Abstract
Research on students’ adoption of course-specific approaches to learning in parallel courses is limited and inconsistent. This study investigated second-semester psychology students’ levels of deep, surface and strategic approaches in two courses running in parallel within a real-life university setting. The results showed significant differences in course-specific adoption regardless of approach. However, the strategic approach seemed more stable. Sub-groups of students exhibited substantial variation: more than half of the students adopted similar approaches in both courses while large minorities showed great variability. Students scoring low on the surface approach, high on the deep approach or high on the strategic approach to learning were flexible in adopting different parallel approaches. However, students scoring high on the surface approach, low on the deep approach or low on the strategic approach seemed stable across contexts. This suggests that even smaller variations in teaching and learning environments can influence students’ approaches to learning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andreou, E., Vlachos, F., & Andreou, G. (2006). Approaches to studying among Greek university students: the impact of gender, age, academic discipline and handedness. Educational Research, 48(3), 301–311. doi:10.1080/00131880600992363.
Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 243–260. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001.
Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Diseth, Å. (2001). Validation of a Norwegian version of the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST): application of structural equation modelling. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45(4), 381–394. doi:10.1080/00313830120096789.
Eley, M. G. (1992). Differential adoption of study approaches within individual students. Higher Education, 23(3), 231–254.
Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 325–345. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0003-0.
Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (2013). The disposition to understand for oneself at university: integrating learning processes with motivation and metacognition. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 267–279. doi:10.1111/bjep.12010.
Entwistle, N. J., McCune, V., & Tait, H. (2013). Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST). Report of the development and use of the inventories. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260291730_Approaches_and_Study_Skills_Inventory_for_Students_%28ASSIST%29_%28incorporating_the_Revised_Approaches_to_Studying_Inventory_-_RASI%29?ev=prf_pub. Accessed 16 June 2014.
Entwistle, N. J., & Peterson, E. R. (2004). Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: relationships with study behaviour and influences of learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(6), 407–428. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2005.08.009.
Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
Entwistle, N. J., Tait, H., & McCune, V. (2000). Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 33–48.
Gijbels, D., Segers, M., & Struyf, E. (2008). Constructivist learning environments and the (im)possibility to change students’ perceptions of assessment demands and approaches to learning. Instructional Science, 36(5–6), 431–443. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9064-7.
Gijbels, D., Van de Watering, G., Dochy, F., & Van den Bossche, P. (2005). The relationship between students’ approaches to learning and the assessment of learning outcomes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20(4), 327–341.
Jones, C. (2002). Biggs’s 3P model of learning: the role of personal characteristics and environmental influences on approaches to learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation; Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Parpala, A., & Postareff, L. (2014). Challenges in analysing change in students’ approaches to learning. In D. Gijbels, V. Donche, J. T. E. Richardson, & J. Vermunt (Eds.), Learning patterns in higher education: dimensions and research perspectives (pp. 232–248). Abingdon: Routledge.
Lowyck, J., Elen, J., & Clarebout, G. (2004). Instructional conceptions: analysis from an instructional design perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(6), 429–444. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2005.08.010.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976a). On qualitative differences in learning. I. Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976b). On qualitative differences in learning. II. Outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115–127.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1997). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. J. Hounsell, & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (2nd ed., pp. 39–58). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic.
Nijhuis, J., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. (2008). The extent of variability in learning strategies and students’ perceptions of the learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 121–134. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.009.
Parpala, A., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Komulainen, E., Litmanen, T., & Hirsto, L. (2010). Students’ approaches to learning and their experiences of the teaching-learning environment in different disciplines. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 269–282. doi:10.1348/000709909X476946.
Richardson, J. T. E. (2004). Methodological issues in questionnaire-based research on student learning in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 347–358. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0004-z.
Scouller, K. M. (1998). The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35, 453–472.
Struyven, K., Dochy, F., Janssens, S., & Gielen, S. (2006). On the dynamics of students’ approaches to learning: the effects of the teaching/learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 16(4), 279–294. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.001.
Tait, H., Entwistle, N. J., & McCune, V. (1998). ASSIST: a reconceptualisation of the approaches to studying inventory. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving students as learners. Oxford: The Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford Brookes University.
Vanthournout, G., Donche, V., Gijbels, D., & Van Petegem, P. (2014). (Dis)similarities in research on learning approaches and learning patterns. In D. Gijbels, V. Donche, J. T. E. Richardson, & J. Vermunt (Eds.), Learning patterns in higher education: dimensions and research perspectives (pp. 11–32). Abingdon: Routledge.
Vermetten, Y. J., Lodewijks, H. G., & Vermunt, J. D. (1999). Consistency and variability of learning strategies in different university courses. Higher Education, 37(1), 1–21.
Wilson, K., & Fowler, J. (2005). Assessing the impact of learning environments on students’ approaches to learning: comparing conventional and action learning designs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(1), 87–101. doi:10.1080/0260293042000251770.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Maria Öhrstedt (PhD student). Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail: maria.ohrstedt@psychology.su.se
Current themes of research:
My research investigates conditions for teaching and learning, mainly within higher education. This involves the interplay between students’ personal factors and the educational context as well as students’ meta-cognitive strategies and learning outcomes.
Relevant conference presentations in the field of Educational Psychology:
Öhrstedt, M. & Lindfors, P. (2014). Students’ approaches to learning across the transition between psychology courses. Oral presentation at the EARLI SIG Higher Education, Leuven, Belgium, 20–22 August.
Öhrstedt, M. & Scheja, M. (2013) Expressing approaches to psychology studies in higher education. Oral presentation at the European Congress of Psychology, Stockholm, Sweden, 10–12 July.
Petra Lindfors (Professor). Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Current themes of research:
My research investigates how various factors at different levels relate to psychobiological mechanisms, stress, health and well-being in adults and adolescents. My research also covers teaching and learning within higher education, interventions and positive psychology. I am on the Board of the Swedish Society of Behavioral Medicine, member of the Stockholm Stress Center steering committee and Deputy Head of the Division of Work and Organizational Psychology and involved in the International Society of Behavioral Medicine.
Relevant publication in the field of Educational Psychology:
Lindfors, P., Hultell, D., Rudman, A., Gustavsson, J. P. (2014). Change and stability in subjective well-being over the transition from higher education to employment. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 188–93. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.043.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Öhrstedt, M., Lindfors, P. Students’ adoption of course-specific approaches to learning in two parallel courses. Eur J Psychol Educ 31, 209–223 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0256-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0256-7