Universal Access in the Information Society

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 699–711 | Cite as

Technology learning and use among older adults with late-life vision impairments

  • Anne Marie Piper
  • Robin Brewer
  • Raymundo Cornejo
Long Paper
  • 371 Downloads

Abstract

Increasing numbers of older adults are now using computers and going online. Yet, certain disabilities that are acquired later in life, such as severe vision impairments, make it difficult to use modern information and communication technologies (ICTs). Currently, we have a limited understanding of how older adults with late-life vision impairments adopt, learn, and use ICTs to communicate and seek information. To address this gap in the literature, this paper presents results from in-depth interviews with 15 older adults (age 60–99), who are low vision or blind, to understand how they use technologies to stay connected and engage online. While the older adults in this study have physical access to computers and many are motivated to explore new technologies to stay in touch, a number of barriers exist to using modern communication devices and online tools (e.g., e-mail, search, social media). Vision impairment in older adulthood presents complex challenges due to one’s changing visual abilities coupled with an evolving landscape of accessible communication technologies. Additionally, the benefits of using modern devices are juxtaposed with generational values of what is meaningful communication and the familiarity and inherent accessibility of phone communication. The paper concludes with a discussion of challenges and opportunities for the design of accessible ICT for older adults with vision impairments.

Keywords

Older adults Vision impairments Information and communication technology Accessibility 

References

  1. 1.
    Bell, C., Fausset, C., Farmer, S., Nguyen, J., Harley, L., Fain, W.B.: Examining social media use among older adults. In: Proceedings of Hypertext and Social Media, pp. 158–163 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blackwell, D., Lucas, J., Clarke, T.: Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2012. National Center for Health Statistics, Vital Health Stat. 10 (260):1–161 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Branham, S., Kane, S.: Collaborative accessibility: how blind and sighted companions co-create accessible home spaces. In: Proceedings of CHI (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brewer, R., Garcia, R.C., Schwaba, T., Gergle, D., Piper, A.M.: Exploring traditional phones as an e-mail interface for older adults. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 8(2), 6:1–6:20 (2016). doi:10.1145/2839303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    CDC: Centers for disease control and prevention: the state of vision, aging, and public health in America. http://www.cdc.gov/visionhealth/pdf/vision_brief.pdf (2011)
  6. 6.
    Charmaz, K.: Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In: Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y. (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn, pp. 509–535. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen, K., Chan, A.: A review of technology acceptance by older adults. Gerontechnology 10, 1–12 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Czaja, S., Charness, N., Fisk, A., Hertzog, C., Nair, S., Rogers, W., Sharit, J.: Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (create). Psychol. Aging 21, 333–352 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davis, F.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319–339 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., Warshaw, P.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 35, 982–1003 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dawe, M.: Desperately seeking simplicity: how young adults with cognitive disabilities and their families adopt assistive technologies. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp. 1143–1152 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dickinson, A., Hill, R.: Keeping in touch: talking to older people about computers and communication. Educ. Gerontol. 33, 613–630 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fisk, A.D., Rogers, W.A., Charness, N., Czaja, S.J., Sharit, J.: Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches, 2nd Ed. (2009), CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Geest, T., Meij, H., Puffelen, C.: Self-assessed and actual internet skills of people with visual impairments. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 13(2), 161–174 (2014). doi:10.1007/s10209-013-0304-5 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gibson, L., Moncur, W., Forbes, P., Arnott, J., Martin, C., Bhachu, A.S.: Designing social networking sites for older adults. In: Proceedings of BCS Interaction Specialist, pp. 186–194 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gregor, P., Newell, A.F., Zajicek, M.: Designing for dynamic diversity: interfaces for older people. In: Proceedings of ASSETS, pp. 151–156 (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hakobyan, L., Lumsden, J., O’Sullivan, D.: Participatory research with older adults with AMD: co-designing a SMART Diet Diary App. In: Proceedings of BCS-HCI, pp. 32–41 (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hanson, V.: Technology skill and age: What will be the same 20 years from now? Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 10, 443–452 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hanson, V.L., Richards, J.T., Lee, C.C.: Web access for older adults: voice browsing? In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Univers. Access HCI, pp. 904–913. HCII, Part I (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hernandez-Encuentra, E., Pousada, M., Gomez-Zuinga, B.: Ict and older people: beyond usability. Educ. Gerontol. 35, 226–245 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hope, A., Schwaba, T., Piper, A.M.: Understanding digital and material social communications for older adults. In: Proceedings of CHI, CHI’14, pp. 3903–3912 (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kane, S.K., Jayant, C., Wobbrock, J.O., Ladner, R.E.: Freedom to roam: a study of mobile device adoption and accessibility for people with visual and motor disabilities. In: Proceedings of ASSETS, pp. 115–122 (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kim, Y.: Reviewing and critiquing computer learning and usage among older adults. Educ. Gerontol. 34, 709–735 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kurniawan, S.: An exploratory study of how older women use mobile phones. In: Proceedings of UbiComp, pp. 105–122 (2006)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lehtinen, V., Näsänen, J., Sarvas, R.: “A little ailly and empty-headed”: older adults’ understandings of social networking sites. In: Proceedings of British HCI, pp. 45–54 (2009)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Leonard, V.K., Jacko, J.A., Pizzimenti, J.J.: An exploratory investigation of handheld computer interaction for older adults with visual impairments. In: Proceedings of ASSETS, pp. 12–19 (2005)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lindley, S.E.: Shades of lightweight: supporting cross-generational communication through home messaging. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 11(1), 31–43 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lindley, S.E., Harper, R., Sellen, A.: Desiring to be in Touch in a Changing Communications Landscape: Attitudes of Older Adults. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). pp. 1693–1702. ACM, New York (2009). doi:10.1145/1518701.1518962
  30. 30.
    McLuhan, M.: Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. McGraw Hill, New York (1964)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mitzner, T., Boron, J., Fausset, C., Adams, A., Charness, N., Czaja, S., Dijkstra, K., Fisk, A., Rogers, W., Sharit, J.: Older adults talk technology: technology usage and attitudes. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26, 1710–1721 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Moffatt, K., David, J., Baecker, R.M.: Connecting grandparents and grandchildren. In: Neustaedter, C., Harrison, S., Sellen, A. (eds.) Connecting Families: The Impact of New Communication Technologies on Domestic Life, pp. 173–193. Springer, London (2012)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Patel, N., Agarwal, S., Rajput, N., Nanavati, A., Dave, P., Parikh, T.S.: A comparative study of speech and dialed input voice interfaces in rural India. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp. 51–54 (2009)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rein, D., Wittenborn, J., Zhang, X., Honeycutt, A., Lesesne, S., Saaddine, J.: Forecasting age-related macular degeneration through the year 2050: the potential impact of new treatments. Arch. Ophthalmol. 127, 533–540 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ryan, E.B., Anas, A.P., Beamer, M., Bajorek, S.: Coping with age-related vision loss in everyday reading activities. Educ. Gerontol. 29, 37–54 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Selwyn, N.: The information aged: a qualitative study of older adults use of information and communications technology. J. Aging Stud. 18, 369–384 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shinohara, K., Tenenberg, J.: Observing sara: a case study of a blind person’s interactions with technology. In: Proceedings of ASSETS, pp. 171–178 (2007)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Smith, A.: Older Adults and Technology Use: Adoption is Increasing But Many Seniors Remain Isolated from Digital Life. Pew Research Center, Washington (2014)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Williams, M.A., Hurst, A., Kane, S.K.: “Pray before you step out”: describing personal and situational blind navigation behaviors. In: Proceedings of ASSETS, pp. 28:1–28:8 (2013)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zajicek, M., Hall, S.: Solutions for elderly visually impaired people using the internet. In: People and Computers XIV—Usability or Else!, pp. 299–307. Springer, London (2000)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zickuhr, K.: Older adults and technology. Pew Internet and American Life Project (2013)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zickuhr, K., Madden, M.: Older adults and internet use. Pew Research Center (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Marie Piper
    • 1
  • Robin Brewer
    • 1
  • Raymundo Cornejo
    • 1
  1. 1.EvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations