Skip to main content
Log in

The next-generation business meeting: from i-lands to flexible meeting landscapes

  • Long paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Meetings are an important form of interaction in business settings. However, meetings are often not held in a way that makes all participants feel engaged. Meeting support systems try to overcome this obstacle by helping meeting participants in the meeting workflow. This paper takes a complementary approach by distinguishing between different perspectives of good meetings: the peopleware perspective, the generic groupware perspective, and the roomware perspective. It is argued that all these perspectives have to be considered simultaneously when heading toward an ideal meeting system design. The paper presents excerpts of a pattern language that empowers users to improve their meeting. Besides this, the pattern language can be considered as a tool for the designer. After showing, how both groups made use of the patterns, the paper finally presents LivingAgendas, a meeting support system that can accompany the meeting participant through the meeting life cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., Angel, S.: A Pattern Language. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alexander, C.: The timeless way of building. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bicharra Garcia, A.C., Kunz, J., Fischer, M.: Cutting to the chase: improving meeting effectiveness by focusing on the agenda. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW’04, Chicago, Illinois, USA, pp. 346–349. New York, NY, 06–10 November 2004

  4. Coplien, J., Harrison, N.B.: Organizational Patterns of Agile Software Development. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. DeMarco, T., Lister, T.: Peopleware: Productive Projects and Teams, 2nd edn. Dorset House, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Doyle, M., Strauss, D.: How to Make Meetings Work. Jove Books, New York (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eppler, M., Sukowski, O.: Managing team knowledge. Eur. Manag. J. 18(3), 334–341 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Greenberg, S., Boyle, M., Laberge, J.: PDAs and shared public displays: making personal information public, and public information personal. In: Personal Technologies, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 54–64 (1999)

  9. Guy, E.S.: “…real, concrete facts about what works…”: integrating evaluation and design through patterns. In: Proceedings of GROUP’05. ACM, New York (2005)

  10. Herlea, T., Claessens, J., De Cock, D., Preneel, B., Vanderwalle, J.: Secure meeting scheduling with agenda. In: Steinmetz, R. et al. (eds.) Proceedings of IFIP CMS 2001, Communications and Multimedia Security Issues of the New Century, May 21, Darmstadt, Germany, pp. 327–338 (2001)

  11. Herrmann, T., Hoffmann, M., Jahnke, I., Kienle, A., Kunau, G., Loser, K.-U., Menold, N.: Concepts for usable patterns of groupware applications. In: Proceedings of GROUP’03, pp. 349–358. ACM Press, Sanibel Island (2003)

  12. Haake, J.M., Haake, A., Schümmer, T., Bourimi, M., Landgraf, B.: End-user controlled group formation and access rights management in a shared workspace system. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW ‘04, Chicago, Illinois, USA, pp. 554–563. ACM, New York, 06–10 November 2004

  13. Haake, J.M., Schümmer, T., Haake, A., Bourimi, M., Landgraf, B.: Supporting flexible collaborative distance learning in the CURE platform. In: Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-37). IEEE Press (2004)

  14. Jennings, N.R., Jackson, A.J.: Agent-based meeting scheduling: a design and implementation. Electron. Lett. 31(5), 350–352 (1995) (IEEE Press)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ju, W., Lee, B.A., Klemmer, S.R.: Range: exploring implicit interaction through electronic whiteboard design. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2008 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW’08 (2008)

  16. Kelsey, D., Plumb, P.: Great Meetings! Great Results. Hanson Park Press Inc, USA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Matson, E. (1996). The seven sins of deadly meetings. Fast Company. April. http://www.fastcompany.com/online/02/meetings_Printer_Friendly.html

  18. Mengis, J., Eppler, M.: Seeing versus arguing. The moderating role of collaborative visualization in team knowledge integration. J. Univers. Knowl. Manag. 1(3), 151–162 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Microsoft SharePoint. http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/help/HA011154391033.aspx (visited Mar 2009)

  20. Jay F.N. Jr., Briggs, R.O., Mittleman, D.D., Vogel, D.R., Balthazard, P.A.:Lessons from a dozen years of group support systems research: a discussion of lab and field findings. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 13(3), 163–207 (1996). http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1189557

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nunamaker, J.F., Dennis, A., Valacich, J., Vogel, D., George, J.F.: Electronic meeting systems. Commun. ACM 34(7), 40–61 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Parker, G., Hoffman, R.: Meeting Excellence: 33 Tools to Lead Meetings That Get Results. Jossey-Bass, San Fransisco (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Prante, T., Röcker, C., Streitz, N.A., Stenzel, R., Magerkurth, C., van Alphen, D., Plewe, D.A.: Hello. Wall—beyond ambient displays. In: Ljugstrand, P., Brotherton, J. (eds.) Video Track and Adjunct Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UBICOMP’03), Seattle, Washington, USA, 12–15 October 2003

  24. Rittel, H.W.J., Webber, M.M.: Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci. 4, 155–169 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schümmer, T.: A Pattern Approach to End-User-Centered Groupware Design. Lohmar, Cologne (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schuler, D.: Liberating Voices: A Pattern Language for Communication Revolution. MIT Press, MA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stefik, M., Foster, G., Bobrow, D.G., Kahn, K., Lanning, S., Suchman, L.: Beyond the chalkboard: computer support for collaboration and problem solving in meetings. Commun. ACM 30(1), 32–47 (1987). doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/7885.7887

  28. Streitz, N.A., Geißler, J., Haake, J.M., Hol, J.: DOLPHIN: integrated meeting support across local and remote desktop environments and LiveBoards. In: Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pp. 345–358. ACM, Chapel Hill (1994)

  29. Sen, I., Haynes, T., Arora, N.: Satisfying user preferences while negotiating meetings. Int. J. Human Comput. Stud. 47, 47–53 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schümmer, T., Lukosch, S.: Patterns for Computer-Mediated Interaction. Wiley, Chichester (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  31. SMART Board™ interactive whiteboards home page. http://www2.smarttech.com/st/en-US/Products/SMART+Boards/

  32. Schümmer, T., Tandler, P.: Patterns for technology enhanced meetings. In: Proceedings of EuroPLoP 2007, UVK, Konstanz (2008)

  33. Schümmer, T., Tellioğlu, H., Haake, J.M.: Towards LivingAgendas—shaping the next generation of business meetings. Paper submitted to ECSCW, 2009

  34. Streitz, N.A., Tandler, P., Müller-Tomfelde, C., Konomi, S.: Roomware: towards the next generation of human-computer interaction based on an integrated design of real and virtual worlds. In: Carroll, J. (ed.) Human-Computer Interaction in the New Millennium, pp. 553–578. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2001)

  35. Tandler, P.: Go digital: toss pin boards and flip charts. Digital moderation—experience active meetings. Comput. Graph. Topics 19(2), 22–24 (2007). http://www.inigraphics.net/press/topics/

  36. Tandler, P.: Synchronous Collaboration in the Age of Ubiquitous Computing. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller (2008)

  37. Tuckman, B.W.: Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychol. Bull. 63, 384–399 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wisneski, C., Ishii, H., Dahley, A., Gorbet, M., Brave, S., Ullmer, B., Yarin, P.: Ambient displays: turning architectural space into an interface between people and digital information. In: Streitz, N.A., Konomi, S., Burkhardt, H.J. (eds.) Cooperative Buildings, Integrating Information, Organization, and Architecture, First International Workshop, CoBuild’98, pp. 22–23. Springer, Berlin (1998)

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank our colleagues of the MAPPER project, especially Hilda Tellioğlu, who shared her insights from ethnographic studies in MAPPER with us. Special thanks are due to all members of the EuroPLoP07 writer’s workshop where a previous version of our meeting patterns was discussed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Till Schümmer.

Appendix: Additional thumbnails of meeting patterns

Appendix: Additional thumbnails of meeting patterns

Action Item

Write an action item list during the meeting. For each action item, agree on someone responsible and define a due date. Optionally specify who can support the responsible person solving an action item. Review the action item list at the end of the meeting to get everyone’s confirmation about agreed tasks (Nodding Dog). Track status of action items in next meeting or define a date when to report next about the progress. The pattern helps to improve Reliability, Clear Goals, Efficiency, Focus, and Results.

Activate!

The pattern provides guidance on choosing those methods and tools in meetings that support a high level of concurrent activity for all participants (and supporting the interaction with technology). This pattern addresses the Communication property and the Participation property.

Be Prepared

Communicate what kind of preparation is required for participating in a meeting and ensure that participants can do this preparation, e.g., by providing access to preparation material or adding preparation tasks to the participants’ calendars. It addresses the following properties: Discipline, Information, Efficiency, Focus.

No Discussion

Label agenda items that have the goal of confirming a decision for which a significant consensus already exists with the term “No Discussion”. Link the item to a prepared decision. As long as no one objects, simply Vote on the prepared decision during the meeting. Having the pattern in place improves Efficiency, Focus, Communication, and Results.

Present Without Presenting

To prevent that meeting time is wasted on repeated presentations (and long PowerPoint shows), you can create the presentation beforehand and attach it to the corresponding agenda item of the meeting (Its My Agenda, Its My Meeting). Ensure that everyone sticks to the deadline to upload input material. Ensure that everyone is prepared (Be Prepared) and has read all input documents. Prepare questions that you will then discuss during the meeting. The pattern focuses on these properties: Information, Efficiency, and Focus.

RSVP—Repondez sil Vous Plait

Collect commitments for participation in order to decide whether or not all required participants are present for a specific agenda item. Share the information of planned attendance with the group. The pattern focuses on these properties: Discipline, Participation, and Results.

Setup and test the tools in time before the meeting

Check the meeting space early enough before the meeting in order to setup and test all tools needed and prevent problems with making the technology work at the participant’s devices. Plan some time to substitute broken components. Have spare parts at hand (e.g., a second projector in case the lamp is broken) or plan and prepare fallback solutions. The pattern addresses the Context property.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schümmer, T., Tandler, P. & Haake, J.M. The next-generation business meeting: from i-lands to flexible meeting landscapes. Univ Access Inf Soc 11, 239–258 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-011-0239-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-011-0239-7

Keywords

Navigation