Abstract
In many animals, vocalizations are necessary for social interactions to occur; however, anthropic noise can pose a problem as it can disrupt acoustic communication. Oscine birds display a variety of strategies to presumably increase the chances of detection in noisy habitats. On the other hand, suboscines, a group of birds with arguably less vocal flexibility, have been less studied, and we have a poor understanding of the strategies that they may use to cope with noise. Anecdotal evidence suggests that vermilion flycatchers (Pyrocephalus rubinus), a suboscine that produces song bouts, interrupts its bouts in the presence of sudden urban noise (SUN, e.g., when a car passes by), avoiding peak noise. To test this idea, we conducted a playback experiment on 27 free-living males. We recorded the song bouts of each individual: before playback, during SUN playback, and after playback. Ambient noise and artificial light at night (ALAN) have been shown to influence bird singing. To evaluate if there is an association between these pollutants and birds’ response to SUN, we also measured mean ambient noise, ambient noise coefficient of variation, and ALAN in the males’ territories. We found that birds sang shorter bouts during the SUN treatment. Song bout length during the SUN treatment was not associated with mean noise levels or coefficient of variation in males’ territories; however, it was positively associated with ALAN. This result was dependent upon an influential point and should be taken cautiously. We found no association between singing recovery (latency to sing and song bout length after SUN relative to before SUN) and mean ambient noise, ambient noise coefficient of variation, and ALAN. Our results show SUN-induced temporal singing flexibility and suggest that vermilion flycatchers are well adapted to acoustically polluted environments, with males living in territories with more light pollution possibly being less affected by traffic noise peaks. A previous study showed that song bout length is an important signal during intra-sexual interactions; interrupting this acoustic component may have important consequences during social interactions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data repository: https://zenodo.org/record/7407393#.Y4_sYnbMJD8
Change history
13 January 2023
The Topical Collection has been added.
References
Bakker M, Wicherts JM (2014) Outlier removal, sum scores, and the inflation of the type I error rate in independent samples t tests: The power of alternatives and recommendations. Psychol Methods 19:409–427
Bermúdez-Cuamatzin E, Ríos-Chelén AA, Gil D, Garcia CM (2011) Experimental evidence for real-time song frequency shift in response to urban noise in a passerine bird. Biol Lett 7:36–38. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2010.0437
Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (2011) Principles of animal communication, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates
Brumm H (2004) The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird. J Anim Ecol 73:434–440
Brumm H (2006) Signalling through acoustic windows: nightingales avoid interspecic competition by short-term adjustment of song timing. J Comp Physiol A 192:1279–1285
Brumm H, Slabbekoorn H (2005) Acoustic communication in noise. Adv Stud Behav 35:151–209
Brumm H, Slater PJB (2006) Ambient noise, motor fatigue, and serial redundancy in chaffinch song. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:475–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0188-y
Brumm H, Zollinger A (2011) The evolution of the Lombard effect: 100 years of psychoacoustic research. Behaviour 148:1173–1198. https://doi.org/10.1163/000579511X605759
Brumm H, Zollinger SA (2013) Avian vocal production in noise. In: Brumm H (ed) Animal communication and noise, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 187–227
Cartwright LA, Taylor DR, Wilson DR, Chow-Fraser P (2014) Urban noise affects song structure and daily patterns of song production in red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). Urban Ecosyst 17:561–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-013-0318-z
Chen Z, Wiens JJ (2020) The origins of acoustic communication in vertebrates. Nat Commun 11:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14356-3
Díaz M, Parra A, Gallardo C (2011) Serins respond to anthropogenic noise by increasing vocal activity. Behav Ecol 22:332–336. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arq210
Dominoni DM, Goymann W, Helm B, Partecke J (2013) Urban-like night illumination reduces melatonin release in European blackbirds (Turdus merula): implications of city life for biological time-keeping of songbirds. Front Zool 60:10
Egnor SER, Wickelgren JG, Hauser MD (2007) Tracking silence: adjusting vocal production to avoid acoustic interference. J Comp Physiol A 193:477–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-006-0205-7
Francis CD, Ortega CP, Cruz A (2011) Vocal frequency change reflects different responses to anthropogenic noise in two suboscine tyrant flycatchers. Proc R Soc Lond B 278:2025–2031
Fuller RA, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2007) Daytime noise predicts nocturnal singing in urban robins. Biol Lett 3:368–370. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0134
Hanna D, Blouin-Demers G, Wilson DR, Mennill DJ (2011) Anthropogenic noise affects song structure in red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). J Exp Biol 214:3549–3556. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.060194
Laiolo P (2010) The emerging significance of bioacoustics in animal species conservation. Biol Conserv 143:1635–1645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.025
Miller PJO, Biassoni N, Samuels A, Tyack PL (2000) Whale songs lengthen in response to sonar. Nature 405:903. https://doi.org/10.1038/35016148
Nakamura-Garcia MT, Ríos-Chelén AA (2021) More than noise: light, moon phase, and singing behavior in a passerine. Urban Ecosyst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-021-01142-2
Nemeth E, Brumm H (2010) Birds and anthropogenic noise: are urban songs adaptive? Am Nat 176:465–475. https://doi.org/10.1086/656275
Okanoya K, Dooling RJ (1987) Hearing in passerine and psitacine birds: a comparatve study of absolute and masked auditory thresholds. J Comp Psychol 101(7):15
Orci KM, Petróczki K, Barta Z (2016) Instantaneous song modification in response to fluctuating traffic noise in the tree cricket Oecanthus pellucens. Anim Behav 112:187–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.12.008
Patricelli GL, Blickley JL (2006) Avian communication in urban noise: causes and consequences of vocal adjustment. Auk 123:639–649
Popp JW (1989) Temporal aspects of singing interactions among territorial ovenbirds (Seiurus aurocapillus). Ethology 82:127–133
Popp JW, Ficken RW, Reinartz JA (1985) Short-term temporal avoidance of interspecific acoustic interference among forest birds. Auk 102:744–748
Proppe DS, Finch E (2017) Vocalizing during gaps in anthropogenic noise is an uncommon trait for enhancing communication in songbirds. J Ecoacoustics 1:1–1. https://doi.org/10.22261/jea.tlp6d
Read J, Jones G, Radford AN (2014) Fitness costs as well as benefits are important when considering responses to anthropogenic noise. Behav Ecol 25:4–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/art102
Ríos-Chelén AA (2009) Bird song: the interplay between urban noise and sexual selection. Oecol Brasil 13:153–216
Ríos-Chelén AA, Cuatianquiz-Lima C, Bautista A, Martínez-Gómez M (2018) No reliable evidence for immediate noise-induced song flexibility in a suboscine. Urban Ecosyst 21:15–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-017-0690-1
Ríos-Chelén AA, Lee GC, Patricelli GL (2015) Anthropogenic noise is associated with changes in acoustic but not visual signals in red-winged blackbirds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:1139–1151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-1928-7
Ríos-Chelén AA, Quirós-Guerrero E, Gil D, Macías Garcia C (2013) Dealing with urban noise: vermilion flycatchers sing longer songs in noisier territories. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:145–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1434-0
Ríos-Chelén AA, Salaberria C, Barbosa I et al (2012) The learning advantage: bird species that learn their song show a tighter adjustment of song to noisy environments than those that do not learn. J Evol Biol 25:2171–2180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-017-0690-1
Ríos Chelén AA, Macías Garcia C, Riebel K (2005) Variation in the song of a sub-oscine, the vermilion flycatcher. Behaviour 142:1121–1138
Rivera-Cáceres K, Macías Garcia C, Quirós-Guerrero E, Ríos-Chelén AA (2011) An interactive playback experiment shows song bout size discrimination in the suboscine vermilion flycatcher (Pyrocephalus rubinus). Ethology 117:1120–1127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.01968.x
Sánchez-González K, Aguirre-Obando OA, Ríos-Chelén AA (2021) Urbanization levels are associated with the start of the dawn chorus in vermilion flycatchers in Colombia. Ethol Ecol Evol 33:377–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2020.1837963
Shannon G, McKenna MF, Angeloni LM et al (2016) A synthesis of two decades of research documenting the effects of noise on wildlife. Biol Rev 91:982–1005. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12207
Singh SS, Haldar C (2007) Biological significance of daily variation in immunity of Perdicula asiatica: role of melatonin and testosterone. Biol Rhythm Res 38:95–106
Slabbekoorn H, Peet M (2003) Birds sing at higher pitch in urban noise. Nature 426:267–267
Sun JWC, Narins PM (2005) Anthropogenic sounds differentially affect amphibian call rate. Biol Conserv 121:419–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.05.017
Templeton CN, Zollinger SA, Brumm H (2016) Traffic noise drowns out great tit alarm calls. Curr Biol 26:R1173–R1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.058
Vargas-Salinas F, Cunnington GM, Amézquita A, Fahrig L (2014) Does traffic noise alter calling time in frogs and toads? A case study of anurans in Eastern Ontario, Canada. Urban Ecosyst 17:945–953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0374-z
Yang XJ, Slabbekoorn H (2014) Timing vocal behavior: lack of temporal overlap avoidance to fluctuating noise levels in singing Eurasian wrens. Behav Processes 108:131–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.002
Acknowledgements
We want to thank Ana Celia Martínez-Hernández and Margarita Martínez for logistic support and two reviewers who made helpful comments to improve this paper. We are grateful to the editor whose comments helped to improve this paper.
Funding
Isaac Muñoz-Santos was supported by a Master degree scholarship by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT, scholarship # 773360, Mexico).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Muñoz-Santos, I., Ríos-Chelén, A.A. Vermilion flycatchers avoid singing during sudden peaks of anthropogenic noise. acta ethol 26, 201–210 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-022-00409-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-022-00409-x