Effects of augmented reality-based multidimensional concept maps on students’ learning achievement, motivation and acceptance

Abstract

In this study, an augmented reality-based multidimensional concept map (ARMCM) learning system is proposed for conducting mobile learning activities. The subjects consisted of 65 students with an average age of 11 years in an elementary school in Taiwan. They were divided into an ARMCM group and a multidimensional concept map (MCM) group. An experiment was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. The experimental results suggested that students in the ARMCM group performed significantly better than those in the MCM group. Moreover, this study also found that the students using the ARMCM learning approach showed significantly higher motivation than those using the MCM learning approach, because ARMCM learning is able to simulate the complex knowledge that they needed to learn. ARMCM learning was easier to understand and easy to use, as it could simplify the content of the learning knowledge. Pedagogical implications, conclusion, and some suggestions based on this study are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. 1.

    McCabe, B.: An integrated approach to the use of complementary visual learning tools in an undergraduate microbiology class. J. Biol. Educ. 45(4), 236–243 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2010.549496

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hwang, G.J., Wu, C.H., Kuo, F.R.: Effects of touch technology-based concept mapping on students’ learning attitudes and perceptions. Educ. Technol. Soc. 16(3), 274–285 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Asan, A.: Concept mapping in science class: a case study of fifth grade students. Educ. Technol. Soc. 10(1), 186–195 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Conradty, C., Bogner, F.X.: Knowledge presented in concept maps: correlations with conventional cognitive knowledge tests. Educ. Stud. 38(3), 341–354 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2011.643100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Huang, H.S., Chiou, C.C., Chiang, H.K., Lai, S.H., Huang, C.Y., Chou, Y.Y.: Effects of multidimensional concept maps on fourth graders’ learning in web-based computer course. Comput. Educ. 58(3), 863–873 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hwang, G.J., Shi, Y.R., Chu, H.C.: A concept map approach to developing collaborative mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 42(5), 778–789 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01102.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hung, P.H., Hwang, G.J., Su, I., Lin, I.H.: A concept-map integrated dynamic assessment system for improving ecology observation competences in mobile learning activities. Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol. 11(1), 10–19 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Yang, C.C., Hwang, G.J., Hung, C.M., Tseng, S.S.: An evaluation of the learning effectiveness of concept map-based science book reading via mobile devices. Educ. Technol. Soc. 16(3), 167–178 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Huang, H.S., Shiu, L.Y., Wang, Y.S., Chang, J.S.: A new method for building web-based courseware. Curric. Instr. Q. 8(3), 127–155 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Eppler, M.J.: A comparison between concept maps, mind maps, conceptual diagrams, and visual metaphors as complementary tools for knowledge construction and sharing. Inf. Vis. 5(3), 202–210 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Chiou, C.C., Tien, L.C., Lee, L.T.: Effects on learning of multimedia animation combined with multidimensional concept maps. Comput. Educ. 80, 211–223 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Tergan, S.O., Keller, T., Burkhard, R.A.: Integrating knowledge and information: digital concept maps as a bridging technology. Inf. Vis. 5(3), 167–174 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Chen, C.H., Chou, Y.Y., Huang, C.Y.: An augmented-reality-based concept map to support mobile learning for science. Asia-Pac. Educ. Res. 25(4), 567–578 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0284-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., Mitchell, R.: Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 18(1), 7–22 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9119-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    McCall, R., Wetzel, R., Löschner, J., Braun, A.K.: Using presence to evaluate an augmented reality location aware game. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 15(1), 25–35 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-010-0306-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Cheng, K.H., Tsai, C.C.: Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: suggestions for future research. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 22(4), 449–462 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9405-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Dunleavy, M., Dede, C.: Augmented reality teaching and learning. In: Spector, J.M., Merrill, M.D., Elen, J., Bishop, M.J. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 4th edn, pp. 735–745. Springer, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_59

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M.B., Kloos, C.D.: Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Comput. Educ. 68, 586–596 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Lee, H., Billinghurst, M., Woo, W.: Two-handed tangible interaction techniques for composing augmented blocks. Virtual Real. 15(2), 133–146 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-010-0163-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ausubel, D.P., Novak, J.D., Hanesian, H.: Educational psychology: a cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Novak, J.D.: Concept mapping: a useful tool for science education. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 27(10), 937–949 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660271003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    BouJaoude, S., Attieh, M.: The effect of using concept maps as study tools on achievement in chemistry. Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 4(3), 233–246 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Liu, C.C., Chen, H.S., Shih, J.L., Huang, G.T., Liu, B.J.: An enhanced concept map approach to improving children’s storytelling ability. Comput. Educ. 56(3), 873–884 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hwang, G.J., Wu, P.H., Ke, H.R.: An interactive concept map approach to supporting mobile learning activities for natural science courses. Comput. Educ. 57(4), 2272–2280 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Hwang, G.J., Kuo, F.R., Chen, N.S., Ho, H.J.: Effects of an integrated concept mapping and web-based problem-solving approach on students’ learning achievements, perceptions and cognitive loads. Comput. Educ. 71, 77–86 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Chiou, C.C.: The effect of concept mapping on students’ learning achievements and interests. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 45(4), 375–387 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290802377240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Chiou, C.C., Lee, L.T., Liu, Y.Q.: Effect of Novak colorful concept map with digital teaching materials on student academic achievement. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 64, 192–201 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hsu, L., Hsieh, S.I.: Concept maps as an assessment tool in a nursing course. J. Prof. Nurs. 21(3), 141–149 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.04.006

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Gul, R.B., Boman, J.A.: Concept mapping: a strategy for teaching and evaluation in nursing education. Nurse Educ. Pract. 6(4), 199–206 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2006.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Miller, G.A.: The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev. 63(2), 81–97 (1956)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Chiang, H.K., Huang, H.S., Wang, Y.S., Shih, W.Y., Tsai, C.F.: The study of learning effects by using multidimensional concept map with concept mapping assessment. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 20(3), 315–340 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Azuma, R.T.: A survey of augmented reality. Presence-Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 6(4), 355–385 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Liarokapis, F.: An augmented reality interface for visualizing and interacting with virtual content. Virtual Real. 11(1), 23–43 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-006-0055-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Chiang, T.H.C., Yang, S.J.H., Hwang, G.J.: Students’ online interactive patterns in augmented reality-based inquiry activities. Comput. Educ. 78, 97–108 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wei, X., Weng, D., Liu, Y., Wang, Y.: Teaching based on augmented reality for a technical creative design course. Comput. Educ. 81, 221–234 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kerawalla, L., Luckin, R., Seljeflot, S., Woolard, A.: “Making it real”: exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching primary school science. Virtual Real. 10(3), 163–174 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-006-0036-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Chen, C.H., Lee, I.J., Lin, L.Y.: Augmented reality-based self-facial modeling to promote the emotional expression and social skills of adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Res. Dev. Disabil. 36, 396–403 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Chen, C.H., Lee, I.J., Lin, L.Y.: Augmented reality-based video-modeling storybook of nonverbal facial cues for children with autism spectrum disorder to improve their perceptions and judgments of facial expressions and emotions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 55, 477–485 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., Graf, S.: Kinshuk.: augmented reality trends in education: a systematic review of research and applications. Educ. Technol. Soc. 17(4), 133–149 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Tsai, C.W., Shen, P.D., Fan, Y.T.: The application of augmented reality in online education: a review of studies published in selected journals from 2003 to 2012. Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ. 10(2), 75–80 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4018/ijicte.2014040107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Zhou, F., Duh, H.B., Billinghurst, M.: Trends in augmented reality tracking, interaction and display: a review of ten years of ISMAR. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, pp. 193–202 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2008.4637362

  42. 42.

    Chen, C.M., Tsai, Y.N.: Interactive augmented reality system for enhancing library instruction in elementary schools. Comput. Educ. 59(2), 638–652 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    De Lucia, A., Francese, R., Passero, I., Tortora, G.: A collaborative augmented campus based on location-aware mobile technology. Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol. 10(1), 55–73 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4018/jdet.2012010104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kaufmann, H., Schmalstieg, D.: Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality. Comput. Graph. 27(3), 339–345 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0097-8493(03)00028-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    ds Max: Knowledge overview. https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/3ds-max (2011). Accessed 20 Apr 2013

  46. 46.

    Vuforia: Natural features and image ratings. https://library.vuforia.com/articles/Solution/Natural-Features-and-Ratings (2014). Accessed 13 Aug 2015

  47. 47.

    Unity: Welcome to the unity scripting reference!. https://docs.unity3d.com/ScriptReference/index.html (2014). Accessed 11 Feb 2015

  48. 48.

    Keller, J.M.: Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. J. Instr. Dev. 10(3), 2–10 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Chu, H.C., Hwang, G.J., Tsai, C.C., Tseng, J.C.R.: A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning systems for natural science courses. Comput. Educ. 55(4), 1618–1627 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. L. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Lim, K.Y., Lee, H.W., Grabowski, B.: Does concept-mapping strategy work for everyone? The levels of generativity and learners’ self-regulated learning skills. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 40(4), 606–618 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00872.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Chiou, C.C., Huang, H.S., Hsieh, J.H.: Applying hypermedia assisted concept maps to construct accounting inventory teaching material. J. Natl. Taipei Teach. Coll. 17(2), 57–84 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chien-Hsu Chen.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Questionnaire of course acceptance with multidimensional concept maps (All questions were originally written in Chinese)

Perceptions of usefulness
1. The learning material for the course is useful
2. The learning material helps me organize the relationships among different concepts in the course
3. The learning material for the course is helpful
4. The learning approach enables me to understand which parts I will have difficulty with
5. The learning material helps me understand the concepts in the course more easily
6. The learning material of the course helps me to focus on the key points in the concepts
7. The learning approach enables me to concentrate on the course material
8. The learning material for the course is useless
9. The learning approach helps me correct some misconceptions
10. The learning approach provides a helpful way for me to understand the differences among the concepts
11. The learning material for this course is hard to understand
12. The learning approach assists me with connecting the course concepts
13. I think the learning approach would be helpful for other courses
Perceptions of ease of use
14. The content of the material is a waste of time
15. The learning material for the course is clear and easy to follow
16. I feel confident in using the learning material for this course to learn
17. The learning material in this course is easy to learn
18. The learning material in this course is hard to use in the learning activity
19. It is easier to find problems when using the material to learn
20. The content of the material is boring
21. This method of learning is more interesting than other alternatives
22. The learning material for this course is easy to use
23. The learning material for this course is exciting to me

Appendix 2

Interview questions

Q1. Do you like this natural science course? Why?
Q2. What was special to you about this course?
Q3. What impressed you the most about this course? Why?
Q4. After using this concept map to learn, do you think this course was easy to learn, or was it the same as usual?
Q5. How do you feel about this learning method?
Q6. Do you want to use this learn method to learn in the future? Why?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, C., Huang, C. & Chou, Y. Effects of augmented reality-based multidimensional concept maps on students’ learning achievement, motivation and acceptance. Univ Access Inf Soc 18, 257–268 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0595-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Augmented reality
  • Multidimensional concept map
  • Mobile learning
  • Interactive learning environments