European Journal of Psychology of Education

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 81–100 | Cite as

High self-control predicts more positive emotions, better engagement, and higher achievement in school



The control-value theory of academic emotions has emerged as a useful framework for studying the antecedents and consequences of different emotions in school. This framework focuses on the role of control-related and value-related appraisals as proximal antecedents of emotions. In this study, we take an individual differences approach to examine academic emotions and investigate how trait self-control is related to students’ experience of academic emotions. We posited a model wherein trait self-control predicted academic emotions which in turn predicted engagement and perceived academic achievement. Filipino university students answered relevant questionnaires. Results indicated that self-control positively predicted positive academic emotions (enjoyment, hope, and pride) and negatively predicted negative emotions (anger, anxiety, shame, hopelessness, and boredom). Academic emotions, in turn, had a significant impact on engagement, disaffection, and perceived achievement. Implications for exploring synergies between research on trait self-control and the control-value theory of academic emotions are discussed.


Self-control Academic emotions Achievement emotions Engagement Disaffection Control-value theory Filipino students 


  1. Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archambault, I., Janosz, M. J., Fallu, J. S., & Pagani, L. S. (2009). Student engagement and its relationship with early high school dropout. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 651–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (1999). Predictive validity of the theory of planned behaviour: The role of questionnaire format and social desirability. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 9, 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartels, J. M., & Magun-Jackson, S. (2009). Approach-avoidance motivation and metacognitive self-regulation: The role of need for achievement and fear of failure. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 459–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumeister, R. F., Heatherton, T. F., & Tice, D. M. (1994). Losing control: How and why people fail at self-regulation. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Baumeister, R. F., Gailliot, M., DeWall, C. N., & Oaten, M. (2006). Self-regulation and personality: How interventions increase regulatory success, and how depletion moderates the effects of traits on behavior. Journal of Personality, 74, 1773–1801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 351–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bembenutty, H. (1999). Sustaining motivation and academic goals: The role of academic delay of gratification. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 233–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bembenutty, H., & Karabenick, S. A. (1998). Academic delay of gratification. Learning and Individual Differences, 10, 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bembenutty, H., & Karabenick, S. A. (2004). Inherent association between academic delay of gratification, future time perspective, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bernardo, A. B. I. (2008). Exploring epistemological beliefs of bilingual Filipino preservice teachers in the Filipino and English languages. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 142, 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bertrams, A., & Dickhauser, O. (2009). High-school students’ need for cognition, self-control capacity, and school achievement: Testing a mediation hypothesis. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 135–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bertrams, A., Englert, C., & Dickhauser, O. (2010). Self-control strength in the relation between trait test anxiety and state anxiety. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 738–741. Google Scholar
  14. Blair, C., & Diamond, A. (2008). Biological processes in prevention and intervention: The promotion of self-regulation as a means of preventing school failure. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 899–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boekaerts, M. (1993). Anger in relation to school learning. Learning and Instruction, 3, 269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. (1990). Direct and indirect effects: Classical and bootstrap estimates of variability. Sociological Methodology, 20, 115–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brannick, M. T., Chan, D., Conway, J. M., Lance, C. E., & Spector, P. E. (2010). What is method variance and how can we cope with it? A panel discussion. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 407–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1982). Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 111–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2009). Mainly openness: The relationship between the Big Five personality traits and learning approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 524–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chan, D. (2009). So why ask me? Are self-report data really that bad? In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity, and fable in the organizational and social sciences (Chapter 13). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Combs, A. W. (1961). What can man become? California Journal for Instructional Improvement, 4, 15–23.Google Scholar
  25. Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Damasio, A. R. (2004). Emotions and feelings: A neurobiological perspective. In A. S. R. Manstead, N. Frijda, & A. Fischer (Eds.), Feelings and emotions (pp. 49–57). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ducksworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16, 939–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Feldman, S. C., Martinez-Pons, M., & Shaham, D. (1995). The relationship of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and collaborative verbal behavior with grades: Preliminary findings. Psychological Reports, 77, 971–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation models. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), A second course in structural equation modeling (pp. 269–314). Greenwich: Information Age.Google Scholar
  30. Fischer, R. (2004). Standardization to account for cross-cultural response bias: A classification of score adjustment procedures and review of research in JCCP. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Ludtke, O., Pekrun, R., & Sutton, R. E. (2009). Emotional transmission in the classroom: Exploring the relationship between teacher and student enjoyment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 705–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Friese, M., & Hoffman, W. (2009). Control me or I will control you: Impulses, trait self-control, and the guidance of behaviour. Journal of Personality Assessment, 43, 795–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gailliot, M. T., Schmeichel, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2006). Self-regulatory processes defend against the threat of death: Effects of self-control depletion and trait self-control on thoughts and fear of dying. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ganotice, F. (2010). A confirmatory factor analysis of scores on Inventory of School Motivation, Sense of Self Scale, and Facilitating Conditions Questionnaire: A study using Philippine sample. The Educational Measurement and Evaluation Review, 1, 59–77.Google Scholar
  36. Ganotice, F. A., & Bernardo, A. B. I. (2010). Validating the factors of the English and Filipino versions of the Sense of Self Scale. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 43, 81–99.Google Scholar
  37. Ganotice, F. A., Bernardo, A. B. I., & King, R. B. (2012). Testing the factorial invariance of the English and Filipino version of the Inventory of School Motivation with bilingual students in the Philippines. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30, 298–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gramzow, R. H., Elliot, A. J., Asher, E., & McGregor, H. A. (2003). Self-evaluation bias and academic performance: Some ways and some reasons why. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hagger, M. S., Wood, C., Stiff, C., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2010). Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 495–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hampson, S. E. (2012). Personality processes: Mechanisms by which personality traits “get outside the skin. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 315–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Harzing, A. W. (2006). Response styles in cross-national survey research: A 26-country study. Cross-cultural Management, 6, 243–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58, 47–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  44. Jackson, D. N., & Messick, S. (1958). Content and style in personality assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 55, 243–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Javeline, D. (1999). Response effects in polite cultures: A test of acquiescence in Kazakhstan. Public Opinion Quarterly, 63, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Johnson, T., Kulesa, P., Llc, I., Cho, Y. I., & Shavitt, S. (2005). The relation between culture and response styles: Evidence from 19 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. King, R. B. (2010). What do students feel in school and how do we measure them?: Examining the psychometric properties of the S-AEQ-F [Short-Academic Emotions Questionnaire-Filipino]. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 43, 161–176.Google Scholar
  48. King, R. B., & Du, H. (2011). All good things come to those who wait: Validating the Chinese version of the Academic Delay of Gratification Scale (ADOGS). The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 7, 64–80.Google Scholar
  49. King, R. B., & Watkins, D. A. (2011). The reliability and validity of the Goal Orientation and Learning Strategies Survey (GOALS-S): A Filipino investigation. The Asia Pacific Education Researcher, 20, 579–594.Google Scholar
  50. King, R. B., & Watkins, D. A. (2012). Cross-cultural validation of the five-factor structure of social goals. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30, 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. King, R. B., McInerney, D. M., & Watkins, D. A. (2012). How you think about your intelligence determines how you feel in school: The role of theories of intelligence on academic emotions. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 814–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., & Schmeck, R. R. (2009). Role of the Big Five personality traits in predicting college students’ academic motivation and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kuhnle, C., Hofer, M., & Kilian, B. (2010). The relationship of value orientations, self-control, frequency of school-leisure conflicts, and life-balance in adolescence. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 251–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lane, A. M., Whyte, G. P., Terry, P. C., & Nevill, A. M. (2005). Mood, self-set goals and examination performance: The moderating effect of depressed mood. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lei, M., & Lomax, R. G. (2005). The effect of varying degrees of nonnormality in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Peake, P. K. (1988). The nature of adolescent competencies predicted by preschool delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 687–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H. L., et al. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. PNAS, 108, 2693–2698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Moorman, R. H., & Podsakoff, P. M. (1992). A meta-analytic review and empirical test of the potential confounding effects of social desirability response sets in organizational behaviour research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nederhof, A. J. (1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Noftle, E. E., & Robins, R. W. (2007). Personality predictors of academic outcomes: Big five correlates of GPA and SAT scores. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 116–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ouano, J. (2011). Motivational antecedents of academic emotions in Filipino college students. The Asia Pacific Education Researcher, 20, 127–132.Google Scholar
  62. Owsley, C., Stalvey, B. T., & Phillips, J. M. (2003). The efficacy of an educational intervention in promoting self-regulation among high-risk older drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 393–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pekrun, R. (2000). A social cognitive, control-value theory of achievement emotions. In J. Heckhausen (Ed.), Motivational psychology of human development (pp. 143–163). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pekrun, R. (2009). Emotions at school. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 575–604). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. Pekrun, R., & Hofmann, H. (1996, April). Affective and motivational processes: Contrasting interindividual and intraindividual perspectives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  67. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Perry, R. P., Kramer, K., & Hochstadt, M. (2004). Beyond test anxiety: Development and validation of the Test Emotions Questionnaire (TEQ). Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 17, 287–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 583–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pekrun, R., Frenzel, A., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2007). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: An integrative approach to emotions in education. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotions in education (pp. 13–36). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Piquero, A. R., Jennings, W. G., & Farrington, D. P. (2010). On the malleability of self-control: Theoretical and policy implications regarding a general theory of crime. Justice Quarterly, 27, 803–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531–544. Google Scholar
  74. Reschly, A. L., Huebner, E. S., Appleton, J. J., & Antaramian, S. (2008). Engagement as flourishing: The contribution of positive emotions and coping to adolescents' engagement at school and with learning. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 419–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schmeichel, B. J., & Vohs, K. (2009). Self-affirmation and self-control: Affirming core values counteracts ego depletion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 770–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schmeichel, B. J., & Zell, A. (2007). Trait self-control predicts performance on behavioral tests of self-control. Journal of Personality, 75, 743–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2000). Self-regulation and academic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 631–649). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Shoda, Y., Mischel, W., & Peake, P. K. (1990). Predicting adolescent cognitive and self regulatory competencies from preschool delay of gratification: Identifying diagnostic conditions. Developmental Psychology, 26, 978–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Skinner, E., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2008). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 493–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchland, G., & Kindermann, T. (2009a). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 765–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (2009b). Engagement and disaffection as organizational constructs in the dynamics of motivational development. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 223–246). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  83. Smith, P. B. (2004). Acquiescent response bias as an aspect of cultural communication style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stipek, D., Feiler, R., Daniels, D., & Milburn, S. (1995). Effects of different instructional approaches on young children’s achievement and motivation. Child Development, 66, 209–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Ten Berge, J. M. F. (1999). A legitimate case of component analysis of ipsative measures, and partialling the mean as an alternative to ipsatization. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Tice, D. M., & Bratslavsky, E. (2000). Giving in to feel good: The place of emotion regulation in the context of general self-control. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 149–159.Google Scholar
  88. Titz, W. (2001). Emotionen von Studierenden in Lernsituationen [Students’ emotions at studying]. Munster: Waxman.Google Scholar
  89. Valeski, T. N., & Stipek, D. J. (2001). Young children’s feelings about school. Child Development, 72, 1198–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Watkins, D., McInerney, D. M., & Boholst, F. A. (2003). The reliability and validity of the Inventory of School Motivation: A Philippine investigation. The Asia Pacific Education Researcher, 12, 87–100.Google Scholar
  91. Wolfe, R. N., & Johnson, S. D. (1995). Personality as a predictor of college performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 177–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  93. Zeidner, M. (2007). Test anxiety in educational contexts: What I have learned so far. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotions in education (pp. 165–184). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 284–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisboa, Portugal and Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronnel B. King
    • 1
  • Marianne Jennifer M. Gaerlan
    • 2
  1. 1.Learning Sciences LabNational Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University1 Nanyang WalkSingapore
  2. 2.Department of English and Applied LinguisticsCollege of Education De La Salle UniversityManilaPhilippines

Personalised recommendations