The European Journal of Health Economics

, Volume 16, Issue 8, pp 813–834 | Cite as

Who is afraid of smoking bans? An evaluation of the effects of the Spanish clean air law on expenditure at hospitality venues

Original Paper

Abstract

Background

In January 2011 Spain modified clean air legislation in force since 2006, removing all existing exceptions applicable to hospitality venues. Although this legal reform was backed by all political parties with parliamentary representation, the government’s initiative was contested by the tobacco industry and its allies in the hospitality industry. One of the most voiced arguments against the reform was its potentially disruptive effect on the revenue of hospitality venues. This paper evaluates the impact of this reform on household expenditure at restaurants and bars and cafeterias.

Methods and empirical strategy

We used household expenditure micro-data for years 2006–2012 to estimate models for the probability of observing expenditures and the expected level of expenditure. We applied a before–after analysis with a wide range of controls for confounding factors and a flexible modeling of time effects in order to identify the effects of the reform.

Results

Our results suggest that the reform caused a 2 % reduction in the proportion of households containing smokers but did not cause reductions in households’ expenditures on restaurant services or on bars and cafeteria services.

Keywords

Smoking ban Hospitality venue Household expenditure Policy evaluation 

JEL Classification

C21 C25 I10 I18 

References

  1. 1.
    Hernández-Aguado, I.: The tobacco ban in Spain: how it happened, a vision from inside the government. J Epidemiol Community Health 67(7), 542–543 (2013)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Galán, Iñaki, Mata, Nelva, Estrada, Carmen, Díez-Gañán, Lucía, Velázquez, Luis, Zorrilla, Belén, Gandarillas, Ana, Ortiz, H.: Impact of the” tobacco control law” on exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in Spain. BMC Public Health 7(1), 1–7 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grupo de Trabajo sobre Tabaquismo de la Sociedad Española de Epidemiología (2009). Evaluación del impacto de la ley de medidas sanitarias frente al tabaquismo. Ministerio de Sanidad y Política Social. MadridGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Villalbí, J.R.: Valoración de la Ley 28/2005 de medidas sanitarias frente al tabaquismo. Revista Española de Salud Pública 83(6), 805–820 (2009)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schneider, N.K., Sebrié, E.M., Fernández, E.: The so-called “Spanish model” tobacco industry strategies and its impact in Europe and Latin America. BMC Public Health 11(1), 907 (2011)PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    FEHR (2014). Corporate website. http://www.fehr.es/acerca-nosotros/colaboradores.php. Accessed 22 Jul 2014
  7. 7.
    Congreso de los Diputados (2010): Diario de Sesiones Comisión de Sanidad, Política Social y Consumo. Acta de la Sesión número 34 del jueves 23 de septiembre de 2010. http://www.congreso.es/public_oficiales/L9/CONG/DS/CO/CO_603.PDF. Accessed 26 Feb 2014
  8. 8.
    Gruer, L., Tursan d’Espaignet, E., Haw, S., Fernandez, E., Mackay, J.: Smoke-free legislation: global reach, impact and remaining challenges. Public Health 126(3), 227–229 (2012)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    FEHR (2011) Impacto económico de la Ley del Tabaco en la Hostelería. http://www.fehr.es/documents/tabaco/Impacto-ley-antitabaco150311.pdf. Accessed 25 Feb 2014
  10. 10.
    Adda, J., Berlinski, S., Machin, S.: Short-run economic effects of the Scottish smoking ban. Int J Epidemiol 36(1), 149–154 (2007)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Glantz, S.A.: Commentary: assessing the effects of the Scottish smokefree law—the placebo effect and the importance of obtaining unbiased data. Int J Epidemiol 36(1), 155–156 (2007)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    No Fumadores (2013). Análisis del impacto económico de la Ley 42/2010, de modificación de la Ley 28/2005 de medidas sanitarias frente al tabaquismo. [http://www.nofumadores.org/documentos/Analisis_economico_2_anos.pdf. Accessed 25 Feb 2014
  13. 13.
    INE (2006). Encuesta de Presupuestos Familiares (Base 2006). Metodología. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. http://www.ine.es/metodologia/t25/t2530p458.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2014
  14. 14.
    Jones, A.M.: A double-hurdle model of cigarette consumption. J Appl Econom 4(1), 23–39 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miles, D.: The probability that a smoker does not purchase tobacco: a note. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 62(5), 647–656 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Madden, D.: Sample selection versus two-part models revisited: the case of female smoking and drinking. J Health Econ 27(2), 300–307 (2008)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deaton, A., Irish, M.: Statistical models for zero expenditures in household budgets. J Public Econ 23(1), 59–80 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Blundell, R., Meghir, C.: Bivariate alternatives to the tobit model. J Econom 34(1), 179–200 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pudney, S.: Estimating engel curves: a generalisation of the P-Tobit model. Finn Econ Pap 1(2), 129–147 (1988)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kvasnicka, M., Tauchmann, H.: Much ado about nothing? Smoking bans and Germany’s hospitality industry. Appl Econ 44(35), 4539–4551 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ahlfeldt, G. M.,and Maennig, W. (2010). Impact of non-smoking ordinances on hospitality revenues: the case of Germany. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie and Statistik, 230(5)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pieroni, L., Pierluigi, D., and Luca, S. (2013). Impact of Italian smoking ban on business activity of restaurants, cafès and bars. Munich Personal REPEC archive. MPRA paper No. 47369. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/47369/. Accessed 4 Apr 2014
  23. 23.
    De Schoenmaker, S., Van Cauwenberge, P., Vander Bauwhede, H.: The influence of a smoking ban on the profitability of Belgian restaurants. Tob control 22(e1), e33–e36 (2013)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Poutvaara, Panu, Siemers, Lars-HR: Smoking and social interaction. J Health Econ 27(6), 1503–1515 (2008)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jones, A. M., Laporte, A., Rice, N., and Zucchelli, E. (2013). Do public smoking bans have an impact on active smoking? Evidence from the UK. Health Economics. Article first published online: 6 November 2013. doi:10.1002/hec.3009
  26. 26.
    Melberg, H.O., Lund, K.E.: Do smoke-free laws affect revenues in pubs and restaurants? Eur J Health Econ 13(1), 93–99 (2012)PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hyland, A., Travers, M., Fix, B., Bearman, P.S., Neckerman, K.M., Wright, L.: National economic impact of clean indoor air regulations on the hospitality industry. After tobacco: what would happen if Americans stopped smoking?. Columbia University Press, NewYork (2011)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sureda, X., Martínez-Sánchez, J.M., Fu, M., Pérez-Ortuño, R., Martínez, C., Carabasa, E., Fernández, E.: Impact of the Spanish smoke-free legislation on adult, non-smoker exposure to secondhand smoke: cross-sectional surveys before (2004) and after (2012) Legislation. PLoS one 9(2), e89430 (2014)PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaume García-Villar
    • 1
    • 3
  • Ángel López-Nicolás
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Departament d’ Economia i EmpresaUniversitat Pompeu FabraBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de EconomíaUniversidad Politécnica de CartagenaCartagenaSpain
  3. 3.Centre de Recerca en Economia i SalutUniversitat Pompeu FabraBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations