Advertisement

Web accessibility in Turkey: awareness, understanding and practices of user experience professionals

  • Yavuz Inal
  • Kerem Rızvanoğlu
  • Yeliz Yesilada
Long Paper
  • 347 Downloads

Abstract

Ensuring web accessibility for all is not an easy task and requires the awareness, understanding and practices of people with different roles. User experience professionals (UXPs) play an important role in ensuring web accessibility for all. However, in Turkey, there is no research concerning the status of the awareness, understanding and common practices of UXPs. The overall goal of the present work was to offer an assessment of the current situation in Turkey to suggest areas of improvement and changes to advance web accessibility practices. To meet this goal, we conducted an online survey. The results of this survey show that UXPs believe they have enough training and education in web accessibility; however, they are not familiar with web accessibility standards and assistive technologies used by people with disabilities. They do not work with people with disabilities in their studies on usability, and they do not consider web accessibility in their projects. Our findings also show that UXPs have a top-down approach to web accessibility and they think that it is the responsibility of project managers to make web applications accessible. In brief, the study showed that UXPs in Turkey need to be better educated and trained on web accessibility, and organizations need to realize that both top-down and bottom-up approaches are required to ensure accessibility of the web for all.

Keywords

Web accessibility User experience Usability User experience professionals 

References

  1. 1.
    Aizpurua, A., Harper, S., Vigo, M.: Exploring the relationship between web accessibility and user experience. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 91, 13–23 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akgül, Y., Vatansever, K.: Web accessibility evaluation of government Websites for people with disabilities in Turkey. J. Adv. Manag. Sci. 4(3), 201–210 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ballesteros, E., Ribera, M., Pascual, A., Granollers, T.: Reflections and proposals to improve the efficiency of accessibility efforts. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 14(4), 583–586 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carter, J., Markel, M.: Web accessibility for people with disabilities: an introduction for web developers. IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun. 44(4), 225–233 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    ENABLED: Enabled web developer survey. http://www.enabledweb.org/publicresults/surveyresults/ (2005)
  6. 6.
    Ferreira, S.B.L., dos Santos, R.C., da Silveira, D.S.: Panorama of Brazilian web accessibility. In: Proceedings of the XXXI ANPAD Meeting—EnANPAD (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Freire, A.P., Russo, C.M., Fortes, R.P.M.: The perception of accessibility in web development by academy, industry and government: a survey of the Brazilian scenario. New Rev. Hypermed. Multimed. 14(2), 149–175 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harper, S., Yesilada, Y.: Web Accessibility: A Foundation for Research. Springer. ISBN: 978-1-84800-050-6 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ismailova, R., Inal, Y.: Web site accessibility and quality in use: a comparative study of government Web sites in Kyrgyzstan, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkey. Univ. Access. Inf. Soc. 16(4), 987–996 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0490-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ismailova, R., Inal, Y.: Accessibility evaluation of top university websites: a comparative study of Kyrgyzstan, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkey. Univ. Access. Inf. Soc. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0541-0 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karkin, N., Janssen, M.: Evaluating websites from a public value perspective: a review of Turkish local government websites. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 34(3), 351–363 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    KAMIS (Kamu İnternet Siteleri Rehberi): http://www.kamis.gov.tr (2014). Accessed Dec 2016
  13. 13.
    Kurt, S.: Accessibility of Turkish university Web sites. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0468-x Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    ISO 9241-171: Ergonomics of human–system interaction—part 171: guidance on software accessibility (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    ISO 9241-210: Ergonomics of human–system interaction—part 210: human-centered design for interactive systems (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lazar, J., Dudley-Sponaugle, A., Greenidge, K.D.: Improving web accessibility: a study of webmasters perceptions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 20, 269–288 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lopes, R., Isacker, K.V., Carriço, L.: Redefining assumptions: accessibility and its stakeholders. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A. (eds.) Computers Helping People with Special Needs. Volume 6179 of the Series Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 561–568 (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Putnam, C., Wozniak, K., Zefeldt, M.J., Cheng, J., Caputo, M., Duffield, C.: How do professionals who create computing technologies consider accessibility? In: ASSETS’12, Proceedings of the 14th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 87–94 (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Menzi-Çetin, N., Alemdağ, E., Tüzün, H., Yıldız, M.: Evaluation of a university website’s usability for visually impaired students. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-015-0430-3 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Takagi, H., Kawanaka, S., Kobayashi, M., Sato, D., Asakawa, C.: Collaborative web accessibility improvement: challenges and possibilities. In: ASSETS’09, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, pp. 195–202 (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tangarife, T.M., Mont’alvao, C.: What the Brazilian developers know about web accessibility and digital inclusion? In: Proceedings of the 6 USIHC—6 International Congress on Ergonomics, Usability, Interface Design and Human–Computer InteractionGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    W3C WAI: Introduction to web accessibility. http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/accessibility.php (2005)
  24. 24.
    WAI Benefits: Developing a web accessibility business case for your organization: overview. https://www.w3.org/WAI/bcase/Overview.html. Accessed Nov 2016
  25. 25.
    WAI Method: Website accessibility conformance evaluation methodology (WCAG-EM) 1.0. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG-EM/. Accessed Nov 2016
  26. 26.
    WAI Planning: Planning and managing web accessibility. https://www.w3.org/WAI/impl/Overview.html. Accessed Nov 2016
  27. 27.
    WAI Policy: Policies relating to web accessibility. https://www.w3.org/WAI/Policy/. Accessed Nov 2016
  28. 28.
    WAI Intro: Getting started with web accessibility. https://www.w3.org/WAI/gettingstarted/. Accessed Nov 2016
  29. 29.
    Yesilada, Y., Brajnik, G., Vigo, M., Harper, S.: Understanding web accessibility and its drivers. In: Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, W4A’12, pp. 19:1–19:9. ACM, New York, NY (2012)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yesilada, Y., Brajnik, G., Vigo, M., Harper, S.: Exploring perceptions of web accessibility: a survey approach. Behav. Inf. Technol. 34(2), 119–134 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yurtay, N., Yurtay, Y., Adak, M.F.: An education portal for visually impaired. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 171, 1097–1105 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yavuz Inal
    • 1
  • Kerem Rızvanoğlu
    • 2
  • Yeliz Yesilada
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Information Systems Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringAtilim UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Faculty of CommunicationGalatasaray UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Middle East Technical UniversityGüzelyurtTurkey

Personalised recommendations