pediatrics. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0676.Google Scholar
  28. Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (1996). Playing with reality: 1. Theory of mind and normal development of psychic reality. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 72, 217–233.Google Scholar
  29. Fonagy, P., Steele, H., Steele, M., Moran, G., & Higgitt, A. (1991). The capacity for understanding mental states: the reflective self in parent and child and its significance for security of attachment. Infant Mental Health Journal of Psychoanalysis, 13, 200–217.Google Scholar
  30. Frederick, J., & Goddard, C. (2010). ‘School was just a nightmare’: childhood abuse and neglect and school experiences. Child & Family Social Work, 15(1), 22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gudmundsen, A.K. (2014). Den største gaven jeg kan gi mine elever, er at jeg ser, hører og forstår dem: Lærerens rolleforståelse av krisehåndtering innenfor en pedagogisk kontekst [The greatest gift I can give my students is that I see, hear and understand them: The teacher’s role understanding of crisis management within an educational context]. Master thesis. Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Teacher Education: Universitetet i Tromsø.Google Scholar
  32. Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2008). Can instructional and emotional support in the first‐grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure? Child Development, 76(5), 949–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hegel, G. W. F., & Wood, A. W. (1991). Hegel: Elements of the philosophy of right. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hester, M., Pearson, C., Harwin, N., & Abrahams, H. (2007). Making an impact: children and domestic violence. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. Hoffman, M. L. (1982). Development of prosocial motivation: empathy and guilt. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), The development of prosocial behaviour (pp. 281–313). New York: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hogan, F., & O’Reilly, M. (2007). Listening to children: children’s stories of domestic violence. Dublin: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  37. Honneth, A. (2005). The struggle for recognition: the moral grammar of social conflicts. UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  38. Hughes, J. N. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and school adjustment: progress and remaining challenges. Attachment & Human Development, 14, 319–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hutchby, I. (2005). Children’s talk and social competence. Children and Society, 19(1), 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hutchby, I. & Moran-Ellis, J. (1998). Children and social competence. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  41. Hydén, M. (2014). The teller-focused interview: interviewing as a relational practice. Qualitative Social Work, 13, 795–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Idøse, C. (2013). Children who have witnessed or experienced domestic violence. What is the teachers’ knowledge about the consequences of domestic violence, and what kind of actions can be made to help these children? Master thesis in special needs education. University in Stavanger.Google Scholar
  43. James, A., Jenks, C., & Prout, A. (1998). Theorizing childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  44. Justice-and Emergency Affairs Department [Justis – og beredskapsdepartementet]. (2013). Et liv uten vold [A life without violence]. Handlingsplan mot vold i nære relasjoner [Actionplan against domestic violence], 2014–2017. Justis – og beredskapsdepartementet Norway.Google Scholar
  45. Koutselini, M., & Valanidou, F. (2014). Children living with violence against their mothers: the side effects on their behaviour, self-image and school performance. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 22(2), 213–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. New York: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  47. Malecki, C. K., & Demaray, M. K. (2003). What type of support do they need? Investigating student adjustment as related to emotional, informational, appraisal, and instrumental support. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(3), 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Markell, P. (2003). Bound by recognition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  49. McColl, A. (2005). Domestic violence and schools: What school officials can do. In School law bulletin. School of Government, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  50. McKee, B.E. (2009). Closed doors, open minds. Belfast: Sociodrama Script.Google Scholar
  51. McKee, B.E., Holt, S. (2012). Domestic abuse – using arts-based education to help student teachers learn about the context and impact on children. In SCoTENS Annual Report (Chapter 3). Cavan.Google Scholar
  52. Møller, L. (2012). Anerkjennelse i Praksis: Om Utviklingsstøttende Relasjoner [Recognition in practice: on developing supportive relations]. Oslo: Kommuneforlaget.Google Scholar
  53. Mullender, A. (2004). Tackling domestic violence: providing support for children who have witnessed domestic violence. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  54. Mullender, A., Hauge, G., Imam, U., Kelly, L., Malos, E., & Regan, L. (2002). Children’s perspectives on domestic violence. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  55. Natland, S., Rasmussen, M. (2012). Jeg var ganske usynlig- : sju ungdommer om sine grunner for å avbryte videregående utdanning [“I was quite unnoticeable”: seven youths about their reasons for interrupting secondary education]. Fontene Forskning [Fontene Research], 1, 4–18.Google Scholar
  56. Norges offentlige utredning (NOU) [Official Norwegian Report]. (2003). Retten Til Liv Uten Vold. Menns Vold Mot Kvinner i Nærrelasjoner [Right to life without violence. Men’s violence against women in close relationships]. Oslo: Justice and the Police Department.Google Scholar
  57. Ollis, D. (2014). The role of teachers in delivering education about respectful relationships: exploring teacher and student perspectives. Heath Education Research, 29(4), 702–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Øverlien, C. (2012). Vold i Hjemmet—Barns Strategier [Domestic violence—children’s strategies]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  59. Øverlien, C. (2015). Ungdom, vold og overgrep—skolen som forebyggende og hjelper [Youth, violence andabuse—school as a preventer and helper]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  60. Øverlien, C., Holen Moen, L. (2016). «Takk for at du spør!» En Oppfølgingsstudie om Kunnskap om Fysiske og Seksuelle Overgrep mot Barn, Samtalemetodikk og FNs Konvensjon om Barnets Rettigheter Blant Blivende Barnevernspedagoger, Grunnskolelærere og Førskolelærere [Thank you for asking!: a follow-up study of competency in the areas of physical and sexual violence against children, conversation methodology, and the United Nations convention on the rights of the child among students training to be child are workers, elementary school teachers and preschool teachers]. Oslo: NKVTS.Google Scholar
  61. Øverlien, C., Jacobsen, M., & Evang, A. (2009). Barns Erfaringer fra Livet på Krisesenter: En Landsomfattende Studie om Flukten, Oppholdet og Forestillinger om Fremtiden [Children’s experiences of life at the refuge: a nationwide study about fleeing home, the refuge stay, and beliefs about the future]. Oslo: NKVTS.Google Scholar
  62. Radford and Hester (2015). More than a mirage? Safe contact for children and young people who have been exposed to domestic violence. In N., Stanley, and C., Humphryes (Eds.), Domestic violence and protecting children: knew thinking and approaches (pp. 112–129). London & Philidalphia: Jessica Kingsley publishers.Google Scholar
  63. Raundalen M., & Schultz, J. H. (2006). Krisepedagogikk–hjelp til barn og unge i krise [Crises Educaion – Help to children and Youngsters in Crises]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  64. Reddy, R., Rhodes, J. E., & Mulhall, P. (2003). The influence of teacher support on student adjustment in the middle school years: a latent growth curve study. Development and Psychopathology, 15(01), 119–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rogers, C. (1951). Client-centered therapy. Boston: Houghton-Miffin.Google Scholar
  66. Sakiz, G., Pape, S. J., & Hoy, A. W. (2012). Does perceived teacher affective support matter for middle school students in mathematics classrooms? Journal of School Psychology, 50(2), 235–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schelbe, L., Chanmugam, A., Moses, T., Saltzburg, S., Williams, L. R., & Letendre, J. (2015). Youth participation in qualitative research: challenges and possibilities. Qualitative Social Work, 14(4), 504–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schibbye, A. L. L. (1996). Anerkjennelse—en terapeutisk intervensjon? [Recognition—a therapeutical intervention?] Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening. Journal of Norwegian Association for Psychologists, 33, 530–537.Google Scholar
  69. Schibbye, A. L. L. (2002). En Dialektisk Relasjonsforståelse—i Psykoterapi med Individ, Par og Familie [A Dialectical understanding of relationships—in psychotherapy with individuals, couples and families]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  70. Schibbye, A.-L. (2003). Å bli kjent med seg selv og den andre [To be familier with oneselve and others]. In A. J. W. Andersen & B. Karlsson (Eds.), Psykiatri i endring—Forståelse og Perspektiv på Klinisk Arbeid [Psychiatry in change—understanding and perspective on clinical work] (pp. 163–183). Gjøvik: Gyldendal Akademisk.Google Scholar
  71. Schibbye, A.L. L. (2009). Relationer. Et Dialektisk Perspektiv på Eksistensiell og Psykodynamisk Psykoterapi, 2. utgave [Relationships. A dialectical perspective on existential and psychodynamic psychotherapy, 2nd ed.]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  72. Selvik, S., & Øverlien, C. (2014). Children with multiple stays at Nordic refuges for abused women: conclusions, challenges, and causes for concern. Nordic Social Work Research, ahead-of-print, 1–15.Google Scholar
  73. Solberg, A. (2014). Reflections on interviewing children living in difficult circumstances: courage, caution and co-production. International Journal of Research Methodology. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2012.729788.Google Scholar
  74. Stafford, A., Stead, J., & Grimes, M. (2008). The support needs of children young people who have to move because of domestic abuse. Edinburgh: Scottish Women’s aid.Google Scholar
  75. Stanley, N., Miller, P., & Richardson Foster, H. (2012). Engaging with children’s and parents’ perspectives on domestic violence. Child & Family Social Work, 17(2), 192–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sterne, A., Poole, L., Chadwick, D., Lawler, C., & Dodd, L. W. (2010). Domestic violence and children: a handbook for schools and early years settings. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  77. Sunde, E., & Raaheim, A. (2009). Jeg hadde en dårlig lærer—En undersøkelse av skoleerfaringer blant mannlige arbeidstakere med kort utdanning [“I had a bad teacher”—an examination of school experiences among male workers with limited formal education]. Norsk Pedagogisk Tidsskrift. Journal of Norwegian Education, 93(5), 356–367.Google Scholar
  78. Swan, P., & Riley, P. (2012). “Mentalization”: a tool to measure teacher empathy in primary school teachers. Australian association for research in education (NJ1). Accessed 25 February 2016.
  79. Utdanningsdirektoratet [Education Directorate]. (2013). Læringsmiljø [Learning environment]. Accessed in 21.03.2014 from:
  80. Wang, R. (2014). «Det Følger jo Ingen Bruksanvisning med Barna…»: En Kvalitativ Studie av Lærerens Opplevelse av Egen Rolle i Møte med Barn som har Opplevd Vold og Bor på Krisesenter [Children don’t come with a manual …: a qualitative study of how teachers perceive their role in encounters with children who have experienced violence and live in shelters]. Masters thesis in psychosocial work, suicide, drugs, violence and traumatic stress. Instittute for clinical medicine. University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  81. Young, H. L., Mancuso, A. F., Faherty, E., Dorman, S. A., & Umbrell, J. R. (2008). Helping child victims of family violence through school personnel: an evaluation of a training program. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 16(2), 144–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisboa, Portugal and Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sabreen Selvik
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Arild Raaheim
    • 2
  • Carolina Øverlien
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies (NKVTS)OsloNorway
  2. 2.Department of EducationUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
  3. 3.Department of Social WorkStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations