European Journal of Psychology of Education

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 275–295 | Cite as

Teacher judgment, student motivation, and the mediating effect of attributions



Based on Weiner’s attributional theory of intrapersonal motivation, the mediating effect of attributions between teacher judgment and student motivation was examined. In two studies, 144 German and 272 Chinese fourth-grade elementary school students were tested on their mathematical achievement, causal ascriptions for success and failure, expectancy for success, self-concept, and test anxiety. Mathematics teachers were asked to estimate students’ performances on the applied mathematics test. Discrepancies between teacher judgment and student performance led to groups of underestimated and overestimated students. One year later, Chinese students were retested on their mathematical achievement. Results show that the attributional pattern of underestimated students was maladaptive compared with overestimated students. Attributions mediated the effect of teacher judgment on students’ expectancy for success, self-concept, test anxiety, and, in case of the Chinese sample, mathematics achievement of the next year. The results indicate the important role of student attributions as a function of teacher judgment and imply attribution retraining as a possible intervention.


Teacher judgment Attribution Motivation Self-concept Test anxiety 


  1. Ames, C., & Felker, D. W. (1979). Effects of self-concept on children’s causal attributions and self-reinforcement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 613–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Artelt, C., Stanat, P., Schneider, W., & Schiefele, U. (2001). Lesekompetenz: Testkonzeption und Ergebnisse [Reading competence: Test concept and results]. In Deutsches PISA-Konsortium (Ed.), PISA 2000-Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich (pp. 67–137). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
  3. Bandalos, D. L., Yates, K., & Thorndike-Christ, T. (1995). Effects of math self-concept, perceived self-efficacy, and attributions for failure and success on test anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 611–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bates, C., & Nettelbeck, T. (2001). Primary school teachers’ judgments of reading achievement. Educational Psychology, 21, 177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blöte, A. W. (1995). Students’ self-concept in relation to perceived differential teacher treatment. Learning and Instruction, 5, 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borko, H., & Cadwell, J. (1982). Individual differences in teachers’ decision strategies: An investigation of classroom organization and management decisions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 598–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brophy, J. (1983). Research on the self-fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 631–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carr, M., & Borkowski, J. G. (1989). Attributional training and the generalization of reading strategies with underachieving children. Learning and Individual Differences, 1, 327–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chang, C. (1985). Family influences on school achievement in China. US-China Friendship, 9, 20.Google Scholar
  11. Choi, I., Nisbett, R. E., & Norenzayan, A. (1999). Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  13. Covington, M. V., & Omelich, C. E. (1979). Effort: The double-edged sword in school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Demaray, M. K., & Elliott, S. N. (1988). Teachers’ judgments of students’ academic functioning: A comparison of actual and predicted performances. School Psychology Quarterly, 13, 8–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dompnier, B., Pansu, P., & Bressoux, P. (2006). An integrative model of scholastic judgments: Pupils’ characteristics, class context, halo effect and internal attributions. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21, 119–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dresel, M., Schober, B., & Ziegler, A. (2005). Nothing more than dimensions? Evidence for a surplus meaning of specific attributions. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ehrlich, E., & DeBruhl, M. (Eds.). (1986). The international thesaurus of quotations. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  18. Feinberg, A. B., & Shapiro, E. S. (2009). Teacher accuracy: An examination of teacher-based judgments of students’ reading with different achievement levels. The Journal of Educational Research, 102, 453–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gölitz, D., Roick, T., & Hasselhorn, M. (2006). Deutscher Mathematiktest für vierte Klassen (DEMAT 4) [German mathematics test for fourth grades (DEMAT 4)]. Göttingen: Beltz.Google Scholar
  20. Graham, S., & Williams, C. (2009). An attributional approach to motivation in school. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 11–34). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Harris, M. J., & Rosenthal, R. (1985). Mediation of interpersonal expectancy effects: 31 meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 363–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haynes, T. L., Perry, R. P., Stupinsky, R. H., & Daniels, L. M. (2009). A review of attributional retraining treatments: Fostering engagement and persistence in vulnerable college students. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 24, pp. 227–272). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoge, R. D. (1983). Psychometric properties of teacher-judgment measures of pupil aptitudes, classroom behaviors, and achievement levels. Journal of Special Education, 17, 401–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoge, R. D., & Butcher, R. (1984). Analysis of teacher judgments of pupil achievement levels. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 777–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoge, R. D., & Coladarci, T. (1989). Teacher-based judgments of academic achievement: A review of literature. Review of Educational Research, 59, 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hunsley, J. (1987). Cognitive processes in mathematics anxiety and test anxiety: The role of appraisals, internal dialogue, and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 388–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jussim, L., Robustelli, S. L., & Cain, T. R. (2009). Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 349–380). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Leppin, A., Schwarzer, R., Belz, D., Jerusalem, M., & Quast, H. H. (1987). Causal attribution patterns of high and low test-anxious students. In R. Schwarzer, H. M. van der Ploeg, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in test anxiety research (Vol. 5, pp. 67–86). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  29. Lobeck, A., Frei, M., & Blöchlinger, R. (1990). Schweizer Rechentest 4.–6. Klasse [Swiss calculation test for grades 4 to 6]. Göttingen: Beltz Test.Google Scholar
  30. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marsh, H. W. (1984). Relations among dimensions of self-attribution, dimensions of self-concept, and academic achievements. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1291–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marsh, H. W. (1986a). Self-serving effect (bias?) in academic attributions: Its relation to academic achievement and self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 190–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marsh, H. W. (1986b). Positive and negative global self-esteem: A substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 810–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McKown, C., & Weinstein, R. S. (2007). Teacher expectations, class context, and the achievement gap. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 235–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McMahan, I. D. (1973). Relationships between causal attributions and expectancy of success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 108–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meyer, J. P. (1980). Causal attribution for success and failure: A multivariate investigation of dimensionality, formation, and consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 704–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mezulis, A., Abramson, L., Hyde, J. S., & Hankin, B. L. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 711–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. PISA-Konsortium Deutschland (Ed.). (2006). PISA 2003. Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente [PISA 2003. Documentation of survey instruments]. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  39. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils’ intellectual development. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
  40. Rost, D.-H., & Lamsfuss, S. (1992). Entwicklung und Erprobung einer ökonomischen Skala zur Erfassung des Selbstkonzepts schulischer Leistungen und Fähigkeiten (SKSLF). [Development of a short scale to measure self-concept of academic performance and ability (SCAPA)]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie [German Journal of Educational Psychology], 6, 239–250.Google Scholar
  41. Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2007). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and application. New Jersey: Pearson.Google Scholar
  42. Sharpley, C. F., & Edgar, E. (1986). Teachers’ rating vs. standardized test: An empirical investigation of agreement between two indices of achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 106–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shavelson, R. J., & Stern, P. (1981). Research on teachers’ pedagogical thoughts, judgments, decisions, and behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51, 455–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Spinath, B., & Spinath, F. M. (2005). Development of self-perceived ability in elementary school: The role of parents’ perceptions, teacher evaluations, and intelligence. Cognitive Development, 20, 190–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tapasak, R. C. (1990). Differences in expectancy-attribution patterns of cognitive components in male and female math performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15, 284–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Urhahne, D., Zhou, J., Stobbe, M., Chao, S.-H., Zhu, M., & Shi, J. (2010). Motivationale und affektive Merkmale unterschätzter Schüler. Ein Beitrag zur diagnostischen Kompetenz von Lehrkräften [Motivational and affective characteristics of underestimated students. A contribution to the diagnostic competence of teachers]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie [German Journal of Educational Psychology], 24, 275–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Urhahne, D., Chao, S.-H., Florineth, M. L., Luttenberger, S., & Paechter, M. (2011). Academic self-concept, learning motivation, and test anxiety of the underestimated student. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 161–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weiner, B. (1983). Some methodological pitfalls in attribution research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 530–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories, and research. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. Weiner, B. (2005). Motivation from an attributional perspective and the social psychology of perceived competence. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 73–84). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  54. Weiner, B. (2006). Social motivation, justice, and the moral emotions: An attributional approach. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  55. Weiner, B. (2010). The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation: A history of ideas. Educational Psychologist, 45, 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ziegler, A., Dresel, M., Schober, B., & Stöger, H. (2005). Ulm Motivational Test Battery (UMTB): Documentation of items and scales. Ulm: University, Educational Psychology (Ulm Educational Psychological Research Report, No. 15).Google Scholar
  57. Ziegler, A., Dresel, M., & Stöger, H. (2008). Addressees of performance goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 643–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisboa, Portugal and Springer Science+Business Media BV 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology of Excellence in Business and EducationLudwig-Maximilians-University of MunichMunichGermany
  2. 2.Department of Educational PsychologyUniversity of HalleHalle (Saale)Germany

Personalised recommendations