Advertisement

The European Journal of Health Economics

, Volume 19, Issue 9, pp 1285–1301 | Cite as

Health inequality indices and exogenous risk factors: an illustration on Luxembourgish workers

  • Stéphane Mussard
  • Maria Noel Pi Alperin
  • Véronique Thireau
Original Research

Abstract

This paper proposes an aggregable family of multidimensional concentration indices which is characterized in order to be consistent with a property of exogenous risk factors, i.e. health risks for which agents are not responsible for. It is shown that those indices are of interest when individuals face different risk factors, whereas traditional indices fail to deal with heterogeneous agents. In this respect, necessary and suficient conditions are stated in order to rank two health distributions thanks to the generalized concentration curves. An illustration is performed using a sample of individuals living in Luxembourg aged 50 and older.

Keywords

Concentration Dominance Health inequality Mirror Symmetry SHARE Luxembourg 

JEL Classification

D6 I1 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Support of Chrome, Lameta, and Liser is gratefully acknowledged. This paper uses data from SHARE Wave 5 (DOI: 10.6103/SHARE.w5.100). The SHARE data collection has been primarily funded by the European Commission through FP5 (QLK6-CT-2001-00360), FP6 (SHARE-I3: RII-CT-2006- 062193, COMPARE: CIT5-CT-2005-028857, SHARELIFE: CIT4-CT-2006-028812), and FP7 (SHAREPREP: N\(^\circ\)211909, SHARE-LEAP: N\(^\circ\)227822, SHARE M4: N\(^\circ\)261982). Additional funding from the U.S. National Institute on Aging (U01_AG09740-13S2, P01_AG005842, P01_AG08291, P30_AG12815, R21_AG025169, Y1-AG-4553-01, IAG_BSR06-11, and OGHA_04-064) and from various national funding sources is gratefully acknowledged (see www.share-project.org).\(\ddag\) This research is part of the HEDYNAP project supported by the Luxembourg Fonds National de la Recherche (contract C12/SC/3977324/HEADYNAP/Pi Alperin) and by core funding from Liser from the Ministry of Higher Education and Research of Luxembourg.

References

  1. 1.
    Aaberge, R.: Ranking intersecting Lorenz curves. Social Choice Welfare 33(2), 235–259 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aczél, J.: Lectures on functional equations and their applications. Academic Press, New York (1966)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alkire, S., Foster, J.: Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. J. Publ. Econ. 95(7–8), 476–487 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bleichrodt, H., van Doorslaer, E.: A welfare economics foundation for health inequality measurement. J. Health Econ. 25, 945–957 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Börsch-Supan, A. (2015), Survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe (SHARE) Wave 5. Release version: 1.0.0. SHARE-ERIC. Data set.  https://doi.org/10.6103/SHARE.w5.100
  6. 6.
    Börsch-Supan, A., Brandt, M., Hunkler, C., Kneip, T., Korbmacher, J., Malter, F., Schaan, B., Stuck, S., Zuber, S.: Data Resource Profile: the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe (SHARE), International Journal of Epidemiology (2013)  https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyt088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bosmans, K.: Consistent comparisons of attainment and shortfall inequality: a critical examination. Health Econ. 25(11), 1425–1432 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bricard, D., Jusot, F., Trannoy, A., Tubeuf, S.: Inequality of opportunity in health and natural reward: evidence from European countries, Research on Economic Inequality, Volume 21: Health and Inequality, 335–370 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brunori, P., Palmisano, F., Peragine, V.: Income taxation and equity: new dominance criteria and an application to Romania, Working papers 12, Società Italiana di Economia Pubblica (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dagum, C.: Transvariazione fra piú di due distribuzioni, in Memorie di metodologia statistica, II, ed. C. Gini (Roma: Libreria Goliardica) (1959)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Erreygers, G.: Can a single indicator measure both attainment and shortfall inequality? J. Health Econ. 28(4), 885–893 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Erreygers, G., Clarke, P., Van Ourti, T.: Mirror, mirror, on the wall, who in this land is fairest of all?– distributional sensitivity in the measurement of socioeconomic inequality of health. J. Health Econ. 31, 257–270 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gakidou, E., Murray, C.J.L., Frenk, J.: A framework for measuring health Inequality, Mimeo (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gini, C. (1916), Il concetto di transvariazione e le sue prime applicazioni, in Giornale degli Economisti e Rivista di Statistica, ed. C. Gini (1959)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Henseke, G.: Good jobs, good pay, better health? The effects of job quality on health among older European workers. Eur. J. Health Econ. 19, 59–73 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    House, J.S., Stretcher, V., Metzner, H.L., Robbins, C.: Occupational stress and health in the Tecumseh Community Health Study. J. Health Social Behav. 27, 62–77 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    House, J.S., Wells, J.A., Landerman, L.R., McMichael, A.J., Kaplan, B.H.: Occupational stress and health among factory workers. J. Health Social Behav. 20, 139–160 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jenkins, S.P., Lambert, P.J.: Ranking income distributions when needs differ. Rev. Income Wealth 39(4), 337–56 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jusot, F., Tubeuf, S., Trannoy, A.: Circumstances and efforts: how important is their correlatio for the measurement of inequality of opportunity in health? Health Econ. 22, 1470–1495 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Karasek, R.A., Baker, D., Marxer, F., Ahlbom, A., Theorell, T.: Job decision latitude, job demands, and cardiovascular disease: a prospective study of Swedish men. Am. J. Publ. Health 71, 694–705 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Khaled, M., Makdissi, P., Yazbeck, M.: Income-related health transfers principles and orderings of joint distributions of income and health, forthcoming. Journal of Health Economics (2018)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kjellsson, G., Gerdtham, U., Petrie, D.: Lies, damned lies, and health inequality measurements: Understanding the value judgments. Epidemiology 26, 673–680 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lambert, P.J., Zheng, B.: On the consistent measurement of attainment and shortfall inequality. J. Health Econ. 30, 214–219 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lambert, P.J., Aronson, J.R.: Inequality decomposition analysis and the Gini coefficient revisited. Econ. J. 103(420), 1221–27 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Le Clainche, C., Wittwer, J.: Responsibility-sensitive fairness in health financing: judgments in four european countries. Health Econ. 24(4), 470–480 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Makdissi, P., Sylla, D., Yazbeck, M.: Decomposing health achievement and socioeconomic health inequalities in presence of multiple categorical information. Econ. Model. 35(C), 964–968 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Makdissi, P., Yazbeck, M.: Measuring socioeconomic health inequalities in presence of multiple categorical information. J. Health Econ. 34(C), 84–95 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Makdissi, P., Yazbeck, M.: Avoiding blindness to health status in health achievement and health inequality measurement, Social Science and Medecine, forthcoming (2016)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Malter, F., Börsch-Supan, A.: SHARE Wave 5: Innovations & Methodology. Munich: MEA, Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy, Malter and Börsch-Supan Eds (2015)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pi Alperin, M.N.: A multidimensional approach to measure health. Eco. Bulletin 36(3), 1553–1568 (2016)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rosa Dias, P.: Inequality of opportunity in health: evidence from a UK cohort study. Health Econ. 18(9), 1057–1074 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rosa Dias, P.: Modelling Opportunity in health under partial observability of circumstances. Health Econ. 19(3), 252–264 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sorenson, G., Pirie, P., Folsom, A., Luepker, R., Jacobs, D., Gillum, R.: Sex differences in the relationship between work and health: the Minnesota heart survey. J. Health Social Behav. 26, 379–394 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Trannoy, A., Tubeuf, S., Jusot, F., Devaux, M.: Inequality of opportunities in health in France: a first pass. Health Econ. 19(8), 921–938 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wagstaff, A.: Inequality aversion, health inequalities and health achievement. J. Health Econ. 21, 627–641 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wagstaff, A.: Decomposing changes in income inequality into vertical and horizontal redistribution and reranking, with applications to China and Vietnam, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3559 (2005)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wagstaff, A., van Doorslaer, E., Watanabe, N.: On decomposing the causes of health sector inequalities with an application to malnutrition inequalities in Vietnam. J. Econom 112, 207–223 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wagstaff, A., van Doorslaer, E.: Overall versus socioeconomic health inequality: a measurement framework and two empirical illustrations. Health Econ 13(3), 297–301 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yaari, M.E.: The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica 55, 99–115 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yitzhaki, S.: On an extension of the Gini index. Int. Econ. Rev. 24, 617–628 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stéphane Mussard
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Maria Noel Pi Alperin
    • 2
  • Véronique Thireau
    • 1
  1. 1.ChromeUniversité de NîmesNîmesFrance
  2. 2.LISEREsch-sur-AlzetteLuxembourg
  3. 3.MREUniversité de MontpellierNîmesFrance

Personalised recommendations