European Journal of Psychology of Education

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 61–77 | Cite as

Doctoral students’ experiences leading to completion or attrition: a matter of sense, progress and distress

  • Christelle DevosEmail author
  • Gentiane Boudrenghien
  • Nicolas Van der Linden
  • Assaad Azzi
  • Mariane Frenay
  • Benoit Galand
  • Olivier Klein


A central trend in qualitative studies investigating doctoral students’ dropout is to stress the importance of students’ integration and socialisation in their working environment. Yet, few of these studies actually compared the experiences of doctoral students who completed or quit their PhD. In order to overcome this limitation and identify the factors that differentiate these two groups, the present study interviewed 21 former doctoral students: 8 completers and 13 non-completers. The results show that what best differentiates these two groups of participants is the extent to which they feel that they are moving forward, without experiencing too much distress, on a research project that makes sense to them. We assume that this set of factors is central in the dropout process. Support from doctoral peers was found to play a positive role overall but did not contribute to differentiating the two groups, presumably because peers have a limited impact on dissertation progress. Supervisors’ support was central to the participants’ stories; it is thus assumed to play a role in the process, but this role is complex and needs further investigation. These results call for a stronger consideration of the doctoral task itself when investigating the process of persistence and attrition and for a more integrated framework that considers jointly both task- and environment-related aspects.


PhD Doctoral Attrition Dropout Motivation Emotions Supervisor Peers 


Compliance with ethical standard


This study was funded by the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (F.R.S.—FNRS) (grant number F.R.F.C. 2.4609.12)


  1. Bair, C. R., & Haworth, J. G. (2004). Doctoral student attrition and persistence: a meta-synthesis of research. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 19, pp. 481–534). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baird, L. L. (1995). Helping graduate students: A graduate adviser’s view. In A. S. Pruitt-Logan & P. D. Isaac (Eds.), Student services for the changing graduate student population. New Directions for Student Services, 72 (pp. 25–32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, B. J., & Austin, A. E. (2009). The role of doctoral advisors: a look at advising from the advisor’s perspective. Innovative Higher Education, 33, 297–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bayley, J. G., Ellis, J. B., Abreu-Ellis, C., & O’Reilly, E. K. (2012). Rocky road or clear sailing? Recent graduates’ recollections and reflections of the doctoral journey. Brock Education, 21(2), 88–102.Google Scholar
  5. Bell-Ellison, B. A., & Dedrick, R. F. (2008). What do doctoral students value in their ideal mentor? Research in Higher Education, 49(6), 555–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanchet, A., & Gotman, A. (2010). L’entretien - L’enquête et ses méthodes (2èmeth ed.). Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  7. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burnette, J. L., O’Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Mind-sets matter: a meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychology Bulletin, 139(3), 655–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cantwell, R., Bourke, S., Scevak, J., Holbrook, A., & Budd, J. (2015). Doctoral candidates as learners: a study of individual differences in responses to learning and its management. In Studies in Higher Education (pp. 1–18).Google Scholar
  11. Carver, C. S. (2004). Self-regulation of action and affect. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of Self-regulation. Research, Theory, and Applications (pp. 13–39). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  12. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Castro, V., Garcia, E. E., Cavazos, J., & Castro, A. Y. (2011). The road to doctoral success and beyond. The International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 6, 51–77.Google Scholar
  14. Cotterall, S. (2013). More than just a brain: emotions and the doctoral experience. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(2), 174–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: the psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. De Ridder, D. T. D., & De Wit, J. B. F. (2006). Self-regulation in health behaviour: concepts, theories, and central issues. In D. T. D. De Ridder & J. B. F. De Wit (Eds.), Self-regulation in health behaviour (pp. 1–23). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Devos, C., Van der Linden, N., Boudrenghien, G., Azzi, A., Frenay, M., Galand, B., & Klein, O. (2015). Doctoral supervision in the light of the three types of support promoted in self-determination theory. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 438–464.Google Scholar
  19. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92.Google Scholar
  21. Ferrer de Valero, Y. (2001). Departmental factors affecting time-to-degree and completion rates of doctoral students at one land-grant research institution. The Journal of Higher Education, 72(3), 341–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gardner, S. K. (2009). Student and faculty attributions of attrition in high and low-completing U.S. doctoral programs. Higher Education, 58, 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gardner, S. K. (2010). Contrasting the socialization experiences of doctoral students in high- and low- completing departments: a qualitative analysis of disciplinary contexts at one institution. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(1), 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gardner, S. K., Jansujwicz, J., Hutchins, K., Cline, B., & Levesque, V. (2012). Interdisciplinary doctoral student socialization. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 377–394.Google Scholar
  25. Gilgun, J. F. (2005). Qualitative research and family psychology. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(1), 40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Girves, J. E., & Wemmerus, V. (1988). Developing models of graduate student degree progress. Journal of Higher Education, 59, 163–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Golde, C. M. (1998). Beginning graduate school: explaining first-year doctoral attrition. New Directions for Higher Education, 101, 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Golde, C. M. (2000). Should I stay or should I go? Student descriptions of the doctoral attrition process. The Review of Higher Education, 23(2), 199–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Golde, C. M. (2005). The role of the department and discipline in doctoral student attrition: lessons from four departments. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(6), 669–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gopaul, B. (2014). Inequality and doctoral education: exploring the “rules” of doctoral study through Bourdieu’s notion of field. Higher Education (pp. 1–16).Google Scholar
  31. Griffin, C. (2004). The advantages and limitation of qualitative research in psychology and education. Scientific Annals of the Psychological Society of Northern Greece, 2, 3–15.Google Scholar
  32. Grunschel, C., Patrzek, J., & Fries, S. (2013). Exploring reasons and consequences of academic procrastination: an interview study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(3), 841–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A., & Krapp, A. (2004). Interest, a motivational variable that combines affective and cognitive functioning. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 89–115). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  34. Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ivankova, N., & Stick, S. (2007). Students’ persistence in a distributed doctoral program in educational leadership in higher education: a mixed methods study. Research in Higher Education, 48(1), 93–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ives, G., & Rowley, G. (2005). Supervisor selection or allocation and continuity of supervision: Ph.D. students’ progress and outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 30(5), 535–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jairam, D., & Kahl, D. H., Jr. (2012). Navigating the doctoral experience: the role of social support in successful degree completion. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 311–329.Google Scholar
  38. Jones, M. (2013). Issues in doctoral studies—forty years of journal discussion: where have we been and where are we going? International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 8, 83–104.Google Scholar
  39. Kamtsios, S., & Karagiannopoulou, E. (2013). Conceptualizing students’ academic hardiness dimensions: a qualitative study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28, 807–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kiley, M. (2009). Identifying threshold concepts and proposing strategies to support doctoral candidates. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(3), 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lavigne, G., Vallerand, R., & Miquelon, P. (2007). A motivational model of persistence in science education: a self-determination theory approach. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(3), 351–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Leclerc-Olive, M. (1997). Le dire de l’évènement (biographique). [Telling (biographical) events]. In Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar
  43. Litalien, D. (2014). Persévérance aux études de doctorat (Ph.D.): modèle prédictif des intentions d’N-C [Persisting in the PhD: A model predicting intention to quit] (Doctoral dissertation). Université Laval, Québec, Canada. Retrieved March 25, 2015 from
  44. Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: the causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  45. Martinsuo, M., & Turkulainen, V. (2011). Personal commitment, support and progress in doctoral studies. Studies in Higher Education, 36(1), 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mazzola, J. J., Walker, E. J., Shockley, K. M., & Spector, P. E. (2011). Examining stress in graduate assistants: combining qualitative and quantitative survey methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(3), 198–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McAlpine, L., & McKinnon, M. (2013). Supervision—the most variable of variables: student perspectives. Studies in Continuing Education, 35(3), 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McLellan, E., MacQueen, K. M., & Neidig, J. L. (2003). Beyond the qualitative interview: data preparation and transcription. Field Methods, 15(1), 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Meijer, P. C., De Graaf, B., & Meirink, J. A. (2011). Key experiences in student teachers’ development. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 17, 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nutov, L., & Hazzan, O. (2011). Feeling the doctorate: is a doctoral research that studies the emotional labor of doctoral students possible? The International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 6, 019–032.Google Scholar
  51. Oliver, D., Serovich, J. M., & Mason, T. L. (2005). Constraints and opportunities with interview transcription: towards reflective practice in HIV/AIDS intervention research. Social Forces, 84(2), 1273–1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Paglis, L. L., Green, S. G., & Bauer, T. N. (2006). Does adviser mentoring add value? A longitudinal study of mentoring and doctoral student outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 47(4), 451–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pyhältö, K., & Keskinen, J. (2012). Doctoral students’ sense of relational agency in their scholarly communities. International Journal of Higher Education, 1(2), 136–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pyhältö, K., Vekkaila, J., & Keskinen, J. (2012). Exploring the fit between doctoral students’ and supervisors’ perceptions of resources and challenges vis-à-vis the doctoral journey. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 395–414.Google Scholar
  55. Richards, L. (1999). Using NVivo in qualitative research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  56. Schutz, P. A., & Zembylas, M. (2009). Advances in teacher emotion research: the impact on teachers’ lives. New York, NY: Springer Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Spaulding, L. S., & Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J. (2012). Hearing their Voices: factors doctoral candidates attribute to their persistence. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 199–219.Google Scholar
  58. Stubb, J., Pyhältö, K., & Lonka, K. (2012). The experienced meaning of working with a PhD thesis. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(4), 439–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: rethinking causes and cures of student attrition (2dth ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  60. Urdan, T., Solek, M., & Schoenfelder, E. (2007). Students’ perceptions of family influences on their academic motivation: a qualitative analysis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(1), 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vekkaila, J., Pyhältö, K., Hakkarainen, K., Keskinen, J., & Lonka, K. (2012). Doctoral students’ key learning experiences in the natural sciences. International Journal for Researcher Development, 3(2), 154–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vekkaila, J., Pyhältö, K., & Lonka, K. (2013). Experiences of disengagement—a study of doctoral students in the behavioural sciences. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 8, 61–81.Google Scholar
  64. Visser, M. S., Luwel, M., & Moed, H. F. (2007). Attainment of doctoral degrees at Flemish universities: a survival analysis. Higher Education, 54, 741–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wao, H. O., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2011). A mixed research investigation of factors related to time to the doctorate in education. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 6, 115–134.Google Scholar
  66. Weidman, J. C., & Stein, E. L. (2003). Socialization of doctoral students to academic norms. Research in Higher Education, 44(6), 641–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. White, J., & Nonnamaker, J. (2008). Belonging and mattering. How science doctoral students experience community. NASPA Journal, 45(3), 350–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Willig, C. (2001). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: adventures in theory and method. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Willis, B., & Carmichael, K. D. (2011). The lived experience of late-stage doctoral student attrition in counselor education. The Qualitative Report, 16(1), 192–207.Google Scholar
  70. Wright, T., & Cochrane, R. (2000). Factors influencing successful submission of Ph.D. theses. Studies in Higher Education, 25(2), 181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zhou, J. (2014). International students’ motivation to pursue and complete a Ph.D. in the U.S. Higher Education (pp. 1–15).Google Scholar
  72. Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: an overview. Educational Psychologist, 25, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisboa, Portugal and Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christelle Devos
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gentiane Boudrenghien
    • 1
  • Nicolas Van der Linden
    • 2
  • Assaad Azzi
    • 2
  • Mariane Frenay
    • 1
  • Benoit Galand
    • 1
  • Olivier Klein
    • 2
  1. 1.Université catholique de LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium
  2. 2.Université Libre de BruxellesBruxellesBelgium

Personalised recommendations