pp 1–13 | Cite as

Diversity of culturable actinobacteria associated with deepwater endemic amphipods of Lake Baikal and study of their biosynthetic capabilities

  • E. S. Protasov
  • D. V. Axenov-GribanovEmail author
  • Ya. A. Rzhechitsky
  • V. A. Emshanova
  • Y. A. Shirokova
  • M. A. Timofeyev
Special Feature: Original Article Freshwater Ecosystems - Key Problems and New Findings from Russian Lakes including Lake Baikal


Lake Baikal’s ecosystem is among the oldest lacustrine ecosystems on the planet with a diverse and unique flora and fauna. Amphipods (Amphipoda, Crustacea) are one of the most diverse groups among the lake’s invertebrate animals. The lake contains more than 350 species and subspecies of amphipods, and each of these species play a significant role in the lake’s food webs. However, their relationships with microorganisms are poorly investigated, which leaves gaps in understanding the relations between aquatic crustaceans and bacteria. We studied the diversity of a specific group of culturable microorganisms (Actinobacteria), and their possible relations with deepwater endemic amphipods present in Lake Baikal. We found that while 73% of the isolated strains belong to the widely distributed genus of Streptomyces, 27% of the isolates belong to rare genera such as Amycolatopsis, Micromonospora, and Pseudonocardia. Fifty-three percent of the studied strains expressed antibiotic activity against Gram-positive bacteria and possess polyketide synthase (PKS) genes. Thus, Actinobacteria associated with Baikal’s endemic deepwater amphipods might both protect amphipods against pathogenic microorganisms and be an untapped source of new natural products with biosynthetic potential.


Baikal Actinobacteria Amphipods Endemics PKS 



We are grateful to Prof. Vadim Takhteev (Irkutsk State University) for help with amphipod identification. Also, we thank Dr. Polina Drozdova (Irkutsk State University), reviewers and editors for their valuable comments that improved the article greatly. This study was carried out with partial financial support of the RSF project (18-74-00018 (DAG)), RFBR project (18-29-05051 (DAG), 18-34-00294 (EP, VE)), projects of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (6.12737.2018/12.2 (EP), 6.9654.2017/8.9 (ZS), 6.12738.2018/12.2 (DAG)).


  1. Ampe F, Thiery A (1998) Microflora associated with the digestive tract of the fairy shrimp Branchinella spinosa. FEMS Microbiol Lett 158:201–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Axenov-Gribanov D, Rebets Y, Tokovenko B, Axenov-Gribanov D, Voytsekhovskaya I, Timofeyev M, Luzhetskyy A (2016) The isolation and characterization of actinobacteria from dominant benthic macroinvertebrates endemic to Lake Baikal. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 61:159–168. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Axenov-Gribanov DV, Tokovenko BT, Rebets YV, Voytsekhovskaya IV, Shatilina ZM, Protasov ES, Luzhetskyy AN, Timofeyev MA (2017) Draft genome sequence of Streptomyces sp. strain IB2014011-1, isolated from Trichoptera sp. larvae of lake Baikal. Genome Announc 5(17): e00062-17. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayuso-Sacido A, Genilloud O (2005) New PCR primers for the screening of NRPS and PKS-I systems in actinomycetes: detection and distribution of these biosynthetic gene sequences in major taxonomic groups. Microb Ecol 49:10–24. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bedulina DS, Takhteev VV, Pogrebnyak SG, Govorukhina EB, Madyarova EV, Lubyaga YA (2014) On Eulimnogammarus messerschmidtii, sp. n. (Amphipoda: Gammaridea) from Lake Baikal, Siberia, with redescription of E. cyanoides (Sowinsky) and remarks on taxonomy of the genus Eulimnogammarus. Zootaxa 3838:518–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bérdy J (2012) Thoughts and facts about antibiotics: where we are now and where we are heading. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 65:385–395. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bilyk O, Luzhetskyy A (2016) Metabolic engineering of natural product biosynthesis in actinobacteria. Curr Opin Biotechnol 42:98–107. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cafaro MJ, Poulsen M, Little AE, Price SL, Gerado NM, Wong B, Currie CR (2011) Specificity in the symbiotic association between fungus-growing ants and protective Pseudonocardia bacteria. Proc Biol Sci 278:1814–1822. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carman KR, Dobbs FC (1997) Epibiotic microorganisms on copepods and other marine crustaceans. Microsc Res Tech 37:116–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chevrette MG, Carlson CM, Ortega HE, Thomas C, Ananiev GE, Barns KJ, Grubbs KJ (2019) The antimicrobial potential of Streptomyces from insect microbiomes. Nat Commun 10:516. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dempsey AAC, Kitting CL, Rosson RA (1989) Bacterial variability among individual Penaeid shrimp digestive tracts. Crustaceana 56:267–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Felsenstein J (1981) Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 17:368–376. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gebreyohannes G, Moges F, Sahile S, Raja N (2013) Isolation and characterization of potential antibiotic producing actinomycetes from water and sediments of Lake Tana, Ethiopia. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 3:426–435. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gillan DC, Dubilier N (2004) Novel epibiotic Thiothrix bacterium on a marine amphipod. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:3772–3775. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gillan DC, Ribesse J, De Ridder C (2004) The iron-encrusted microbial community of Urothoe poseidonis (Crustacea, Amphipoda). J Sea Res 52:21–32. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gil-Turnes MS, Fenical W (1992) Embryos of Homarus americanus are protected by epibiotic bacteria. Biol Bull 182:105–108. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gil-Turnes MS, Hay ME, Fenical W (1989) Symbiotic marine bacteria chemically defend crustacean embryos from a pathogenic fungus. Science 80(246):116–118. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Glockner FO, Zaichikov E, Belkova N, Glöckner FO, Zaichikov E, Belkova N, Denissova L, Pernthaler J, Pernthaler A, Amann R (2000) Comparative 16S rRNA analysis of lake bacterioplankton reveals globally distributed phylogenetic clusters including an abundant group of actinobacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:5053–5065. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grossart HP, Tang KW, Kiørboe T, Ploug H (2007) Comparison of cell-specific activity between free-living and attached bacteria using isolates and natural assemblages. FEMS Microbiol Lett 266:194–200. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grossart H-P, Dziallas C, Tang KW (2009) Bacterial diversity associated with freshwater zooplankton. Environ Microbiol Rep 1:50–55. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grossart H-P, Dziallas C, Leunert F, Tang KW (2010) Bacteria dispersal by hitchhiking on zooplankton. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:11959–11964. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hall T (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98Google Scholar
  23. Harris JM (1993) The presence, nature, and role of gut microflora in aquatic invertebrates: a synthesis. Microb Ecol 25:195–231. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holland R, Hergenrader G (1981) Bacterial epibionts of diaptomid copepods. Trans Am Microsc Soc 100:56–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holmes NA, Innocent TM, Heine D, Bassam MA, Worsley SF, Trottmann F, Wilkinson B (2016) Genome analysis of two Pseudonocardia phylotypes associated with Acromyrmex leafcutter ants reveals their biosynthetic potential. Front Microbiol 7:1–16. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Izumikawa M, Murata M, Tachibana K, Ebizuka Y, Fujii I (2003) Cloning of modular type I polyketide synthase genes from salinomycin producing strain of Streptomyces albus. Bioorg Med Chem 11:3401–3405. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Karnaukhov DY, Bedulina DS, Kaus A, Prokosov SO, Sartoris L, Timofeyev MA, Takhteev VV (2016) Behaviour of Lake Baikal amphipods as a part of the night migratory complex in the Kluevka settlement region (south-eastern Baikal). Crustaceana 89:419–430. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Khalzov IA, Mekhanikova IV, Sitnikova TY (2018) First data on ectosymbiotic consortia of infusoria and prokaryotes associated with amphipods inhabiting the Frolikha underwater hydrothermal vent, lake Baikal. Zool Zhurnal 97:1525–1530. (in Russian) Google Scholar
  29. Kieser B, Buttner M, Charter K, Hopwood B (2000) Practical streptomyces genetics. John Innes Foundation, NorwichGoogle Scholar
  30. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kolter R, Greenberg EP (2006) The superficial life of microbes. Nature 441:300–302. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947–2948. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Long RA, Azam F (2001) Antagonistic interactions among marine pelagic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:4875–4983. Google Scholar
  34. Mekhanikova IV, Takhteev VV (2008) Cuticular nonsensory microstructures of amphipods from Lake Baikal (Crustacea: Amphipoda), their taxonomic and adaptive significance. Invertebr Zool 5:17–37 (In Russian) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nadell CD, Xavier JB, Foster KR (2009) The sociobiology of biofilms. FEMS Microbiol Rev 33:206–224. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nagasawa S, Nemoto T (1988) Presence of bacteria in guts of marine crustaceans and on their fecal pellets. J Plankton Res 10:559–564. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parfenova VV, Pavlova ON, Terkina IA, Suslanova MY, Kostornova TY, Nikulina IG, Sorokovikova LM (2005) Water quality and protection : microbial community of the oxidized layer of Lake Baikal bottom sediments in the Selenga mouth. Water Resour 32:227–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Passari AK, Leo VV, Chandra P, Kumar B, Nayak C, Hashem A, Singh BP (2018) Bioprospection of actinobacteria derived from freshwater sediments for their potential to produce antimicrobial compounds. Microb Cell Fact 17:68. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paulus C, Rebets Y, Zapp J, Rückert C, Kalinowski J, Luzhetskyy A (2018) New Alpiniamides from Streptomyces sp. IB2014/011-12 assembled by an unusual hybrid nonribosomal peptide synthetase trans-AT polyketide synthase enzyme. Front Microbiol 9:1959. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Protasov ES, Axenov-Gribanov DV, Voytsekhovskaya IV, Tokovenko BT, Shatilina ZM, Timofeyev MA (2017) The diversity and antibiotic properties of actinobacteria associated with endemic deepwater amphipods of lake Baikal. Ant Leeuw Int J Gen Mol Microbiol 110:1593–1611. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Romanova EV, Aleoshin VV, Kamaltynov RM, Mikhailov K, Logacheva MD, Sirotinina EA, Sherbakov DY (2016) Evolution of mitochondrial genomes in Baikalian amphipods. BMC Genom 17:1016. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sanasam S, Nimaichand S, Ningthoujam D (2011) Novel bioactive actinomycetes from a niche biotope, Loktak Lake, in Manipur, India Isolation of Lake Actinomycetes. J Pharm Res 4:1707–1710Google Scholar
  43. Schmidt C, Le Bris N, Gaill F (2008) Interactions of deep-sea vent invertebrates with their environment: the case of Rimicaris exoculata. J Shellfish Res 27:79–90.[79:IODVIW]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seipke RF, Kaltenpoth M, Hutchings MI (2012) Streptomyces as symbionts: an emerging and widespread theme? FEMS Microbiol Rev 36:862–876. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shishlyannikova TA, Kuzmin AV, Fedorova GA, Shishlyannikov SM, Lipko IA, Sukhanova EV, Belkova NL (2017) Ionofore antibiotic polynactin produced by Streptomyces sp. 156A isolated from Lake Baikal. Nat prod res 31(6):639–644. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sitnikova TY, Mekhanikova IV (2014) Amphipods (Amphipoda, Gammaridea) at the Gorevoy Utes oil and methane seep, Lake Baikal. Crustaceana 87:1500–1520. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sochard MR, Wilson DF, Austin B, Colwell RR (1979) Bacteria associated with the surface and gut of marine copepods. Appl Environ Microbiol 37:750–759Google Scholar
  48. Stackebrandt E, Ebers J (2006) Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microbiol Today 33:152–155Google Scholar
  49. Sun W, Zhang F, He L, Loganathan K (2015) Actinomycetes from the South China Sea sponges: Isolation, diversity, and potential for aromatic polyketides discovery. Front Microbiol 6:1–15. Google Scholar
  50. Takhteev VV (2000a) Essays on the amphipods of Lake Baikal (systematics, comparative ecology, evolution), 1st edn. Irkutsk State University Press, Irkutsk (In Russian) Google Scholar
  51. Takhteev VV (2000b) Trends in the evolution of Baikal amphipods and evolutionary parallels with some marine malacostracan faunas. Adv Ecol Res 31:197–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Takhteev VV, Berezina NA, Sidorov DA (2015) Checklist of the Amphipoda (Crustacea) from continental waters of Russia, with data on alien species. Arthropoda Sel 24:335–370Google Scholar
  53. Takhteev VV, Karnaukhov DY, Govorukhina EB, Misharin AS (2019) Diel vertical migrations of hydrobionts in the coastal area of Lake Baikal. Inl Water Biol 12:178–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30:2725–2729. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tang KW (2005) Copepods as microbial hotspots in the ocean: effects of host feeding activities on attached bacteria. Aquat Microb Ecol 38:31–40. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tang KW, Dziallas C, Grossart HP (2011) Zooplankton and aggregates as refuge for aquatic bacteria: protection from UV, heat and ozone stresses used for water treatment. Environ Microbiol 13:378–390. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Terkina IA, Driukker VV, Parfenova VV, Kostornova TI (2002) The biodiversity of actinomycetes in Lake Baikal. Microbiology 71:404–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Väinölä R, Witt JDS, Grabowski M, Bradbury JH, Jazdzewski K, Sket B (2008) Global diversity of amphipods (Amphipoda; Crustacea) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595:241–255. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Van Arnam EB, Clardy J, Currie CR, Ruzzini AC, Sit CS, Horn H, Pinto-Tomás AA, Clardy J (2016) Selvamicin, an atypical antifungal polyene from two alternative genomic contexts. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:12940–12945. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ward A, Allenby N (2018) Genome mining for the search and discovery of bioactive compounds: the Streptomyces paradigm. FEMS Microbiol Lett. Google Scholar
  61. Wawrik B, Kerkhof L, Zylstra GJ, Kukor JJ (2005) Identification of unique type II polyketide synthase genes in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:2232–2238. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Weber T, Charusanti P, Musiol-Kroll EM, Jiang X, Tong Y, Kim HU, Lee SY (2015) Metabolic engineering of antibiotic factories: new tools for antibiotic production in actinomycetes. Trends Biotechnol 33:15–26. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zothanpuia Chandra P, Leo VV, Mishra VK, Kumar B, Singh BP (2017) Production of potent antimicrobial compounds from Streptomyces cyaneofuscatus associated with fresh water sediment. Front Microbiol. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society of Limnology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Irkutsk State UniversityIrkutskRussia
  2. 2.Baikal Research CentreIrkutskRussia

Personalised recommendations