Abstract
In experiment 1, novice fourth-grade students (N = 92) who compared multiple examples that separately varied each critical aspect and then simultaneously varied all critical aspects developed better conceptual knowledge about the altitude of a triangle than students who compared multiple examples that did not separately vary each critical aspect but simultaneously varied all critical aspects. In experiment 2, this pattern was the same for fourth-grade students (N = 90) but not for sixth-grade students (N = 94) who had greater prior knowledge about the concept. Aspects that are critical for learning should be varied first separately and then simultaneously, and students with different levels of prior knowledge may perceive different aspects as critical for their learning and thus benefit differently from the identical instruction.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.






References
Albro, E., Uttal, D., De Loache, J., Kaminski, J. A., Sloutsky, V. M., Heckler, A. F., et al. (2007). Fostering transfer of knowledge in education settings. In D. S. McNamara & G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 21–22). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2000). Learning from examples: instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 181–214.
Bowden, J., & Marton, F. (1998). The University of learning: beyond quality and competence in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A. (1956). A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.
Catrambone, R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(6), 1147–1156.
Chazan, D., & Ball, D. (1999). Beyond being told not to tell. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19, 2–10.
Clarke, T., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2005). The impact of sequencing and prior knowledge on learning mathematics through spreadsheet applications. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 15–24.
Cooper, G., & Sweller, J. (1987). Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 347–362.
Cronbach, L. (1967). How can instruction be adapted to individual differences. In R. Gagne (Ed.), Learning and individual differences (pp. 23–39). Columbus: Merrill.
Cronbach, L., & Snow, R. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington.
Fischbein, E., & Nachlieli, T. (1998). Concepts and figures in geometrical reasoning. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1193–1211.
Gentner, D. (2005). The development of relational category knowledge. In D. H. Rakison & L. Gershkoff-Stowe (Eds.), Building object categories in developmental time (pp. 245–275). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Hung, B. (2007). Comparison facilitates children’s learning of names for parts. Journal of Cognition and Development, 8(3), 285–307.
Gentner, D., & Namy, L. L. (1999). Comparison in the development of categories. Cognitive Development, 14(4), 487–513.
Gibson, J. J., & Gibson, E. J. (1955). Perceptual learning: differentiation or enrichment? Psychological Review, 62, 32–41.
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306–355.
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1–38.
Gick, M. L., & Paterson, K. (1992). Do contrasting examples facilitate schema acquisition and analogical transfer? Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 539–550.
Gutierrez, A., & Jaime, A. (1999). Pre-service primary teachers’ understanding of the concept of altitude of a triangle. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2, 253–275.
Hershkowitz, R. (1989). Visualization in geometry: two sides of the coin. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 11(1), 61–76.
Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1996). Instruction, understanding, and skill in multidigit addition and subtraction. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 251–283.
Holmqvist, M., Gustavsson, L., & Wernberg, A. (2007). Generative learning: learning beyond the learning situation. Educational Action Research, 15(2), 181–208.
Holyoak, K. J., & Koh, K. (1987). Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer. Memory & Cognition, 15(4), 332–340.
Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 509–539.
Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 23–31.
Ki, W. W. (2007). The enigma of Cantonese tones: How intonation language speakers can be assisted to discern them. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J. O., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington: National Academy Press.
Klausmeier, H. J. (1992). Concept learning and concept teaching. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 267–286.
Kurtz, K. J., Miao, C., & Gentner, D. (2001). Learning by analogical bootstrapping. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 417–446.
Linder, C., Fraser, D., & Pang, M. F. (2006). Using a variation approach to enhance physics learning in a college classroom. Physics Teacher, 44(9), 589–592.
Lo, M. L., Marton, F., Pang, M. F., & Pong, W. Y. (2004). Toward a pedagogy of learning. In F. Marton & A. B. M. Tsui (Eds.), Classroom discourse and the space of learning (pp. 189–225). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Marton, F. (1999). Variatio est mater Studiorum. In: Opening address delivered to the 8th European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction Biennial Conference, Goteborg, Sweden, August 24–28.
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2006). On some necessary conditions of learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 193–220.
Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2008). The idea of phenomenography and the pedagogy for conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 553–559). London: Routledge.
Marton, F., & Tsui, A. B. M. (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Merrill, M. D., & Tennyson, R. D. (1978). Concept classification and classification errors as a function of relationships between examples and nonexamples. Improving Human Performance Quarterly, 7, 351–364.
Namy, L. L., & Gentner, D. (2002). Making a silk purse out of two sow’s ears: young children’s use of comparison in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(1), 5–15.
Paas, F., & van Merrienboer, J. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: a cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 122–133.
Pang, M. F. (2002). Making learning possible: The use of variation in the teaching of school economics. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Pang, M. F. (2003). Two faces of variation: on continuity in the phenomenographic movement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(2), 145–156.
Pang, M. F., & Marton, F. (2005). Learning theory as teaching resource: enhancing students’ understanding of economic concepts. Instructional Science, 33(2), 159–191.
Pang, M. F., Linder, C., & Fraser, D. (2006). Beyond lesson studies and design experiments – Using theoretical tools in practice and finding out how they work. International Review of Economics Education, 5(1), 28–45.
Quilici, J. L., & Mayer, R. E. (1996). Role of examples in how students learn to categorize statistics word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 144–161.
Ranzijn, F. J. A. (1991). The number of video examples and the dispersion of examples as instructional design variables in teaching concepts. The Journal of Experimental Education, 59(4), 320–330.
Reed, S. K. (1989). Constraints on the abstraction of solutions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 532–540.
Reed, S. K. (1993). A schema-based theory of transfer. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction (pp. 39–67). Norwood: Ablex.
Renkl, A., Stark, R., Gruber, H., & Mandl, H. (1998). Learning from worked-out examples: the effects of example variability and elicited self-explanations. Cotemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 90–108.
Richland, L. E., Holyoak, K. J., & Stigler, J. W. (2004). Analogy use in eighth-grade mathematics classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 37–60.
Richland, L. E., Zur, O., & Holyoak, K. J. (2007). Cognitive supports for analogies in the mathematics classroom. Science, 316, 1128–1129.
Rittle-Johnson, B., & Star, J. R. (2007). Does comparing solution methods facilitate conceptual and procedural knowledge? An experimental study on learning to solve equations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 561–574.
Rittle-Johnson, B., & Star, J. R. (2009). Compared with what? The effects of different comparisons on conceptual knowledge and procedural flexibility for equation solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 529–544.
Rittle-Johnson, B., Star, J. R., & Durkin, K. (2009). The importance of prior knowledge when comparing examples: influences on conceptual and procedural knowledge of equation solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 836–852.
Ross, B. H. (1989a). Remindings in learning and instruction. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 438–469). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ross, B. H. (1989b). Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: different effects on the access and use of earlier problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 456–468.
Ross, B. H. (1997). The use of categories affects classification. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(2), 240–267.
Ross, B., & Kennedy, P. (1990). Generalizing from the use of earlier examples in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(1), 42–55.
Ross, B. H., & Kilbane, M. C. (1997). Effects of principle explanation and superficial similarity on analogical mapping in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(2), 427–440.
Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 475–522.
Silver, E. A., Ghousseini, H., Gosen, D., Charalambous, C., & Strawhun, B. (2005). Moving from rhetoric to praxis: issues faced by teachers in having students consider multiple solutions for problems in the mathematics classroom. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24, 287–301.
Snow, R., & Lohman, D. (1984). Toward a theory of cognitive aptitude for learning from instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 347–376.
Star, J. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2009). It pays to compare: an experimental study on computational estimation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102(4), 408–426.
Svensson, L. (1984). Människobilden i INOM-gruppens forskning: Den lärande människan. [The view of man in the research of the INOM-group: The learning man]. Goteborg: Institutionen för pedagogik, Göteborgs universitet.
Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. A. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 59–89.
Tennyson, R. D. (1973). Effect of negative instances in concept acquisition using a verbal learning task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 247–260.
Tennyson, R. D., & Cocchiarella, M. J. (1986). An empirically based instructional design theory for teaching concepts. Review of Educational Research, 56, 40–71.
Tennyson, R. D., Wooley, F. R., & Merrill, M. D. (1972). Exemplar and nonexemplar variables which produce correct concept classification behavior and specified classification errors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 144–152.
Tennyson, R. D., Youngers, J., & Suebsonthi, P. (1983). Acquisition of mathematical concepts by children using prototype and skill development presentation forms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 280–291.
VanderStoep, S. W., & Seifert, C. M. (1993). Learning “how” versus learning “when”: improving transfer of problem-solving principles. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 93–111.
Vinner, S., & Hershkowitz, R. (1983). On concept formation in geometry. Zentralbl. Didakt. Math., 1, 20–25.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Jian-peng Guo. Institute of Education, Xiamen University, China. E-mail: guojp@xmu.edu.cn
Current themes of research:
Curriculum and instruction. Educational psychology. Math education.
Ming Fai Pang. Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong S.A.R. China. E-mail: pangmf@hkucc.hku.hk
Current themes of research:
Curriculum and instruction. Teaching and learning. Teacher education.
Pang, M. F. (2003). Two faces of variation: On continuity in the phenomenographic movement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(2), 145–156.
Pang, M. F. & F. Marton (2003). “Beyond Lesson Study: Comparing Two Ways of Facilitating the Grasp of Some Economic Concepts.” Instructional Science 31(3), p. 175–94.
Pang, M. F., & Marton, F. (2005). Learning theory as teaching resource: Enhancing students’ understanding of economic concepts. Instructional Science, 33(2), 159–191.
Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2006). On some necessary conditions of learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 193–220.
Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2008). The idea of phenomenography and the pedagogy for conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 553–559). London: Routledge.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, Jp., Pang, M.F. Learning a mathematical concept from comparing examples: the importance of variation and prior knowledge. Eur J Psychol Educ 26, 495–525 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0060-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0060-y
Keywords
- Example variability
- Comparison
- Conceptual knowledge
- Mathematics education
- Positive and negative examples