Developing a workstation design assistance tool for older knowledge workforce inclusion

Abstract

The paper addresses two significant and growing trends: knowledge work and population ageing. The population pyramid inversion brings important changes for society as a whole. These changes are associated with the inclusion of older persons in the workforce for knowledge work, which represents a challenge for adapting the work environment to meet all workers’ needs. In order to approach a more universal design of the work environment system, industrial designers need support from user-sensitive inclusive design studies. Moreover, there are plenty of guidelines and tools containing relevant information. However, there is the need to develop more appropriate tools oriented to industrial designers and that cover the initial phase of the design process. A study about and with users and designers have driven the research outcomes and direction. Through an iterative process, various prototypes versions have been developed through research and designers’ feedback. A range of contents and a theoretical framework, namely UCAP, have been developed in order to implement them in this inclusive workstation design guidance tool. This study provides an overview of how knowledge work is affected by the ageing of the population, the role of designers in helping to create inclusive workstations, and the need for developing a new tool to aid designers in this endeavour. A theoretical framework intended for use in the development of the inclusive workstation design guidance tool is proposed and developed. As a result, this study provides one step towards the universal design of the products and environments found in knowledge work for the benefit of not only designers but consumers, makers and buyers of such products, all of whom can benefit from these outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. 1.

    Jackson, R., Initiative, C.G.A., Plan, O.T.: The Challenge of Global Aging, p. 22. Center for Strategic and International Studies, National Press Foundation, Washington, DC (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Serrano, J.P., Latorre, J.M., Gatz, M.: Spain: promoting the welfare of older adults in the context of population aging. Gerontologist 54(5), 733–740 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Web: CIA: Worldfactbook (2015). https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/. Accessed 28 Jan 2015

  4. 4.

    EUSTAT: La Población De La C.A. De Euskadi Disminuirá En Más De 100.000 Personas Entre 2013 Y 2026 (2014)

  5. 5.

    Smith, J.: Welcoming Workplace: Designing Office Space for an Ageing Workforce in the 21st Century Knowledge Economy. Helen Hamlyn Centre, Royal College of Art, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Maguire, M., Peace, S., Nicolle, C., Marshall, R., Sims, R., Percival, J., Lawton, C.: Kitchen living in later life: exploring ergonomic problems, coping strategies and design solutions. Int. J. Des. 8, 73–91 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Chavalkul, Y., Saxon, A., Jerrard, R.N.: Combining 2D and 3D design for novel packaging for older people. Int. J. Des. 5, 43–58 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Gregor, P., Newell, A.F., Zajicek, M.: Designing for dynamic diversity: interfaces for older people. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies, pp. 151–156

  9. 9.

    Brinkley, I.: The Knowledge Economy: How Knowledge is Reshaping the Economic Life of Nations. The Work Foundation, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Myerson, J., Bichard, J., Erlich, A.: New Demographics New Workspace: Office Design for the Changing Workforce. Gower Publishing Ltd., Farnham (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Langdon, P., Lewis, T., Clarkson, J.: The effects of prior experience on the use of consumer products. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 6, 179–191 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Langdon, P., Lewis, T., Clarkson, P.J.: Prior experience in the use of domestic product interfaces. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 9, 209–225 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Dewsbury, G., Rouncefield, M., Sommerville, I., Onditi, V., Bagnall, P.: Designing technology with older people. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 6, 207–217 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Czaja, S.J., Charness, N., Fisk, A.D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S.N., Rogers, W.A., Sharit, J.: Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (CREATE). Psychol. Aging 21, 333 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Persson, H., Åhman, H., Yngling, A.A., Gulliksen, J.: Universal design, inclusive design, accessible design, design for all: different concepts—one Goal? On the concept of accessibility—historical, methodological and philosophical aspects. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 14, 505–526 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Mace, R.: What is universal design. The Center for Universal Design at North Carolina State University. Retrieved 19 Nov 2004 (1997)

  17. 17.

    Keates, S.: Developing BS7000 Part 6—guide to managing inclusive design. User-Centered Interaction Paradigms for Universal Access in the Information Society, pp. 332–339. Springer, Anonymous (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Harley, D., Vetere, F., Fitzpatrick, G., Kurniawan, S.: Intergenerational Context as an Emphasis for Design. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 11, 1–5 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Carroll, J.M., Convertino, G., Farooq, U., Rosson, M.B.: The firekeepers: aging considered as a resource. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 11, 7–15 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Neugarten, B.L., Havighurst, R.J., Tobin, S.S.: The measurement of life satisfaction. J. Gerontol. 16, 134–143 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Havighurst, R.J., Neugarten, B.L., Tobin, S.S.: Disengagement and patterns of aging. Gerontologist 24 (1963) (Unpublished paper read at the International Gerontological Research Seminar, Markaryd

  22. 22.

    Myerson, J., Bichard, J., Erlich, A.: New demographics new workspace. Ashgate Publishing Group, Farnham (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kim, C.: User characteristics and behavior in operating annoying electronic products. Int. J. Des. 8, 93–108 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    den Ouden, E., Yuan, L., Sonnemans, P.J., Brombacher, A.C.: Quality and reliability problems from a consumer’s perspective: an increasing problem overlooked by businesses? Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 22, 821–838 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Gonzalez, I., Morer, P.: Relevant factors in the PSSD for Sustainability: Inclusive Workstation Components Design Study for Older Workforce Inclusion. PhD work, University of Navarra (2015) (not accessible online)

  26. 26.

    Dujarier, M.: The three sociological types of consumer work. J. Consum. Culture (2014). doi:10.1177/1469540514528198

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Luttwak, E.: Turbo Capitalism. HarperCollins Publishers, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Rogers, M.: Boomers and Technology: An Extended Conversation. AARP and Microsoft. Retrieved March 20, 2012 (2009)

  29. 29.

    Waller, S., Bradley, M., Hosking, I., Clarkson, P.J.: Making the case for inclusive design. Appl. Ergon. 46, 297–303 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Maslow, A.H.: A theory of human motivation. Psychol. Rev. 50, 370 (1943)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Maslow, A.H.: A Theory of Human Motivation. In: Personality: Critical Concepts in Psychology, pp. 169–188. Routledge, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Huitt, W. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. Educational Psychology Interactive (2004)

  33. 33.

    Coleman, R., Lebbon, C.: Inclusive Design. Helen Hamlyn Research Centre, Royal College of Art, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Newell, A.F., Gregor, P., Morgan, M., Pullin, G., Macaulay, C.: User-sensitive inclusive design. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 10, 235–243 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Cascini, G., Montagna, F.: Modelling (pre-) design activities with a multi-stakeholder perspective. In: Principia designae-pre-design, design, and post-design, pp. 175–197. Anonymous, Springer (2015)

  36. 36.

    Wilson, J.R.: Fundamentals of systems ergonomics/human factors. Appl. Ergon. 45, 5–13 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Chandrasegaran, S.K., Ramani, K., Sriram, R.D., Horváth, I., Bernard, A., Harik, R.F., Gao, W.: The evolution, challenges, and future of knowledge representation in product design systems. Comput. Aided Des. 45, 204–228 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Persad, U., Langdon, P., Clarkson, J.: Characterising user capabilities to support inclusive design evaluation. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 6, 119–135 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Bridger, R.: Introduction to Ergonomics, pp. 203–204. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2003)

  40. 40.

    Karwowski, W.: Achieving compatibility in human–computer interface design and evaluation. In: The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, pp. 1226–1238. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Clausen, G., Wyon, D.P.: The combined effects of many different indoor environmental factors on acceptability and office work performance. HVAC&R Res. 14, 103–113 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Salvendy, G.: Handbook of Industrial Engineering: Technology and Operations Management. Wiley, Hoboken (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Haake, A.B.: Individual music listening in workplace settings an exploratory survey of offices in the UK. Musicae Scientiae 15, 107–129 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Bosch-Sijtsema, P.M., Ruohomäki, V., Vartiainen, M.: Multi-locational knowledge workers in the office: navigation, disturbances and effectiveness. New Technol Work Employ 25, 183–195 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Gorgievski, M.J., van der Voordt, T.J.M., van Herpen, S.G., van Akkeren, S.: After the fire: new ways of working in an academic setting. Facilities 28, 206–224 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    ISO (International Organization for Standarization): ISO/TR 22411:2008 (2008). http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=40933. Accessed 30 Jan 2015

  47. 47.

    Evans, G.W., Johnson, D.: Stress and open-office noise. J. Appl. Psychol. 85, 779 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Porter, J.M., Case, K., Marshall, R., Gyi, D., Sims neé Oliver, R.: ‘Beyond Jack and Jill’: designing for individuals using HADRIAN. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 33, 249–264 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Abascal, J., Arrue, M., Fajardo, I., Garay, N., Tomás, J.: The use of Guidelines to Automatically Verify Web Accessibility. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 3, 71–79 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Design Council.: Eleven Lessons: Managing Design in Eleven Global Companies Desk Research Report. Design Council (2007)

  51. 51.

    Dong, H., McGinley, C., Nickpour, F., Cifter, A.S.: Designing for designers: insights into the knowledge users of inclusive design. Appl. Ergon. 46, 284–291 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Goodman, J., Langdon, P., Clarkson, P.J.: Formats for user data in inclusive design. In: Universal Acess in Human Computer Interaction. Coping with Diversity, pp. 117–126. Anonymous, Springer (2007)

  53. 53.

    Shah, J., Woodward, J., Smith, S.: Applied tests of engineering design skills: visual thinking characterization, test development and validation. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 11), pp. 15–19, Copenhagen, Denmark

  54. 54.

    Fulton Suri, J., Marsh, M.: Scenario building as an ergonomics method in consumer product design. Appl. Ergon. 31, 151–157 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Mieczakowski, A., Langdon, P., Clarkson, P.J.: Investigating designers’ and users’ cognitive representations of products to assist inclusive interaction design. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 12, 279–296 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Desmet, P.: A multilayered model of product emotions. Des. J. 6(2), 4–13 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Smith, H.S.: Emotional evaluation of a product/system. PhD work, University of Central Florida (2008). http://etd.fcla.edu/CF/CFE0002175/Smith_Hana_S_200805_PhD.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Basque Country’s government platform for Improving Older people quality of life cluster by ‘Fomento de San Sebastian’ for supporting this work, the colleagues from the University of the Basque Country and the University of Navarra, and the anonymous reviewers who have provided thoughtful and interesting advice that significantly contributed to the improvement in this paper.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Gonzalez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gonzalez, I., Morer, P. Developing a workstation design assistance tool for older knowledge workforce inclusion. Univ Access Inf Soc 16, 641–651 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0507-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Inclusivity
  • Older workers
  • Knowledge work
  • Guidelines
  • Design