Advertisement

From internet access to internet skills: digital inequality among older adults

  • Eszter Hargittai
  • Anne Marie Piper
  • Meredith Ringel Morris
Long Paper

Abstract

Although much research examines the factors that affect technology adoption and use, less is known about how older adults as a group differ in their ability to use the Internet. The theory of digital inequality suggests that even once people have gone online, differences among them will persist in important ways such as their online skills. We analyze survey data about older American adults’ Internet skills to examine whether skills differ in this group and if they do, what explains differential online abilities. We find that there is considerable variation in Internet know-how and this relates to both socioeconomic status and autonomy of use. The results suggest that attempts to achieve a knowledgeable older adult population regarding Internet use must take into account these users’ socioeconomic background and available access points.

Keywords

Older adults Internet skills Digital inequality 

References

  1. 1.
    Arning, K., Ziefle, M.: Development and validation of a computer expertise questionnaire for older adults. Behav. Inform. Technol. 27(4), 325–329 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290802127153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bonfadelli, H.: The Internet and Knowledge Gaps: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation. Eur. J. Commun. 17(1), 65–84 (2002). http://ejc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/17/1/65
  3. 3.
    Boot, W.R., Charness, N., Czaja, S.J., Sharit, J., Rogers, W.A., Fisk, A.D., Mitzner, T., Lee, C.C., Nair, S.: Computer Proficiency Questionnaire: Assessing Low and High Computer Proficient Seniors. Gerontol. 55(3), 404–411 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnt117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brajnik, G., Yesilada, Y., Harper, S.: Web accessibility guideline aggregation for older users and its validation. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 10(4), 403–423 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-011-0220-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brewer, R., Garcia, R.C., Schwaba, T., Gergle, D., Piper, A.M.: Exploring traditional phones as an e-mail interface for older adults. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 8(2), 6:1–6:20 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2839303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brewer, R., Morris, M.R., Piper, A.M.: Why would anybody do this?: Understanding older adults’ motivations and challenges in crowd work. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’16, pp. 2246–2257. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858198
  7. 7.
    Brewer, R., Piper, A.M.: Tell it like it really is: A case of online content creation and sharing among older adult bloggers. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’16, pp. 5529–5542. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858379
  8. 8.
    Bucur, A., Renold, C., Henke, M.: How do older netcitizens compare with their younger counterparts? Cyberpsychol. Behav. Impact Internet, Multim. Virtual Real. Behav. Soc. 2(6), 505–513 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1999.2.505 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bundesamt fr Statistik: Kultur, Medien und Informationsgesellschaft: Panorama. Tech. rep. (2016). https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/kultur-medien-informationsgesellschaft-sport.assetdetail.200306.html
  10. 10.
    Carpenter, B., Buday, S.: Computer use among older adults in a naturally occurring retirement community. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23(6), 3012–3024 (2007). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VDC-4M69JJ9-1/2/4c2c9a19a111241e9de7c155ef4b703b
  11. 11.
    Cavender, A.C., Bigham, J.P.: Toward web accessibility for older users. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 10(4), 357–358 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-011-0219-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Center, P.R.: Internet/Broadband Fact Sheet. Tech. Rep. (2017). http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/internet-broadband/
  13. 13.
    Choi, N.G., Dinitto, D.M.: The digital divide among low-income homebound older adults: Internet use patterns, eHealth literacy, and attitudes toward computer/Internet use. J. Med. Internet Res. 15(5), e93 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2645 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Correa, T.: Digital skills and social media use: how Internet skills are related to different types of Facebook use among ‘digital natives’. Inform. Commun. Soc. 19(8), 1095–1107 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1084023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cotten, S., Yost, E., Berkowsky, R., Winstead, V., Anderson, W.: Designing Technology Training for Older Adults in Continuing Care Retirement Communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cotten, S.R., Anderson, W.A., McCullough, B.M.: Impact of Internet Use on Loneliness and Contact with Others Among Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 15(2) (2013).  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2306. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3636305/
  17. 17.
    Cotten, S.R., Ford, G., Ford, S., Hale, T.M.: Internet use and depression among older adults. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28(2), 496–499 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Crabb, M., Hanson, V.L.: An Analysis of Age, Technology Usage, and Cognitive Characteristics Within Information Retrieval Tasks. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 8(3), 10:1–10:26 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2856046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cresci, M.K., Yarandi, H.N., Morrell, R.W.: Pro-Nets Versus no-nets: differences in urban older adults’ predilections for internet use. Educ. Gerontol. 36(6), 500–520 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270903212476 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Czaja, S., Charness, N., Fisk, A., Hertzog, C., Nair, S., Rogers, W., Sharit, J.: Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (create). Psychol. Aging 21, 333–352 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Czaja, S.J., Charness, N., Fisk, A.D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S.N., Rogers, W.A., Sharit, J.: Factors Predicting the Use of Technology: findings From the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychol. Aging 21(2), 333–352 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1524856/
  22. 22.
    Czaja, S.J., Lee, C.C., Branham, J., Remis, P.: OASIS connections: results from an evaluation study. Gerontol. 52(5), 712–721 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gns004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Davis, F.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319–339 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    De Choudhury, M., Morris, M.R., White, R.W.: Seeking and Sharing Health Information Online: Comparing Search Engines and Social Media. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’14, pp. 1365–1376. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557214
  25. 25.
    DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C., Schafer, S.: Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use. In: K. Neckerman (ed.) Social Inequality, pp. 355–400. Russell Sage Foundation, New York (2004). https://www.russellsage.org/research/reports/dimaggio
  26. 26.
    Dobransky, K., Hargittai, E.: The disability divide in internet access and use. Inform. Commun. Soc. 9(3), 313–334 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dobransky, K., Hargittai, E.: Unrealized potential: Exploring the digital disability divide. Poetics 58, 18–28 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dutton, W.H., Helsper, E.J., Gerber, M.M.: Oxford Internet Survey 2009 Report: The Internet in Britain. Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford (2009). http://oxis.oii.ox.ac.uk/wpcontent/uploads/sites/43/2014/11/oxis2009-report.pdf
  29. 29.
    Erickson, J., Johnson, G.M.: Internet use and psychological wellness during late adulthood. Can. J. Aging = La Revue Canadienne Du Vieillissement 30(2), 197–209 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980811000109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Freese, J., Rivas, S., Hargittai, E.: Cognitive ability and internet use among older adults. Poetics. (Journal of Empirical Research on Culture, the Media and the Arts) 34(4), 236–249 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Friemel, T.N.: The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media Soc. 18(2), 313–331 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814538648. http://nms.sagepub.com/content/18/2/313
  32. 32.
    Geest, T., Meij, H., Puffelen, C.: Self-assessed and actual internet skills of people with visual impairments. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 13(2), 161–174 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-013-0304-5 Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gonçalves, V.P., de Almeida Neris, V.P., Seraphini, S., Dias, T.C.M., Pessin, G., Johnson, T., Ueyama, J.: Providing adaptive smartphone interfaces targeted at elderly people: an approach that takes into account diversity among the elderly. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 16(1), 129–149 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-015-0429-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Guo, P.J.: Older adults learning computer programming: motivations, frustrations, and design opportunities. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’17, pp. 7070–7083. ACM, New York (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025945
  35. 35.
    Haight, M., Quan-Haase, A., Corbett, B.: Revisiting the digital divide in canada: the impact of demographic factors on access to the internet, level of online activity, and social networking site usage. Inform. Commun. Soc. 17, 503–519 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hanson, V.: Technology skill and age: What will be the same 20 years from now? Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 10, 443–452 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hargittai, E.: Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People’s Online Skills. First Monday 7(4) (2002). http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/942
  38. 38.
    Hargittai, E.: The Digital Reproduction of Inequality. In: Grusky, D. (ed.) Social Stratification, pp. 939–944. Westview Press, Boulder (2008)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hargittai, E.: Is Bigger Always Better? Potential Biases of Big Data Derived from Social Network Sites. ANNALS Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 659(1), 63–76 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215570866. http://ann.sagepub.com/content/659/1/63
  40. 40.
    Hargittai, E., Dobransky, K.: Old dogs, new clicks: Digital inequality in skills and uses among older adults. Can. J. Commun. 42, 195–222 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hargittai, E., Hinnant, A.: Digital Inequality: Differences in Young Adults? Use of the Internet. Commun. Res. 35(5), 602–621 (2008). http://www.webuse.org/p/a24
  42. 42.
    Hargittai, E., Hsieh, Y.P.: Succinct Survey Measures of Web-Use Skills. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 30(1), 95–107 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310397146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hargittai, E., Shaw, A.: Mind the skills gap: the role of internet know-how and gender in differentiated contributions to wikipedia. Inform. Commun. Soc. 18(4), 424–442 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.957711 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Heart, T., Kalderon, E.: Older adults: are they ready to adopt health-related ICT? Int. J. Med. Inform. 82(11), e209–231 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Henke, M.: Promoting independence in older persons through the internet. CyberPsychol. Behav. 2(6), 521–527 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1999.2.521. http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/cpb.1999.2.521
  46. 46.
    Hill, R., Betts, L.R., Gardner, S.E.: Older adults? experiences and perceptions of digital technology: (Dis)empowerment, wellbeing, and inclusion. Comput. Hum. Behav. 48, 415–423 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hope, A., Schwaba, T., Piper, A.M.: Understanding digital and material social communications for older adults. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), pp. 3903–3912. ACM, New York (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557133
  48. 48.
    Lee, C., Coughlin, J.F.: PERSPECTIVE: Older adults’ adoption of technology: an integrated approach to identifying determinants and barriers. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 32(5), 747–759 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12176. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpim.12176/abstract
  49. 49.
    Lehtinen, V., Näsänen, J., Sarvas, R.: “A little silly and empty-headed”: Older adults’ understandings of social networking sites. In: Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Celebrating People and Technology (BCS-HCI '09). British Computer Society, pp. 45–54. Swinton, UK (2009). https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1671017
  50. 50.
    Livingstone, S., Helsper, E.: Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers? use of the internet: the role of online skills and internet self-efficacy. New Media Soc. 12(2), 309–329 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342697. http://nms.sagepub.com/content/12/2/309
  51. 51.
    Loges, W.E., Jung, J.Y.: Exploring the digital divide: internet connectedness and age. Commun. Res. 28(4), 536–562 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1177/009365001028004007. http://crx.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/28/4/536
  52. 52.
    Manaf, E., Wong, S.: Assessing the eHealth literacy skills of older adults: a preliminary study. J. Consumer Health Internet 16(4), 369–381 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1080/15398285.2012.701163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Marqui, J.C., Jourdan-Boddaert, L., Huet, N.: Do older adults underestimate their actual computer knowledge? Behav. Inform. Technol. 21(4), 273–280 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929021000020998 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Mitzner, T.L., Boron, J.B., Fausset, C.B., Adams, A.E., Charness, N., Czaja, S.J., Dijkstra, K., Fisk, A.D., Rogers, W.A., Sharit, J.: Older adults talk technology: technology usage and attitudes. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(6), 1710–1721 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Office for National Statistics: Statistical bulletin: Internet users in the UK: 2016 (2016). https://www.ons.gov.uk/businessindustryandtrade/itandinternetindustry/bulletins/internetusers/2016
  56. 56.
    Ono, H., Zavodny, M.: Digital inequality: a five country comparison using microdata. Soc. Sci. Res. 36(3), 1135–1155 (2007). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X0600072X
  57. 57.
    Park, C.S.: Does Twitter motivate involvement in politics? Tweeting, opinion leadership, and political engagement. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(4), 1641 – 1648 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.044. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563213000472
  58. 58.
    Perrin, A., Duggan, M.: Americans’ Internet Access: 2000-2015. Tech. rep., Pew Research Center (2015). http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/06/26/americans-internet-access-2000-2015/
  59. 59.
    Piper, A., Cornejo, R., Brewer, R.: Understanding the challenges and opportunities of smart mobile devices among the oldest old. Int. J. Mobile Hum Comput. Interact. 8(2) (2016)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Piper, A.M., Brewer, R., Cornejo, R.: Technology learning and use among older adults with late-life vision impairments. Universal Access in the Information Society pp. 1–13 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0500-1
  61. 61.
    Rogers, W.A., Cabrera, E.F., Walker, N., Gilbert, D.K., Fisk, A.D.: A survey of automatic teller machine usage across the adult life span. Hum. Factors 38(1), 156–166 (1996).  https://doi.org/10.1518/001872096778940723 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Saunders, E.: Maximizing computer use among the elderly in rural senior centers. Educ. Gerontol. 30(7), 573–585 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Selwyn, N.: The information aged: a qualitative study of older adult?s use of information and communications technology. J. Aging Studies 18, 369–384 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Selwyn, N., Gorard, S., Furlong, J.: Whose Internet is it Anyway?: Exploring Adults’ (Non)Use of the Internet in Everyday Life. Eur. J. Commun. 20(1), 5–26 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323105049631. http://ejc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/20/1/5
  65. 65.
    Sengpiel, M., Jochems, N.: Validation of the Computer Literacy Scale CLS. In: Zhou, J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) Proceedings, Part I, of the First International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Design for Aging, vol. 9193, pp. 365–375. Springer, New York (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20892-3_36
  66. 66.
    Smith, A.: Older adults and technology use: adoption is increasing but many seniors remain isolated from digital life. Pew Research Center (2014). http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/04/03/older-adults-andtechnology-use/
  67. 67.
    Sum, S., Mathews, R., Hughes, I., Campbell, A.: Internet use and loneliness in older adults. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 11(2), 208–211 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    van Boekel, L., Peek, S., Luijkx, K.: Diversity in older adults? Use of the Internet: identifying subgroups through latent class analysis. Med. Internet. Res. 19(5), e180 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    van Deursen, A., van Dijk, J., Peters, O.: Rethinking Internet skills: the contribution of gender, age, education, Internet experience, and hours online to medium-and content-related Internet skills. Poetics 39(2), 125–144 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    van Deursen, A., van Dijk, J., ten Klooster, P.: Increasing inequalities in what we do online: a longitudinal cross sectional analysis of internet activities among the dutch population (2010 to 2013) over gender, age, education, and income. Telematics Inform. 32, 259–272 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    van Deursen, A.J., Helsper, E.J.: A nuanced understanding of Internet use and non-use among the elderly. Eur. J. Commun. 30(2), 171–187 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323115578059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    van Dijk, J.: The Deepening Divide. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks (2005)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Vroman, K.G., Arthanat, S., Lysack, C.: Who over 65 is Online? Older adults’ dispositions toward information communication technology. Comput. Hum. Behav. 43(C), 156–166 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Wasserman, I., Richmond-Abbott, M.: Gender and the internet: causes of variation in access, level, and scope of use. Soc. Sci. Quart. 86(1), 252–270 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    World Health Organization: Ageing and Health Fact Sheet. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs404/en/ (2015)
  76. 76.
    World Health Organization: World report on ageing and health. http://www.who.int/ageing/events/world-report-2015-launch/en/ (2015)
  77. 77.
    Zickuhr, K., Madden, M.: Older adults and internet use. Pew Research Center (2012). http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/06/06/older-adults-and-internet-use/
  78. 78.
    Zillien, N., Hargittai, E.: Digital Distinction: Status-Specific Internet Uses. Soc. Sci. Quart. 90(2), 274–291 (2009). http://www.webuse.org/p/a26
  79. 79.
    Zyskowski, K., Morris, M.R., Bigham, J.P., Gray, M.L., Kane, S.K.: Accessible Crowdwork?: Understanding the Value in and Challenge of Microtask Employment for People with Disabilities. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, CSCW ’15, pp. 1682–1693. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675158

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Northwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  3. 3.Microsoft ResearchRedmondUSA

Personalised recommendations