Skip to main content
Log in

Technological ecosystems and ontologies for an educational model based on Web 3.0

  • Long Paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Active learning promotes knowledge creation as a learning strategy for students working both individually and cooperatively. Learning 2.0 supported by the Web 2.0 model is based on the idea that students are creators of resources that can be used by students and teachers. This work begins in a context in which active learning is used and a model 2.0 through which students create, share and use resources through different channels of a technological ecosystem. From this context, a framework 3.0 was developed and tested, based on the Web 3.0 model, in which all the resources generated by students and teachers are organised and classified through an ontology which can be transferred to other subjects. Moreover, a semantic search system was developed that operates by drawing inferences between the elements of the ontologies. The framework was validated in two groups, respectively. One group was able to use the content they generated in real time, while the other group was only able to use content generated by students in previous courses. The result obtained was that both groups preserved the characteristics of learning in the 2.0 model, and the transition to the 3.0 model allowed better access to the knowledge created in the subject as well as an improvement in the searchability of resources. A relationship was also identified between model 3.0 and an improvement in students’ grades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Richardson, W.: The Educator’s guide to the read/write web. Educ. Leadersh. 63, 24–27 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kemp, S.: Digital in 2018: world’s internet users pass the 4 billion mark. https://wearesocial.com/blog/2018/01/global-digital-report-2018 (2018). Accessed 23 Jan 2019

  3. Moodle: Moodle - Open-source learning platform | Moodle.org. https://moodle.org/ (2019). Accessed 23 Jan 2019

  4. Cabada, R.Z., Estrada, M.L.B., Hernández, F.G., Bustillos, R.O., Reyes-García, C.A.: An affective and Web 3.0-based learning environment for a programming language. Telemat. Inform. 35, 611–628 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Downes, S.: E-learning 2.0. eLearn 10, 1 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1145/1104966.1104968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fidalgo-Blanco, A., Sein-Echaluce, M.L., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: APFT: Active peer-based Flip Teaching. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series Part F132203, 83

  7. Fidalgo-Blanco, A., Sein-Echaluce, M.L., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Micro flip teaching with collective intelligence. In: I. A. Zaphiris, P. (ed.) Learning and Collaboration Technologies. LCT 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 400–415. Springer, Cham (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Strickland, J.: How Web 3.0 Will Work | HowStuffWorks. https://computer.howstuffworks.com/web-30.htm. (2018). Accessed 23 Jan 2019

  9. García-Peñalvo, F.J., Miguel, A., Pardo, S.: Una revisión actualizada del concepto de eLearning. Décimo Aniversario. Educ. Knowl. Soc. 16, 119–144 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Scott, C.L.: The futures of learning 3: what kind of pedagogies for the 21st century? UNESCO digital library (2015). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000243126. Accessed 23 Jan 2019

  11. Tawil, S.: Two roads ahead for education—Which one should we take? https://www.dvv-international.de/adult-education-and-development/editions/aed-802013-post-2015/articles/two-roads-ahead-for-education-which-one-should-we-take/ (2015). Accessed 23 Jan 2019

  12. Wheeler, S.: e-Learning 3.0: Learning through the eXtended Smart Web. In: Keynote speech for National IT Training Conference. Dublin, Ireland (2011)

  13. Ahmud-Boodoo, R.B.M.H.: E-learning and the semantic web: a descriptive literature review. In: Issa, T., Isaías, P. (eds.) Web-Based Services: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, pp. 24–55. Springer, Berlin (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wu, W., King, L.J.: Artificial Intelligence and eLearning 4.0: a new paradigm in higher education. In: Wankel, C., Stachowicz-Stanusch, A. (eds.) Emerging Web 3.0/Semantic Web Applications in Higher Education: Growing Personalization and Wider Interconnections in Learning, pp. 81–103. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bucos, M., Dragulescu, B., Veltan, M.: Designing a semantic web ontology for E-learning in higher education. In: 2010 9th International Symposium on Electronics and Telecommunications, pp. 415–418. IEEE (2010)

  16. Gros, B., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Future trends in the design strategies and technological affordances of e-learning. In: Spector, M., Lockee, B.B., Childress, M.D. (eds.) Learning, Design, and Technology. An International Compendium of Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, pp. 1–23. Springer, Switzerland (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Memeti, A., Imeri, F., Xhaferi, G. Reusing learning objects and the impact of web 3.0 on e-Learning platforms council for innovative research. Int. J. Comput. Distrib. Sys. 4(3), 64–68 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl. Acquis. 5, 199–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mohan, P., Brooks, C.: Learning objects on the semantic Web. In: Proceedings 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Technologies, pp. 195–199. IEEE Comput. Soc (2003)

  20. Kurilovas, E., Kubilinskiene, S., Dagiene, V.: Web 3.0—based personalisation of learning objects in virtual learning environments. Comput. Hum. Behav. 30, 654–662 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Staab, S., Studer, R., Schnurr, H.P., Sure, Y.: Knowledge processes and ontologies. IEEE Intell. Syst. 16, 26–34 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Haghshenas, M., Kabir, H., Khademi, M.: Some properties of semantic web in e-learning. Int. J. Innov. Manag. Technol. 4, 189–191 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. García-Peñalvo, F.J., Fidalgo-Blanco, A., Sein-Echaluce, M.L., Conde, M.A.: Cooperative micro flip teaching. In: I. A. Zaphiris, P. (ed.) Learning and Collaboration Technologies. LCT 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 14–24. Springer, Cham (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sein-Echaluce, M.L., Fidalgo-Blanco, A., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Students’ knowledge sharing to improve learning in academic engineering courses. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 32, 1024–1035 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fidalgo-Blanco, A., Sein-Echaluce, M.L., García-Peñalvo, F.J., Conde, M.A.: Using learning analytics to improve teamwork assessment. Comput. Human Behav. 47, 149–156 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. W3Techs: Usage Statistics and Market Share of WordPress for Websites. https://w3techs.com/technologies/details/cm-wordpress/all/all (2018). Accessed 23 Jan 2019

  27. Rodríguez-Conde, M.J., García-Peñalvo, F.J., García-Holgado, A.: Pretest y postest para evaluar la implementación de una metodología activa en la docencia de Ingeniería del Software. Zenodo (2017). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1034822

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fidalgo-Blanco, A., Sein-Echaluce, M.L., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Enhancing the main characteristics of active methodologies: a case with Micro Flip Teaching and Teamwork. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 35(1(B)), 1–12 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shapiro, S.S., Wilk, M.B.: An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52, 591–611 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., del Pilar Baptista Lucio, M.: Metodología de la investigación. Mc Graw-Hill Educación, Mexico (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wilcoxon, F.: Some rapid approximate statistical procedures. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 52, 6 (1950)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Epanechnikov, V.A.: Non-parametric estimation of a multivariate probability density. Theory Probab. Appl. 14, 153–158 (1969)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Fontes de Gracia, S: Diseños de investigación en psicología. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (2001)

  34. Spearman, C.: Correlation calculated from faulty data. Br. J. Psychol. 1904–1920(3), 271–295 (1910)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Fontes de Gracia, S., García Gallego, C., Quintanilla Cobián, L., Rodríguez Fernández, R., Rubio de Lemus, P., Sarriá Sánchez, E.: Fundamentos de investigación en psicología. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (2010)

  36. Walpole, R., Myers, R.H., Myers, S.L., Ye, K.E.: Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists. Pearson, London (2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been partially funded by the Spanish Government Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness throughout the DEFINES project (Ref. TIN2016-80172-R) and the Educational Innovation Service of the Technical University of Madrid (Project IE1718.0603). The authors would like to thank the research groups GIDTIC (http://gidtic.com), GRIAL (http://grial.usal.es) and LITI (http://www.liti.es) for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María Luisa Sein-Echaluce.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sein-Echaluce, M.L., Fidalgo-Blanco, Á. & Esteban-Escaño, J. Technological ecosystems and ontologies for an educational model based on Web 3.0. Univ Access Inf Soc 18, 645–658 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-019-00684-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-019-00684-9

Keywords

Navigation