Advertisement

The European Journal of Health Economics

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 257–267 | Cite as

Drug overprescription in nursing homes: an empirical evaluation of administrative data

  • Magdalena A. Stroka
Original Paper

Abstract

A widely discussed shortcoming of long-term care in nursing homes for the elderly is the inappropriate or suboptimal drug utilization, particularly of psychotropic drugs. Using administrative data from the largest sickness fund in Germany, this study was designed to estimate the effect of institutionalization on the drug intake of the frail elderly. Difference-in-differences propensity score matching techniques were used to compare drug prescriptions for the frail elderly who entered a nursing home with those who remained in the outpatient care system; findings suggest that nursing home residents receive more doses of antipsychotics, antidepressants, and analgesics. The potential overprescription correlates with estimated drug costs of about €87 million per year.

Keywords

Medication errors Patient safety Expenditures Drug over- and undersupply Medical costs 

JEL Classification

I10 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Helpful comments by Thomas Bauer, Hendrik Schmitz, and participants of the Annual Meeting of the DDGÖ (Bayreuth) are gratefully acknowledged. I am grateful to my colleagues from the WINEG for access to data of the Techniker Krankenkasse and to the German Research Foundation (DFG) for the financial support.

References

  1. 1.
    Statistisches Bundesamt: Pflegestatistik 2009. Pflege im Rahmen der Pflegeversicherung; Deutschlandergebnisse. Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dowideit, A.: Endstation Altenheim. Alltag und Missstände in der deutschen Pflege. Redline, München (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Park, M., Tang, J.H.-C.: Changing the practice of physical restraint use in acute care. J. Gerontol. Nurs. 33(2), 9–16 (2007)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Routledge, P.A., O’Mahony, M.S., Woodhouse, K.W.: Adverse drug reactions in elderly patients. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 57(2), 121–126 (2004). doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01875.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hajjar, E.R., Cafiero, A.C., Hanlon, J.T.: Polypharmacy in elderly patients. Am. J. Geriatr. Pharmacother. 5(4), 345–351 (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2007.12.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ziere, G., Dieleman, J.P., Hofman, A., Pols, H.A.P., van der Cammen, T.J.M., Stricker, B.H.C.: Polypharmacy and falls in the middle age and elderly population. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 61(2), 218–223 (2006). doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02543.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    van den Bussche, H., Weyerer, S., Schäufele, M., Lübke, N., Schröfel, S., Dietsche, S.: Die ärztliche Versorgung von Pflegeheimbewohnern in Deutschland—Eine kritische Würdigung der vorliegenden Studien. Medical care in nursing homes in Germany—a critical review of actual studies. Z. Allg. 85(6), 240 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gross, H.: Hausarzt nicht erreichbar? Heilberufe 63(4), 42–44 (2011). doi: 10.1007/s00058-011-0424-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holt, S., Schmiedl, S., Thürmann, P.A.: Potenziell inadäquate Medikation für ältere Menschen: die PRISCUS liste. Deutsch. Ärztebl. 107(31–32), 543–551 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beers, M.H.: Explicit criteria for determining potentially inappropriate medication use by the elderly: an update. Arch. Intern. Med. 157(14), 1531–1536 (1997)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Perri, M., Menon, A.M., Deshpande, A.D., Shinde, S.B., Jiang, R., Cooper, J.W., Cook, C.L., Griffin, S.C., Lorys, R.A.: Adverse outcomes associated with inappropriate drug use in nursing homes. Ann. Pharmacother. 39(3), 405–411 (2005). doi: 10.1345/aph.1E230 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heckman, J.J., Ichimura, H., Todd, P.: Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. Rev. Econ. Stud. 65(2), 261–294 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rubin, D.B.: Estimating casual effects of the treatment in randomised and non-randomised studies. J. Educ. Psychol. 66, 688–701 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rosenbaum, P.R., Rubin, D.B.: The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1), 41–55 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosenbaum, P.R., Rubin, D.B.: Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. Am. Stat. 39(1), 33–38 (1985)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mensah, J., Oppong, J.R., Schmidt, C.M.: Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme in the Context of the Health MDGs: an empirical evaluation using propensity score matching. Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Essen (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heckman, J.J., Ichimura, H., Todd, P.E.: Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Rev. Econ. Stud. 64(4), 605–654 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith, J.A., Todd, P.E.: Does matching overcome LaLonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators? Experimental and non-experimental evaluation of economic policy and models. J. Econ. 125(1–2), 305–353 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hanlon, J.T., Wang, S., Handler, S.M., Weisbord, S.D., Pugh, M.J., Semla, T.P., Stone, R.A., Aspinall, S.L.: Suboptimal prescribing of primarily renally cleared medications for older VA nursing home (NH) patients. J. Am. Geritatrics Soc. 58, 87 (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Smith, J.A.: A critical survey of empirical methods for evaluating active labor market policies. Schweiz. Z. Volkswirtsch. Stat. 136(6), 1–22 (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Becker, S.O., Ichino, A.: Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. Stat. J. 2(4), 358–377 (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bryson, A., Dorsett, R., Purdon, S.: The use of propensity score matching in the evaluation of active labour market policies. Dept. of Work and Pensions, London (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rosenbaum, P.R.: Observational Studies. Springer, New York (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gowrisankaran, G., Town, R.J.: Estimating the quality of care in hospitals using instrumental variables. J. Health Econ. 18(6), 747–767 (1999). doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(99)00022-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lien, H.M., Chou, S.Y., Liu, J.T.: Hospital ownership and performance: evidence from stroke and cardiac treatment in Taiwan. J. Health Econ. 27(5), 1208–1223 (2008). doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.03.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Needleman, J., Buerhaus, P., Mattke, S., Stewart, M., Zelevinsky, K.: Nurse-staffing levels and the quality of care in hospitals. N. Engl. J. Med. 346(22), 1715–1722 (2002). doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa012247 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sloan, F.A., Picone, G.A., Taylor, D.H., Chou, S.Y.: Hospital ownership and cost and quality of care: is there a dime’s worth of difference? J. Health Econ. 20(1), 1–21 (2001)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Grabowski, D.C., Feng, Z., Hirth, R., Rahman, M., Mor, V.: Effect of nursing home ownership on the quality of post-acute care: an instrumental variables approach. J. Health Econ. 32(1), 12–21 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.08.007 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mukamel, D.B., William, D.: Quality report cards and nursing home quality. Gerontologist 43(2), 58–66 (2003)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fahey, T., Montgomery, A.A., Barnes, J., Protheroe, J.: Quality of care for elderly residents in nursing homes and elderly people living at home: controlled observational study. Br. Med. J. 326(7389), 580 (2003). doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7389.580 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Institute of Medicine: Improving the quality of care in nursing homes. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C (1986)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Institute of Medicine: Improving the quality of long-term care. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C (2001)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Werner, R.M., Norton, E.C., Konetzka, R.T., Polsky, D.: Do consumers respond to publicly reported quality information? Evidence from nursing homes. J. Health Econ. 31(1), 50–61 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.01.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Avorn, J., Soumerai, S.B., Everitt, D.E., Ross-Degnan, D., Beers, M.H., Sherman, D., Salem-Schatz, S.R., Fields, D.: A randomized trial of a program to reduce the use of psychoactive drugs in nursing homes. N. Engl. J. Med. 327(3), 168–173 (1992). doi: 10.1056/NEJM199207163270306 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Alanen, H., Finne-Soveri, H., Noro, A., Leinonen, E.: Use of antipsychotic medications among elderly residents in long-term institutional care: a three-year follow-up. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 21(3), 288–295 (2006). doi: 10.1002/gps.1462 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Azermai, M., Elseviers, M., Petrovic, M., van Bortel, L., Stichele, R.V.: Geriatric drug utilisation of psychotropics in Belgian nursing homes. Hum. Psychopharmacol.: Clin. Exp. 26(1), 12–20 (2011). doi: 10.1002/hup.1160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mann, E., Kopke, S., Haastert, B., Pitkala, K., Meyer, G.: Psychotropic medication use among nursing home residents in Austria: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr. 9(1), 18 (2009)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pittrow, D., Krappweis, J., Rentsch, A., Schindler, C., Hach, I., Bramlage, P., Kirch, W.: Pattern of prescriptions issued by nursing home-based physicians versus office-based physicians for frail elderly patients in German nursing homes. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 12(7), 595–599 (2003). doi: 10.1002/pds.860 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ruths, S., Straand, J., Nygaard, H.A.: Psychotropic Drug Use in Nursing Homes - Diagnostic Indications and Variations between Institutions. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 57, 523–528 (2001)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Waxman, H.M., Klein, M., Carner, E.A.: Drug misuse in nursing homes: an institutional addiction? Hosp. Community Psychiatry 36(8), 886–887 (1985)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Barber, N.D., Alldred, D.P., Raynor, D.K., Dickinson, R., Garfield, S., Jesson, B., Lim, R., Savage, I., Standage, C., Buckle, P., Carpenter, J., Franklin, B., Woloshynowych, M., Zermansky, A.G.: Care homes’ use of medicines study: prevalence, causes and potential harm of medication errors in care homes for older people. Quality and Safety in Health Care 18(5), 341–346 (2009). doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.034231 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Beers, M.H., Ouslander, J.G., Fingold, S.F., Morgenstern, H., Reuben, D.B., Rogers, W., Zeffren, M.J., Beck, J.C.: Inappropriate Medication Prescribing in Skilled-Nusring Facilities. Ann. Intern. Med. 117, 684–689 (1992)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Fialová, D., Topinková, E., Gambassi, G., Finne-Soveri, H., Jónsson, P.V., Carpenter, I., Schroll, M., Onder, G., Sørbye, L.W., Wagner, C., Reissigová, J., Bernabei, R.: Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use Among Elderly Home Care Patients in Europe. JAMA: The. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 293(11), 1348–1358 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hughes, C.M., Lapane, K.L.: Administrative Initiatives for Reducing Inappropriate Prescribing of Psychotropic Drugs in Nursing Homes: how Successful Have They Been? Drugs Aging 22(4), 339–351 (2005)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hach, I., Rentsch, A., Krappweis, J., Kirch, W.: Psychopharmakaverordnungen an älteren Menschen: Ein Vergleich zwischen Patienten aus Altenund Pflegeheimen, ambulant behandelten Pflegefällen und ambulanten Patienten ohne Pflegebedarf. Z. Gerontol. Geriatr. 37, 214–220 (2004)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Rothgang, H., Brochert, L., Müller, R., Unger, R.: GEK-Pflegereport 2008. Schwerpunktthema: Medizinische Versorgung in Pflegeheimen. Asgard, Sankt Augustin (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RWI EssenEssenGermany
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsRuhr-Universität BochumBochumGermany
  3. 3.WINEG-Scientific Institute of TK for Benefit and Efficiency in Health CareHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations