The European Journal of Health Economics

, Volume 18, Issue 9, pp 1157–1179 | Cite as

Gender-specific practice styles and ambulatory health care expenditures

Original Paper

Abstract

This paper explores the role of physician gender in the expenditures for ambulatory care as a potential source of practice style variation. We exploit a large doctor–patient panel dataset based on insurance-claims data from Switzerland to estimate the effect of physician gender on health care expenditures. We find considerable heterogeneity across specialties. In primary care, female doctors are found to produce similar overall expenditures per visit as their male colleagues, but significantly smaller prescribing costs and significantly higher laboratory costs. In secondary-care specialties, we find that women generate lower overall expenditures, which is mainly driven by consultation costs. These findings provide evidence for the existence of sex-specific practice styles that translate into different overall expenditures as well as different compositions of these expenditures.

Keywords

Physician gender Health care costs Practice style Health care expenditure Doctor visits 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Michael Gerfin, Stefan Boes, Stefan Lamp, the participants of the Spring Meeting of Young Economists 2015 and research seminar participants for valuable comments and suggestions. I am also indebted to a Swiss health insurance company for providing the data. No third-party funding has been received for this project.

References

  1. 1.
    Béjean, S., Peyron, C., Urbinelli, R.: Variations in activity and practice patterns: a French study for GPs. Eur. J. Health Econ. 8(3), 225–236 (2007)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bertakis, K.D.: The influence of gender on the doctor–patient interaction. Patient Edu. Couns. 76(3), 356–360 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bertrand, M.: New perspectives on gender. Handb. Labor Econ. 4, 1543–1590 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bovier, P.A., Martin, D.P., Perneger, T.V.: Cost-consciousness among Swiss doctors: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv. Res. 5(1), 72 (2005)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burkhard, D., Schmid, C., Wüthrich, K.: Financial incentives and physician prescription behavior. University of Bern, Discussion Paper (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cameron, A.C., Trivedi, P.K.: Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cameron, A.C., Gelbach, J.B., Miller, D.L.: Robust inference with multiway clustering. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 29(2), 238–249 (2011). doi: 10.1198/jbes.2010.07136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Constant, A., Leger, P.T.: Estimating differences between male and female physician service provision using panel data. Health Econ. 17(11), 1295–1315 (2008)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Croson, R., Gneezy, U.: Gender differences in preferences. J. Econ. Lit. 47(2), 448–474 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Devlin, R.A., Sarma, S.: Do physician remuneration schemes matter? The case of canadian family physicians. J. Health Econ. 27(5), 1168–1181 (2008)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dumontet, M., Franc, C.: Gender differences in french gps activity: the contribution of quantile regressions. Eur. J. Health Econ. 16(4), 421–435 (2015)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eckel, C.C., Grossman, P.J.: Differences in the economic decisions of men and women: experimental evidence. Handb. Exp. Econ. Res. 1, 509–519 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Epstein, A.J., Nicholson, S.: The formation and evolution of physician treatment styles: an application to cesarean sections. J. Health Econ. 28(6), 1126–1140 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.08.003, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629609000770
  14. 14.
    Fang, M.C., McCarthy, E.P., Singer, D.E.: Are patients more likely to see physicians of the same sex? Recent national trends in primary care medicine. Am. J. Med. 117(8), 575–581 (2004)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Firpo, S., Fortin, N., Lemieux, T.: Decomposition methods in economics. Handb. Labor Econ. 4, 1–102 (2011). doi: 10.1016/S0169-7218(11)00407-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fortin, N.M.: The gender wage gap among young adults in the united states the importance of money versus people. J. Hum. Resour. 43(4), 884–918 (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gourieroux C, Monfort A, Trognon A (1984) Pseudo maximum likelihood methods: theory. Econometrica 52(3):681–700. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1913471
  18. 18.
    Grytten, J., Sørensen, R.: Practice variation and physician-specific effects. J. Health Econ. 22(3), 403–418 (2003). doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00105-4, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629602001054
  19. 19.
    Grytten, J., Monkerud, L., Sørensen, R.: Adoption of diagnostic technology and variation in caesarean section rates: a test of the practice style hypothesis in Norway. Health Serv. Res. 47(6), 2169–2189 (2012)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hemenway, D., Fallon, D.: Testing for physician-induced demand with hypothetical cases. Med. Care 23(4), 344–349 (1985)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ikenwilo, D., Scott, A.: The effects of pay and job satisfaction on the labour supply of hospital consultants. Health Econ. 16(12), 1303–1318 (2007)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Imbens GW, Wooldridge JM (2009) Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. J. Econ. Lit. 47(1):5–86. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27647134
  23. 23.
    Jefferson, L., Bloor, K., Birks, Y., Hewitt, C., Bland, M.: Effect of physicians’ gender on communication and consultation length: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 18(4), 242–248 (2013)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    de Jong JD (2008) Explaining Medical Practice Variation. Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kaiser, B., Schmid, C.: Does physician dispensing increase drug expenditures? Empirical evidence from switzerland. Health Econ. 25(1), 71–90 (2016)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kristiansen, I.S., Hjortdahl, P.: The general practitioner and laboratory utilization: why does it vary? Family Pract. 9(1), 22–27 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lagro-Janssen, A.: Medicine is not gender-neutral: influence of physician sex on medical care. Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde 152(20), 1141–1145 (2008)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Molitor D (2016) The evolution of physician practice styles: Evidence from cardiologist migration. Working Paper 22478, National Bureau of Economic Research. doi: 10.3386/w22478, http://www.nber.org/papers/w22478
  29. 29.
    Mousquès, J., Renaud, T., Scemama, O.: Is the “practice style” hypothesis relevant for general practitioners? An analysis of antibiotics prescription for acute rhinopharyngitis. Soc. Sci. Med. 70(8), 1176–1184 (2010)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Phelps, C.E., Mooney, C.: Variations in medical practice use: causes and consequences. In: Arnould R.J., Rich, R.F., White W.D. (eds.) Competitive Approaches to Health Care Reform, pp. 140–178. Urban Institute Press, Washington D.C. (1993)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Phillips, R.L., Dodoo, M.S., Green, L.A., Fryer, G.E., Bazemore, A.W., McCoy, K.I., Petterson, S.M.: Usual source of care: an important source of variation in health care spending. Health Aff. 28(2), 567–577 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Reich, O., Weins, C., Schusterschitz, C., Thöni, M.: Exploring the disparities of regional health care expenditures in Switzerland: some empirical evidence. Eur. J. Health Econ. 13, 193–202 (2012)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rizzo, J.A., Blumenthal, D.: Physician labor supply: do income effects matter? J. Health Econ. 13(4), 433–453 (1994)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rizzo, J.A., Zeckhauser, R.J.: Pushing incomes to reference points: why do male doctors earn more? J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 63(3), 514–536 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Santos Silva, J.M., Tenreyro, S.: The log of gravity. Rev. Econ. Stat. 88(4), 641–658 (2006). doi: 10.1162/rest.88.4.641 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Selby, J.V., Grumbach, K., Quesenberry Jr., C.P., Schmittdiel, J.A., Truman, A.: Differences in resource use and costs of primary care in a large HMO according to physician specialty. Health Serv. Res. 34(2), 503–518 (1999)PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Starzmann, K., Hjerpe, P., Dalemo, S., Björkelund, C., Boström, K.B.: No physician gender difference in prescription of sick-leave certification: a retrospective study of the skaraborg primary care database. Scand. J. Prim. Health Care 30(1), 48–54 (2012)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tamblyn, R., Mcleod, P., Hanley, J.A., Girard, N., Hurley, J.: Physician and practice characteristics associated with the early utilization of new prescription drugs. Med. Care 41(8), 895–908 (2003)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wooldridge, J.M.: Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations