Abstract
This research focuses on understanding how socio-psychological dimensions such as student social identity and student perceptions of their learning community affect learning at university. To do this, it integrates ideas from phenomenographic research into student learning with ideas from research on social identity. In two studies (N = 110, and N = 97) the relationships between student social identity, perceptions of the learning community, approaches to learning, and academic performance were explored. Our findings suggest that a strong student social identity is associated with a deep approach to learning, which in turn is linked to higher academic performance. Also, perceptions of learning community mediate the relationship between student social identity and deep approaches to learning. Significantly, a surface approach turns out not to be associated with student social identity or perceptions of the learning community, but it is negatively related to academic performance. Our research argues for the value of an integration of complementary frameworks, emphasising social and psychological aspects of the learning experience that can be used to improve our understanding of how and why students vary in the quality of their learning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderman, L. H., & Anderman, E. M. (2000). Considering contexts in educational psychology. Educational Psychologist, Special issue on the Role of Social Context in Educational Psychology: Substantive and Methodological Issues, 35, 67–68.
Ashford, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (3rd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, Y. P. (2001). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133–149.
Bizumic, B., Reynolds, J. K., Turner, J. C., Bromhead, D., & Subasic, E. (2009). The role of the group in individual functioning: school identification and the psychological well-being of staff and students. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 58, 171–192.
Bliuc, A.-M., McGarty, C., Reynolds, K. J., & Muntele, O. (2007). Opinion-based group membership as a predictor of commitment to political action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 19–32.
Bliuc, A.-M., Ellis, R. A., Goodyear, P., & Piggott, L. (2010). Learning through face-to-face and online discussions: associations between students’ conceptions, approaches and academic performance in political science. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 512–525.
Bornholt, L. J. (2001). Self-concepts, usefulness and behavioural intentions in the social context of schooling. Educational Psychology, 21, 67–78.
Bornholt, L. J., Maras, P., & Robinson, R. A. (2009). ‘I am–we are’: personal and social pathways to further study, work and family life. Social Psychology of Education, 12, 345–359.
Cameron, J. (1999). Social identity and the pursuit of possible selves: implications for the psychological well-being of university students. Group Dynamics, 3, 179–189.
Cameron, J. (2004). A three-factor model of social identity. Self and Identity, 3, 239–262.
Dahlin, B., & Regmi, M. O. (1997). Conceptions of learning among Nepalese students. Higher Education, 33, 471–493.
Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410–436.
Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: ingroup identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 617–626.
Ellemers, N., de Gilder, D., & Haslam, S. A. (2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work: a social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Academy of Management Review, 29, 459–478.
Ellis, R. A., Goodyear, P., Prosser, M., & Calvo, R. (2008). Engineering students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning through discussions in face-to-face and online contexts. Learning and Instruction, 18, 267–282.
Engestrom, Y. (1999). Situated learning at the threshold of the new millennium. In J. Bliss, R. Säljö, & P. Light (Eds.), Learning sites: Social and technological resources for learning (pp. 249–257). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Enwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning (pp. 169–194). London: Croom Helm.
Goodnow, C. (1992). Strengthening the links between educational psychology and the study of social contexts. Educational Psychologist, 27, 177–196.
Goodyear, P., & Zenios, M. (2007). Discussion, collaborative knowledge work and epistemic fluency. British Journal of Educational Studies, 55, 351–368.
Greeno, J. (2006). Learning in activity. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 79–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haslam, S. A., Powell, C., & Turner, J. C. (2001). Social identity, self-categorization, and work motivation: rethinking the contribution of the group to positive and sustainable organisational outcomes. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 319–339.
Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., Postmes, T., & Haslam, C. (2009). Social identity, health and well-being: an emerging agenda for applied psychology. Applied Psychology, 58, 1–23.
Jussim, L., Ashmore, R., & Wilder, D. (2001). Introduction: social identity and intergroup conflict. In R. D. Ashmore, L. Jussim, & D. Wilder (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict resolution (pp. 3–14). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Krause, K.-L., Hartley, R., James, R., & McInnis, C. (2005). The first year experience in Australian universities: findings from a decade of national studies. Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne. http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/higher_education/policy_issues_reviews/key_issues/assuring_quality_in_higher_education/first_year_experience_aust_uni.htm. Accessed 21 June 2010.
Kuh, G. (1995). The other curriculum: out-of-class experiences associated with student learning and personal development. Journal of Higher Education, 66, 123–155.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lea, M., & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23, 157–172.
Marshall, D., Summers, M., & Woolnough, B. (1999). Students’ conceptions of learning in an engineering context. Higher Education, 38, 291–309.
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. Publishers.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976a). On qualitative differences in learning. I. Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976b). On qualitative differences in learning. II. Outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115–127.
McInnis, C. (2001). Researching the first year experience: where to from here? Higher Education Research and Development, 20(2), 105–114.
McInnis, C. (2004). Studies of student life: an overview. European Journal of Education, 39, 383–394.
McInnis, C., James, R., & Hartley, R. (2000). Trends in the first year experience in Australian universities. Centre for the study of higher education, University of Melbourne. http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/highered/eippubs/eip00_6/fye.pdf. Accessed 26 Nov 2009.
Mclean, M. (2001). Can we relate conceptions of learning to student academic achievement? Teaching in Higher Education, 6, 399–413.
Ouwerkerk, J. W., Ellemers, N., & de Gilder, D. (1999). Group commitment and individual effort in experimental and organizational contexts. In N. Elemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 184–204). Oxford: Blackwell.
Pike, G. R., Schroeder, C. C., & Berry, T. R. (1997). Enhancing the educational impact of residence halls: the relationship between residential learning communities and first year college experiences and persistence. Journal of College Student Development, 38, 609–621.
Pintrich, P. R. (1994). Continuities and discontinuities: future directions for research in educational psychology. Educational Psychologist, 29, 37–148.
Postmes, T., & Jetten, J. (2006). Reconciling individuality and the group. In T. Postmes & J. Jetten (Eds.), Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity (pp. 258–269). London: Sage.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Richardson, J. T. E., Morgan, A., & Woodley, A. (1999). Approaches to studying in distance education. Higher Education, 37, 23–55.
Robbins, P., &. Aydede, M. eds. (2009). The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schoenfeld, A. (1999). Looking toward the 21st century: challenges of educational theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28, 4–14.
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of just choosing one. Educational Research, 27, 4–12.
Solomon, G. (1995). Reflections on the field of educational psychology by the outgoing journal editor. Educational Psychologist, 30, 105–108.
Solomon, Y. (2007). Not belonging? What makes a functional learner identity in undergraduate mathematics? Studies in Higher Education, 32, 79–96.
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations: Monterey (pp. 33–47). CA: Brooks-Cole.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1984). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A., & White, K. M. (1999). The theory of planned behaviour: self-identity, social identity, and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 225–244.
Tinto, V., & Russo, P. (1994). Coordinated studies programs: their effect on student involvement at a community college. Community College Review, 22, 16–25.
Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991). Improving the quality of student learning: the influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22, 251–266.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Van Rossum, E. J., & Schenk, S. M. (1984). The relationship between learning conception, study strategy and learning outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 73–83.
Wilding, J., & Andrews, B. (2006). Life goals, approaches to study and performance in an undergraduate cohort. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 171–182.
Zhao, C.-M., & Kuh, G. (2004). Adding value: learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45, 115–138.
Acknowledgement
The authors are pleased to acknowledge the financial support of the Australian Research Council through grant DP0988334. We are also grateful to our colleagues and the students of ‘Gh Asachi’ Technical University, and ‘AI Cuza’ University, Iaşi, Romania for their assistance in conducting the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Ana-Maria Bliuc
Current themes of research:
Student social identity. Student learning in higher education. Blended learning.
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Bluic, A.-M., Ellis, R., & Goodyear, P. (in press). The role of social identification as a university student in learning: relationships between students’ social identity, approaches to learning, and academic achievement. Educational Psychology.
Bluic, A.-M., Ellis, R. A., Goodyear, P., & Piggott, L. (2011). A blended learning approach to foreign policy: student experiences of learning through face-to-face and online discussions. Computers and Education, 56(3), 856–864.
Bluic, A.-M., Ellis, R. A., Goodyear, P., & Piggot, L. (2010). Learning through face-to-face and online discussions: associations between students’ conceptions, approaches and academic performance in political science. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41 215–225.
Rob Ellis
Current themes of research:
The role of technology in student learning. Learning through inquiry in higher education.
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Ellis, R. & Goodyear, P. (2010). Students’ experiences of e-learning in higher education: the ecology of sustainable innovation. New York: Routledge.
Ellis, R.A., Ginns, P., & Piggott, L. (2009) eLearning in higher education: some key aspects and their relationship to approaches to study. Higher Education Research and Development, 28, 3, 303–318.
Ellis, R, Goodyear, P, Calvo, R, & Prosser, M. (2008). Engineering students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning through discussions in face-to-face and online contexts. Learning and Instruction, 18(3), 267–282.
Peter Goodyear
Current themes of research:
Learning technologies and new media. Learning, cognition and motivation.
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Goodyear, P & Retalis, S. (2010). Technology-enhanced learning: design patterns and pattern languages. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Ellis, R. & Goodyear, P. (2010). Students’ experiences of e-learning in higher education: the ecology of sustainable innovation. New York: Routledge.
Goodyear, P, & Ellis, R. (2008). University students’ approaches to learning: rethinking the place of technology. Distance Education, 29(2), 141–152.
Ellis, R, Goodyear, P, Calvo, R, & Prosser, M. (2008). Engineering students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning through discussions in face-to-face and online contexts. Learning and Instruction, 18(3), 267–282
Daniela Muntele Hendres
Current themes of research:
Student social identity, teaching and learning in higher education.
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Bliuc, A.-M., Ellis, R., Goodyear, P., & Muntele Hendres, D. (in press). The role of social identification as a university student in learning: relationships between students’ social identity, approaches to learning, and academic achievement, Educational Psychology.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bliuc, AM., Ellis, R.A., Goodyear, P. et al. Understanding student learning in context: relationships between university students’ social identity, approaches to learning, and academic performance. Eur J Psychol Educ 26, 417–433 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0065-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0065-6