Abstract
Children’s motivations to engage in everyday activities draw on their experiences in thinking of oneself and the activities. In theory, these personal and social realities provide the complex foundations of self-concepts. The aim of this project was to define the foundations of children’s self-concepts about everyday activities; to focus on everyday activities of literacy and numeracy. Participants were 8- to 12-year-old girls and boys, in a pilot study (N = 16), correlational models of identities (N = 297) and comparative contexts (N = 42), and experimental evidence (N = 82). The pilot study validated materials, and Study 1 confirmed a perceptual base for self-concepts. Results of Study 2 highlighted a range of comparative contexts, and Study 3 confirmed personal and social bases of children’s self-concepts. In this situation, foundations of self-concepts cover identities (as a sense of individuality and belonging) and self-categorizations, in thinking about stability of skills and abilities over time, and in relation to children the same age. These ideas are readily applied to identities and arrays of self-categorizations in other situations. In conclusion, a personal and social theory of self-concepts extends contemporary Motivational Spiral Models that relate self-concepts to task strategies, skills, feelings and participation. Outcomes suggest foundations for differential interventions motivating children to participate in everyday activities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACER. (2003). TORCH test of reading comprehension, 2nd edn. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research. http://www.acer.edu.au.
ACER. (2007). Progressive achievement test–Mathematics PAT–Maths. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research. http://www.acer.edu.au.
Albert, S. (1977). Temporal comparison theory. Psychological Review, 84(6), 485–503.
Archambault, I., Eccles, J. S., & Vida, M. N. (2010). Ability self-concepts and subjective value in literacy: joint trajectories from grades 1 through 12. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 804–816.
Asgari, S., Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2012). When do counterstereotypic ingroup members inspire versus deflate? The effect of successful professional women on young women’s leadership self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(3), 370–383.
Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80–114.
Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., Onatsu-Arvilommi, T., & Nurmi, J. (2002). Three methods for studying developmental change: A case of reading skills and self concept. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 343–364.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2006). Socio economic indices for areas. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service. http://www.abs.gov.au.
Bennett, M., & Sani, F. (2008). Children’s subjective identification with social groups: a self-stereotyping approach. Developmental Science, 11(1), 69–75.
Bergh, R., Akrami, N., & Ekehammar, B. (2012). The compatibility of personality and social identity processes: the effect of gender identity on neuroticism. European Journal of Personality, 26, 175–181.
Bong, M. (2001). Between- and within-domain relations of academic motivation among middle and high school students: self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 23–34.
Bornholt, L. J. (1997). Aspects of self knowledge about activities with young children. Every Child, 3, 8–9.
Bornholt, L. J. (2000a). The gendered nature of competence: specific and general aspects of self knowledge in social contexts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 350–370.
Bornholt, L. J. (2000b). Social and personal aspects of self knowledge: a balance of individuality and belonging. Learning & Instruction, 10, 415–429.
Bornholt, L. J. (2001). Self-concepts, usefulness and behavioural intentions in the social context of schooling. Educational Psychology, 21, 67–78.
Bornholt, L. J. (2004). Enhancing reading self concepts that ‘feed forward’ to improve task choices for children with reading difficulties. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 9, 25–27.
Bornholt, L. J. (2005a). ASK-KIDS self concept inventory. Test and test manual. Melbourne: ACER Press.
Bornholt, L. J. (2005b). Aspects of self knowledge ASK about activities: an integrated model of self concepts. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 156–164.
Bornholt, L. J. (2005c). Response of motivation spiral models (MSM) to context: developing children’s motivation in reading, movement and social activities. Australian Journal of Psychology, 57, 157.
Bornholt, L. J., & Cooney, G. H. (1993). Social comparisons and students perceptions of their own achievement. Australian Journal of Education, 37, 69–76.
Bornholt, L. J., & Ingram, A. (2001). Personal and social identity in children’s self-concepts about drawing. Educational Psychology, 21(2), 151–167.
Bornholt, L. J., & Piccolo, A. (2005). Individuality, belonging and children’s self concepts: a learning spiral model of self evaluation, performance and participation in physical activities. Applied Psychology An International Review, 54, 516–537.
Bornholt, L. J., Gientzotis, J., & Cooney, G. H. (2004). Understanding choice behaviours: pathways from school to university — changing aspirations and opportunities. Social Psychology of Education, 7, 211–228.
Bornholt, L. J., Maras, P. F., & Robinson, R. A. (2009). ‘I am — we are’: personal and social pathways to further study, work and family life. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 12(3), 345–359.
Brake, N. A., & Bornholt, L. J. (2004). Personal and social bases of children’s self-concepts about physical movement. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98, 711–724.
Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: on being the same and different at the same time. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482.
Chen, S.-K., Hwang, F.-M., Yeh, Y.-C., & Lin, S. S. J. (2011). Cognitive ability, academic achievement and academic self-concept: extending the internal/external frame of reference model. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 308–326.
Coleman, C., & Bornholt, L. J. (2003). Reading self concepts and task choices for children with reading difficulties. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 8, 24–31.
Conway, M., & Ross, M. (1984). Getting what you want by revising what you had. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(4), 738–748.
Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585–609.
Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., & Blumfield, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s self and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830–847.
Fisher, L. J. (2013a) Motivational spiral models (MSM): Common and distinct features of developing motivations in diverse contexts. Springer Plus, 2, 565. www.springerplus.com/content/2/1/565.
Fisher, L. J. (2013b) Motivated Planned Pathways to study, work and family life: Personal, relational and social motivations in socio-economic contexts. [under review].
Fisher, L. J., Spencer, F. H., & Ouvrier, R. A. (2010). SYSTEMS-R cognitive screening for children. Sydney, Australia: Watervale Systems.
Fisher, L. J., Möller, J., & Köller, O. (2013). Content and peer comparisons for core and peripheral components: Skills and self concepts about literacy and numeracy. Research papers on Development & Diversity (vol. II, pp. 5–23). Sydney: Watervale Systems.
Guthrie, J., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 403–425). Oxford: Routledge.
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & You, W. (2012). Instructional contexts for engagement and achievement in reading. In S. L. Chistenson et al. (Eds.) Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 601–634). Springer Science+Business Media.
Harter, S. (1986). Cognitive-developmental processes in the integration of concepts about emotions and the self. Social Cognition, 4, 119–151.
Hattie, J. (1992). Self concept. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Hattie, J. (2002, August). Why is it so difficult to enhance self-concept in the classroom?: The power of feedback in the self-concept-achievement relationship. Keynote address, Self Centre Conference in Sydney, Australia.
Hoyle, R. H. (2011). Structural equation modelling for social and personality psychology. London: Sage Publications.
Kirsch, I., de Jong, J., Lafontaine, D., McQueen, J., Mendelovits, J., & Monseur, C. (2002). Reading for change. Performance and engagement across countries. Results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD.
Kline, P. (2000). The handbook of psychological testing (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Latrofa, M., Vaes, J., Cadinu, M., & Carnaghi, A. (2010). The cognitive representation of self-stereotyping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(7), 911–922.
Maras, P. (2007). ‘But no one in my family has been to university’: aiming higher: school students’ attitudes to higher education. Australian Educational Researcher, 34(4), 69–90.
Marsh, H. W. (1990). Influences of internal and external frames of reference on the formation of Math and English self-concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 107–116.
Marsh, H. W., Debus, R., & Bornholt, L. J. (2005). Validating young children’s self-concept responses: methodological ways and means to understand their responses. In D. M. Teti (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in developmental psychology (pp. 138–160). Oxford: Blackwell.
McGee, R., Prior, M., Williams, S., Smart, D., & Sanson, A. (2002). The long-term significance of teacher-rated hyperactivity and reading ability in childhood: findings from two longitudinal studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 1004–1017.
Möller, J., & Köller, O. (2001). Dimensional comparisons: an experimental approach to the internal/external frame of reference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 826–835.
Möller, J., Streblow, B., Pohlmann, B., & Köller, O. (2006). An extension to the internal/ external frame of reference model to two verbal and numerical domains. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21(4), 467–487.
Möller, J., Retelsdorf, J., Köller, O., & Marsh, H. W. (2011). The reciprocal internal/external frame of reference model: an integration of models of relations between academic achievement and self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 1315–1346.
Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Social stereotyping and social reality. Oxford: Blackwell.
Onorato, R. S., & Turner, J. C. (2004). Fluidity in the self-concept: the shift from personal to social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 257–278.
Ouvrier, R. A., Hendy, J., Bornholt, L. J., & Black, F. H. (1999). SYSTEMS: School-years screening test for evaluation of mental status. Journal of Child Neurology, 14, 772–780.
Pohlmann, B., & Möller, J. (2009). On the benefit of dimensional comparisons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 248–258.
Prior, M. (1994). Reading disability in Australian children. Australian Journal of Remedial Education, 26, 3–7.
Prior, M., Bavin, M., & Ong, B. (2011). Predictors of school readiness in five- to six-year-old children from an Australian longitudinal community sample. Educational Psychology, 31(1), 3–16.
Reynolds, K. J., & Oakes, P. J. (2000). Variability in impression formation: Investigating the role of motivation, capacity and the categorization process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(3), 355–373.
Russell, L., Bornholt, L., & Ouvrier, R. (2002). Brief cognitive screening and self concepts for children with low intellectual functioning. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41, 93–104.
Senn, N. (2012). Effective approaches to motivate and engage reluctant boys in literacy. Reading Teacher, 66(3), 211–220.
Simpkins, S. D., Fredericks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Charting the Eccles’ expectancy-value model from mothers’ beliefs in childhood to youths’ activities in adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 48(4), 1019–1032.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Rankin, R. J. (1995). A test of the internal/external frame of reference model at different levels of math and verbal self-perception. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 161–184.
Smart, D., Prior, M., Sanson, A., & Oberkaid, F. (2001). Children with reading difficulties: a six-year follow-up from early primary school to secondary school. Australian Journal of Psychology, 53, 45–53.
Spencer, F. H., & Bornholt, L. J. (2003). A model of children’s cognitive functioning and cognitive self-concepts. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 8, 4–9.
Stipek, D. (1993). Motivation to learn (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Tajfel, H. (1982). The social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39.
Tanti, C., Stukas, A. A., Halloran, M. J., & Foddy, M. (2011). Social identity change: shifts in social identity during adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 34(3), 555–567.
Turner, J. C. (1987). Rediscovering the social group A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Wilson, A. E., & Ross, M. (2000). The frequency of temporal-self and social comparisons in people’s personal appraisals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 928–942.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thanks the children, their parents and guardians, and school staff for their co-operation; to Ian Fisher, Fiona Spencer, Jens Möller, and Alison Elliott for support and advice; and Kathryn Timmis, Adrienne Whitby, Leilah Nelson, Peter Tong, Carol Pearce, Marijana Vurmeska, Jodie Gaven, Lucy Chimarides, Matthew Drury, and David Glen for the research assistance. Partial funding for this project was from an Australian Research Council Insititutional Grant and a seed grant from the University of Sydney.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Dr. Laurel Fisher. Watervale Systems, PO Box 318 Potts Point, NSW 1335 Australia
Current themes of research:
Self concepts in motivation include motivational spiral models (MSM) that relate self concepts, positive and negative feelings, skills, strategies, and participation. The role of identities in diverse contexts cover a sense of individuality, belonging, place, and spirituality that provide foundations for health and well-being. Brief, meaningful assessment materials are useful tools in community, clinical, health, and educational settings
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Fisher, L. J. (2013). Motivated spiral models (MSM): Common and distinct motivation in context. SpringerPlus, 2, 565. http://www.springerplus.com/content/2/1/565
Fisher, L. J., & Spencer, F. H. (2013). Children’s social behaviour for learning (SBL): Extending observations of social behaviour (under review).
Bornholt, L. J., Robinson, R. A., & Maras, P. F. (2009). ‘I am — we are’: Personal and social pathways to further study, work and family life, Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 12(3), 345–359.
Bornholt, L., Brake, N., Thomas, S., Madden, S., Clarke, S., Anderson, G. & Kohn, M. (2005). Understanding affective and cognitive self evaluations about the body for adolescent girls, British Journal of Health Psychology, 10, 1–10
Bornholt, L. J., Ajersch, S., Fisher, I. H., Markham, R. H., & Ouvrier, R. A. (2010). Cognitive screening for children and adolescents: General limits or ceiling effects? Journal of Child Neurology, 25, 567–571.
Bornholt, L. J., & Wilson, R. (2007). A mediated model of aspects of self knowledge (M-ASK). Applied Psychology. An International Review, 56, 302–318.
Bornholt, L. J. (2005). ASK-KIDS inventory for children. Melbourne: ACER Press. http://www.acer.edu.au
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fisher, L. Foundations of children’s self-concepts about everyday activities: Identities and comparative contexts. Eur J Psychol Educ 29, 537–555 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-014-0212-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-014-0212-y