Skip to main content

Evaluation of e-commerce websites accessibility and usability: an e-commerce platform analysis with the inclusion of blind users


Considering the importance associated with e-commerce website accessibility and usability, a study on one of the most relevant Portuguese e-commerce websites has been performed using both automatic and manual assessment procedures. In an initial stage, we evaluated the chosen website with a Web accessibility and usability automatic tool called SortSite; after that, we performed a manual evaluation to verify each previously detected error and present possible solutions to overcome those faults. In a third phase, three usability specialists have been used to perform a heuristic evaluation of the chosen website. Finally, user tests with blind people were carried out in order to fully assess the compliance with accessibility and usability guidelines and standards. The results showed that the platform had a good score regarding the automatic evaluation; however, when the heuristic and manual evaluations were performed, some accessibility and usability problems were discovered. Moreover, the user test results showed bad marks regarding efficiency, effectiveness, and satisfaction by the group of participants. As a conclusion, we highlight user interaction problems and propose seven recommendations focused on enhancing accessibility and usability of not only the evaluated e-commerce website, but also of other similar ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4


  1. Gonçalves, R., Martins, J., Pereira, J., Santos, V., Cota, M.P.: Can I access my school website? auditing accessibility of the portuguese teaching institutions websites. J. UCS 19(18), 2639–2655 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Martins, J., Gonçalves, R., Branco, F., Pereira, J., Peixoto, C., Rocha, T.: How Ill Is Online Health Care? An Overview on the Iberia Peninsula Health Care Institutions Websites Accessibility Levels. In: New Advances in Information Systems and Technologies. Springer, pp. 391–400 (2016)

  3. Rocha, T.: Interaction metaphor for Access to Digital Information an autonomous form for People with Intellectual Disabilities. Doctoral Thesis. University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, (2014)

  4. Tânia, R., Diana, C., Ramiro, G., José, M., Frederico, B., Maximino, B.: Usability Evaluation of the Touch Screen and Mouse as Input Devices by People with Intellectual Disabilities (2015)

  5. ISO (2008) ISO 9241-171—Ergonomics of human-system interaction—guidance on software accessibility. Accessed 20 Jan 2016

  6. Baptista, A., Martins, J., Gonçalves, R., Branco, F., Rocha, T.: Web accessibility challenges and perspectives: A systematic literature review. In: 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 2016, AISTI, pp. 1–6 (2016)

  7. Rocha T, Martins J, Gonçalves R, Branco F: Usability evaluation of an entertainment platform by people with intellectual disabilities. In: 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 2016. AISTI, pp 1–5 (2016)

  8. W3C-WAI (2008) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. Accessed 28-01-2011

  9. Steed, A., Tromp, J.: Experiences with the Evaluation of CVE Applications. In: Proceedings of collaborative virtual environments, 1998. pp 123–127 (1998)

  10. Karoulis, A., Sylaiou, S., White, M.: Usability evaluation of a virtual museum interface. Informatica 17(3), 363–380 (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hix, D., Hartson, H.R.: Developing User Interfaces: Ensuring Usability Through Product & Process. Wiley, Hoboken (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kreps D (2008) How the web continues to fail people with disabilities

  13. Law, L-C, Hvannberg, E.T.: Complementarity and convergence of heuristic evaluation and usability test: a case study of universal brokerage platform. In: Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction, 2002. ACM, pp 71–80 (2002)

  14. Albert, W., Tullis, T.: Measuring the User Experience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics. Newnes, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Richey, R., Klein, J.: Design and Development Research: Methods, Strategies, and Issues. Routledge, Abingdon (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. PowerMapper (2016) SortSite Online. 2016

  17. Lazar, J., Allen, A., Kleinman, J., Malarkey, C.: What frustrates screen reader users on the web: a study of 100 blind users. Int. J. Human-computer Interact. 22(3), 247–269 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Di Blas, N., Paolini, P., Speroni, M.: Usable accessibility to the Web for blind users. In: Proceedings of 8th ERCIM Workshop: User Interfaces for All, Vienna, 2004. Citeseer (2004)

  19. Power, C., Freire, A., Petrie, H., Swallow, D.: Guidelines are only half of the story: accessibility problems encountered by blind users on the web. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2012. ACM, pp 433–442 (2012)

  20. Takagi, H., Asakawa, C., Fukuda, K., Maeda, J.: Accessibility designer: visualizing usability for the blind. In: ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing, 2004. vol 77–78. ACM, pp 177–184 (2004)

  21. Mankoff, J., Fait, H., Tran, T.: Is your web page accessible?: a comparative study of methods for assessing web page accessibility for the blind. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2005. ACM, pp 41–50 (2005)

  22. Gonçalves, R., Martins, J., Branco, F., Pereira, J., Peixoto, C., Rocha, T.: AccessWeb Barometer: A Web Accessibility Evaluation and Analysis Platform. In: INTERNET 2015, The Seventh International Conference on Evolving Internet, 2015. IARIA, pp 18–25

  23. Nielsen, J.: Heuristic evaluation. Usability inspection methods 17(1), 25–62 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Figueiredo, B.: Web design: estrutura, concepção e produção de sites web. FCA—Editora de Informática, Lisboa (2004)

  25. Krug, S.: Não me faça pensar!: uma abordagem de bom senso à usabilidade na web. Alta Books, Rio de Janeiro (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Benyon, D., Holland, S., Carey, T.: Human-Computer Interaction. Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd., London (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nielsen, J.: Severity ratings for usability problems. Papers and Essays 54 (1995)

  28. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications, London (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramiro Gonçalves.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gonçalves, R., Rocha, T., Martins, J. et al. Evaluation of e-commerce websites accessibility and usability: an e-commerce platform analysis with the inclusion of blind users. Univ Access Inf Soc 17, 567–583 (2018).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


  • Web accessibility
  • Web usability
  • E-commerce
  • Heuristics
  • User tests
  • Blind people