Advertisement

Limnology

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 163–170 | Cite as

Monitoring trends in the extent of major floods in the lower reach of Songkhram River Basin, Northeastern Thailand

  • ThihaEmail author
  • Rojchai Satrawaha
  • Komgrit Wongpakam
Note

Abstract

This study analyzes trends in the extent of major floods in the lower reach of Songkhram River Basin, one of the most important areas for aquatic biological production in the Lower Mekong River Basin. We first classified the time series Landsat imagery acquired at a 2-year interval between 2000 and 2006 using the unsupervised classification method. We then analyzed the extent of major floods through the image matrix analysis on seasonal land cover map pairs. Additionally, we estimated flood volumes and discharge rates for each time series. We finally analyzed the extent of land uses that were affected by major flood events. Accuracy assessment showed that the extent of major floods was accurately mapped. Analysis of trends of major floods revealed that there was a considerable variation in the extent through 2006, with the flood decreasing since 2002. Analysis of flood risk areas based on the 2000–2004 data showed that about 3.04% of the study areas was at high risk of being flooded. Between 2000 and 2006, about 5.5% of the study area that are classified as agriculture and built-up land uses was affected by major floods. Our estimates on flood volumes and discharge rates are consistent with the data from other studies. Overall findings suggest that accurate mapping of major floods and flood risk areas using space and time dependent data can be important for developing protocols for flash flood early warning and flood risk management and mitigation. Output GIS maps and data combined with crude assumptions about water flow will serve as the baseline data to estimate the amount of water that flows in and out of the basin. Further research should focus on integration of social science research to evaluate the socio-economic impacts of major floods and identifying coping strategies of affected communities.

Keywords

Major floods Flood risk mapping Landsat Unsupervised classification Songkhram River Basin Thailand 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a research grant from Mahasarakham University, Thailand. The Land Development Department of Thailand provided the following GIS data: land use, administrative boundaries, aerial photos and topographic maps. Thirty-meter ASTER digital elevation data was downloaded from the site http://www.gdem.aster.ersdac.or.jp/. We thank the local residents of Nong Khai, Sakon Nakhon and Nakhon Phanom provinces of North-east Thailand for providing valuable information and sharing their insights toward water-induced disasters during our field work. We also thank an anonymous reviewer for his comments on earlier version of this manuscript.

References

  1. ADPC (2004) Vulnerability assessment to climate change in Songkhram. MWBP, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  2. Alsdorf D, Han S-C, Bates P, Melack J (2010) Seasonal water storage on the Amazon floodplain measured from satellites. Remote Sens Environ 114(11):2448–2456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbier EB, Acreman M, Knowler D (1993) Economic valuation of wetlands: a guide for policy makers and planners. Ramsar Convention Bureau, IUCN, GlandGoogle Scholar
  4. Blake DJH, Pitakthepsombut R (2006) Situation analysis: lower Songkhram River Basin, Thailand. MWBPGoogle Scholar
  5. Blake DJH, Lopez A, Howes J, Chan-Ard T (2006) Rapid inventory and assessment of wetlands and their biodiversity in the Lower Songkhram Basin, NE Thailand. MWBP, Vientiane, Lao PDRGoogle Scholar
  6. Chavez PS, MacKinnon DJ (1994) Automatic detection of vegetation changes in the Southwestern United States using remotely sensed images. Photogr Eng Remote Sens 60(5):571–583Google Scholar
  7. Chutiratanaphan S, Patanakanok B (2001) Land use monitorning in Sri Songkhram Wetland area. In: Paper presented at the 22nd Asian conference on remote sensing, 5–9 November 2001, Centre for Remote Imaging, Sensing and Processing (CRISP), National University of SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  8. Congalton R, Green K (1999) Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. CRC/Lewis Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  9. Coulter LL, Stow DA (2008) Assessment of the spatial co-registration of multitemporal imagery from large format digital cameras in the context of detailed change detection. Sensors 8:2161–2173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Finlayson CM, Spiers AG (eds) (1999) Global review of wetland resources and priorities for wetland inventory. Supervising scientist report 144/Wetlands International Publication 53, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  11. Friend R (2007) Securing sustainable livelihoods through wise use of wetland resources: reflections on the experience of the Mekong Wetlands Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use Programme (MWBP), Vientianne, Lao PDRGoogle Scholar
  12. Khon Kaen University (1997) Environmental impact assessment and mitigation plan resulting from water storage in the mainstream of the Nam Songkhram Project. Final report for Department of Energy Promotion and Development, Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment, Thailand (Unpublished report)Google Scholar
  13. Khumsri M, Sriputtnibondh N, Thongpun W (2006) Fisheries co-management in Lower Songkhram River Basin: problems and challenges. In: Burnhill TJ, Warren TJ (eds) Proceedings of 7th technical symposium on Mekong Fisheries, 15–17 November 2005, MRC conference series no. 6, Mekong River Commission, VientianeGoogle Scholar
  14. MRC (2008) Flood situation report, August 2008. MRC technical paper no. 21, Mekong River Commission, VientianeGoogle Scholar
  15. MRC (2010) Mekong River Commission Secretariat preliminary report on low water level conditions in the Mekong mainstreamGoogle Scholar
  16. MRCS/WUP-FIN (2005) Nam Songkhram model applications. WUP-FIN Phase II—hydrological, environmental and socio-economic modelling tools for the Lower Mekong Basin impact assessment Working Paper No. 5. Mekong River Commission and Finnish Environment Institute Consultancy Consortium, Vientiane, Lao PDRGoogle Scholar
  17. MRCS/WUP-FIN (2006) Impact assessment report. WUP-FIN Phase II-hydrological, environment and socioeconomic modelling tools for the Lower Mekong Basin. Mekong River Commission and Finnish Environment Institute Consultancy Consortium, Vientiane, Lao PDRGoogle Scholar
  18. Nagabhatla N, Finlayson CM, Sellamuttu SS, Wickramasuriya R, Pattnaik C, Prasad NP, Gunawardena A (2007) Using geospatial tools to overcoming sustainability concerns for wetland ecosystems. In: E-Proceedings of the 28th Asian conference on remote sensing (ACRS). Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  19. Sakamoto T, Nhan Van N, Kotera A, Ohno H, Ishitsuka N, Yokoza M (2007) Detecting temporal changes in the extent of annual flooding within the Cambodia and the Vietnamese Mekong Delta from MODIS time-series imagery. Remote Sens Environ 109:295–313Google Scholar
  20. Satrawaha R, Prathepha P, Andrews R, Petney T (2009) Fundamental hydrochemical parameters of the Songkhram River in Northeast Thailand: foundation data for the study of an endangered tropical wetland ecosystem. J Limnol 10(1):7–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sretthachau C, Pitakthepsombut R, Niyomchat W (eds) (2005) Tai Baan Research on the ecology and history of the seasonally flooded forest of the Lower Songkhram River Basin. MWBP, Vientiane, Lao PDRGoogle Scholar
  22. Starr P, Ingthamjitr S (2005) Fisheries research and development in the Mekong Region. Catch and Culture, vol 11(3), Mekong River Commission. ISSN 0859-290XGoogle Scholar
  23. Suntornratana U, Poulsen A, Visser T, Nakkaew S and Talerkkeatleela T (2002) Migration onto the floodplain of the Songkhram River Basin. In: Proceedings of the 4th technical symposium on Mekong fisheries. 10–11 December, 2001. MRC conference series no. 2. Mekong River Commission, Phnom Penh, pp 270–282Google Scholar
  24. Suwanwerakamtorn R, Ratcharoen A, Salakkham E (2007) The seasonally-flooded forest change in the lower Songkhram river basin. J Remote Sens GIS Assoc of Thailand (RESGAT) 8(2):36–47Google Scholar
  25. Tou JT, Gonzalez RC (1974) Pattern recognition principles. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhou CH, Luo JC, Yang CJ, Li BL, Wang SL (2000) Flood monitoring using multi-temporal AVHRR and RADARSAT imagery. Photogr Eng Remote Sens 66(5):633–638Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society of Limnology 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Walai Rukhavej Botanical Research InstituteMahasarakham UniversityMaha SarakhamThailand

Personalised recommendations