Foundations of Computational Mathematics

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 151–181 | Cite as

Arbitrary-Order Trigonometric Fourier Collocation Methods for Multi-Frequency Oscillatory Systems

Article

Abstract

We rigorously study a novel type of trigonometric Fourier collocation methods for solving multi-frequency oscillatory second-order ordinary differential equations (ODEs) \(q^{\prime \prime }(t)+Mq(t)=f(q(t))\) with a principal frequency matrix \(M\in \mathbb {R}^{d\times d}\). If \(M\) is symmetric and positive semi-definite and \(f(q) = -\nabla U(q)\) for a smooth function \(U(q)\), then this is a multi-frequency oscillatory Hamiltonian system with the Hamiltonian \(H(q,p)=p^{T}p/2+q^{T}Mq/2+U(q),\) where \(p = q'\). The solution of this system is a nonlinear multi-frequency oscillator. The new trigonometric Fourier collocation method takes advantage of the special structure brought by the linear term \(Mq\), and its construction incorporates the idea of collocation methods, the variation-of-constants formula and the local Fourier expansion of the system. The properties of the new methods are analysed. The analysis in the paper demonstrates an important feature, namely that the trigonometric Fourier collocation methods can be of an arbitrary order and when \(M\rightarrow 0\), each trigonometric Fourier collocation method creates a particular Runge–Kutta–Nyström-type Fourier collocation method, which is symplectic under some conditions. This allows us to obtain arbitrary high-order symplectic methods to deal with a special and important class of systems of second-order ODEs in an efficient way. The results of numerical experiments are quite promising and show that the trigonometric Fourier collocation methods are significantly more efficient in comparison with alternative approaches that have previously appeared in the literature.

Keywords

Second-order ordinary differential equations Multi-frequency oscillatory systems Trigonometric Fourier collocation methods Multi-frequency oscillatory Hamiltonian systems Quadratic invariant Variation-of-constants formula  Symplectic methods 

Mathematics Subject Classification

65L05 65L20 65M20 65P10 

References

  1. 1.
    L. Brugnano and F. Iavernaro. Line integral methods which preserve all invariants of conservative problems. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 236 (2012), 3905–3919.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Brugnano, F. Iavernaro and D. Trigiante. A note on the efficient implementation of Hamiltonian BVMs. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 236 (2011), 375–383.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. Brugnano, F. Iavernaro and D. Trigiante. A simple framework for the derivation and analysis of effective one-step methods for ODEs. Appl. Math. Comput. 218 (2012), 8475–8485.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. Brugnano, F. Iavernaro and D. Trigiante. Energy and Quadratic Invariants Preserving integrators based upon Gauss collocation formulae. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 50 (2012), 2897–2916.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R.W. Butler and A.T.A. Wood. Laplace approximations for hypergeometric functions with matrix argument. Ann. Statist. 30 (2002), 1155–1177.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Celledoni, R.I. McLachlan, B. Owren and G.R.W. Quispel. Energy-Preserving Integrators and the Structure of B-series. Found. Comput. Math. 10 (2010), 673–693.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Chartier and A. Murua. Preserving first integrals and volume forms of additively split systems. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 27 (2007), 381–405.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.L. Cieslinski and B. Ratkiewicz. Energy-preserving numerical schemes of high accuracy for one-dimensional Hamiltonian systems. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 44 (2011), 155206.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Cohen. Conservation properties of numerical integrators for highly oscillatory Hamiltonian systems. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 26 (2006), 34–59.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Cohen and E. Hairer. Linear energy-preserving integrators for Poisson systems. BIT 51 (2011), 91–101.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Cohen, E. Hairer and C. Lubich. Numerical energy conservation for multi-frequency oscillatory differential equations. BIT 45 (2005), 287–305.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Cohen, T. Jahnke, K. Lorenz and C. Lubich. Numericalintegrators for highly oscillatory Hamiltonian systems: a review, inAnalysis, Modeling and Simulation of Multiscale Problems (A. Mielke,ed.). Springer, Berlin (2006), 553–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Dahlby, B. Owren and T. Yaguchi. Preserving multiple first integrals by discrete gradients. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 44 (2011), 305205.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.M. Franco. Runge-Kutta-Nyström methods adapted to the numerical integration of perturbed oscillators. Comput. Phys. Comm. 147 (2002), 770–787.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J.M. Franco. Stability of explicit ARKN methods for perturbed oscillators. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 173 (2005), 389–396.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J.M. Franco. New methods for oscillatory systems based on ARKN methods. Appl. Numer. Math. 56 (2006), 1040–1053.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. García, P. Martín and A.B. González. New methods for oscillatory problems based on classical codes. Appl. Numer. Math. 42 (2002), 141–157.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    B. García-Archilla, J.M. Sanz-Serna and R.D. Skeel. Long-time-step methods for oscillatory differential equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 20 (1999), 930–963.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. Gutiérrez, J. Rodriguez and A.J. Sáez. Approximation of hypergeometric functions with matricial argument through their development in series of zonal polynomials. Electron. Trans. Numer. Anal. 11 (2000), 121–130.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    E. Hairer. Energy-preserving variant of collocation methods. JNAIAM J. Numer. Anal. Ind. Appl. Math. 5 (2010), 73–84.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    E. Hairer and C. Lubich. Long-time energy conservation of numerical methods for oscillatory differential equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 38 (2000), 414–441.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    E. Hairer, C. Lubich and G. Wanner. Geometric Numerical Integration: Structure-Preserving Algorithms for Ordinary Differential Equations. 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    E. Hairer, R.I. McLachlan and R.D. Skeel. On energy conservation of the simplified Takahashi-Imada method. Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 43 (2009), 631–644.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    E. Hairer, S.P. Nørsett and G. Wanner. Solving OrdinaryDifferential Equations I: Nonstiff Problems. Springer-Verlag,Berlin, 1993.MATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    J.K. Hale. Ordinary Differential Equations. Roberte E. Krieger Publishing company, Huntington, New York, 1980.MATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. Hochbruck and C. Lubich. A Gautschi-type method for oscillatory second-order differential equations. Numer. Math. 83 (1999), 403–426.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    M. Hochbruck and A. Ostermann. Explicit exponential Runge-Kutta methods for semilineal parabolic problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 43 (2005), 1069–1090.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    M. Hochbruck and A. Ostermann. Exponential integrators. Acta Numer. 19 (2010), 209–286.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    M. Hochbruck, A. Ostermann and J. Schweitzer. Exponential rosenbrock-type methods. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 47 (2009), 786–803.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    F. Iavernaro and B. Pace. Conservative Block-Boundary Value Methods for the solution of Polynomial Hamiltonian Systems. AIP Conf. Proc. 1048 (2008), 888–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    F. Iavernaro and D. Trigiante. High-order symmetric schemes for the energy conservation of polynomial Hamiltonian problems. JNAIAM J. Numer. Anal. Ind. Appl. Math. 4 (2009), 787–101.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    A. Iserles. A First Course in the Numerical Analysis of Differential Equations. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    A. Iserles, G.R.W. Quispel and P.S.P. Tse. B-series methods cannot be volume-preserving. BIT 47 (2007), 351–378.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    A. Iserles and A. Zanna. Preserving algebraic invariants with Runge-Kutta methods. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 125 (2000), 69–81.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    P. Koev and A. Edelman. The efficient evaluation of the hypergeometric function of a matrix argument. Math. Comput. 75 (2006), 833–846.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    M. Leok and T. Shingel. Prolongation-collocation variational integrators. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 32 (2012), 1194–1216.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    J. Li, B. Wang, X. You and X. Wu. Two-step extended RKN methods for oscillatory systems. Comput. Phys. Comm. 182 (2011), 2486–2507.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    J. Li and X. Wu. Adapted Falkner-type methods solving oscillatory second-order differential equations. Numer. Algo. 62 (2013), 355–381.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    R.I. McLachlan, G.R.W. Quispel and P.S.P. Tse. Linearization-preserving self-adjoint and symplectic integrators. BIT 49 (2009), 177–197.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    M. Petkovšek, H.S. Wilf and D. Zeilberger. A=B, AK Peters Ltd., Wellesley, MA, 1996.MATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    G.R.W. Quispel and D.I. McLaren. A new class of energy-preserving numerical integration methods. J. Phys. A 41 (2008), 045206.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    E.D. Rainville. Special functions. Macmillan, New York, 1960.MATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    S. Reich. Symplectic integration of constrained Hamiltonian systems by composition methods. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 33 (1996), 475–491.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    S. Reich. On higher-order semi-explicit symplectic partitioned Runge-Kutta methods for constrained Hamiltonian systems. Numer. Math. 76 (1997), 231–247.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    D.S.P. Richards. High-Dimensional Random Matrices from the Classical Matrix Groups, and Generalized Hypergeometric Functions of Matrix Argument. Symmetry 3 (2011), 600–610.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    J.M. Sanz-Serna. Symplectic integrators for Hamiltonian problems: an overview. Acta Numer. 1 (1992), 243–286.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    C.W. Scherr and E.V. Ivash. Associated Legendre Functions. Am. J. Phys. 31 (1963), 753.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    L.J. Slater. Generalized hypergeometric functions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1966.MATHGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sun Geng. Construction of high order symplectic Runge-Kutta methods. J. Comput. Math. 11 (1993), 250–260.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    P.J. Van der Houwen and B.P. Sommeijer. Explicit Runge-Kutta (-Nyström) methods with reduced phase errors for computing oscillating solutions. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 24 (1987), 595–617.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    H. Van de Vyver. A fourth-order symplectic exponentially fitted integrator. Comput. Phys. Comm. 174 (2006), 115–130.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    B. Wang, K. Liu and X. Wu. A Filon-type asymptotic approach to solving highly oscillatory second-order initial value problems. J. Comput. Phys. 243 (2013), 210–223.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    B. Wang and X. Wu. A new high precision energy-preserving integrator for system of oscillatory second-order differential equations. Phys. Lett. A 376 (2012), 1185–1190.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    B. Wang, X. Wu and H. Zhao. Novel improved multidimensional Strömer-Verlet formulas with applications to four aspects in scientific computation. Math. Comput. Modell. 57 (2013), 857–872.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    K. Wright. Some relationships between implicit Runge-Kutta, collocation and Lanczos \(\tau \) methods, and their stability properties. BIT 10 (1970), 217–227.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    X. Wu and B. Wang. Multidimensional adapted Runge-Kutta-Nyström methods for oscillatory systems. Comput. Phys. Comm. 181 (2010), 1955–1962.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    X. Wu, B. Wang and W. Shi. Efficient energy-preserving integrators for oscillatory Hamiltonian systems. J. Comput. Phys. 235 (2013), 587–605.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    X. Wu, B. Wang and J. Xia. Explicit symplectic multidimensional exponential fitting modified Runge-Kutta-Nyström methods. BIT 52 (2012), 773–795.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    X. Wu, X. You, W. Shi and B. Wang. ERKN integrators for systems of oscillatory second-order differential equations. Comput. Phys. Comm. 181 (2010), 1873–1887.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    X. Wu, X. You and B. Wang. Structure-Preserving Algorithms for Oscillatory Differential Equations. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    X. Wu, X. You and J. Xia. Order conditions for ARKN methods solving oscillatory systems. Comput. Phys. Comm. 180 (2009), 2250–2257.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SFoCM 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mathematical SciencesQufu Normal UniversityQufuPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics, Nanjing UniversityState Key Laboratory for Novel Software Technology at Nanjing UniversityNanjingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Centre for Mathematical SciencesUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations