Skip to main content
Log in

How to present more readable text for people with dyslexia

  • Long paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The presentation of a text has a significant effect on the reading speed of people with dyslexia. This paper presents a set of recommendations to customize texts on a computer screen in a more accessible way for this target group. This set is based on an eye tracking study with 92 people, 46 with dyslexia and 46 as control group, where the reading performance of the participants was measured . The following parameters were studied: color combinations for the font and the screen background, font size, column width as well as character, line and paragraph spacings. It was found that larger text and larger character spacings lead the participants with and without dyslexia to read significantly faster . The study is complemented with questionnaires to obtain the participants’ preferences for each of these parameters, finding other significant effects. These results provide evidence that people with dyslexia may benefit from specific text presentation parameters that make text on a screen more readable. So far, these recommendations based on eye tracking data are the most complete for people with dyslexia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Words with no consistent correspondence between grapheme and phoneme, e.g., vase pronounced as /vāz/.

  2. A nonword is a word that has no meaning, is not known to exist, or is disapproved.

  3. Functional words are words that have little lexical meaning, but instead serve to express grammatical relationships with other words within a sentence.

  4. http://www.text4all.net/dyswebxia.html

  5. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.easyaccess.epubreader

  6. The CYMK code for the colors and their contrast are shown in “Appendix 1.”

  7. Although there are others units that can be used, the simplest is to use a percentage of the current font size.

  8. Los Encuentros del Caracol Aventurero (The Encounters of the Adventurous Snail) by Federico García Lorca.

  9. From the book Soy dix-leso? (I am dys-dumb?) of the Papelucho series by Marcela Paz. This text example is given in “Appendix 2.”

  10. The fonts tested were: Arial, Arial Italic, Computer Modern Unicode, Courier, Garamond, Helvetica, Myriad, OpenDyslexic, OpenDyslexic Italic, Times, Times Italic and Verdana [79].

  11. http://www.bdadyslexia.org.uk/.

  12. http://www.text4all.net/.

References

  1. Al-Wabil, A., Zaphiris, P., Wilson, S.: Web navigation for individuals with dyslexia: an exploratory study. Univers. Access Hum. Comput. Interact. Coping Divers. 4554, 593–602 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV-TR. American Psychiatric Publishing Inc., Virgina (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baeza-Yates, R., Rello, L.: Estimating dyslexia in the Web. In: Proceedings of W4A 2011. ACM Press, Hyderabad, India (2011)

  4. Baeza-Yates, R., Rello, L., Dembowski, J.: A context-aware synonym simplification algorithm: CASSA. In: Proceedings of NAACL ’15. ACM, Denver, Colorado, USA (2015)

  5. Barnum, C.M.: Usability Testing Essentials: Ready, Set.. Test!. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beauvois, M.F., Derouesne, J.: Phonological alexia: three dissociations. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 42, 1115–1124 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Berninger, V.W., Nielsen, K.H., Abbott, R.D., Wijsman, E., Raskind, W.: Writing problems in developmental dyslexia: under-recognized and under-treated. J. School Psychol. 46(1), 1–21 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beymer, D., Russell, D., Orton, P.: An eye tracking study of how font size and type influence online reading. In: Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Culture, Creativity, Interaction—vol. 2, BCS-HCI ’08, pp. 15–18. British Computer Society, Swinton, UK, UK (2008). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1531826.1531831

  9. Boldyreff, C., Burd, E., Donkin, J., Marshall, S.: The case for the use of plain English to increase Web accessibility. wse p. 42 (2001)

  10. Bouma, H., Legein, C.P.: Foveal and parafoveal recognition of letters and words by dyslexics and by average readers. Neuropsychologia 15(1), 69–80 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bradford, J.: Designing web pages for dyslexic readers (2011). http://www.dyslexia-parent.com/mag35.html

  12. British Dyslexia Association: Dyslexia style guide (2012). http://www.bdadyslexia.org.uk/

  13. Bruck, M.: The word recognition and spelling of dyslexic children. Read. Res. Q. 23(1), 51–69 (1988)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Bruck, M.: Word-recognition skills of adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia. Dev. Psychol. 26(3), 439 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bruck, M.: Component spelling skills of college students with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia. Learn. Disab. Q. 16(3), 171–184 (1993)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Brunswick, N.: Unimpaired reading development and dyslexia across different languages. In: McDougall, S., de Mornay Davies, P. (eds.) Reading and Dyslexia in Different Orthographies, pp. 131–154. Psychology Press, Hove (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Caldwell, B., Cooper, M., Reid, L.G., Vanderheiden, G.: Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. WWW Consortium (W3C) (2008)

  18. Carrillo, M.S., Alegría, J., Miranda, P., Pérez, S.: Evaluación de la dislexia en la escuela primaria: Prevalencia en español (Evaluation of dyslexia in primary school: The prevalence in Spanish). Escritos de Psicología (Psychology Writings) 4(2), 35–44 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chapman, C.: The most popular fonts used by designers (2011). http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2011/08/the-most-popular-fonts-used-by-designers/

  20. Cohen, L., Dehaene, S., Verstichel, P.: Number words and number non-words: a case of deep dyslexia extending to Arabic numerals. Brain 117, 267–279 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Collier, D.: Colour text legibility (2012). http://www.hgrebdes.com/colour/spectrum/colourvisibility.html

  22. Coltheart, M., Masterson, J., Byng, S., Prior, M., Ridoch, J.: Surface dyslexia. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A Hum. Exp. Psychol. 35A, 469–495 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cornoldi, C., Oakhill, J.V.: Reading Comprehension Difficulties: Processes and Intervention. Routledge, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cuetos, F., Valle, F.: Modelos de lectura y dislexias (Reading models and dyslexias). Infancia y Aprendizaje (Infancy and Learning) 44, 3–19 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dickinson, A., Gregor, P., Newell, A.F.: Ongoing investigation of the ways in which some of the problems encountered by some dyslexics can be alleviated using computer techniques. In: Proceedings of ASSETS’02, pp. 97–103. Edinburgh, Scotland (2002)

  26. Dixon, M.: Comparative study of disabled vs. non-disabled evaluators in user-testing: dyslexia and first year students learning computer programming. Universal Access in Human Computer Interaction. Coping with Diversity pp. 647–656 (2007)

  27. Elbro, C., Nielsen, I., Petersen, D.K.: Dyslexia in adults: Evidence for deficits in non-word reading and in the phonological representation of lexical items. Ann. Dyslexia 44(1), 203–226 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ellis, A.W.: Reading, Writing and Dyslexia. Erlbaum, London (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Evans, B.: Dyslexia and Vision, vol. 5. Wiley, Hoboken (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Evans, B.J., Cook, A., Richards, I.L., Drasdo, N.: Effect of pattern glare and colored overlays on a simulated-reading task in dyslexics and normal readers. Optom. Vis. Sci. 71(10), 619–628 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Evett, L., Brown, D.: Text formats and web design for visually impaired and dyslexic readers-clear text for all. Interact. Comput. 17, 453–472 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Frase, L.T., Schwartz, B.J.: Typographical cues that facilitate comprehension. J. Educ. Psychol. 71(2), 197 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Frith, U.: A developmental framework for developmental dyslexia. Ann. Dyslexia 36(1), 67–81 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  34. García-Albea, J.E., Sánchez-Casas, R.M., Viso, S.: Efectos de la frecuencia de uso en el reconocimiento de palabras (Effects of usage frequency in word recognition). Investigaciones psicológicas (Psychological Research) 1, 24–63 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Goulandris, N.E.: Dyslexia in Different Languages: Cross-linguistic Comparisons. Whurr Publishers, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gregor, P., Dickinson, A., Macaffer, A., Andreasen, P.: Seeword: a personal word processing environment for dyslexic computer users. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 34(3), 341–355 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gregor, P., Newell, A.F.: An empirical investigation of ways in which some of the problems encountered by some dyslexics may be alleviated using computer techniques. In: Proc. ASSETS’00, ASSETS 2000, pp. 85–91. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA (2000)

  38. Hagtvet, B.E.: Listening comprehension and reading comprehension in poor decoders: evidence for the importance of syntactic and semantic skills as well as phonological skills. Read. Writ. 16(6), 505–539 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Holmes, V., Carruthers, J.: The relation between reading and spelling in skilled adult readers. J. Mem. Lang. 39(2), 264–289 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hyönä, J., Olson, R.K.: Eye fixation patterns among dyslexic and normal readers: effects of word length and word frequency. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 21(6), 1430 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Inhoff, A.W., Rayner, K.: Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: effects of word frequency. Percept. Psychophys. 40(6), 431–439 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Interagency Commission on Learning Disabilities: Learning Disabilities: A Report to the U.S. Congress. Government Printing Office, Washington DC, U.S. (1987)

  43. International Dyslexia Association: Definition of dyslexia: http://interdys.org/DyslexiaDefinition.htm (2011). Based in the initial definition of the Research Committee of the Orton Dyslexia Society, former name of the IDA, done in 1994

  44. Jeanes, R., Busby, A., Martin, J., Lewis, E., Stevenson, N., Pointon, D., Wilkins, A.: Prolonged use of coloured overlays for classroom reading. Br. J. Psychol. 88(4), 541–548 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Jiménez, J.E., Guzmán, R., Rodríguez, C., Artiles, C.: Prevalencia de las dificultades específicas de aprendizaje: La dislexia en español (the prevalence of specific learning difficulties: Dyslexia in Spanish). Anales de Psicología (Annals of Psychology) 25(1), 78–85 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Just, M.A., Carpenter, P.A.: A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. Psychol. Rev. 87, 329–354 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kanvinde, G., Rello, L., Baeza-Yates, R.: IDEAL: a dyslexic-friendly e-book reader (poster). In: Proceedings of ASSETS’12, pp. 205–206. Boulder, USA (2012)

  48. Keenan, J.M., Betjemann, R.S., Olson, R.K.: Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Sci. Stud. Read. 12(3), 281–300 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Kriss, I., Evans, B.J.W.: The relationship between dyslexia and Meares–Irlen Syndrome. J. Res. Read. 28(3), 350–364 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kurniawan, S., Conroy, G.: Comparing comprehension speed and accuracy of online information in students with and without dyslexia. Advances in Universal Web Design and Evaluation: Research, Trends and Opportunities, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA pp. 257–70 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Landerl, K., Bevan, A., Butterworth, B., et al.: Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: a study of 8–9-year-old students. Cognition 93(2), 99–125 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Lewis, C.: Using the “Thinking-Aloud” Method in Cognitive Interface Design. IBM TJ Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lockley, S.: Dyslexia and higher education: accessibility issues. The Higher Education Academy, (2002)

  54. Lyon, G.R.: Toward a definition of dyslexia. Ann. Dyslexia 45(1), 3–27 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  55. McCarthy, J.E., Swierenga, S.J.: What we know about dyslexia and web accessibility: a research review. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 9, 147–152 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  56. McClelland, J.L.: Preliminary letter identification in the perception of words and non-words. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2(1), 80–91 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Mosberg, L., Johns, D.: Reading and listening comprehension in college students with developmental dyslexia. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, (1994)

  58. Nielsen, J.: Lower-literacy users (2012). Jakob Nielsen’s Alertbox. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20050314.html

  59. O’Brien, B.A., Mansfield, J.S., Legge, G.E.: The effect of print size on reading speed in dyslexia. J. Res. Read. 28(3), 332–349 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Olson, R.K., Kliegl, R., Davidson, B.J.: Dyslexic and normal readers’ eye movements. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 9(5), 816 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Paciello, M.G.: Web Accessibility for People with Disabilities. CMP Books, Lawrence, Kansas (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Patterson, K., Marshall, J.C., Coltheart, M.: Surface Dyslexia: Neuropsychological and Cognitive Studies of Phonological Reading. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Patterson, K.E.: Neuropsychological approaches to the study of reading. Br. J. Psychol. 72(2), 151–174 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Patterson, K.E.: The relation between reading and phonological coding: further neuropsychological observations. Neurocase 1(3), 251–257 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Paulesu, E., Démonet, J.F., Fazio, F., McCrory, E., Chanoine, V., Brunswick, N., Cappa, S.F., Cossu, G., Habib, M., Frith, C.D., Frith, U.: Dyslexia: cultural diversity and biological unity. Science 291(5511), 2165–2167 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Pedley, M.: Designing for dyslexics: Part 3 (2006). http://accessites.org/site/2006/11/designing-for-dyslexics-part-3-of-3

  67. Perron, C.: Colour choices on web pages: contrast vs readability (2012). http://www.writer2001.com/index.htm

  68. Pirozzolo, F.J., Rayner, K.: The neural control of eye movements in acquired and developmental reading disorders. Stud. Neurolinguist. 4, 1–27 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Pollak, D.: Dyslexia, the Self and Higher Education: Learning Life Histories of Students Identified as Dyslexic. Trentham Books Ltd, UK (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Rack, J.P., Snowling, M.J., Olson, R.K.: The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: a review. Read. Res. Q. pp. 29–53 (1992)

  71. Rainger, P.: A dyslexic perspective on e-content accessibility (2012). www.texthelp.com/media/39360/USDyslexiaAndWebAccess.PDF

  72. Raney, G.E., Rayner, K.: Word frequency effects and eye movements during two readings of a text. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 49(2), 151 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Rayner, K.: Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers. J. Exp. Child Psychol 41(2), 211–236 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  74. Rayner, K.: Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychol. Bull. 124, 372–422 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Rayner, K., Duffy, S.A.: Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Mem. Cogn. 14(3), 191–201 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  76. Rayner, K., Raney, G.E.: Eye movement control in reading and visual search: effects of word frequency. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 3(2), 245–248 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  77. Rello, L., Baeza-Yates, R.: Lexical quality as a proxy for web text understandability (poster). In: Proceedings of WWW ’12, pp. 591–592. Lyon, France (2012)

  78. Rello, L., Baeza-Yates, R.: The presence of English and Spanish dyslexia in the Web. New Rev. Hypermed. Multimed. 8, 131–158 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  79. Rello, L., Baeza-Yates, R.: Good fonts for dyslexia. In: Proceedings of ASSETS’13. ACM Press, Bellevue, Washington, USA (2013)

  80. Rello, L., Baeza-Yates, R.: Evaluation of dyswebxia: a reading app designed for people with dyslexia. In: Proceedings of W4A ’14. Seoul, Korea (2014)

  81. Rello, L., Baeza-Yates, R., Bott, S., Saggion, H.: Simplify or help? Text simplification strategies for people with dyslexia. In: Proceedings of W4A ’13. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2013)

  82. Rello, L., Baeza-Yates, R., Dempere, L., Saggion, H.: Frequent words improve readability and short words improve understandability for people with dyslexia. In: Proceedings of INTERACT ’13. Cape Town, South Africa (2013)

  83. Rello, L., Baeza-Yates, R., Saggion, H., Bayarri, C., Barbosa, S.D.J.: An iOS reader for people with dyslexia (demo). In: Proceedings of ASSETS’13. ACM Press, Bellevue, Washington, USA (2013)

  84. Rello, L., Bautista, S., Baeza-Yates, R., Gervás, P., Hervás, R., Saggion, H.: One half or 50 %? An eye-tracking study of number representation readability. In: Proceedings of INTERACT ’13. Cape Town, South Africa (2013)

  85. Rello, L., Bayarri, C., Otal, Y., Pielot, P.: A computer-based method to improve the spelling of children with dyslexia using errors. In: Proceedings of the 16th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference of Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS 2014). Rochester, USA (2014)

  86. Rello, L., Kanvinde, G., Baeza-Yates, R.: Layout guidelines for web text and a web service to improve accessibility for dyslexics. In: Proceedings of W4A ’12. ACM Press, Lyon, France (2012)

  87. Rello, L., Pielot, M., Marcos, M.C., Carlini, R.: Size matters (spacing not): 18 points for a dyslexic-friendly Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of W4A ’13. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2013)

  88. Rubenstein, H., Garfield, L., Millikan, J.A.: Homographic entries in the internal lexicon1. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 9(5), 487–494 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  89. de Santana, V.F., de Oliveira, R., Almeida, L.D.A., Baranauskas, M.C.C.: Web accessibility and people with dyslexia: a survey on techniques and guidelines. In: Proceedings of W4A ’12, p. 35. ACM (2012)

  90. Santana, V.F., Oliveira, R., Almeida, L.D.A., Ito, M.: Firefixia: an accessibility web browser customization toolbar for people with dyslexia. In: Proceedings of W4A ’13. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2013)

  91. Schneps, M.H., Thomson, J.M., Sonnert, G., Pomplun, M., Chen, C., Heffner-Wong, A.: Shorter lines facilitate reading in those who struggle. PloS One 8(8), e71,161 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  92. Schuberth, R.E., Eimas, P.D.: Effects of context on the classification of words and non-words. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 3(1), 27–36 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  93. Seymour, P.H.K., Aro, M., Erskine, J.M.: Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. Br. J. Psychol. 94(2), 143–174 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  94. Speech Therapy Association of Catalonia: PRODISCAT: Protocol de detecció i actuació en la dislèxia. Àmbit Educativo (Protocol for detection and management of dyslexia. Educational scope.). Education Department of the Catalonian government (2011)

  95. Temple, C.M.: Developmental analogues to acquired phonological dyslexia. In: Malatesha, R.N., Whitaker H.A. (eds,) Dyslexia: A Global Issue. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, La Haya (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  96. Tinker, M.A.: Influence of simultaneous variation in size of type, width of line, and leading for newspaper type. J. Appl. Psychol. 47(6), 380 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  97. Tinker, M.A.: Legibility of print, vol. 1. Iowa State University Press, Ames (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  98. Tobii Technology: Product description of Tobii 50 Series (2005)

  99. Topac, V.: The development of a text customization tool for existing web sites. In: Text Customization for Readability Symposium (2012)

  100. Topac, V.: Improving text accessibility and understanding of domain-specific information. Ph.D. thesis, Universitatea Politehnica Timişoara (2014)

  101. Tseng, A.: Six surprising bad practices that hurt dyslexic users (2012). http://uxmovement.com/content/6-surprising-bad-practices-that-hurt-dyslexic-users/

  102. United Nations Committee of the General Assembly: Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. United Nations, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  103. Valle, F.: Reading errors in Spanish. In: Reading and writing problems in different systems. Kluwer (1988)

  104. Vellutino, F.R., Fletcher, J.M., Snowling, M.J., Scanlon, D.M.: Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 45(1), 2–40 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  105. Warrington, E., Zangwill, O.L.: A study of dyslexia. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 20(3), 208 (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  106. WebAIM: Web accessibility in mind (2014). http://webaim.org/

  107. Wimmer, H.: Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Appl. Psycholinguist. 14(1), 1–33 (1993)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  108. Wolf, M., O’Rourke, A.G., Gidney, C., Lovett, M., Cirino, P., Morris, R.: The second deficit: an investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia. Read. Writ. 15(1–2), 43–72 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  109. World Health Organization: International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries and Causes of Death (ICD-10), 10th edn. World Health Organization, Geneva (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  110. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C): Web accessibility initiative (WAI) (2011). http://www.w3.org/WAI/

  111. Zarach, V.: Ten guidelines for improving accessibility for people with dyslexia (2012). CETIS University of Wales, Bangor. http://wiki.cetis.ac.uk/Ten_Guidelines_for_Improving_Accessibility_for_People_with_Dyslexia

  112. Zeman, A., Milton, F., Smith, A., Rylance, R.: By heart an fmri study of brain activation by poetry and prose. J. Conscious. Stud. 20(9–10), 9–10 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  113. Zorzi, M., Barbiero, C., Facoettia, A., Lonciari, I., Carrozzi, M., Montico, M., Bravar, L., George, F., Pech-Georgel, C., Ziegler, J.: Extra-large letter spacing improves reading in dyslexia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 11455–11459 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Mari-Carmen Marcos for her assistance with the eye tracking hardware. Special thanks are due to the participants with dyslexia and their families.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luz Rello.

Additional information

This research was conducted while Luz Rello was doing her PhD at Web Research Group, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona.

Appendices

Appendix 1: color and brightness

The CYMK/RGB codes for the contrast and colors used are:

Text contrast:

  • 0 % (pure black font, 000000/0,0,0): brightness text: 255; brightness background: 0; brightness difference: -255; color difference: 765.

  • 25 % (404040/64,64,64): brightness text: 255; brightness background: 63; brightness difference: 192; color difference: 573.

  • 50 % (7E7E7E/126,126,126): brightness text: 255; brightness background: 126; brightness difference: 129; color difference: 387.

  • 75 % (BFBFBF/191,191,191): brightness text: 255; brightness background: 191; brightness difference: 64; color difference: 191.

Background contrast:

  • 100 % (pure black background, 000000/0,0,0): brightness text: 0; brightness background: 255; brightness difference: -255; color difference: 765.

  • 25 % (404040/64,64,64): brightness text: 63; brightness background: 255; brightness difference: -192; color difference: 573.

  • 50 % (7E7E7E/126,126,126): brightness text: 126; brightness background: 255; brightness difference: -129; color difference: 387.

  • 75 % (BFBFBF/191,191,191): brightness text: 191; brightness background: 255; brightness difference: -64; color difference: 191.

Colors:

  • black (000000/0,0,0)/white (FFFFFF/255,255,255):

    Color difference: 765, brightness difference: 255;

  • off-black (0A0A0A/10,10,10)/off-white(FFFFE5/255,255,259):

    Color difference: 735, brightness difference: 245;

  • black (000000/0,0,0)/yellow (FFFF00/255,255,0):

    Color difference: 510, brightness difference: 226;

  • blue (00007D/0,0,125)/white (FFFFFF/255,255,255):

    Color difference: 640, brightness difference: 241;

  • dark brown (1E1E00/30,30,0)/light mucky green (B9B900/185,185,0):

    Color difference: 310, brightness difference: 137

  • brown (282800/40,40,0)/mucky green (A0A000/160,160,0):

    Color difference: 240, brightness difference: 107

  • black (000000/0,0,0)/creme (FAFAC8/250,250,200):

    Color difference: 700, brightness difference: 244;

  • blue (00007D/0,0,125)/yellow (FFFF00/255,255,0):

    Color difference: 635, brightness difference: 212

Appendix 2: text example

¿Soy dix-leso?

by Marcela Paz (Papelucho series)

Por la tarde fuimos al doctor. Era un señor bastante preguntón, que se hacía el simpático por fuera, pero se notaba que era malo por dentro. Me martilló las costras y otras cuestiones con un martillito lindo. Y mientras hablaba y hablaba con la mamá se martillaba su otra mano gorda.

Yo pensaba qué pasaría si en vez de su mano gorda se martillara el tremendo grano que tenía en la nariz? Pero apenas se lo rascó y siguió dale que dale hablando de “este niño”. Y “este niño” por aquí y “este niño” por allá.

Traté de entender lo que decían.

Casi lo entendí. No estoy seguro si la cosa es que soy superdotado o viceversa. Menos mal que además parece que soy dix-leso, que es algo muy guay y como distinto. Y tampoco me importa mucho ser así.

Mis padres fueron al colegio a hablar con mi profe y volvieron furiosos.

De todos modos yo tengo mi enfermedad propia y nadie me la quita.

Pero en la noche, me desvelé. Porque claro, en el día a uno le gusta ser enfermo y en la noche no. Así que desperté a mi padre apretetándole la nariz porque es el único modo de despertarlo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rello, L., Baeza-Yates, R. How to present more readable text for people with dyslexia. Univ Access Inf Soc 16, 29–49 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-015-0438-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-015-0438-8

Keywords

Navigation