Skip to main content
Log in

Utility indifference valuation for jump risky assets

  • Published:
Decisions in Economics and Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We discuss utility maximization problems with exponential preferences in an incomplete market where the risky asset dynamics is described by a pure jump process driven by two independent Poisson processes. This includes results on portfolio optimization under an additional European claim. Value processes of the optimal investment problems, optimal hedging strategies and the indifference price are represented in terms of solutions to backward stochastic equations driven by the Poisson martingales. Via a duality result, the solution to the dual problems is derived. In particular, an explicit expression for the density of the minimal martingale measure is provided. The Markovian case is also discussed. This includes either asset dynamics dependent on a pure jump stochastic factor or claims written on a correlated non tradable asset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ankirchner S., Imkeller P., Reis G.: Pricing and hedging of derivatives based on non-tradable underlyings. Math. Finance 20(2), 289–312 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becherer D.: Bounded solutions to backward SDE’s with jumps for utility optimization, indifference hedging. Ann. Appl. Probab. 16(4), 2027–2054 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellini F., Frittelli M.: On the existence of minimax martingale measures. Math. Finance 12, 1–21 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjork T., Kabanov Y., Runggaldier W.: Bond market structure in presence of marked point processes. Math. Finance 7(2), 211–223 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, R., Ferrario, B., Santacroce, M.: Backward stochastic differential equations driven by cadlag martingales. Teor. Veroyatn. Primen. 52, 375–385 (2007) Transl. to appear in Theory of Probability and its Applications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceci C.: An HJB approach to exponential utility maximization for jump processes. Int. J. Risk Assess. Manag. 11(1/2), 104–121 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceci C., Gerardi A.: Pricing for geometric marked point processes under partial information: entropy approach. Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance 12(2), 179–207 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceci C., Gerardi A.: Utility-based hedging, pricing with a nontraded asset for jump processes. Nonlinear Anal. Theor. Methods Appl. 71(12), e1953–e1969 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Delbaen F., Grandits P., Rheinlander T., Samperi D., Schweizer M., Stricker C.: Exponential hedging, entropic penalties. Math. Finance 12, 99–123 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doléans-Dade C.: Quelques applications de la formule de changement de variables pour le semi-martingales. Z. fur. W. 16, 181–194 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ethier S.N., Kurtz T.G.: Markov Processes. Characterization and Convergence. Wiley, New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming W., Soner M.M.: Controlled Markov processes and viscosity solutions. Springer, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Föllmer H., Sondermann D.: Hedging of nonredundant contingent claims. In: Hildenbrand, W., Mas-Colell, A. (eds) Contributions to Mathematical Economics, pp. 205–223. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey R.: Risk minimization with incomplete information in a model for high-frequency data. Math. Finance 10(2), 215–222 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey R., Runggaldier W.: A nonlinear filtering approach to volatility estimation with a view towards high frequency data. Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance 4(2), 199–210 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frittelli M.: The minimal entropy martingale measure, the valuation problem in incomplete markets. Math. Finance 10(1), 39–52 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerardi A., Tardelli P.: Risk-neutral measures and pricing for a pure jump price process: a stochastic control approach. Probab. Eng. Inf. Sci. 24(01), 47–76 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granditis P., Rheinlander T.: On the minimal entropy martingale measure. Ann. Probab. 30(3), 1003–1038 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Y., Imkeller P., Müller M.: Utility maximization in incomplete markets. Ann. Appl. Probab. 15(3), 1691–1712 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karoui N.El, Peng N., Quenez M.C.: Backward stochastic differential equations in finance. Math. Finance 7(1), 1–71 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karoui N. El, Rouge R.: Pricing via utility maximization and entropy. Math. Finance 10, 259–276 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz T.G., Stockbridge R.H.: Existence of Markov controls and characterization of optimal Markov controls. SIAM J. Control Optim. 36(2), 609–653 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mania M., Santacroce M.: Exponential utility maximization under partial information. Finance Stoch. 14(3), 419–448 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mania M., Schweizer M.: Dynamic exponential utility indifference valuation. Ann. Appl. Probab. 15(3), 2113–2143 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mania M., Tevzadze R.: Backward stochastic PDEs related to the utility maximization problem. J. Math. Sci. 153(3), 292–376 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton R.: Optimal consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous time model. J. Econ. Theor. 3, 373–413 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morlais M.A.: Utility maximization in a jump market model. Stoch. Int. J. Probab. Stoch. Process. 81(1), 1–27 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musiela M., Zariphopoulou T.: An example of indifference prices under exponential preferences. Finance Stoch. 8, 229–239 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen M., Zitkovic G.: Optimal investment with an unbounded random endowment and utility-based pricing. Math. Finance 19(1), 129–159 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardoux, E.: Generalized discontinuous backward stochastic differential equations. In : Karoui, N.El., Mazliak, L. (eds.) Backward Stochastic Differential Equations in: Pitman Res. Notes Math. Ser. 364, Longman Harlow, pp. 207–219 (1997)

  • Rydberg, T., Shephard N.: A modelling framework for prices, trades made at the New York stock exchange, Nuffield College working paper series 1999-W14, Oxford, Nonlinear, Nonstationary Signal Processing, eds. W.J. Fitzgerald et al., Cambridge University Press, pp. 217–246 (2000)

  • Schachermayer W.: Utility maximization in incomplete market. In: Frittelli, M., Runggaldier, W.J. (eds) Stochastic Methods in Finance, pp. 255–293. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zariphopoulou T.: A solution approach to valuation with unhedgeable risks. Finance Stoch. 5(1), 61–82 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Ceci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ceci, C., Gerardi, A. Utility indifference valuation for jump risky assets. Decisions Econ Finan 34, 85–120 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10203-010-0107-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10203-010-0107-6

Keywords

Keywords

Navigation