, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 149–154 | Cite as

Dissolved oxygen concentration in river sediment of the Lake Biwa tributaries, Japan

  • Yoshihiro YamadaEmail author
  • Yugo Mito
  • Akitake Igeta
  • Eitaro Wada


The dissolved oxygen concentration in the sediment pore water downstream of rivers in the Lake Biwa basin was measured, and the factors affecting the dissolved oxygen concentration were analyzed. In August 2003, nine rivers (Sakai, Nakanoi, Hebisuna, Anziki, Yasu, Echi, Ane, Oh, and Ohura) were surveyed. The dissolved oxygen was depleted in the sediment pore water of the rivers with a high proportion of particles less than 250 μm in size. For these rivers, the difference between the dissolved oxygen concentrations of the river surface water and the pore water was large, ranging from −9.54 to −5.26 mg L−1. It was found that the proportion of land turned to paddy fields has an effect on the percentage of the particles below 250 μm (standard partial regression coefficient = 0.807, p = 0.023). These results suggest that, in the Lake Biwa basin, the sedimentation of the fine particles released from paddy fields results in poor dissolved oxygen in the river sediment downstream. In addition, the water flow conditions in small- and medium-scale rivers without headwaters also affect the sedimentation of suspended particles.


Dissolved oxygen Lake Biwa Paddy field River Sediment 



This study was part of the Multi-Disciplinary Research for Understanding Interactions between Humans and Nature in the Lake Biwa-Yodo River Watershed project at the Research Institute for Humanity and Nature.


  1. Declerck S, Bie TD, Ercken D, Hampel H, Schijvers S, Wichelen JV, Gillard V, Mandiki R, Losson B, Bauwens D, Keijers S, Vyverman W, Goddeeris B, Meester LD, Brendonck L, Martens K (2006) Ecological characteristics of small farmland ponds: associations with land use practices at multiple spatial scales. Biol Conserv 131:523–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Galay V (1983) Causes of river bed degradation. Water Resour Res 19:1057–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Garban B, Ollivon D, Poulin M, Gaultier V, Chesterikoff A (1995) Exchanges at the sediment–water interface in the river Seine, downstream from Paris. Water Res 29:473–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Haggard BE, Soerens TS (2006) Sediment phosphorus release at a small impoundment on the Illinois River, Arkansas and Oklahoma, USA. Ecol Eng 28:280–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jarvie HP, Jurgens MD, Williams RJ, Neal C, Davies JJL, Barrett C, White J (2005) Role of river bed sediments as sources and sinks of phosphorus across two major eutrophic UK river basins: the Hampshire Avon and Herefordshire Wye. J Hydrol 304:51–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kawara O, Hirayama K, Kunimatsu T (1996) A study on pollutant loads from the forest and rice paddy field. Wat Sci Tech 33:159–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kondoh T, Misawa S, Toyota M (1993) Characteristics of effluents of nitrogen and phosphorous in paddy fields during the padding and transplanting season. Trans JSIDRE 164:147–155 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  8. McAuliffe C (1971) Gas chromatographic determination of solutes by multiple phase equilibrium. Chem Technol 1:46–51Google Scholar
  9. Nakano T, Tayasu I, Wada E, Igeta A, Hyodo F, Miura Y (2005) Sulfur and strontium isotope geochemistry of tributary rivers of Lake Biwa: implication for human impact on the decadal change of lake water quality. Sci Total Environ 345:1–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nakano T, Tayasu I, Yamada Y, Hosono T, Igeta A, Hyodo F, Ando A, Saitoh Y, Tanaka T, Wada E, Yachi S (2008) Effect of agriculture on water quality of Lake Biwa tributaries, Japan. Sci Total Environ 389:132–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nijboer RC, Verdonschot PFM (2004) Variable selection for modelling effects of eutrophication on stream and river ecosystem. Ecol Model 177:17–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Shiga prefecture (2011) Rivers and Bays in Shiga prefecture. http\\
  13. Sugimoto Y, Komai Y, Kumimatsu T (2008) Evaluation of loading rate of nitrogen from rice–paddies by small watershed method. J Water Environ Technol 6:113–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Takeda I, Kunimatsu T, Kobayashi S, Maruyama T (1991) Pollutants balance of a paddy field areas and its loading in the water system—studies on pollution loadings from a paddy field area. Trans JSIDRE 153:63–72 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  15. Tsuchiyama F (2005) The aquatic environment of irrigation ponds. J of JSWE 26:247–251 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  16. Wang S, Stiles T, Flynn T, Stahl AJ, Gutierrez JL, Angelo RT, Frees L (2009) A modeling approach to water quality management of an agriculturally dominated watershed, Kansas, USA. Air Soil Pollut 203:193–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Yamada Y, Koitabashi T, Ueda T, Wada E (2001) Distribution of CH4 in the north basin of Lake Biwa and tributary rivers. Limnology 2:193–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yamada Y, Igeta A, Nakashima S, Mito Y, Ogasawara T, Wada S, Ohno T, Ueda A, Hyodo F, Imada M, Yachi S, Tayasu I, Fukuhara S, Tanaka T, Wada E (2006) The runoff of suspended substance, nitrogen and phosphorus by enforced draining during the ploughing season. Experiments in paddy fields. Jpn J Limnol 67:105–112 (in Japanese with English abstract)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society of Limnology 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoshihiro Yamada
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yugo Mito
    • 2
    • 3
  • Akitake Igeta
    • 4
  • Eitaro Wada
    • 5
  1. 1.Faculty of AgricultureKagawa UniversityKitaJapan
  2. 2.The United Graduate School of Agricultural SciencesEhime UniversityKitaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Environmental TechnologyFukken CorporationHigashiJapan
  4. 4.Research Institute for Humanity and NatureKyotoJapan
  5. 5.Research Institute for Global ChangeJapan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and TechnologyYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations