Abstract
This paper discusses work carried in the context of a study addressing the design and development of a wearable communication aid for people who are illiterate and cannot speak. People with such disabilities often depend on electronic augmentative and alternative communication devices for interpersonal communication. A central theme of the paper, however, is that such products, and products intended for people with disabilities more generally, have characteristics that inadequately attend to users’ needs—in particular many devices pay insufficient regard to the psychological and sociological impact the devices have upon their users. The paper briefly discusses an empirical case study targeted to design and develop the Portland Communication Aid (PCA). The process of establishing user requirements, and in particular the notion of designer-facilitated participatory design, is discussed. The resulting prototype of the PCA is briefly explained along with a discussion of the importance of product semantics in the design of assistive technology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen JL (2002) Some problems of designing for augmentative and alternative communication users: an enquiry through practical design activity. PhD Thesis. Loughborough University, Loughborough
Allen JL (2004) Beyond functionality—product semantics in assistive device design. In: Keates S, Clarkson J, Langdon P, Robinson P (eds) Designing a more inclusive world. Springer-Verlag, London, pp 101–110
Buchanan R (1992) Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues 8(2):5–21
Collingsworth J (1993) Design for disability: a handbook for students and teachers. London Guildhall University, London
Csikszentmihalyi M, Rochberg-Halton E (1981) The meaning of things—domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Dewey J (1938) Experience and education. The MacMillan Company, New York
Galer M (1983) Methodology for the evaluation of aids for the disabled. Institute for Consumer Ergonomics, Loughborough
Goffman E (1973) Stigma—notes on the management of spoiled identity. Penguin Books Ltd, London
Hogan P (1994/95) Introducing the European Institute for Design and Disability. Usertalk 4(Winter):2–3
Jonas W (1993) Design as problem-solving? or: here is the solution—what was the problem?. Design Studies 14(2):157–170
Jonkers HL (1980) Aids for the physically disabled: consumer conclusions drawn from a cost-benefit analysis. In: Bray J, Wright S (eds) The use of technology in the care of the elderly and the disabled. Francis Pinter, London, pp 167–178
Jordan PW (1999) Inclusive design. In: Green WS, Jordan PW (eds) Human factors in product design: current practice and future trends. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 171–181
Krippendorff K, Butter R (1984) Product semantics: exploring the symbolic qualities of form. In: Innovation, the Journal of the Industrial Designers Society of America, Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 4–9
Light J, McNaughton D, Parnes P (1986) A protocol for the assessment of the communication interaction skills of non speaking severely handicapped adults and their facilitators. Blissymbolics Communication Institute, Toronto
McConkey R, McCormack B (1983) Educating people about disability. Souvenir Press (Educational & Academic) Ltd, London
Murphy J (1993) The advantages and disadvantages of high tech AAC devices with voice output. In Fifth Annual European Minspeak Conference. Mansfield, pp 55–65
Murphy J, Collins S (1994) Advantages and disadvantages of AAC Systems. Communication Matters 8(3):5–7
Murphy J, Marková I, Moodie E, Scott J, Boa S (1995) Augmentative and alternative communication systems used by people with cerebral palsy in Scotland: demographic survey. Augmentative Alternative Communication 11(1):26–36
Nicolle C, Poulson DF, Richardson SJ (1995) A methodology for defining user requirements for rehabilitation and assistive technology. In: Porrero IP, de la Bellasca RP (eds) The European context for assistive technology—Proceedings of the 2nd TIDE Congress. IOS Press, Paris, pp 37–40
Poulson DF, Ashby MC, Richardson SJ (eds) (1996) USERfit: a practical handbook on user-centred design for assistive technology. ECSC-EC-EAEC, Brussels
Ring ND (1980) Communication aids for the speech impaired. In: Bray J, Wright S (eds) The use of technology in the care of the elderly and the disabled. Francis Pinter, London, pp 79–82
Stanton N, Baber C (1996) Factors affecting the selection of methods and techniques prior to conducting a usability evaluation. In: Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, McClelland IL (eds) Usability Evaluation in Industry. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 39–48
Thomas D (1982) The experience of handicap. Methuen & Co Ltd, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Allen, J. Designing desirability in an augmentative and alternative communication device. Univ Access Inf Soc 4, 135–145 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-005-0117-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-005-0117-2