Skip to main content
Log in

Social relationships and social structure of the mound-building mouse (Mus spicilegus) in intraspecific cage groups

  • Original Article
  • Published:
acta ethologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The social relationships of Mus spicilegus were studied in intraspecific cage groups for a month during the reproductive period to clarify the role of intraspecific aggressiveness in shaping social structure and in reproduction. The mound-building mice were captured from a wild population in northern Bulgaria. A total of 13 groups, 5 male, 4 female, and 4 male–female groups, were tested. Each group consisted of five unfamiliar adults. The experiments were carried out in 100×100-cm glass cages. The patterns of behaviour and the dominant–subordinate structure within each group were investigated. A dominance index for every individual in the group was calculated. During the period of establishment of the hierarchical structure in the groups a high level of aggressiveness was registered among individuals. About half of the subdominants and subordinates were found dead, with or without obvious marks of injury. Male–male interactions were more aggressive compared to these of females. Dominant–subordinate relationships between individuals of the same sex were observed in the mixed groups. A link between dominance rank and reproduction was established. The dominant male and the dominant female formed a pair and started to breed. Based on these findings it can be assumed that the aggressiveness of M. spicilegus is an adaptation to its life in the fields, where dominance is likely to be an essential factor in individual reproductive success. It is likely that the successful rearing of offspring in natural populations, which are exposed to strong biotic and abiotic impact, necessitates the existence of monogamous relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bonhomme F, Catalan J, Britton-Davidian J (1984) Biochemical diversity and evolution in the genus Mus. Biochem Genet 22:275–303

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boursot P, Bonhomme F, Britton-Davidian J, Catalan J, Yonekawa H, Orsini P, Gerasimov S, Thaler L (1984) Evolution (Genetique). Introgression differentielle des genomes nucleaires et mitichondriaux chez deux semi–especes europeennes de souris. C R Acad Sci 299(9):365–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Brain PF (1987) The adaptiveness of house mouse aggression. In: Brain P, Mainardi D, Parmigiani S (eds) House mouse aggression. A model for understanding the evolution of social behaviour. Harwood Academic, Chur, Switzerland, pp 1–22

  • Cassaing J (1982) Les populations sauvages de souris du midi de la France (Mus musculus domesticus et Mus spretus): Approche etho-ecoloque et consequences evolutives. Thesis, Academie de Montpellier

  • Chovnick A, Yasukawa NJ, Monder H, Christian JJ (1987) Female behaviour populations of mice in the presence and absence of male hierarchy. Aggress Behav 13:367–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Cihakova J, Frinta D (1996) Intraspecific and interspecific behavioural interaction in the wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) and the yellow-necked mouse (Apodemus flavicollis) in a neutral cage. Folia Zool 45(2):105–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon AK, Fisch HU (1989) The ethopharmacological study of drug induced changes in behaviour. In: Blanchard RJ, Brain PF, Blanchard DC, Parmigiani S (eds) Ethoexperimental approaches to the study of behaviour. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 451–473

  • Evans CM, Brain PR (1978) Attempts to influence fighting and threat behaviour in adult isolated female CFW mice in standard opponent aggression tests using injected and subcutaneously implanted androgens. Physiol Behav 14:551–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Frinta D, Cihakova J (1996) Neutral cage interaction in Mus macedonicus (Rodentia: Muridae): an aggressive mouse? Acta Soc Zool Bohem 60:97–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Garza JC, Dallas J, Duryadi D, Gerasimov S, Croset H, Boursot P (1997) Social structure of the mound-building mouse Mus spicilegus revealed by genetic analysis with microsatellites. Mol Ecol 6:1009–1017

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kotenkova EV, Mikhailenko AC, Ljalukchina SI (1989) Repertoire of posture and movement and seasonal changes in behaviour in social interactions in mound-building mouse (Mus hortulanus Nordm.) (in Russian, English summary). In: Sokolov VE, Kotenkova EV, Krasnov BR, Meshkova NN (eds) House mouse. Academy of Sciences, Moscow, pp 135–142

  • Lehner P (1996) Handbook of ethological methods, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Livoreil B, Goua P, Baudoin C (1993) A comparative study of social behaviour of two sympatric ground squirrels (Spermophilus spilosoma, S. mexicanus). Ethology 93:236–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh JH (1981) Behaviour of the house mouse. Symp Zool Soc Lond 47:337–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh JH (1987) Aggression in confined populations. In: Brain P, Mainardi D, Parmigiani S (eds) House mouse aggression. A model for understanding the evolution of social behaviour. Harwood Academic, Chur, Switzerland, pp 119–133

  • Marchlewska-Koj A (1997) Sociogenic stress and rodent reproduction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1997:699–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchlewska-Koj A, Pochron E, Galewicz-Sojeska A, Galas J (1994) Suppression of estrus in female mice by the presence of conspecifics or by foot shock. Physiol Behav 55:317–321

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milishnikov AN, Rafiev AN, Muntianu AL (1998) Genotypic variability in populations of moundbuilder Mice Mus spicilegus Pet., 1982, at different life-cycle stages. Russ J Genet 34:785–790

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mota PG (1987) Behavioural analysis of two rodent species from different ecological habitats. In: Brain P, Mainardi D, Parmigiani S (eds) House mouse aggression. A model for understanding the evolution of social behaviour. Harwood Academic, Chur, Switzerland, pp 69–86

  • Orsini P, Bonhomme F, Britton-Davidian J, Croset H, Gerasimov S, Thaler L (1983) Le complexe d'especes du genre Mus en Europe Centrale et Orientale. Z Saugetierkd 48:86–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Palanza P, Re L, Mainardi D, Brain PF, Parmigiani S (1996) Male and female competitive strategies of wild house mice pairs (Mus musculus domesticus) confronted with intruders of different sex and age in artificial territories. Behaviour 133:863–882

    Google Scholar 

  • Palanza P, Gioiosa L, Parmigiani S (2001) Social stress in mice: gender differences and effects of estrous cycle and social dominance. Physiol Behav 73(3):411–420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parmigiani S, Brain PF, Palanza P (1989) Ethoexperimental analysis of different forms of intraspecific aggression in the house mouse (Mus musculus). In: Blanchard RJ, Brain PF, Blanchard DC, Parmigiani S (eds) Ethoexperimental approaches to the study of behaviour. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 418–431

  • Patris B, Baudoin C (1998) Female sexual preferences differ in Mus spicilegus and Mus musculus domesticus: the role of familiarization and sexual experience. Anim Behav 56:1465–1470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patris B, Baudoin C (2000) A comparative study of parental care between two rodent species: implication for mating system of the mound-building mouse Mus spicilegus. Behav Proc 51:35–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patris B, Gouat P, Jacquot C, Christophe N, Baudoin C (2002) Agonistic and sociable behaviours in the mound-building mice, M. spicilegus: a comparative study with Mus musculus domesticus. Aggress Behav 28:75–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simeonovska D (1994) Social interactions between male Mus spicilegus in encounters. Pol Ecol Stud 20:445–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Simeonovska-Nikolova D, Gerasimov S (2000) Seasonal changes of some population characteristics of Mus spicilegus Petenyi in North Bulgaria. Acta Zool Bulg 52(2):81–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov VE, Zagoruyko NV, Kotenkova EV, Lyalukhina SI (1988) Comparative analysis of group behaviour in Mus musculus musculus and Mus hortulanus (in Russian). Zool J LXVII(8):1214–1223

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov VE, Kotenkova EV, Ljalukchina SI (1990) Biologija domovoj i kurganchikovoj mysej. (The biology of the house mouse and mound-building mouse) (in Russian). Nauka, Moscow

  • Sokolov VE, Kotenkova EV, Michailenko AG (1998) Mus spicilegus. Mamm Species 592:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchomelova E, Munclinger P, Frinta D (1998) New evidence of pseudosexual behaviour and female aggression in mice: neutral cage interaction in Mus spicilegus and Mus spretus (Rodentia: Muridae). Folia Zool 47(4):241–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Svare B (1987) Recent advances in the study of female aggressive behaviour in mice. In: Brain P, Mainardi D, Parmigiani S (eds) House mouse aggression. A model for understanding the evolution of social behaviour. Harwood Academic, Chur, Switzerland, pp 135–159

  • Thaler L (1986) Origin and evolution of mice: an appraisal of fossil evidence and morphological traits. Current topics in microbiology and immunology, vol 127. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasukawa N J, Monder H, Leff FR, Christian JJ (1984) Role of female behaviour in controlling population growth in mice. Aggress Behav 11:49–64

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This investigation conformed with international requirements for the ethical treatment of animals. The experiments complied with the current law of the Republic of Bulgaria.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela Marinova Simeonovska-Nikolova.

Additional information

Communicated by P. Gama Mota

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simeonovska-Nikolova, D.M. Social relationships and social structure of the mound-building mouse (Mus spicilegus) in intraspecific cage groups. acta ethol 6, 39–45 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-003-0077-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-003-0077-6

Keywords

Navigation