Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sex differences in care complexity and cost of cardiac-related procedures as a basis for improving hospital payments systems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The European Journal of Health Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we estimate sex differences in care complexity and cost of cardiac-related procedures in order to demonstrate the importance of sex as a risk adjuster in a hospital payment system. We use individual visit-level data for all adult Israelis who underwent either heart valve surgery (HVS) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) during the period 2014–2018 in publicly funded hospitals. We find that women undergoing a cardiac-related procedure are more likely to die during hospitalization, they have longer hospital stays, and overall, they are more likely to be care-complex than men. Furthermore, the cost of the surgery itself is higher for women than for men in the case of HVS (though not CABG), and the cost of the post-operative hospital stay is higher in the case of CABG (though not HVS). It is concluded that sex differences should be considered in the calculation of payment for cardiac-related procedures in order to reduce incentives for selection and reduce unwarranted variation in cardiac-care utilization and medical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Concept: Charlson Comorbidity Index, November 17, 2020.

    http://mchp-appserv.cpe.umanitoba.ca/viewConcept.php?conceptID=1098.

  2. The Spearman's rho between the hospital’s location and size is 0.181.

References

  1. Den Ruijter, H.M., Haitjema, S., Asselbergs, F.W., Pasterkamp, G.: Sex matters to the heart: a special issue dedicated to the impact of sex related differences of cardiovascular diseases. Atherosclerosis 241(1), 205–207 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.05.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergquist, S.L., Layton, T.J., McGuire, T.G., Rose, S.: Data transformations to improve the performance of health plan payment methods. J Health Econ 66, 195–207 (2019)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Busse, R., Geissler, A., Quentin, W., & Wiley, M.: Diagnosis-related groups in Europe - moving towards transparency, efficiency and quality in hospitals. World Health Organization (2011) on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Berkshire, England.

  4. Antioch, K.M., Ellis, R.P., Gillett, S., et al.: Risk adjustment policy options for casemix funding: international lessons in financing reform. Eur J Health Econ 8, 195–212 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-006-0020-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Quentin, W., Rätto, H., Peltola, M., Busse, R., Häkkinen, U., group, E: Acute myocardial infarction and diagnosis-related groups: patient classification and hospital reimbursement in 11 European countries. Eur. Heart J. 34(26), 1972–1981 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs482

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gaughan, J., Kobel, C.: Coronary artery bypass grafts and diagnosis related groups: patient classification and hospital reimbursement in 10 European countries. Health Econ. Rev. 4(1), 4 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-014-0004-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. CMS: Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS): Non-Emergent Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Measure. Measure Information Form (2020) Performance Period. https://qpp.cms.gov/docs/cost_specifications/2019-12-17-mif-ebcm-ne-cabg.pdf

  8. Mannacio, V.A., Mannacio, L.: Sex and mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft. J. Thorac. Dis. 10, S2157–S2159 (2018). https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.06.149

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Vogel, B., Acevedo, M., Appelman, Y., Merz, C.N.B., Chieffo, A., Figtree, G.A., Maas, A.H.: The lancet women and cardiovascular disease commission: reducing the global burden by 2030. Lancet 397(10292), 2385–2438 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00684-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. van de Ven, W.P.M.M., van Vliet, R.C.J.A.: How can we prevent cream skimming in a competitive health insurance market? In P. Zweifel, & H.E. Frech (Eds.), Health economics worldwide (pp. 23–46). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2392-1_2

  11. Martinussen, P.E., Hagen, T.P.: Reimbursement systems, organisational forms and patient selection: evidence from day surgery in Norway. Health Econ. Policy Law 4(Pt 2), 139–158 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744133109004812

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McGuire, T.G., Schillo, S., van Kleef, R.C.: Very high and low residual spenders in private health insurance markets: Germany, The Netherlands and the U.S. Marketplaces. Eur J Health Econ 22, 35–50 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-020-01227-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kobel, C., Thuilliez, J., Bellanger,M. & Pfeiffer, K.P.: DRG systems and similar patient classification systems in Europe. Diagnosis-related groups in Europe (2011): 37–58.

  14. Turina, M.I.: Future of heart valve surgery. Eur. J. Cardio-Thorac. Surg. 26(1), 8–13 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Granton, J., Cheng, D.: Risk stratification models for cardiac surgery. Pap. Present. Semin. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 12(3), 167–174 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Case, A., Paxson, C.: Sex differences in morbidity and mortality*. Demography (Pre-2011), 42(2), 189–214. (2005). https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/sex-differences-morbidity-mortality/docview/222944435/se-2?accountid=27692

  17. Norris, C.M., Yip, C.Y.Y., Nerenberg, K.A., Clavel, M.A., Pacheco, C., Foulds, H.J.A., Mulvagh, S.L.: State of the science in women’s cardiovascular disease: a Canadian perspective on the influence of sex and gender. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 9(4), e015634 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.015634

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Stramba-Badiale, M., Fox, K.M., Priori, S.G., Collins, P., Daly, C., Graham, I., Tendera, M.: Cardiovascular diseases in women: a statement from the policy conference of the European society of cardiology. Eur Heart J 27(8), 994–1005 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Huxley, R.R., Woodward, M.: Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for coronary heart disease in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Lancet 378(9799), 1297–1305 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Meyer, M. R., Bernheim, A. M., Kurz, D. J., O’Sullivan, C., J., Tüller, D., Zbinden, R., Eberli, F. R.: Gender differences in patient and system delay for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: current trends in a swiss ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction population. Eur. Heart J. Acute Cardiovasc. Care, 8(3), 283–290. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872618810410

  21. Legato, M.J., Johnson, P.A., Manson, J.E.: Consideration of sex differences in medicine to improve health care and patient outcomes. JAMA 316(18), 1865–1866 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.13995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Collet, P., Foldager, D., Habib, G., Hassager, C.: ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease (2021)

  23. Dreyfus, G., Windecker, S.: How to shape the future of cardiology and cardiac surgery? Eur Heart J (2020)

  24. Head, S.J., Milojevic, M., Daemen, J., Ahn, J., Boersma, E., Christiansen, E.H., Fuster, V.: Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet 391(10124), 939–948 (2018)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shah, J. J., Couffinhal, A., Nguyen, H. T. H., Schieber, G., Prokopov, D. K., Nenkov Salchev, P., Atanasov, P.: Final action plan for the implementation of DRGs-based payments. The World Bank. (2015).

  26. Bäuml, M., Dette, T., Pollmann, M.: Price and income effects of hospital reimbursements. J. Health Econ. 81, 102576 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Geissler, A., Quentin, W., Scheller-Kreinsen, D., Busse, R.: Introduction to DRGs in europe: Common objectives across different hospital systems. Diagnosis-Related Groups in Europe: Moving Towards Transparency, Efficiency and Quality in Hospitals, 9–21. (2011).

  28. Busse, R., Geissler, A., Aaviksoo, A., Cots, F., Häkkinen, U., Kobel, C., Quentin, W.: Diagnosis related groups in europe: Moving towards transparency, efficiency, and quality in hospitals? BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 346, f3197. (2013)

  29. Markovitz, A.A., Ellimoottil, C., Sukul, D., Mullangi, S., Chen, L.M., Nallamothu, B.K., Ryan, A.M.: Risk adjustment may lessen penalties on hospitals treating complex cardiac patients under medicare’s bundled payments. Health Aff. 36(12), 2165–2174 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Brammli-Greenberg, S., Waitzberg, R., Perman, V., Gamzu, R.: Why and how did Israel adopt activity-based hospital payment? the procedure-related group incremental reform. Health Policy 120(10), 1171–1176 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.08.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Deyo, R.A., Cherkin, D.C., Ciol, M.A.: Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 45(6), 613–619 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mendlovic, J., Merin, O., Fink, D., Tauber, R., Jacobzon, E., Tager, S., Mimouni, F.B., Silberman, S.: The need for cardiac surgery differential tariffs in Israel at the era of aging population and emerging technology: Importance of procedure type and patient complexity as assessed by EuroSCORE. Israel J. Health Policy Res. 10(1), 1–9 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cots, F., Chiarello, P., Salvador, X., Castells, X., Quentin, W.: DRG-based hospital payment: Intended and unintended consequences. Diagnosis-Related Groups in Europe: Moving Towards Transparency, Efficiency and Quality in Hospitals, 75–92. (2011).

  34. Ellis, R.P., McGuire, T.G.: Provider behavior under prospective reimbursement cost sharing and supply. J. Health Econ. 5(2), 129–151 (1986)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cook, A., Averett, S.: Do hospitals respond to changing incentive structures? evidence from Medicare’s 2007 DRG restructuring. J. Health Econ. 73, 102319 (2020)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Antioch, K.M., Walsh, M.K.: The risk-adjusted vision beyond casemix (DRG) funding in Australia. HEPAC 5(2), 95–109 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-003-0208-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hara, H., Takahashi, K., van Klaveren, D., Wang, R., Garg, S., Ono, M., SYNTAX Extended Survival Investigators: Sex differences in all-cause mortality in the decade following complex coronary revascularization. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 76(8), 889–899 (2020)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Johnston, A., Mesana, T.G., Lee, D.S., Eddeen, A.B., Sun, L.Y.: Sex differences in long-term survival after major cardiac surgery: a population-based cohort study. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 8(17), e013260 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.013260

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Kytö, V., Sipilä, J., Tornio, A., Rautava, P., Gunn, J.: Sex-based outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 112(6), 1974–1981 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.01.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Nielsen, S., Giang, K.W., Wallinder, A., Rosengren, A., Pivodic, A., Jeppsson, A., Karlsson, M.: Social factors, sex, and mortality risk after coronary artery bypass grafting: a population-based cohort study. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 8(6), e011490 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.011490

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Shi, D., Zhang, B., Motamed, M., Lee, S., Wang, P., McLaren, C., Brogly, S.B.: Higher mortality in women after coronary artery bypass: meta-analysis and bias analysis of confounding. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 113(2), 674–680 (2022)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Simchen, E., Israeli, A., Merin, G., Ferderber, N.: Israeli women were at a higher risk than men for mortality following coronary bypass surgery. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 13(5), 503–509 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007349230374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Widmer, P.K., Trottmann, M., Zweifel, P.: Choice of reserve capacity by hospitals: a problem for prospective payment. Eur J Health Econ 19, 663–673 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-017-0909-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ellis, R.P., McGuire, T.G.: Hospital response to prospective payment: moral hazard, selection, and practice-style effects. J. Health Econ. 15(3), 257–277 (1996)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. OECD. Geographic Variations in Health Care: What Do We Know and What Can Be Done to Improve Health System Performance?, OECD Health Policy Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264216594-en.

  46. Sutherland, K., Levesque, J.F.: Unwarranted clinical variation in health care: definitions and proposal of an analytic framework. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 26(3), 687–696 (2020)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. State of Israel. Ministry of Health. Hospitalization institutions and units for hospitalization in Israel. Trends in hospitalization and patient movement by institutions and departments. (in Hebrew). https://www.health.gov.il/UnitsOffice/HD/MTI/info/Pages/Inpatient_Institutions.aspx

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was funded with the assistance of the Government of Israel and the Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute. We are grateful to John Armstrong, Konstantin Beck, John Bertko, Sylvia Demme, Rudy Douven, Randy Ellis, Jacob Glazer, Lukas Kauer, Thomas McGuire, Sonja Schillo, Erik Schut, Christian Schmid, Maria Trottmann, Wynand Van de Ven, Juergen Wasem, and participants in the Risk Adjustment Network 2021 Annual Meeting (in Weggis, Switzerland) for helpful comments and discussion. We also thank Merav Kaplan at the Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute for her initial work on data curation and Prof. Bruce Rosen for his comments on the final draft. We also thank Yaacov Diskin, Senior information Analyst at HMC, and to the Information Division of the Israeli Ministry of Health for the initial contracting and de-identifying of the datasets.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SB-G contributed to conceptualization, methodology, software, formal analysis, data curation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, and visualization. SF contributed to methodology, software, formal analysis, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, and visualization. NS contributed to conceptualization, data curation, and writing—review and editing. YW contributed to conceptualization, data curation, and writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuli Brammli-Greenberg.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. The views presented here are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Israeli Ministry of Health, its directors, officers or staff.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Case complexity variables by sex and procedure

The analysis in this appendix is based on the national database. The differences between men and women were tested for two case complexity variables: age and Charlson score. It was found that on average the CABG patients are older than the heart valve surgery patients with higher Charlson scores. On average, women are older than men (2 years in the case of the heart valve procedure and 4 years in the case of CABG). However, while women have lower average Charlson scores in the heart valve procedure, they have higher scores in the CABG procedure (Table 2.1). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests reject the Null Hypothesis that the distribution of age and Charlson score are the same for men and women in both procedures (See Table

Table 7 Case complexity variables by sex and procedure; mean (SD)

7).

Care complexity variables by sex and procedure

See Table

Table 8 Care complexity variables by sex and procedure

8.

Actual cost variables by sex and procedure

See Table

Table 9 Actual cost variables (log10) for heart valve surgery or CABG, B(CI)

9.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brammli-Greenberg, S., Fialco, S., Shtauber, N. et al. Sex differences in care complexity and cost of cardiac-related procedures as a basis for improving hospital payments systems. Eur J Health Econ 24, 539–556 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-022-01496-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-022-01496-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation