Abstract
Classical conditioning in animals is a learning procedure involving a biologically relevant stimulus paired with a previously neutral stimulus. In fish, light and sound are frequently used as previously neutral stimuli for conditioning tests. However, in laboratory experiments with replicates, such stimuli may influence the responses of fish in nearby aquariums. Herein, we developed a simple applicable methodology for classical conditioning in fish that prevents this type of influence. We isolated fish in individual aquariums and introduced a water jet that caused localized water movement, followed by the introduction of a food pellet. These procedures were repeated for each fish for 20 days. After 14 days, all fish were conditioned. Moreover, in subsequent probe trials (memory retention tests) conducted within 32 days after conditioning procedures, fish responded accordingly. These findings corroborate the applicability and usefulness of the method tested herein especially under lab conditions. Therefore, we suggest that a simple water jet is a useful and reliable tool for fish conditioning in future studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailey C, Bartsch D, Kandel E (1996) Toward a molecular definition of long-term memory storage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93(24):13445–13452
Boele H, Koekkoek S, De Zeeuw C (2010) Cerebellar and extracerebellar involvement in mouse eyeblink conditioning: the ACDC model. Front Cell Neurosci 3:1–13
Bratland S, Stien L, Braithwaite V, Juell J, Folkedal O, Nilsson J, Oppedal F, Fosseidengen J, Kristiansen T (2010) From fright to anticipation: using aversive light stimuli to investigate reward conditioning in large groups of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquac Int 18(6):991–1001
Braubach O, Wood H, Gadbois S, Fine A, Croll R (2009) Olfactory conditioning in the zebrafish (Danio rerio). Behav Brain Res 198(1):190–198
Dadda M, Bisazza A (2016) Early visual experience influences behavioral lateralization in the guppy. Anim Cogn 19:949–958
Doyle J, Merovitch N, Wyeth R, Stoyek M, Schmidt M, Wilfart F, Fine A, Croll R (2017) A simple automated system for appetitive conditioning of zebrafish in their home tanks. Behav Brain Res 317:444–452
Ebbesson L, Braithwaite V (2012) Environmental effects on fish neural plasticity and cognition. J Fish Biol 81(7):2151–2174
Fernandes M, Volpato G (1993) Heterogeneous growth in Nile tilápia: social stress and carbohydrate metabolism. Physiol Behav 54:319–323
Folkedal O, Fernö A, Nederlof M, Fosseidengen J, Cerqueira M, Olsen R, Nilsson J (2018) Habituation and conditioning in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata): effects of aversive stimuli, reward and social hierarchies. Aquac Res 49(1):335–340
Freeman J, Rabinak C (2004) Eyeblink conditioning in rats using pontine stimulation as a conditioned stimulus. Integr Physiol Behav Sci 39(3):180–191
Galhardo L, Almeida O, Oliveira R (2011) Measuring motivation in a cichlid fish: an adaptation of the push-door paradigm. Appl Anim Behav Sci 130:60–70
Houpt K (2012) Motivation for cribbing by horses. Anim Welf 21:1–7
Kandel E, Schwartz J, Jessel T, Siegelbaum S, Hudspeth A (2014) Princípios de neurociências, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill-Education, Porto Alegre, pp 1256–1273
Kenney J, Scott I, Josselyn S, Frankland P (2017) Contextual fear conditioning in zebrafish. Learn Mem 24(10):516–523
Kim J, Clark R, Thompson R (1995) Hippocampectomy impairs the memory of recently, but not remotely, acquired trace eyeblink conditioned responses. Behav Neurosci 109(2):195–203
Lieberman D (2000) Learning: behavior and cognition. Wadsworth, Belmont
Lindell S, Miner S, Goudey C, Kite-Powell H, Page S (2012) Acoustic conditioning and ranching of black sea bass Centropristis striata in Massachusetts USA. Bull Fish Res Age 35:103–110
Losey G, Margules L (1974) Cleaning symbiosis provides a positive reinforcer for fish. Science 184(4133):179–180
Manabe K, Dooling R, Takaku S (2013) Differential reinforcement of an approach response in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Behav Process 98:106–111
Matthews L, Ladewig J (1994) Environmental requirements of pigs measured by behavioral demand-functions. Anim Behav 47:713–719
Moreira P, Volpato G (2004) Conditioning of stress in Nile tilapia. J Fish Biol 64(4):961–969
Nilsson J, Kristiansen T, Fosseidengen J, Fernö A, Van den Bos R (2007) Learning in cod (Gadus morhua): long trace interval retention. Anim Cogn 11(2):215–222
Nordgreen J, Janczak A, Hovland A, Ranheim B, Horsberg T (2009) Trace classical conditioning in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): what do they learn? Anim Cogn 13(2):303–309
Roy T, Bhat A (2016) Learning and memory in juvenile zebrafish: what makes the difference - population or rearing environment? Ethology 122(4):308–318
Steinmetz J, Rosen D, Chapman P, Lavond D, Thompson R (1986) Classical conditioning of the rabbit eyelid response with a mossy-fiber stimulation CS: I. Pontine nuclei and middle cerebellar peduncle stimulation. Behav Neurosci 100(6):878–887
Steinmetz J, Lavond D, Thompson R (1989) Classical conditioning in rabbits using pontine nucleus stimulation as a conditioned stimulus and inferior olive stimulation as an unconditioned stimulus. Synapse 3(3):225–233
Tlusty M, Andrew J, Baldwin K, Bradley T (2008) Acoustic conditioning for recall/recapture of escaped Atlantic salmon and rainbow trout. Aquaculture 274(1):57–64
Warburton K (2003) Learning of foraging skills by fish. Fish Fish 4(3):203–215
Wendelaar-Bonga S (1997) The stress response in fish. Physiol Rev 77(3):591–625
Yang Y, Lei C, Feng H, Sui J (2015) The neural circuitry and molecular mechanisms underlying delay and trace eyeblink conditioning in mice. Behav Brain Res 278:307–314
Yue S, Moccia R, Duncan I (2004) Investigating fear in domestic rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, using an avoidance learning task. Appl Anim Behav Sci 87(3–4):343–354
Yue S, Duncan I, Moccia R (2008) Investigating fear in rainbow trout (oncorhynchus mykiss) using the conditioned-suppression paradigm. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 11(1):14–27
Zion B, Barki A (2012) Ranching fish using acoustic conditioning: has it reached a dead end? Aquaculture 344-349:3–11
Zion B, Barki A, Grinshpon J, Rosenfeld L, Karplus I (2011a) An automatic fishing machine based on acoustic conditioning. Aquac Eng 45(2):87–91
Zion B, Barki A, Grinshpon J, Rosenfeld L, Karplus I (2011b) Retention of acoustic conditioning in St Peter's fish Sarotherodon galilaeus. J Fish Biol 78(3):838–847
Financial support
This project was funded by CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) through a scholarship for the first author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in this research were in accordance with the Ethical Principles for Animal Experimentation adopted by the Brazilian College of Animal Experimentation (COBEA) and was approved by the Ethics Committee on the Use of Animals (CEUA) at the Biosciences Institute of UNESP, Botucatu campus (SP-Brazil) (Protocol # 699-CEUA).
Electronic supplementary material
Fig. 1
Learning curves of response (latency) for each individual fish to water movement, the conditioned stimulus, after the application of the water jet. Data considering conditioning daily averages (4 tests per day; mean ± SD) of latency response over the 20 consecutive days. (DOCX 633 kb)
Video 1
Fish reacting to the water movement and eating the food pellet added 10 s later. Note that each fish reacted independently to the respective individual stimulation and that the application of individual water jet in one aquarium could not be perceived by fish in the other aquarium. (MP4 23,045 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barretto, A.B., Maia, C.M., Alves, N.P.C. et al. Water jet: a simple method for classical conditioning in fish. acta ethol 21, 169–173 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-018-0297-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-018-0297-4